8,536 Forum Posts by "positively-negative"
At 3/19/08 07:27 AM, StephanosGnomon wrote: whether rapping or raping i'm contemplating our fate when
these top-hotted statesmen act lowly like basements...
face it, "sophisticated" gots no placement here,
wasted in the A.M., for breakfast was beer.
steeeeeer clear lil queers i'm already sauced and silly,
"i've never seen you mod here before..." -- OH RLY?
You're eight lines too short, you are using the wrong rhyming scheme for the first four lines and your metaphors are crap. But you have a nice rhyming cuplet at the end and with a little more work you could have a very respectable sonnet of the English style.
Doing the work I should be doing for my assignment due today on NG instead of my worksheet. FANTASTIC!!
The answer quite simply is too many.
I don't go for creative, I go for creative. A super intense fire does the trick. (a few thousand degrees at least.)
At 3/19/08 07:03 AM, Sexylegs wrote: I'm McSophisticated.
I wear a monocle, and a top hat, and a tuxedo.
All the time.
Even when raping? Politely of course, cause rude rape isn't sophisticated.
The same one as yesterday, bar a few changes.
Right, membership drive time! We need a list of NG users who like Post-Punk and are cool, then this loveable society can grow.
GO!
Hmm, when I have a lot of time at Uni I normally go and find some a nice spot to sit and relax, or find an interesting conversation to join in on.
What courses you doing?
People go on about the amounts of money Heather Mills gets, but what about what Paul gets out of it all? I'm sure Heather could do with it more than him.
At 3/19/08 02:44 AM, PolishMatt wrote: It was just a cover up. He's still alive.
I sorry but Yoko having him killed for rekindling his friendship with Paul (the other dead one,) sounds so much cooler. And it means you can blame the evil bitch for all the world's problems.
Make sure that you suck so much that they give you a desk job.
I'd use the classic tunnel underneath the bank and break through on a national holiday. Weapons are far too risky, get's you far less money, and they make the potential jailtime much.
At 3/19/08 01:06 AM, JoelR wrote: a slap stings for about 5 seconds. are you that pussy? a punch in the jaw would HURT.
I don't mean physically my friend, I mean metaphorically. A concept that may or may not be to advanced for you.
At 3/19/08 12:48 AM, PolishMatt wrote: Be quiet. John Lennon wasn't a man, he was a god.
If he was a god, why did he die then? I mean immortal is a generic convention when it comes to god.
There is a more cold-hearted quality to a slap that lingires long after contact. A punch is all over very quickly and may initially hurt more, but a slap stings for ages and stays imprinted on the soul.
At 3/19/08 12:11 AM, PolishMatt wrote: Paul McCartney got divorced recently. About time adult celebrity men start realizing women are completely useless.
Yeah, but it's still to late for the one man who needed that advice more than any other. Mr John Lennon.
NEWASISINNOTNEWBUTNEWTOMYCOLLECTION
Depeche Mode - Violator (Collectors Edition)
And a new set of headphones.
At 3/18/08 10:28 PM, CapnCrunchDaPimp wrote: Cough cough Milli Vanilli cough cough
They don't even play guitar, but you get the point. Smoke and mirrors.
They didn't play anything except their fans and the music media, oh, and on the worst second album ever. (Trust me, you think the first one was bad, the second one gives it a hiding.)
"Musically I am more talented than Paul McCartney, I am the new Elvis" LAWL!!!
At 3/18/08 07:34 PM, slackerzac wrote:At 3/18/08 07:33 PM, wtfyourface wrote: No, no, no. This is what a good brother would do.I was gonna say smack him a few times, but thats a better idea.
Make a video of it. Use it to your benefit. It could be great blackmail material for when he's older.
Create the video, then smake him a few times maybe?
At 3/18/08 07:21 PM, GreenKandy wrote: FUCK New Zealand.
Won't load for moi.
Maybe he got a detention for wearing a crap shirt?
At 3/18/08 05:19 AM, Night-Mare wrote: Bloc Party. <3
I also like whys. They are a good way to start discussion.
At 3/18/08 12:32 AM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: Sadly, I bet you knew I was going to mention an Industrial band instead of my beloved Cure or Depeche Mode.
I suspected much, but since Swans have elements of Post Punk and you name dropped Smith and the gang and the Mode, I forgive you.
No, this is a random death, your deaths are just weird and pointless.
Clark, James:
"Uh, I don't know, Um, I don't know what to say. I don't know. (pauses) I didn't know anybody was there. Howdy."
It depends on purely wether it is Eric Clapton or J.J. Cale's version.
This is a crew developed for those who are fans of the Post-Punk musical genre (or direct spin-offs and relatives,) to come and discuss the music, or for those who may be interested in learning more about the genre to ask questions.
Basic information can be found here
RULESKIS:
1. Try to stay on the topic of post-punk or relative to post punk.
2. No flaming - Sure if you don't like a band, you can say you don't like them and why, but don't attack the person purely because your taste doesn't match his, because at the end of the day opinions are not facts.
3. If you are making a hypothetical claim, try to back it up with some form of evidence, be it factual or circumstantial.
4. If you are unsure of something, ask a question, not only will most people try to do their damnest to answer correctly, it could avoid potential embarassment. e.g. If you think a band is post punk but aren't sure, ask "is (insert band name here) post punk or not?"
5. Take someone's opinion seriously unless it is purely pathetic trolling. You are not the be all and end all of musical knowledge, comprehende?
Anyways, to join:
List your favourite post punk band and why.
Myself, I am an Echo and the Bunnymen guy. The talent of all four of the classic members (Ian McCulloch, Will Sergent, Les Pattinson and the late, great Pete de Frietas,) made songs like "The Killing Moon" (off their masterpiece album "Ocean Rain,) literally timeless and as beautiful today as back in the early 1980's.
At 3/17/08 08:01 PM, zone12 wrote: Earth has given us nothing but pain and we will give nothing back.... We will take everything and burn the rest.
Actually I think you will find it is us humans who gave us nothing but pain. The earth was just the place where we did it all.
At 3/17/08 09:04 PM, AwesomeSauce wrote: One concern I've heard raised before is that people may start to try to convince disabled or elderly loved ones to commit suicide, so as to remove the burden from the family. I've heard some who hold this view comment on statistics about this specific issue.
Yeah, treat so called "Slippery Slope" arguements with extreme caution says my lecturer. She says that what that arguement is based on cannot be proven as the consequences haven't happened, and also that many of the issues where a "slippery slope" arguement was used, the future problems didn't occur at all.
Your link is broken, but I suspect it was the case that we discussed in my Ethics class a few weeks ago. Basically there are two major arguements in this case as follows.
The argument from the sanctity of human life:
1. It is absolutely wrong to kill innocent human beings.
2. Mr Latimer killed Tracy.
3. Tracy is an innocent human being.
4. Therefore, what Mr Latimer did was wrong.
The benefits argument:
1. If we can benefit someone, without harming anyone else, we ought to
do so.
2. Killing Tracy would benefit her by relieving her suffering.
3. Killing Tracy would not harm anyone else.
4. Mr Latimer killed Tracy.
5. Therefore, what Mr Latimer did was right.
