571 Forum Posts by "NJDeadzone"
nothing you haven't heard before
how about someone make a game, maybe the creator of defend your castle, that you drop people in front of tanks in hopes that the tanks will stop...oh wait, that'd just be a recreation of the effort of those few foolish americans that went the whole 9 yards and travelled to Baghdad to do that. Human shields their called...i could make a whole topic about them. Maybe i will, maybe i will...
oh and if anyone was watching MSNBC, they had the countdown of the deadline, and i was expecting people in times square to be celebrating like new years but good thing that didn't happen...
June 12th, whoever can figure this out gets a bonus cookie from me.
no need to freak...but gay isn't the best adjective for a war unless we sodomize Saddam, kinda has a catchy thing to it.
what is this, sportscenter?! live coverage of a war is being treated like an NBA game...this is just desperation for ratings.
At 3/19/03 04:43 PM, wafflemeister wrote: I SERIOUSLYdo not think Americans have the right to insult the French. Our country is 1/2 fatasses
Wait?! The French eat?
You guys have co-existed on this forum since i started posting in January, you know eachothers buttons so just disable them...
this topic is defintely becoming the "I'm taking my anger out on people that counter me the most" thread
At 3/19/03 05:00 PM, clownfish wrote: Well, Bush's period started in 2000, and he didn't do anything about Saddam
Not just Saddam, all of the Middle East, he was practically isolationist and it cost him dearly. He had a horseshoe up his ass is first year as President, remember the spy-plane incident?
business issues like Oscar tix, that bastard has seen every US movie ever made...it's the James Lipton of Asia
It's the information war, it's pleasing the nations through shallow propaganda in order to create nostalgia, painful, fearful, and arrogant nostalgia.
China as a eerie little entity is understated as well lol, you know very well they could trample NK if it wanted to. That's why China isn't upset about NK bringing upon this trouble. China is handling them behind the scenes i'd bet.
At 3/19/03 01:22 AM, mysecondstar wrote: well, it seems that iraq does have WMD. now we have to deal with "chemical ali", the general in charge of deploying all chemical or biological weapons. the US is in big trouble if they use it.
War sucks! war isn't some fantastic, glorious hooplah like the idiot countries during WWI felt. War is frustration that brings upon further frustration
At 3/17/03 10:41 PM, karasz wrote:
but by attacking iraq it makes us in violation of the UN... the very THING that we are attacking IRAQ for doing... im not the only one that sees the irony behind this right???
personally i think the UN should be re-worked and re-made to suit the post cold war world...
You're absolutely right, i withdraw that argument for now
1. Kim Jong Il, this generation's Hitler
2. Saddam, he should've been taken out 10 years ago
3. Castro, once he's gone, Cuba=Neo-Las Vegas, it was so nice from what i heard from my grandparents, when they went there on vacation in the 50s.
At 3/19/03 12:57 AM, NJDeadzone wrote:>< religion is the opium of the masses-Karl Marx
that was very cliche of me, i apologize...anyway you all get my picture so true to my promise i will speak of it no more.
At 3/19/03 04:36 PM, Taxman2A wrote:170 countries turning against us? not likely!
170 countries? about 4 have an military that can cross an ocean, France, Russia, China, and name another...
The only country which would even make for a vaguely entertaining war is China
damn right, they're so in on this crap right now, but of course true to their legendary general Sun-Tzu(wrote the Art of War-the best military strategy book EVER) they are formless leaving the world to guess their motives
so Vas, you'd definitely know what i'm talking about with the Turnpike thing
I'm Jewish in tradition, but deist in faith...i wrote a few months ago about deism and it got me in trouble because many were spreading the word and giving me a role i didn't want...but i'll talk about it again.
Deism is the believe that God created the universe and left it alone to do its thing. What makes it so much fun is that it accounts for everything and doesn't favor a certain people. Things just happen.
A simple analogy would be that God's playing SimUniverse and built the minimal requirements and is just putting it on the highest speed of growth and left the computer screen. That reasoning works for me, and i've been closer to him ever since
::halo floats over my head::
>< relgion is the opium of the masses-Karl Marx
well it answered the question. Phuck the Phrench
talking is talking, it's not like anyone in this forum has real power.
::meanwhile, Colin Powell is watching Ganguro Girl..."Damn i love this website"::
At 3/18/03 10:51 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:At 3/18/03 07:32 PM, NJDeadzone wrote:Well, I'm glad to see that someone clings to delusional, Nazi-era methods of declaring victory. Would it be better if it were behind the smoldering ashes of Baghdad with wounded children all around.
the losing proletariat is not supposed to enjoy defeat of the government it never tried to revolt against. and i'm sure the Kurds will be jumping for joy now that we've probably unleashed a greater evil on the world. War is costly. But this war was never finished.
i have to admit, he has A+ speech writers
well it was naive and American of me to think that the US will solely rebuild the Iraqi government, but doesn't it have that right?
well played, sir, well played
At 3/19/03 12:14 AM, karasz wrote:i must say this was a great idea on ur part... i want more of these type threads...
thanx, well i won't be like Max Kellerman and keep score, but i like this style thread too, it's to the point :), and no tit for tat bickering...yet or maybe i'll find a way to mute.
I'd say yes for only one reason...where would we fight if we were invaded on land? I was bored the other day and i was making up names of future events taking place on American soil. Here are some ideas:
Battle of Appalachia
The Badlands Standoff
Battle of Los Angeles (Whoops copyright issue)
Louisiana Delta Offensive
Worcester Massachussetts Scorched Earth Policy
Boise Armistice.
Which sounds the nicest for you? It's obvious that Bush would rather take the war to Saddam's House than otherwise.
yuppers, nice fiddling there...
