At 11/30/09 12:06 AM, Dobio wrote: I miss SOAS dearly.

As do I.

A thread called "giant tits" and there are a significant lack of giant tits.

So I want to know this, newgrounds. Where do you draw the line, specifically?
How big is too big?

Perhaps a (SFW) pic for reference.

This is September Carrino, a 28F cup (Natural). Too big? Not big enough? Just right?

This thread needs moar giant tits.

At 11/24/09 01:38 AM, Gagsy wrote: Not very well to be honest.

I'm terrified some nights of going to sleep thinking that I'm going to die in my sleep. Just last night I was crying about it, didn't help that I had a hard day and I seem to have pulled a muscle in my shoulder, so I was uncomfy in myself and feeling emotionally raw.

But anyway, I always wear pjs and like to tuck the duvet underneath my feet for extra cosiness.

I suppose you're going for 26,000 tonight. That's.... I'm not even sure if it's impressive or just in a category on its own at this point.

Bravo.

At 11/24/09 12:44 AM, Jon4life wrote: In nature men are more attracted to woman with bigger boobs because they can provide for more kids. But in society now, we don't want to have as many kids as possible.

Actually, that's hips you're thinking of. It's still the case with many remote tribes.
Larger hips = easier child bearing = better mother, etc.

Breasts in themselves are only attractive to men because women hide them. There was an experiment some years ago where a group of men and women lived together in a large house for a month or so, and the women always wore long gloves, covering nearly to their elbow. The men were never allowed to see their hands. By the end of the experiment, the men were going crazy, trying to get a glipse of the womens' hands, simply because they were not able to.

But back on topic, I actually find Chelsea Charms to be quite attractive. Partly for the "OMG" factor, but mostly because I actually think she's a pretty good lookin woman.

But if I had to choose, I would still go for Ewa Sonnet, from Poland.
(Both pics above are safe for work.)

Here is another pic of Ewa:

Do any of you also have a class with that one guy who clears his throat like 100 times an hour?

What a coincidence. I'm listening to an Industrial Death Metal band right now, called "Violent Work of Art"

Violent Work of Art - The Worst is Yet To Come (YouTube. Bit of an acquired taste, they are)

At 11/6/09 06:34 PM, k6ka wrote: I'm not going to download an IRC client!

Well then you're a wuss. How about a firefox extension?

ChatZilla can be installed as a firefox extension and run in your browser.

Windows: X-Chat
Linux: X-Chat
Any: IRSSI

gogogogo

At 11/6/09 03:18 PM, Jon-86 wrote: An interview via MSN.... I feel old :[

Hey! You're not a real girl!

Yes I am, can't you see my pink text?

Oh MSN.....

At 11/3/09 04:07 PM, urbn wrote: A Serif font on your task bar, eww.

I'm rebelling against Helvetica.
Or I'm just lazy when it comes to font selection. Take your pick.

I did a :P as my post mood because I wasn't serious.

But I prefer to not use a big desktop manager like KDE or Gnome, and go for just using Openbox with Tint2 and Nitrogen.

I started with Fluxbox but I am a bit of an information whore and when it's harder to check something that I want (Like my wifi strength on the school's shitty wireless) than simply glancing, I get tired of minimal designs and want more.

Plus KDE4 can be extremely pretty if you put a little time into it, and that makes it easy to stop my friends from believing that linux is 10 years in the past and ugly as a derailed train smashing through an old folks home

At 11/3/09 03:41 PM, urbn wrote: Eww, KDE...

Oh yes. So ugly.

I've been working on an IRC bot in Perl for months (Since January?)
I guess IRC bots don't really stack up against an operating system as a project, but oh well.

It needs some optimization still, but the featureset is pretty nice.
- Plenty of hard-coded commands directed at channel management, etc
- Command aliases (Multiple names for any command)
- Custom Commands (Build your own commands with custom args, using any of the hard coded commands)
-> Required arguments
-> Optional arguments
-> Defaults for unspecified optional args
- Last.FM nowplaying information
- Random FML grabber
- Stats tracking
- Custom timer system
- Points/Awards system
- Use of several variables ($noun, $adjective, $chan, $nick, etc) useable in all commands
- Dictionary system for items and for users
- 4 types of automated spam detection
- Two regex filter commands (Nick and Text filters)
- Regex supported for all appropriate commands (Kick, Ban, etc)
- Automated channel ban management (Set a default and maximum ban time for your channel, automatically expired by the bot)
- Everything is configurable on IRC by the channel owner, specific to that channel
- More :)

Full Size

One time I accidentally a whole coke.

Pretty much what I got out of that story.

And I'm pretty sure the answer here is "Reformat your computer" or something to that effect -.-

iTunes is shit

2002 Honda Civic coupe :)

Self installed stereo, and at 164,000km (Just over 100,000mi) it's still running perfectly.

At 10/18/09 11:17 PM, blakemo wrote: Thread's title definitely misled me.

God I need help.

Same boat.

Apparently the guys at Staples are real assholes.

The advantage to putting magic numbers into variables is when someone else reads your code (Or you look at it again next year) there will be this nice variable definition at the top that can be commented to explain why it is the value that you chose.

Plus it's easier to change if you need to.

When it's code for myself and nobody else, anything goes.
When it's code that someone else is potentially going to see (Namely assignments...) then use variables for that stuff.

At 10/8/09 07:50 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: I've said it once I'll say it again.

Alexis Rhodes from "Yu-Gi-Oh! GX"

I'm a sucker for blondes.

Close but...

A lot of people ask how to do a "press any key to continue" in C that doesn't involve the enter key.

This might be helpful for you somehow.

If you are on a POSIX system (Linux, BSD, etc), this removes the buffer from from getchar() entirely

#include <termios.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int getch( )
{
        struct termios oldt,
        newt;
        int ch;
        tcgetattr( STDIN_FILENO, &oldt );
        newt = oldt;
        newt.c_lflag &= ~( ICANON | ECHO );
        tcsetattr( STDIN_FILENO, TCSANOW, &newt );
        ch = getchar();
        tcsetattr( STDIN_FILENO, TCSANOW, &oldt );
        return ch;
}

int main()
{
        printf( "Press any key to continue...\n" );
        while( !getch() );
        return 0;
}

At 10/6/09 02:11 PM, GustTheASGuy wrote: What is that code?

A language called "FP", written by John Backus
Wikipedia

It was never designed for real-world use, just for education in schools.

Brainfuck.

+++ +++ +++ +           initialize counter (cell #0) to 10
[                       use loop to set the next four cells to 70/100/30/10
    > +++ +++ +             add  7 to cell #1
    > +++ +++ +++ +         add 10 to cell #2 
    > +++                   add  3 to cell #3
    > +                     add  1 to cell #4
    <<< < -                 decrement counter (cell #0)
]                   
>++ .                   print 'H'
>+.                     print 'e'
+++ +++ +.              print 'l'
.                       print 'l'
+++ .                   print 'o'
>++ .                   print ' '
<<+ +++ +++ +++ +++ ++. print 'W'
>.                      print 'o'
+++ .                   print 'r'
--- --- .               print 'l'
--- --- --.             print 'd'
>+.                     print '!'
>.                      print '\n'

Or, if you remove all the comments,

++++++++++[>+++++++>++++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>++.>+.+++++++..+++.>++.<<+++++++++++++++.>.+++.------.--------.>+.>.

Quick. Someone give me the relevant code in their language of choice to print out the number from 1 to 10, inclusive.

For example, in Perl:

print for (1..10);

Now, in Functional Programming (FP) there is no such thing as a variable or a constant. [b]Everything[/b] is a function.
Here's how you print 1 through 10 in FP:

? print1to is (if = o [ id , {1} ] cons o [ {1} , {<>} ] rotl o cons o [ id , print1to o - o [ id , {1} ] ]).
Function print1to defined.

? print1to:10.
-> <1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10>

Stupid Languages & Concepts class.

At 9/28/09 06:57 PM, citricsquid wrote: linux isn't for those who want windows. use windows if you want windows.

OH. MY. GOD. THIS!

THIS!!!!!
THISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHISTHIS!!!

It's so simple! Why can't people figure it out!
AHHHHHISHIDHSSDSHDUSHD you're getting sig'd.

I'm surprised nobody has mentions this yet..
You can write the code anywhere you want, and as long as you don't do anything OS specific, you can move the code and it will work anywhere.

BUT

You can't compile it on Windows and then move it and expect it to run anywhere else.
You must move the source code (.cpp file(s)) and compile them on the OS you intend to use them on.

Clearly it depends on the size of your e-penis. Having a vagina is the other way to be an instant regular here.

With the specs you have, an old Sempron just doesn't cut it anymore. Not to mention it runs at 400 million degrees kelvin.

You could try spraying out all your fans and the heatsink on the CPU with a can of compressed air, and then leave the case open and point a nice big room fan in there to help keep it cool.

Another note on Windows XP is that it only reads up to about 2GB or RAM (maybe 3) accurately, and your mother board probably doesn't support much more than that anyways.

The best suggestion is just to build yourself a new computer. You can get a nice machine that'll run most modern games for $500 start to finish.

There is a reason Guitar Hero appears more popular than Rock Band / 2.
The answer is quite simply the approach each company takes.

Harmonix has gone the route of weekly DLC, every single week since RB1 was released and lately we've been getting as many as 10 to 13 songs per week. Everyone who is planning on buying Rock Band most likely already has it and a large chunk of them are updating it each week with new content.

Activision/Neversoft has gone the route of one new title per platform every 3 months.
The new "Guitar Hero 5" is actually the 13th release in the GH series, with GH: Van Halen to be the 14th.
You can't buy these things online, and each one comes with its own instruments, accessories, etc. It's no wonder you see more GH at stores and no wonder they move so much more through retailers.

The GH titles to date:
1. Guitar Hero 1 (Harmonix)
2. Guitar Hero 2 (Harmonix)
3. Guitar Hero: Rocks the 80's (Harmonix)
4. Guitar Hero 3 (Neversoft takes over from here on)
5. Guitar Hero: World Tour
6. Guitar Hero: Aerosmith
7. Guitar Hero: Metallica
8. Guitar Hero: On Tour (NinDS)
9. Guitar Hero: On Tour 2 (or whatever it's called, NinDS)
10. Guitar Hero: Handheld (Stupid little handheld battery operated thing)
11. Guitar Hero: Arcade (The arcade version of GH3 that you see in malls and is never calibrated right)
12. Guitar Hero: Smash Hits
13. Guitar Hero 5
14. Guitar Hero: Van Halen

See what I mean?
For comparison, here is the rock band list of releases
1. Rock Band 1
2. Rock Band 2
3. Rock Band: Unplugged (PSP)
4. The Beatles: Rock Band
Unreleased: Lego Rock Band

GH3 and RB1 came out within a month of each other.
Think the series is sufficiently milked yet?

Ell. Oh. Ell.

Good ol' Evark