608 Forum Posts by "Profanity"
At 12/30/13 02:48 PM, Scintillating wrote:At 12/30/13 02:44 PM, Profanity wrote: In BinaryWRONG
In any prime base
That's not even true.
At 11/29/13 02:47 AM, Korriken wrote:At 11/29/13 02:08 AM, Feoric wrote:Just FYI.The daily show? really?
Ignoring the fact that the GOP is actively trying to deny Democrats the right to vote AND ADMITS IT? Really?
So many noobies in here think they're old school.
If you eat more calories than you burn, you will gain weight.
If you burn more calories than you eat, you will lose weight.
If you eat the wrong things, your body must burn more calories to eliminate waste, but you can never gain weight without eating enough calories. Believing otherwise is delusional and symptomatic of an eating disorder.
If you're dyslexic, use a program with spell check and comb your posts before submitting. Sounding out "appose" when you mean "oppose" completely ruins your argument.
You could insert more persuasive language while you're at it.
At 11/20/13 12:11 PM, supermofo wrote: You really had me until you mentioned the vengeful sky wizard as if he/she certainly exists.
It's a figure of speech.
At 11/19/13 03:29 PM, LittleWashu wrote: Actually I am none of the above. I side with him because you don't send a man to jail without knowing 100% of the story. There was so much grey in this cause it wasn't even funny.
1. Trayvon Martin was doing nothing wrong when George Zimmerman decided to start stalking him with a gun and a truck.
2. George Zimmerman disobeyed the 911 operator and chased him on foot with his gun.
3. George Zimmerman swore on the 911 call, "fucking coon".
4. Trayvon Martin yelled for help before George Zimmerman shot him.
Zimmerman's following actions were as follows:
1. Convince the jury that he followed the innocent black kid because he looked suspicious.
2. Convince the jury that he chased the innocent black kid because he looked suspicious.
3. Edit out "fucking coon" when pursuing a lawsuit against NBC.
4. Convince the jury that he had been the one yelling for help.
5. Separate from his wife after pulling a gun in an argument.
6. Get arrested after pulling a gun on his girlfriend in an argument.
At 11/19/13 12:52 PM, Elitistinen wrote: Zimm vs Trayvon brought out. Then everyone jumps at each other like stray dogs.
Duh? Anyone who sides with Zimmerman is a biased shill for one of three things:
1. Fox News
2. Gun nuttery
3. Racism
They need some sense smacked into them. Fox news (and its unlabeled vassals across the media spectrum) are responsible for spreading misinformation in order to influence public opinion. They admit to it, they have been sued for it, and they continue to do it for their King Murdoch.
Everyone else who looked for the unbiased facts in the Trayvon Martin Murder understands that Zimmerman was a closet racist who fancied himself as a hero-in-sneakers. He tracked, stalked, and murdered an innocent black teen because he had been fermenting a hatred of gangster-criminal types after several reported break-ins and suspicious activities in his neighborhood.
Mexican is a divergent Multiple Meaning Word. It can refer to a person who is a citizen of Mexico, a person who was raised on Mexico, or a person whose parentage or ancestry is of Mexican origin.
Yes, you can be racist against Mexicans.
At 11/19/13 12:45 AM, JeremyLokken wrote: Maybe you don't remember when NBC re-edited the 911 tapes to make Zimmerman sound racist? Lawyers dream right there.
Jeremy "Only Reads Anti-Liberal-Biased Media" Lokken, everyone.
"Fucking coons"
--George "Kills Innocent Black Kids" Zimmerman
At 11/19/13 12:31 AM, JeremyLokken wrote: Liberals didn't get their fill. The journalists found him guilty. And that's all that's needed in this country. And Spike Lee.
Jeremy "Blame The Liberals" Lokken, everybody.
That sounds like a subtly racist statement. Throwing bananas at Black politicians is often done by racist tardballs.
At 11/18/13 09:53 PM, Rome-forger wrote: Is anyone going to actually come up with a reason why a sterilization program for criminals is a bad idea or are you all just going to call me stupid over and over again? Seriously just calling someone stupid or tardball is about at the level of a 4 year old having a debate.
It's difficult to take you seriously when you mix up homophones and misspell so many words.
It's a bad idea because you have not made persuasive arguments. It's a worse idea because it has inherent flaws. People who should qualify for your sterilization punishment typically would be serving life sentences anyway.
At 11/18/13 09:09 PM, Rahmemhotep wrote: You will learn how God judges you.
You can't learn how God judges you after you're dead. Your circulatory system stops functioning and your cells deteriorate.
Are you fucking serious you gay retard? What in your shit-void of a brain made you think this is an acceptable thread? Stop using New grounds, Tox.
At 11/18/13 02:08 PM, poxpower wrote:At 11/18/13 01:44 PM, Profanity wrote: Which crimes?Is that an argument or a question? lol
This is a debate forum: it is what anyone makes of it.
OP is a tardball though. He needs an advocate & role model.
At 11/18/13 03:15 PM, Rome-forger wrote: To Profanity Nice try with attempting to make me seem unreasonable and irrational with comments like "first you'll sterilize everyone who does a miner crime like jay walking, loitering, and speeding. Then he'll search the records and going back a thousand years find a man the committed a crime and killing everyone who is related to that man Wahahhaha!"
You did that to yourself with the thread anchor.
You didn't specify which types of crime warranted sterilization procedures, which types of sterilization techniques would be used, how the procedures would be funded, what policies would be enacted to keep sterilized criminals from having children with methods which circumvent the sterilization sentence.
You said that criminals make poor parents. That means we should be also enacting policies which protect children from the influence of their criminal families. Should we kill them, sentence them to reeducation labor camps to eliminate their criminal leanings?
What if they are later proven innocent or not guilty?" If that's what you're worried about then you should be opposed to the death penalty in states which have it. But even for the states that don't have it your comment is pointless because there are people who go to jail for 20 years and later found to be innocent. You can't give those people back those 20 year nor can you do anything about the people that have been sterilized. You can't end the entire penal system because there are some times mistakes all you can do is say sorry we screwed up and move on.
I found the problem: you're stupid.
At 11/18/13 02:36 PM, Kel-chan wrote: Don't forget in today's lawsuit happy world- everybody is 1 lawsuit away from ruin
Other things that ruin lives:
- Hospital bills
- Car crashes
- Kids from gun nut families massacring schoolchildren
- Post-Climate Change megastorms
At 11/17/13 11:24 PM, Gagsy wrote: Stop talking out of your arse.
At 11/17/13 11:40 PM, Light wrote: Provide credible empirical evidence to support this claim. If you can do that, I'll happily shut the fuck up.
I already posted seven credible sources. If you want to know more about how your blind assumptions aren't equal to the facts of the world around you, I guess I could point you toward any other unbiased source (i.e. not unwomen.org studies on the frequency of reported penetrative rape) and you would start to agree with Bill, Makakov, and myself.
Which crimes?
Are we going to sterilize all of the bankers and finance professionals who rip people off? Are we going to sterilize elite athletes who break the rules of their contracts? People who import chameleon goods in shipping crates labelled "Toys" to avoid tariffs? Or are we going to sterilize people who appear drunk in public? Jay walk? Earn undeclared wages at manual labor jobs? Shoplift? Pickpocket? Smoke weed? Get too many speeding tickets? What if they are later proven innocent or not guilty? Do we sterilize the prosecutors who withheld evidence? Do we sterilize the judge who ignored due process? Do we kill the children of adults who commit crimes? And the grandchildren of elderly who commit crimes? If someone is found to have committed a crime in the past, and his family records reveal that four thousand citizens are his direct descendants, do we throw them all in the incinerator?
Why don't you just rename it to Artist - Songtitle.mp3?
At 11/17/13 11:08 PM, Light wrote: It's obvious that women have it harder in life.
The absolute ignorance of this post is astounding. Do you even know how "other societies" (i.e. places whose names you skip over on GDP lists) function? Women are not the only victims of subjugation and sexual predation. Rape is used as a tool of war against males in all corners of those societies.
In men's prison systems, it's even worse. Men are nearly 70% more likely to serve time in prison than women for committing the same crimes, and they are 80-95% more likely to be raped while in prison.
Despite all of your (and Gagsy's) first world pampered little baby assumptions about how the world works: Men are far more likely to be raped than women.
At 11/17/13 10:56 PM, Entice wrote:At 11/17/13 10:54 PM, Gagsy wrote: using the definition of rape as penetration by the perpetratorNot saying you're wrong, but doesn't that definition skew the statistics a bit?
She doesn't know what in the bloody hell she's on about because she's a sexist twat.
At 11/17/13 10:18 PM, Gagsy wrote: I love you Bill but that is the biggest bullshit floating around.
Not really. Statistically speaking, 5% of women report sexual assault from the age of 16 on. 3%-5% of men report sexual assault by other men, and that figure increases in societies which have less stigma against male-on-male intercourse. Female-on-female rape, by contrast, is very rare.
Women need to look out for male rapists, males need to look out for male and female rapists. Male victims under-report crimes at a far higher rate than females.
Bill is right.
Is this fat and scarred girl you're dating the same girl you spent several hundred dollars on a few weeks ago? The one who accused you of rape?
A waning dating culture which requires men to pay for everything women want, hold doors for them, build them houses, find a higher paying job so they can be stay-at-home mothers, and pay upwards of 50% of their paycheck to their ex in a divorce.
A working culture where a man is always at fault (and can be fired) for accusations of sexual harassment. Where men are shamed by the Nusocial Justice Movement because they have worked harder than female colleagues to earn a higher wage.
A justice system which assumes all men are violent rapists, doling out harsher sentences for male criminals than for female criminals who commit the same offense.
A waxing social justice culture which demonizes male sexual attraction and puts female sexual attraction, homosexual attraction, and transsexual attraction on a pedestal.
At 11/17/13 01:31 PM, NeonSpider wrote:At 11/17/13 12:12 AM, JRob wrote: We have quantum computers...Source? As far as I'm aware there have been several claims made by various companies, but zero proof. It's the kind of claim that doesn't seem to hold up under investigation.
albeit not as great as what you're probably thinking...
The D-Wave Blog has all the credible sources you need.
you could read a few articles. Google probably wont return entirely different results for different people. Quantum computing is advancing in leaps and bounds as we speak.
D-Wave has passed several computing tests with flying colors
At 11/17/13 01:02 PM, CeeeX wrote: Are these kinds of threads considered to be normal in this forum?
Sadly: yes. This place is a honeypot for idiots, pseudointellectuals, and liars.
