You need a Grounds Gold Account to post on the NG BBS!If you don't have one, click here to sign up now! It's fast, free, and easy — and opens up tons of great NG features!
At 1/19/09 10:12 AM, xxlonelyhunterxx wrote:
"This flash was not of good quality in my opinion... "
or
"What about this made it front page material?"
Actually, if you wrote reviews entirely comprised of one-liners such as those and nothing else, I can understand why they were deleted. That's not constructive criticism, it's not constructive unless you have points to back your criticism up.
I pretty much never lurk. When I click on a thread I have every intention of replying simply from reading the title. Unless, of course, the title is drastically misleading and I have nothing to post which won't earn me a ban. But then there's the fairly-frequent situation where I'll ignore the risk and post anyway.
If you write a review for an Adam Phillips movie with a nine or lower, it's almost certain the review will be marked as abusive, and most likely removed.
At 1/19/09 08:26 AM, Cally wrote:
It's estimated that "A secondary school in a gang-affected area may have 20 seriously gang-involved pupils, 40 less seriously involved and up to 100 marginally involved."
Multiply those figures by five and it sounds a lot more like my school.
At 1/18/09 07:46 PM, SatanHam wrote:
mabey u gotz 2 much porn.
or ur comp just bs.
lmao = reminds me wen i played cs; source on AOL.
haha my ping was literally 3000.