375 Forum Posts by "Papa-Smuff"
ah come on guys its still close and the polls are about to close
hey people i need you to go to gamefaqs and vote for jill valentine in the popular character tournament. it is a real close one between jill and peach from mario
heres the link
please vote jill can win this one.
At 10/8/06 06:33 PM, neoptolemus wrote: Instead of trying to find and kill those that are annoyed at your country why don't you do something different. Surely it would make a bigger impact if you found out WHY they are so pissed off
Because we are not muslim?
At 10/1/06 04:42 PM, Faffington wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but:
True communism relies on everyone being equal and working together.
Anarchy is each man for himself.
so just how they people act?
how so?
Im pretty sure im asking what is the difference between anarchy and communism?
What is the difference between true communism and anarchy since they both beleive in a no government system?
At 9/30/06 05:05 PM, Cartman678 wrote: I wasn't sure whether to put this in politics or general...
This is the President of Iran
Now, look at the man, second on the left
deffinately in general
regardless of whether it is morally ok. the economics needs to be taken into consideration. And for that matter to what extent do you guys think morals should play in a system like free health care where one group doesnt share in the cost?
I personally dont really see how they can be givin free health care. I mean you can only assume that in any country the free health care is being provided through the taxes that civilians and citizens pay. And since in most cases illegal immigrants dont pay taxes, it would simply be impossible to maint a system of free health care. It would break and bankrupt the system.
Do you guys think illegal immigrants should be eligible for free health care?
That is actually an excellent reason as to why we have a represtative democracy as oppose to a full democracy, to prevent mob rule and rule that kicking muslims out.
At 8/9/06 06:37 PM, WhiteSupremacistDude wrote: Iran can easily blow up the nukes at the U.S.A
Wait im sorry but your post was really confusing especially this part. Do you think Iran could nuke america?
then if the UN engages it will simply kill civilians for the UN to back down,
What in the world makes you think that they would do this? I honestly dont know, have they done this before or something? And what makes you think their own civilians (once again your post is confusing so im sort of assuming that you were talking about Iran killing their own civilians) would let that happen.
At 8/3/06 05:55 PM, -Karbon- wrote: What the fuck is he thinking? He is the worst president I have ever seen.
How many presidents have you really seen?
At 8/1/06 07:35 PM, xMystic_Manx wrote: The problem with this is that they never disclosed what surgery it was.
Actually they have. He was going to have, or has had I guess, stomach surgery to stop internal bleeding. They havent really come out with how he started bleeding internally. They did say that it was because Castro has been very active with a visit to Argentina and some sort of celebration and I guess other stress causing it. Im not to sure I beleive it though. I not a doctor but Im not sure you can start bleeding because of stress but i guess in old age, he is after all like 80.
Ill throw in some links since it seems you dont like to research things on your own.
At 7/9/06 05:53 PM, rockizzy wrote: and i dont see why i should stop going places where they play great music just because people smoke there. so that could be an argument FOR banning smoking in public place.
Actually yes if a place allows smokers then you should stop going there if it bothers you so much. If you dont like smokers then it should fall upon you to stay away from them. The smokers shouldnt have to try and avoid you because you dont like them. I mean I dont like gay people but that doesnt mean that they should all move from san francisco because I want to go there with out seeing gay people. That just means that I cant go to san francisco.
Im just kidding though, I love gay people, and they love me. Im like candy to those people.
At 7/8/06 05:54 PM, facksfunny wrote:
:Russian population will start rising as well. The government has tons of money now,
But there is actually a population decline in russia right now. Russia's population is declining so drasticly that the un says that their population could be cut by a third by 2050.
Poke dude and halo lock, Im sorry but you guys need to learn to spell if you want people to take you seriously. Secondly in case you didnt notice, this is the politics forum. And you maybe your asking yourselves what that means. Well I'll tell you, that means we debate and defend our views on politics, or what ever the thread is about. So when some one comes up with an opposing opinion to your own, then you counter their point(s). As appose to, what you both did, and tell the other person to "get a girlfriend" or "fucking hell with you"
At 7/6/06 01:39 PM, Jayemare wrote: Well, I guess what he thought was better was to change a country with a huge middle class, a standard of living on par with europe, a socially active government, and a powerful economy into a bleak, economic wasteland with millions living in third-world conditions...
And Cuba being a third world country has nothing to do with the block america has on them?
what would be the criteria to be on the security council then?
I know I use a lot of words that many would consider rascist. I have words for latins gays whites blacks and just one for asians, cant really find a lot of words for them. And of course I use the n word, and not the weak n word the one ending in er, I think I get bnned for saying it in here. I use them much more just because they are so taboo.
Do you think bush owns all of the oil companies or something?
At 6/28/06 02:01 AM, FightingForFreedom wrote:At 6/28/06 01:35 AM, Papa_Smuff wrote: The president doesnt really effect gas prices though?
The Bush admnistration is not in controll of Oil prices or Oil production.
sorry that wasnt suppose to be a question. It was suppose to end with a period.
Just to clear things up though, you were agreeing with me right.
The president doesnt really effect gas prices though?
At 6/27/06 01:19 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: I'm all in favor of letting people eat twinkies, but they can still eat them even if there's a label like I proposed.
Oh yeah people should have a right to know what they are eating. And I would personally be ok with putting labels say that eating to many of siad food can be dangerous.
At 6/27/06 01:22 PM, Thespus wrote: It was just a musing, really. Black market ding dongs, apple pies, mini muffins!!!!
Yeah I can see it now. Making moonshine oreos in my bath tub.
At 6/27/06 04:15 AM, Kenzu wrote: I think it would be good enough if fast food chains like Mc D. get restrictions on how much sugar can be contained in each of their products.
Yah see I am ok with that. If the company willingly says that they wont sell any more fat food, then good for them. I probably wont eat there any more but good for them. Aslong as the government stays out of it.
At 6/26/06 11:39 PM, Extremewookie wrote: Yah but 94% (I made that statistic up)
Atleast your honest with your self.
of the nation can't stop eating bon bons, so should the government take action?
No, I wouldnt have a problem with other stuff like I dont know, some educational program or something. As long as the government doesnt prevent me or other people who want to eat those things from eating them.
At 6/26/06 11:39 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: Yet the government can regulate meat to make sure it's not tainted?
Tainted with what? diseases? There is a difference between a twinkie and a pattie tainted with e coli or mad cow disease. That one tainted pattie can be harmful to who ever eats it while a twinkie gets dangerous after eating to much. Which is really true for any thing. To much of anything can be bad for a person. That is why people need to learn simple self control. And I personally beleive that this is not a place for government.
no people should just learn some self control. Like me myself, I am a relativly thin person. I can realy eat anything I want with out really getting big. Now is it fair that the government limit the foods, or restrict the type of food, I can eat because some dumbasses cant stop eating ding dongs and bon bons.
Do you really think that guys and girl learn differently?
the only difference I see between liberal christians and conservative christians is the conservative christian want every one else to follow their beliefs while liberal ones dont really care what other people do.
