Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

If criminals don't obey laws, what makes you think that they care what a sign says?

It's better than most of the stuff on TV, but when most of the stuff on TV is shit, it really isn't saying much.

i rather use the energy of antimatter, but the question is the storage of it

At 4/21/13 12:06 PM, Emma wrote:

At 4/21/13 12:01 PM, Osyris wrote: I just don't get the treasonous people who always threaten to start a civil war whenever some gun legislation pops up.

Disarming me = justification to secede

Seceding is largely illegal, so whatever state is stupid enough to do so can have fun dealing with no sovereign recognition and the National Guard + the military

At 4/21/13 11:57 AM, Ceratisa wrote:

At 4/21/13 11:42 AM, Osyris wrote:

At 4/21/13 11:28 AM, Ceratisa wrote: The government isn't exactly a stellar crime fighting power now is it?

i mean if you are worrying about defense, and only defense, I see no problem with outlawing some types of weapons, especially when shotguns and (machine) pistols are more suited for personal defense

The 2nd was established right after the founding fathers defeated the ruling government

context.

Cool, I guess?

I just don't get the treasonous people who always threaten to start a civil war whenever some gun legislation pops up.

why am i not surprised that virtually everyone at that rally was white

At 4/21/13 11:28 AM, Ceratisa wrote: The government isn't exactly a stellar crime fighting power now is it?

police service depends on your city. I'm all for people defending themselves, but I rather prioritize getting the people who we pay tax money for that purpose better equipment because an M9 isn't going to stop a mass shootout perpetrator

i mean if you are worrying about defense, and only defense, I see no problem with outlawing some types of weapons, especially when shotguns and (machine) pistols are more suited for personal defense

At 4/21/13 11:28 AM, i-am-ghey wrote: some people (e.g teachers) should be allowed to carry non-lethal weapons, like stun guns, if they have received proper training.

so when another school shooting happens, they have a way to disable the shooter temporary, without having to inflict life-threatening injuries.

the chances of them hitting a guy decked out in bulletproof armor, ballistic headgear, fully auto ARs, and probably a backup machine pistol is poor even with training. you might as well just have an school safety officer with a machine pistol take care of the invader

At 4/21/13 01:09 AM, LemonCrush wrote:

At 4/21/13 01:07 AM, All-American-Badass wrote: I firmly believe in the 2nd amendment, i really don't think we should be that restricted on what gun we as Americans can own. If i want to own an AR-15 with a 30 round magazine i should have every right to do so.

Imagine how quick the manhunt for that Boston bomber would have been if gun laws were looser in MA.

If everyone had bombs, I bet that the Boston marathon bombings wouldn't happen.

put your dick in a meat grinder

I don't get how Republicans claim that Obama didn't kill Osama because he wasn't the one who physically fired off the gun, but Lemon here says that Obama is (directly) responsible for killing many Iraqi citizens.

At 4/8/13 12:57 AM, thegarbear14 wrote:

They are more than background checks. A national registry of guns, needing a background check to have another person fire off a magazine at the range or to even touch your rifle. It's basically what they did in new zealand with their registry. It would have to be transferred and registered to each person that it goes to.

If you think this imminent gun confiscation is coming, you should stop paying taxes completely and go bug out in the middle of Africa or something.

Which raises the cost of goods effectively taking more money out of people's pockets to buy essential items

How? All it does is to make corporations pay people the same wages no matter what your gender, race, religion, former nationality, etc (The list can go on) under the same job title.

broke my arm

At 4/17/13 08:32 PM, LemonCrush wrote:

At 4/17/13 08:27 PM, BumFodder wrote: Compared to your last president, he isnt as bad really

He is many magnitudes worse. He has expanded and multiplied everything Bush did. The murder,

tried to end both wars

the fascism

is a Leftie

, the poverty

trying to convince Americans that "Tricke down" and "lowering taxes creates jobs" is snake oil

, the abolition of civil rights,

tried to pass Fair Pay act

At 4/16/13 02:49 PM, tox wrote:

Or name someone

bronies and "hipsters"

who the fuck doesn't have "ADD" these days

maybe the medication is giving you psycho dependence

I still don't see how background checks should even pose a question to the 2nd amendment. It's almost common sense for me to keep criminals and the mentally ill from buying a weapon.

fuck this gang, its filled with red shades

At 4/3/13 11:10 PM, Luis wrote:

At 4/3/13 11:09 PM, Knights wrote: Luis, are you doing this cause of the red glasses trend or are you legit willing to start a gang, cause I'm the original OG, mang.

Well i like the red glasses and the warm reception I got from it, and I was just curious of how well starting a more elaborate gang might be.

you havent seen the wrath of the Red Shades Resistance Army yet

we all ova da plaic

Im in this school gang called the chdoe squad.

Maybe we can "affiliate"

Taking heavy enemy fire.

Man the machine guns!

At 4/3/13 10:53 PM, NintendoCubed wrote:

At 4/3/13 10:41 PM, Osyris wrote: I'm about that blue shades life.

Are the Greens okay with you?

We can sign an alliance

At 4/3/13 10:45 PM, Jester wrote:

At 4/3/13 10:41 PM, Osyris wrote: I'm about that blue shades life.

There is no life without red shades.

this guy died for you yet you defy Him

I'm about that blue shades life.

hello

At 4/3/13 10:29 PM, Vnzi wrote:

At 4/3/13 10:28 PM, Osyris wrote: red shades = samefags

fact

didn't you ask for them
hippo-crite

im infected

:(

must now mspaint red shades

red shades = samefags

fact

At 4/3/13 05:50 PM, Vnzi wrote:

At 4/3/13 05:47 PM, 372 wrote:

At 4/3/13 05:37 PM, Sequenced wrote: This was announced on april fools guys...

...shit...
it's not real....
D:

you sure?
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/04/02/nemo-finds-a-sequel-f inding-dory-announced
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/04/02/finding-dory -ellen-degeneres-hooked-for-nemo-sequel/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/02/finding-dory-findin g-nemo-sequel_n_2999649.html?ir=Entertainment

Fuck.

Finding Nemo shoudn't be milked. I mean, Cars was already pretty disappointing, but Cars 2 was like a steaming pile is shit sprinkled with rectal yellow discharge.

I genuinely see it not existing before 10 years from now.