532 Forum Posts by "Oro"
-
.oro. six cycle psyche by OroClick to listen.
- Score
- 0 / 5.00
- Type
- Loop
- Genre
- Ambient
- Popularity
- 3 Views
I moved to San Angelo recently and haven't found much to do. Any of you guys from around the area or know what to do on a 4th of July weekend?
Yeah, I agree. This shit is bogging down my entire life.
Oh well, some pretty sick new stuff so far.
Also, level 24 ftw. Wtf is the icon some kind of bronze fist with belts?
At 6/22/07 04:05 AM, Hellian00 wrote: I once accidentally punched my balls. I then doubbled over from reflex and cummed on my face.
HAHAHAHAHA
Dude, fucking ace.
At 4/17/07 10:30 AM, DaSadGirl wrote:At 4/17/07 08:00 AM, Jose wrote:This silly chink got a higher score than the columbine fellows.
Isn't, "There She Is!" Japanese?
( 3
nope, Korean
At 4/16/07 07:22 PM, pigbot229 wrote: i go to v tech, it was called the most deadly massicare in american history it happened on the first floor i was on the second all i could recall was large popping sounds and screams i'm so happy to be alive
you're 16?
At 4/12/07 06:56 AM, 2wiceBorn wrote: With you being a child, you have very little understanding of what people do in the Military.
I, however, will be joining the Royal Marines.
Very nice. Royal Marines are a solid force.
I enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps about 5 months ago, I ship out to MCRD San Diego on August 6th of this year.
The fight was almost entirely bitch except for the sucker punch at the end. Still pretty fucking funny considering the big kid was that huge of a faggot
its actually more of a jet black.
also your taco is upside down and horrible
At 4/11/07 04:27 PM, Brick-top wrote: No, it goes you call him a cunt and he exercises the right to beat your head it with a steel bar.
haha, true.
you if you go to somebodies house and call them a cunt, you'll get reamed for harassment or something.
fail
Interesting question, but lest you forget the subconscious comprehension of just about anything and everything around you.
The so "lightning bolt" process of thought, or obtainment of an idea, is not a matter of rocks in a box.
Rather, consider your thoughts an infinite mass of sand, running through a sifter. Every grain that passes through the sifter is stored in your subconscious, and every group of sand, bit of rock, or anything not passable into the sifter remains readily available on top, as a conscious, workable knowledge.
Whatever sticks out to you apon comprehension is what you can eaisly access during the process of though, although in certain streaks of luck or deep thought, you can access knowledge that you have unknowingly comprehended in the past.
So, you aren't really obtaining entirely new rocks, moreso you are discovering rocks in the basket that you forgot about, or didn't realize were already there.
"In order for someone to be found guilty of first degree murder the government must prove that the person killed another person; the person killed the other person with malice aforethought; and the killing was premeditated."
Varients of murder/manslaughter charges are not named based on how bad the crime is, but how the crime was performed.
At 4/4/07 03:58 PM, Demosthenez wrote: Im not sure if its possible to hide WMD's but I have thought about the best way to hide them would be.
Get workers who have no family to build some underground area where satellites would not notice extra commotion or construction equipment. Limit the knowledge to only a few individuals in the higher chain of command that you trust with your life, your childrens lives, and your entire familys lives. Kill all the workers and the engineers who designed the thing, bury their bodies in the construction area, and destroy all blueprints and records of the equipment and supplies that were used. Seal all exits.
Dont get me wrong, I think Saddam had no WMD's but it would be possible to hide them if you really had an awesome plan and executed it flawlessly. Wouldnt it be just hilarious if like 70 years form now some Iraqi stumbles into an underground WMD cache like this?
They wouldn't have to go to that much trouble. It isn't like we have every single inch of every single country on earth covered by 24/7 surveillance teams. It would have been extremely easy and within Saddams reach to drive some basic governemtn issue transport vehicles to a nondiscreet area in the desert, and hide them, without anybody noticing.
Then again, they probably have several high security clearance areas that very few people, much of whom are already dead, knew about.
At 4/4/07 01:55 PM, MysticMan wrote: 2. - Everyone gets pissed off. Nukes the US.
Wrong. Not "everyone" has nukes, and those who do would either be too pussy to fire them, or we'd have already fucked them up.
At 4/4/07 03:30 AM, troubles1 wrote: unlike the insurgency we are currently dealing with , fighting a conventional war with them could happen.
We're already fighting Iranian insurgents in Iraq.
At 4/4/07 12:55 AM, Menace2Sobriety wrote: We had no true reason to be there, since the whole idea was the Iraq was supplying Al Queda with WMD's, which were nonexistent. Bush simply wanted to one-up his daddy by taking Hussein out, which the original Pres. Boushe couldn't do during Desert Storm.
I'm going to go ahead and be stubborn and point out that stating the WMD's were "nonexistant" is unfair. You don't know that. Iraq is 169,234 square miles, and a good deal of fucking desert. We've found catacombs of intricate underground terminals and passageways/escape routes/storage areas all over and underneath Iraq in desolate areas as well as urban areas. If they were stockpiling WMD's, they knew that they had to do a fucking good job at keeping it under wraps.
Not nessisarily saying that they had WMD's, but merely pointing out that if they truly wanted to hide something well, they know their land, and they have plenty of it. Imagine a 169,234 square mile perimiter sand box, 1 mile deep, and you're trying to find a weapons cache.
Also, the whole GWB wanting to one up his Dad, thing. I'm not even going to waste my time explaining just how ignorant that makes you look, just saying that.
War is won by nuetralizing the enemy, not annoying them.
Besides, if you tranq'd every target, realistically, you would have to take them as a POW, and that would be much too costly for us to give EVERY casualty a free Qu'ran and prayer rug, like we do now.
We shouldn't have to house all of them, hell does it for free.
At 4/3/07 06:28 PM, uhnoesanoob wrote: You are a fucking moron. While Iran may be a farily large threat to the UN, nukeing it would be the dumbest thing ever. First off, you have the majority of Iranians, who are innocent. Second off, this would cause WW3.
Reasons why [[hypothetically]] nuking Iran would not cause WW3:
-The parking lot formerly known as Iran wouldn't be able strike back or form an allied revolt.
-Who is to have the balls to rise up against somebody who just completely leveled a country in seconds? WWII anybody? Hiroshima? Nagasaki? What happend after we dropped the A bombs? Japan backed out real quick, and nobody fucked with us for a LONG time.
At 4/3/07 10:51 PM, Dre-Man wrote:At 4/3/07 10:48 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: wasn't meant something.I rest my case.
How do you figure? Picking at his English justifies your bullshit?
At 4/3/07 10:23 PM, Dre-Man wrote: The difference is, that World War II actually meant something.
I've seen a couple other posts pertaining to this same thing, as well.
Brief history lesson for the memory impaired:
We invaded Iraq based on faulty intelligence which at the time seemed like solid, definitive proof that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction.
We launched a preemptive strike on Iraq in the event that Saddam intended to use the WMD's on the U.S. or our allies. Unreasonable? Fuck no. Saddam had ties with Al-Qaeda, and obviously they mean business.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons /1/17/TerroristAttacksAlQaeda.png
We covered our asses by fucking them up in both Afghanistan and Iraq, and we even liberated the Iraqis at the expense of 3,000 of our finest, and countless other casualties of other allied forces.
Anyway, they didn't have WMD's. Our fault? Kinda, not really. When given information that is provided as reliable and when facing situations like more innocent loss of life, I think GWB acted appropriately
Today, without any WMDs being found, we're still in Iraq.
Why?
They're going batshit without a dictator, and until all the assholes can cope, we need to stay there and patch the hole that we widened by taking down the dictator.
The majority of Iraqi's did not like the tyrant Saddam, but there are assholes who did.
The remaining assholes are fucking everything up, and those are the motherfuckers we're neutralizing today.
Anyway man, the threat presented by Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda does mean something. Even if today we're not defending what we once were, we had a just cause to intervene, and if we left now, that would just be fucked up.
At 2/14/07 07:06 PM, Tanktunker wrote: What exactly did America gain in the invasion of Iraq?
I mean, you're losing alot of money, so what do you have to show for it?
I don't think we went in for our own benefit, although most 13 year olds would argue that we are fighting for oil.
amazing. thank you so much for posting this.
I've never really liked Carlos Mencia.
Yeah, guys. The post is satire.
Not horribly unfunny, I just don't think it was obvious enough that it was a joke, or that it nessisarily belongs here.
Oh... I get it.
I thought the post seemed a little too stupid to be true, but I trusted that the politcal section wasn't for inane attempted humor. My bad.
Hilarious.
Not very sad, although I'd be lying if I said it's not a story.
At 2/13/07 03:01 PM, TehChahlesh wrote: I am so sick of this bullshit American attitude. "We are the best country in the world", "Our preisdent is amazing", "our economy rules". I also can't stand the way that they all unanimously support the war in Iraq, president Bush, and Israel. They clearly are all the exact same and share the same views on everything. I don't acutally live in America, and of course, have never met an American, but rest assured, my stance is firmly grounded in nothing.
Has anybody ever called you an idiot?
Let me be the first, be it the case.
I don't know about the "Our predisent is amazing" or the "our economy rules", but yes, "We are the best country in the world".
Also, I don't know what you're reading ( or thinking ), but uh, President Bush has a 40% approval rating right now in America, which has rocketed to this point, from a long lasting 32%. Hardly any Americans agree with President Bush.
We all support Israel? What the fuck? I personally support Israel, but I highly doubt that the majority of Americans care about Israel, or even know where it is. You're over estimating the general American publics interest in international and worldly affairs.
I'll also note that almost every American disagrees on something.
I kind of fear what other youth your age think in your country, although I am quite aware of the general worldly perseption of America as a giant monstrer, filled with Bush loving drones and baby killers, but you easily summed it up much better than I ever could, when you said my stance is firmly grounded in nothing".
At 1/8/07 10:02 PM, Chiklay4 wrote: Back than the marines were Different than today, actually way different
Today marines Will Shoot anyone and anything that moves in Iraq
a kid walk over the a side walk Shoot in sight
a mom run over there crying for her child Shoot in sight
And Boot camp is like a Nazi camp than boot camp
what they do in boot camp is Jog saying "Kill Kill Kill"
over and over.
When your about to join the marines they give your a paper. what does the paper say?
Well you can't read it Even if you ask they will Say "YOU MUST SIGN IT FIRST THAN READ IT!!"
and some of the words are blanked almost leaving the paper have a black line and a X
Before
there was "Shoot Any Fucking living thing in sight!"
no it was either killing the terriost and and saving a few people like children or w/e you have to save
Now its different , Way different. Right after MY sisters friend showed me the paper It looked like a person erase alot of information that didn't want know one to see and hes going to Florida to show his Dad(Who was in the marines as well a long time ago) the paper they told him to sign.
I won't argue with you, but I will point out that
": When your about to join the marines they give your a paper. what does the paper say?
Well you can't read it Even if you ask they will Say "YOU MUST SIGN IT FIRST THAN READ IT!!" "
is factually incorrect. I never signed anything without thoroughly reading through it. Whatever you saw blacked out, I didn't see. Quite possibly they were using an old form, with factors that no longer apply today. You will and would not be held accountable for text that isn't there.
As for the "kill kill kill" comment, that is just a cadence. There are tons of cadences, which are just what you chant while jogging to get your cardio up. They are usually sung in the stereotypical military fashion, eg: " I don't know what I've been told/ Eskimo pussy is mighty cold! " etc.
It is also absurd to compare Recruit Training to a Nazi Concentration camp. Recruit Training is for consenting individuals to be broken down and rebuilt in whatever means nessisary. You are pushed almost to breaking point during Basic Training, and ultimately benefit drastically.
I did join the Marine Corps. I enlisted 4 months ago, and I ship out to MCRD San Diego on August 6th.
nice effort man. good topic!
