Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 2/19/07 08:05 PM, AdamRice wrote: Okay, as omega so pleasantly explained to you, perpetual motion devices and free energy are simply impossible.

This isn't one of those, "well they said they couldn't do this, but they did!" scenarios. It isn't going to turn out like that. How do I know? Physics and chemistry classes.

you never know. as i said before, all the things in physics class and chemistry are all based on what we understand. perhaps there are areas in space where the laws of physics are diffrent.

Go ahead and take some, I encourage you, they will teach you many things you never knew or didn't think about before.

im going to take a physics class next semester. pretty exited about it.

Just remember, a 100% efficient machine IS impossible, there is no way to make one.
You cannot take the combustion products of a chemical reaction such as the burning of gasoline and reburn them, it will not work. Combustion products are always in a lower energy state then the combustion reactants. That is why they give off energy when burned.

well the fule idea is farfetched, but perhaps there is some way, some fule source on another planet that does that with a mix of another fule

I've thought a lot about the free energy thing too, it simply isn't possible and no one is going to come up with a way to make it possible.

you never know that. the future is unknown. the impossible has became possible.

Also, if energy was free, over time it would lose value from an economics standpoint. If you have something that is common place, easy to obtain, and never ending, it is going to lose value over time. Why would people pay big money for something that is infinite and easy to get?

well maybe in time money wont be the main product. like you have a product not to make money but to make something more efficent. of cource having a world where money is no longer there, but the will to better ourselves will be a long time from now.

i never believe in the impossible. things on paper can be diffrent then actual physicl thingsl. and plus we are humans so our understanding is limited.

old. very old.

At 2/19/07 01:23 PM, LockDown68 wrote: I like how on every planet they speak english but on Earth we can't get the mexicans to speak my english....

they explain how they do that. they use a universal translator that well make everyone seem to speak english and to them you would be speaking their language. it doesnt always work with all spieces.

and star trek is a pretty good show.

the borg are the best. i would get the dvd series, but they cost too much.

i saw it was over $100 just for one season of voyager.

At 2/6/07 07:18 PM, Turd-Of-The-Week wrote: My computer rejects games like sim city and sim city 2000 because there DOS....I don't know why...? any ideas?

because it would and should work. it probebly worked when the game first came out.

again, microsoft is makeing their program more frusterating to consumers.

simplisity is not in their vocab except on the simplisity of their money making.

microsoft is evil, and so are the computer companies that run on microsoft.

At 2/6/07 07:12 PM, OrbitalDebris wrote: Wait, how can a computer NOT be backwards compatable? I mean you have a DOS game and your OS had DOS. You have a floppy disk and a disk reader.

Comptuers only build upwards on top of older technologies. You shouldn't have a problem running older games and such on yoru computer.

you would think. thats why i dont like microsoft and the computers that run on them. the simplest things they diliberetly make harder.

it takes forever to find what you want on your computer when it should be right in front of you. instead of pushing one button to make like a cd burn, they want you to send that file to another file then go to the toolbar and slect the option of burn cd, and that is in other segments of the list and also in an option that doesnt even sound like it is for cd burning.

microsoft doesnt like simplisity. you have to be a computer genius to use a computer for regular things now.

backwards compatible.

i have a pretty recent version of microsoft word. i wanted to open a document that was from a pretty old version of microsoft word. i tried to open it but it wouldnt even touch it. so after trying so hard i finally downloaded the same version of that old microsoft word. i tired to open the document and guess what....it didnt open even there. why did it not open? well i had the right verson to open it. there should be no reason why it shouldnt have opened. the only reason is that there is another program that is deliberatly preventing me from reading it, and that program's only use it to make it harder for me to use my computer.

so i had to set up that old computer and get the file from there, which took 3 flopy disks.

backward compatablility of programs is a must. there is no reason why it shouldnt be already done.

i say all computers are shit. if they have probelems then they are shit.

im waiting on the new computer that you can controle by thought and it will do every little bit that you want it to do.

computers today suck.

creating a bomb
making a starship
making a gun
making a tv

you can do anything with ducktape. ducktape is the way of the future

sonic died after sonic the hedghog 3

ozzy still does concerts? wow. i didnt think he could sing anymore.

or is it kinda like this now

"im going of the rails on a crazzy.....um....crazy.....sharon! how does this song go, i cant remember!"

ipods are pretty much the best mp3 players out there. throw yours away and get an ipod.

how ugly?

like only ugly if compared to other good looking girls

or ugly as in pimples and shit.

or ugly as in has the looks of a dogs ass after it takes a big dump?

so if he took her to court because he thought he was being violated, then he was an idiot.

if he took her court because he knew he was going to get payed, then he deserves a salute.

in rape, it isnt always double standard.

if a man eats out a woman while she is uncouncious, then the woman is being raped.

if a woman (who is atractive and has no deseases) gives a guy a blowjob while he is inconcious then that guy has a gift.

so what was his reason for taking her to court? was it because he felt violated (which only a guy who doesnt deserve a dick would feel) or was it because he was a total pimp and was all like "bitch, if you wana suck me you has got a pay me bitch"

feel violated = stupid asshole pussy
feel greedy = total pimp and great man

no man should feel violated if an atractive young woman gives him a blowjob. if i were to wake up as see that i would be all like "oh my god....i am so lucky."

At 1/25/07 02:19 PM, oddworth wrote: You have to be rally stupid to think the moniter, is the computer its self!

not really. with the rate technology is growing, it is very easy to believe that the moniter is also the computer for someone who doesnt know much about computers.

At 1/25/07 11:46 AM, Togukawa wrote: Who are you talking to?

sorry, i was talking to the topic starter

it is funny if you think its funny. some people think its funny. i do sometimes.

i have a question though. are you against people that are religious and religioun itself in a way of wanting people to all see the way of "science" or are you just merrly stating your theories on the flaws of religion?

i just wana make sure if you are or aren't the type of person that wants everyone to see one way.

if you are trying to get people to see one way, try as hard as you can but you will not win.

if you are just stating your theories as to why religioun has flaws, then keep at it and build upon it.

im sure that when our generation is older there will be some totally new technology out there where the young generation will completly know how to use it but we will be lost.

this guy obviously has little need for computers in his day to day life so his knowledge of computers doesnt need to be much.

it would be very easy to confuse the monitor for the computer because take a look at how technology is going. things are getting smaller. for someone who doesnt use computers much, a monitor looks very much like a computer. eventually computers will be inside the monitor.

he isnt stupid, just doesnt have the knowledge of computers that we do. since he doesnt seem like the person that rely on computers alot then he doesnt need the knowledge of computers.

if someone where to ask you what the most developed country in africa was and you didnt know, that doesnt mean you are stupid, just means you are ignorant of the information. same thing with computers. lack of information because it isnt a big priority. more of a luxory of information.

At 1/22/07 10:13 AM, Radioactive24 wrote: Pure ownage.

I love stupid people.

wasnt stupid, just ignorant.

eventually our generation will be like that for some new technology. and then so on.

many people commonly mistake the monitor for the computer. the older people often will mistake what the componets of a computer are because if they have less need for a computer then they dont really need to know much about it.

hard to tell, but you look asian.

i guess the stereotype that homosexuals are a threat to the american family.

pretty much every president has a school or library named after them, wether or not that president was any good or bad.

well first you are probebly a guy

second the period flushes out the egg.

third, you are probebly a guy

At 1/25/07 01:25 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Yeah.. thats funny.

he got in because his father has money.

there is a site that is like a graveyard of websites. it shows all these sites no longer running. anyone know what im talking about?

At 1/22/07 09:14 AM, Benovere wrote: Yeah, its not like we are shooting at anyone or getting killed and stuff. Just because it is not a declared war does not make it any less real. The vietnam war, for example, was a 'police action' and just look at the casualties resulting in that. I do respect your opinion, but comments like those get on my nerves from time to time.

by real war i mean that if we were to loose, our country would be taken over.

if the military gave you no benifits, would not pay for tuition, you dont get any changes in taxes, or anything, would you still join if you were going to join even with the benifits.

i would think that there would be a large portion of people would not join because of no benifits because isnt the benifits one of the main reasons to join? college tuition is getting higher and higher, and so is cost of living. you will soon pratically need a scollarship just to get into a bad college.

no, because there is no reason to. its not like we are in some kind of real war.