566 Forum Posts by "Nitroglys"
At 10/8/05 07:55 PM, fli wrote: Obesity is certainly a factor insurances take in when they're calculating your premium.
That is why non-smokers, non-obese, very young people pay less--
while smoking, fat, old people tend to pay more.
And if you're paying more--
why the hell shouldn't insurance pay whatever health related diseases that they are charging you?
If you pay more,
then you gotta expect more.
what im saying is if someone who is on the same insurance company os you and they have to have surgery due to an obesity problem the insurance company has to pay thus making you, the consumer, having to pay.
I dont think that insurence should cover ceartin obesity problems. Problems as such that people bring on themselves. It makes no sense that we should have to pay for people who like to go to McDonalds too much.
(I am not talking about obesity diseases)
At 10/7/05 05:25 PM, FAB0L0US wrote
Cmon. She consciously picked out a most offensive shirt when she was going to a very public place. She was TRYING to get attention.
have you ever heard of freedom of speech?!!!
I bet this woman is like those losers in High School who try shit like this just for attention.
thats bull shit you cant genralize people.
If she wasnt trying to cause a ruckus she wouldnt have either not worn the shirt or complied.
its breach of freedom of speech up and down. fuck i would of taken my shirt off with just a bra and sat down(if only i was a woman)
McInnis said Southwest rules allow the airline to deny boarding to any passenger whose clothing is "lewd, obscene or patently offensive."
they could of put a peice of tape over "fuck" and not a person should be pissed.
Is this tough stuff? They can do what they want and this woman has no right to sue.
I really hate attention whores like this. And shes 32? Get a fuckin life, you crazy biotch.
what the fuck is your problem. you know what i bet your one of those jock mother fuckers who picks on kids all day and a kid brings a gun to school and shoots you.
At 10/7/05 05:28 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:
The CIA is not allowed to do that anymore. They have been caught with their hands down their pants to many times. And, frankly, if they were caught again, I dont think the world would be to happy.
who says it has to be the CIA.
At 10/7/05 04:56 PM, Bio- wrote:
Ofcoarse their not! What dumbfuck would do something as plain and stupid as that after WWII. Now from a more smart and poilitical point of view, they would have installed a puppet government, and controlled the country from the background. Thats modern war, and best part?-No low moral in the offending country, because its a "libiration" to a "democracy."
My opinion.
ok point. but you cant go in and take out a gov't without a fight. if any radical change in gov't is done force is ussaly involved. you'll never get rid of the all mighty gun.
i know triple post, my bad. But i had to post this.
Has anyone noticed how when people fuck with the form of gov't the economy just colapses. Like Vietnam, Afganistan, Russia(thats a big one), and all of the post-Russian ruled countries. it just seems that when you screw with something as large as the goverment nothing can go right.
At 10/6/05 02:10 PM, Desert-Drifter wrote: bull shit you can't. they're still a danger to society.
yup those retarded serial killers will run rampent.
At 10/6/05 02:34 PM, adamsaysmoesgay wrote:
well, what about iran? irans economy is good, and God has to do with everything there to, politics, law, etc. Also, saudi arabia is another example of this, and if u go there, u will find that money is so easy to make there, the economy there is good too.
Double post. Sorry.
they may have a good economy at the moment. but less people are buying into their biggest industy oil. and not to count their possible links with terrorist groups. they may have a good upper and middle classes but their unemployment rate is over 30% they aren't doing that good, just better than others.
At 10/6/05 01:41 AM, night_watch_man18 wrote:
Most of what we have today in Western society is based on faith, is it not? Murder. Rape. Theft. These are all things that are viewed as bad in almost any religion, and is the basis of what created our laws today.
they may be in the bible but most of that is just plain common sense. we didnt need a god to tell us that rape, theft, and murders are bad.
Now don't get me wrong, I understand where you're coming from. Frankly, I'm an Agnostic, and I don't believe that religion should have impact on certain aspects of society (such as homosexuality for an example)
well thats what im saying. there is a difference between law and religous law period. and if a country is under religous law then nore aspects of their lives will be controled, beacuse religoun just goes too far. Im not saying muslim law is the only religon that has bad ideas about law. The arian's(which is based on christianty) want to expell all blacks, asian, arabians, all races, and "mud people."
Now if they are causing unneccessary harm to many people, than yes, I think there is a universal shared thought that harm is to be avoided.
arians
At 10/5/05 11:00 PM, night_watch_man18 wrote:
Well, to be Muslim, you understand that God has to do with everything, even politics and social norms, because of Divine Unity. Everything in existance has a connection with the Divine.
there is a difference between religon and law. for example when afganistan was put under muslim law by the taliban they saw a sharp decline in their economy. not to mention the demolishment of the worlds biggest buhhdas. i just think that religon of any type is a very bad way to govern anything.
At 10/5/05 09:01 PM, tr0mb0ne wrote: I think it was all a big conspiracy and Bush is responsible for everything and everythign that goes wrong ion politics is his fault because he talks funny.
i hate you.
At 10/5/05 05:54 PM, adamsaysmoesgay wrote:
i dont mean that, i mean it makes them look more sophisticated, and it does bring out the beauty of the womans face.
you know im talkin bout the thing the have on their head COVERING their face. and for making them look more sopfisticated thats just your oppinon
At 10/5/05 05:47 PM, adamsaysmoesgay wrote:At 10/5/05 05:44 PM, Nitroglys wrote:
i actually think this makes women look better! no kidding! This is done for a reason, as a womens body can attract men very easily, so they are told to wear the hajab, and to cover there body not with tight stuff, when they start puberty i think, or somewhere close to that. i know some start at 9.
I hope to god your being sarcastic beacuse the entire reason for the hajab is to make women less attractive.
this isnt new news they have been doing this long before. they have been killing civilans even before the war.
At 10/5/05 05:21 PM, Wamzlee wrote:
Whats funny was that I went to an improv show by Second City, and they had a short skit where it had people gathering...cheering "Kill Him Kill Him!" and then the warden comes out and says that the man on death penalty failed to die from 350,000 volts of electricity and is now in a persistant vegetative state. Then the people who were cheering "Kill Him!" are now protesting...saying "Save him! Save Him!"
that is why you cant fry someone who was menal handicaped before they commit the crime but you can fry them if they became mentaly handicaped after the fact. Ain't that america for you
At 10/5/05 02:24 PM, night_watch_man18 wrote:
it's a religion that actually makes a lot of sense. They even use a naturalistic means of explaining the world and existance, so long as there is a belief of Divine Unity. I can dig it.
it is a very well thought out religon and if you do read into it you do understand it more. but putting people under islam law isnt a good idea cause their is a lot of ideas in it that arent good.(women have to wear the things on their heads.)
At 10/5/05 05:52 AM, LoneSnakeX wrote:
Dude 12 different sects? What kinda nonsense is that, there are only 2 (Shi'i and Sunni) and everyone knows that. And by the way in Iran woman already have permission to become lead prayer. A few changes in the rules doesnt make a new sect, I doubt there will ever be a new sect added.
you my friend arent that smart if you even think about posting that. the sunni and sheites are the ones in iraq. there are more!
At 10/4/05 08:30 PM, arabmoe wrote: you do realize bin ladens family isd the most poweerfull country in saudi arabia and could buy all of you without flinching. as long as you realize that wee arabs have much much more money than you americans you should be fine.
now when you say "we" arabs you mean the wealthy high up ones not the ones that are starving to death right.
At 10/4/05 07:31 PM, LoneSnakeX wrote: This is actually a good point you are making here, the USA has spend over 200 billion USD on the war in Iraq alone! Just check out the site below for more info about that USA - costs of war in Iraq
Also there is some kinda conspiracy which you guys might wanna read, LINK
that was a great link but the hitler bush one was good and well thought out, but its just one of those thing that you have to say "come on"
At 10/4/05 06:09 PM, The_Tank wrote:
I think Bin Ladin is an idiot
Whoa stop right there if the fucker is such an idiot then how could he pull off a stunt like 9/11. these people aren't idiots if they could cause so much damage and hysteria.
and don't come at me with some kind of stastical bull shit, they are used to losing lots of lives.
because even when America made an attempt at helping him he shot himself in the foot and turned on us,
First of all we weren't helping bin laden we were helping afganistan, and at the time it was a great idea cause we were still at a cold war with russia.
I think Bin Ladin is an idiot because he was excommunicated from his own country for his extremist acts of violance and was forced to turn to the Taliban to fund his sneaky terror oriented attacks.
Just beacuse he was excommunicated doesnt mean that he isnt a national hero in his country. you know how many people look up to him, how many babies have been named after him. he is like a god to them.
He's been hiding in a huge desert filled with caves, it's not hard to not be found out there, and all he did was convince some fellow terrorists to blow up the world trade center, I could of thought of that.
all he did he defied our securtity system. and we are the idiots for not evacutating the second tower after the first was hit.
At 10/4/05 11:37 AM, PhysicsMafia wrote:
if ppl just didnt take drugs there would be no market for drug dealers, but aslong as ppl keep buyin them there will always be dealers, the majority of dealers dont actually do their own drugs, not the big time one neway.
close down gun makers? that would not solve problems, there are already enough guns in circulation to provide gangs and terrorists with weapons for hundreds of years. and its not guns that kill ppl, its peoples own stupidity, lack of education and lack of respect that results in the loss of life. murder didnt just start once guns were invented, its always been here
aww isnt that cute. living in a soceity where no one does drugs, guns dont exist, and rainbows line the roads paved in gold. well you may be right, but that kind of soceity will never exist ever. drugs will always be here even if all the drugs we have now were wiped off the face of the earth people would still try to get high different ways. and there may be a lot of guns now but we should try to stop making new ones.
At 10/4/05 03:24 PM, The_Tank wrote: Muslims don't like non muslims, and terrorists view non muslims as evil. The last thing that the terrorists wanted was for the Evil outsiders to come and take their Holy Land. So the short answer is no, by taking their holy land and killing and capturing their leaders we are not doing exactly what they wanted.
you have the idea right but the facts all wrong. Not all muslims view other religons as evil and some dont even look down their nose at other religons. The taliban are the ones who impose muslim law on people and dislike other religon like when they took over afganistan and blew up the worlds tallest buhhda. And the thing about the reason they are so mad at us isnt beacuse its their holy land, its beacuse we are just plain invading their land period. I mean you would be pissed if someone came into your country and started fucking with your goverment too.
At 10/3/05 06:39 PM, random8982 wrote: communism was a good idea gone horribly wrong and always gone wrong. a good example of communistic features can be found in the book "Faith of the Fallen" by Terry Goodkind. it sets up a great setting of a city run by communism.
Bravo
america is a very fucked up capitalistic country. the tax cut outs for the rich no free health care. WHAT THE FUCK!
Come on people there has to be a connection. If you attack a major part of the U.S. of economy they have to expect a reaction such one that is as large as the war on terror. and as for the Saddam regime, they had proven evidence of accosiation with the taliban.
ok the terrorists ran into the buildings. that alone demands a response, and it was done. but maybe that what they wanted, not to kill people and that be the end of it but what they wanted is to get us into a war to spend money and kill even more people. they wanted us to get in a war they wanted us to do exactly what we did.
ok think about this your tax dollars are paying for someone who rapes, sells drugs, kills people to live and it costs more to put someone on death row. and it cost $.10 for a bullet.
At 10/1/05 02:11 PM, Jinzoa wrote: i state you said the drug dealer should die for causing his death which in anyway your saying he should not be arrested for dealing the drugs but killed,
ok so what about crack babys. and im done
