At 5/31/08 12:43 AM, SuperjointRitual wrote: sadly as cool as that looks, it would probably snap depending on how hollow the handle itself really is. Plus it would be hard to hold because the metal would get to hot. fuck Pocohontas man

that depends on the material and how it's made. a hollow stick wouldn't necessarily break just because it's hollow. and as far as smoking it... you hold it by the shaft to smoke, and it works just fine. lol.

At 5/19/08 04:01 AM, Drakim wrote: Do you have any proof of this? It's not just enough for you to claim it happens and then expect us to accept it.

believe what you want to believe... i wasn't expecting athiests to accept it, in fact i was expecting quite the opposite. why do you feel, the opposite? does the thought of conversion discomfort you? if it is alright for a theist to become an atheist, why not an atheist to agnostic/theist?

and just to avoid, the "oh, you're avoiding the point at hand" bs, despite that you wouldn't believe me anyways... i've witnessed it happen. people change... but will you acknowledge it?

Well, I wouldn't blame somebody for what he does at the last seconds of his life.
But, I'd like to point out that it's very common to lie about deathbed conversions.

:But, I'd like to point out that it's very common to lie about deathbed conversions. Darwin for example, is often still today said to have converted on his death bed, but this is entirely made up and supported by Christians who want to discredit evolution.

i could use ad hominem and ask you if you have any proof of this, and we could go into one big circle jerk. but that would be pointless. i just stated that such an event is truly a testament to mankind's frailty.

go ahead and continue to bash on christians, exalt darwin, dawkins, nietzche or whatever if it makes you feel more comfortable than discussing the topic at hand.

i find it somewhat odd that atheists, people who i view as some hardcore mofos, don't quite know how to deal with the aspect of death and dying... some even converting to a religion when death happens to someone they know/love.

my question is simply this:
if atheists are strong willed and independent, why do they fall back upon some form of religion when death or disaster strikes?

i'm not dissing them, but it was always something that intrigued me and really speaks volumes about the frailty of mankind. anyone care to discuss?

At 4/27/08 01:30 AM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Read the link before you open your mouth.

And stop trolling me, it's pathetic.

i did read it it.
i disagreed with it.
and i made a post asking a valid question. :)

At 4/27/08 01:20 AM, SirBackBoobs wrote:

At 4/27/08 01:13 AM, KP94 wrote: Well i like meat.
And well i think we were born to eat meat (not entirely like a pig)
but i think that if animals were treated write when being killed everyone would eat it.

People aren't born to eat meat. Our bodies aren't designed for it.

what about chimps? people say we're closely related to them, and they're omnivores...

seriously, read the fucking rules.

At 4/27/08 12:57 AM, SirBackBoobs wrote: No, you just started a flame war with me after I agreed with you, and in this flame war of ours, you were very condescending about how you live your live.

actually, you started by not being open-minded and easy to troll. it's amazing how far you manged to shove that stick up your arse. :p

Oh yeah, I forgot that when I read someone's location, I should assume it's not really where the person lives, but where they once lived.

a textbook case of assumption. subject probably takes everything at face value.

You're just another middle-class drone who wishes he was a gangsta. There's no way you could survive in a real ghetto. As evidence, I bring up the fact that you're on fucking newgrounds in a flame war, which is about the nerdiest thing someone could do.

more hypocrisy.

I'm seriously done arguing with you. I can feel my cerebral cortex withering away to dust every time I read one of your responses.

serious case of butthurt with an overt aura of pretentiousness and pseudo-intellectualism. and a poor attempt at an insult.

good, now gtfo.

At 4/27/08 12:27 AM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Notice I wasn't the one that tried to prove to everyone how different I was in the first place.

do you remember saying...
:Oh, and as for doing anything unconventional, I'm a vegan and animal rights activist, so that's a bit out by the way side
oh, no... you never made any claim to being "different".

from the sounds of it, you have security issues. but hey, who doesn't? everyone knows how to live, but the question is this: "does everyone live life to the fullest?"

Wow, you can insult me without actually making a valid point. Bravo.

well aside from this blatant hypocrisy... do you also remember...
:So, are you trying to make a point except that everyone else besides you doesn't know how to live?
which i was not making in the first place. but i guess some people fail to scroll up. :p

just as this answer comes to no surprise to me. i'm sure this comes to no surprise to you... i like to travel to the "ghettos" of various countries, just because it feels like home. a place where yuppies and various other bourgeoisie get the sweet, ever-merciful crap kicked out of them. where do i get the money? don't ask.

Wow, you feel at home in the ghettos of other countries, but you live in orange county? I didn't realize you were so poor you had to live in orange county! You remind me of b-rad from malibu's most wanted.

and another one takes the bait. you're on the ropes now son. did you for once stop to think that, perhaps i claim this place as my location because it reminds me of a more innocent time? i doubt it. and i'm the condescending one...? i don't whether to laugh or cry at your ignorance.

At 4/27/08 12:14 AM, SirBackBoobs wrote:

At 4/27/08 12:10 AM, qu3muchach0 wrote: Some condescending bullshit

That's ludicrous.

aw, did i strike a nerve? the truth hurts doesn't it? lol.

At 4/26/08 11:53 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Read the poetry of charles bukowski and tell it's "classic"

classic meaning it's a an easily recognized and easily copied style.

I didn't say it was a huge shock, but it certainly isn't conventional, considering only 2% of the population is. Even fewer actually protest anything.

yes, yes, yes... i've heard the same line from countless hipsters, yuppies, and various homos that claim "OMG!!! I'M SO DIFFERENT!!! GIVE PRAISE!". :p
so if you're trying to say that living the shallow life isn't conventional, i will adamantly disagree.

So, are you trying to make a point except that everyone else besides you doesn't know how to live?

from the sounds of it, you have security issues. but hey, who doesn't? everyone knows how to live, but the question is this: "does everyone live life to the fullest?"

It wasn't exactly a high school group, but it was along the same lines. We got to do a lot more than a high school group would have. I'd really like to know where you've been, though.

just as this answer comes to no surprise to me. i'm sure this comes to no surprise to you... i like to travel to the "ghettos" of various countries, just because it feels like home. a place where yuppies and various other bourgeoisie get the sweet, ever-merciful crap kicked out of them. where do i get the money? don't ask.

um... why would anybody bring their stash to school...? let alone leave in their locker/backpacks? hell, my school had constant drug searches. but the difference was that people were smart enough to keep it on their person instead.

At 4/26/08 11:25 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: No, I consider the poems of charles bukowski, and the paintings of claude monet to be art. I don't make distinctions between art and "high art," though. I've been to europe before, but I haven't been anywhere else, sorry if I'm not well traveled enough for you. Oh, and as for doing anything unconventional, I'm a vegan and animal rights activist, so that's a bit out by the way side.

lol. you and everyone else enjoys "the classics". ya, that's original alright. :p
hell, i'm from cali... what makes you think being vegan and an animal rights activist is a shock to me?
big deal! and if you were actually from cali, or bothered to read a profile, then we wouldn't be having the convo. :p

If you read ANYTHING I had written, you would have realized that I don't frown on graffiti, AND consider it to be art. However, there are a lot of people who want to be artists, and not many who have talent or a message to express. Hence, most graffiti is not in anyway artistic.

and if you read anything i've written you would have realized that you need to get out and do more unconventional things. lawl.
europe? plz... you probably went with a highschool group. :p

At 4/26/08 10:45 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote: Oh yeah, it's such an experience when someone scribbles three initials onto the side of a train.

Most of it is shit, quit kidding yourself.

lol. i laugh because i know what i'm talking about. :p
you probably haven't put too thought in the "arts", now have you?
i bet still consider anime and johnen vasquez comics as the pinnacle of "high art". XD
have you ever done anything unconventional? or traveled anywhere aside from something you saw on tv? :p

you're missing out on a lot of things... i weep for you. :')
try visiting places with "no tresspassing" signs once in awhile... you'll see some amazing art. ^_^

At 4/26/08 10:36 PM, SirBackBoobs wrote:

At 4/26/08 10:18 PM, hippl5 wrote: 1. Graffiti is not art. Most of it isn't even in bubble letters, just illegible chicken scribble.

Depends on the motives behind it. If you design a beautiful piece, that expresses some sort of message that you feel strongly about, then that would be art.

Of course, that's only about .01% of all graffiti.

and then again, you'll probably only see less than .01% because most it's in hard to find places.
art is supposed to be an experience/journey. and that is why graffiti is art in it's purest form.

At 4/26/08 10:18 PM, hippl5 wrote: 1. Graffiti is not art. Most of it isn't even in bubble letters, just illegible chicken scribble.

says you. :p

2. Notoriety isn't contribution.

then why do politicians get away with it, and it is considered great? hm...?

3. Extortion is definitely good for the economy.

HELL YA! we wouldn't be anywhere without extortion. good to see we agree on somethings. :p

At 4/26/08 10:13 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote: I could not "choose" to be gay, nor could any other any other heterosexual male I know.
The average man is so repulsed by the idea of having sex with with another man that it has to be at the very least non-optional.

Genes may not directly cause homosexuality, but they may make one more likely to develop as one.

then why do homosexuals still try to recruit people? hm... if you've ever lived in a place with a high rate of homos, you would have at least witnessed this more than once... i think it's just an excuse, especially since people are required by law to be nice to them and not spurn their advances or otherwise be labeled as "intolerant". there are more reasons than "omg! it's against my religion!"...

for example, the elitism and militarism.

At 4/26/08 09:28 PM, TheMason wrote: Jet,

I think you're watching too many movies. If the govt really was killing aggitators why isn't people like Shaggy dead yet...or the guys behind Loose Change?

lol. loose change!!!???
because it was fake... who would care about a fake documentary...? oo?

At 4/26/08 10:08 PM, poxpower wrote:

At 4/26/08 09:59 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote: Please punch yourself in the throat.

I vote for this too

is because you can't disprove, my claims? lol. fucking win. :p

awww, you know liberals are always trying to ham it up on the political stage... that's why no one takes them seriously as a whole. why can't we get a liberal politician who is screaming incoherently? i'd hit that. :p

At 4/19/08 05:24 PM, JackPhantasm wrote: Then the machine finally solves the problem. And starts life all over again.

You should read it if you haven't. It's really good.

*yawn* come up with something original other than, "0M5ZORZ111 IN ORDER FOR HUMANITY TO BE PERFECT WE ALL HAVE TO DIE!!!"

it sounds like every other religion out there...
i swear, who says Atheism isn't a religion...? lol.

fear only works on people who believe that mankind is perfect/can solve it's own problems.
so relax, you have nothing to worry about. ;p

well, for christianity...
it says in the bible that a crap-load of people will hate us.
and it's TRUE! everyone in the whole world hates us.

refute that proof. :p

At 4/26/08 08:39 PM, reviewer-general wrote:

At 4/26/08 07:35 PM, qu3muchach0 wrote: what about black white supremacists? how come they're considered regarded as confused...?

What the hell are you talking about?

non-whites who are somewhat partial to the pro-white movement? have you never heard/seen?
if we had more people reaching out to hate groups, maybe there wouldn't be so much hate. :p

At 4/26/08 08:37 PM, reviewer-general wrote:

At 4/26/08 07:16 PM, qu3muchach0 wrote: when you think about it... gangs contribute to the economy, arts, and society as a whole.

No.

No they do not.

;

yes they do. consider "underground" art if you will. graffiti is an art that has been greatly developed by gang culture. like it or not, it actually influences art, not in just one country, but world-wide.

secondly, they contribute to society by being apart of the "don't tell me culture". but instead of just staying at home angsting away, they actually get things done, establish territories, and gain affluence/influence.

with said affluence/influence, they contribute to the economy by buying luxurious things from snobby department/jewelery stores, buy cars, and build businesses.

lol. explore some more and think outside the box every once in awhile. :p

if homosexuality hasn't died out yet because of evolution...
then shouldn't that be proof that it's a CHOICE...?

double standards, much ppl.? lol.

wow this thread is more civil than...

"0M6!!!1 I'M 4N 4THI3ST DER IS N0 god!!!!1ONEZOR I PWNJ00!!"
or
"OM5!!!1 ST0P P3RS3CUTIN ME I'MA CHRISTIAN!!!1"

for some odd reason, this thread seems a little more than hypocritical though... :(

so then... is it wrong to have convictions? should i listen and believe everything you say and become exactly like you?

yessa massa. lol.

what are you guys...? ignant?
the reason why they don't send women to the frontline is for their safety.
the military doesn't want females to become pow's because they'll become victims of rape and various other forms of vicious torture far worse than what a man would have to endure.
and to put it bluntly, they are a very attractive target to the opposing army and have a significantly lower survival rate in pow camps than men.

you may not like it, but it's a cold, hard fact of life..

bump for great justice...

actually, yes...
it is quite possible to combine the two.
in fact... it's been done in California.

it's called being a pretentious douchebag with no original pov...
lawl.