566 Forum Posts by "Nitroglys"
Throughout cinematical history there has been monumental movies, such as the jazz singer, the last temptation of crist, (a few spike lee movies) and so on. But i am wondering what do the NG'ers think is the most influental movie in history, or at least in their life, and why.
Doom is the purest of video games. The creators started out just wanting to give a free shareware game(sniffs) its just so beautyful (blow's nose)
I noticed today, right now the flash portal has some very good flashes. i am used to shooting down most of the flashes while maybe 3 get through. I noticed a few days ago the same thing. are flashmakers getting smarter. has any one else noticed this?
Shit man our goverment pisses away 8bill a day. I'm glad to see that were at least sending a day's worth of money the flu's way.
Honestly, does this surprise anyone.
Ask about the Karl Rove Scandal.
I wanna see a link, the main reason they penatlize you for attempted suicide it is for you trying to escape finnacal problems. But ive heard of the laws but never seen anything proving it.
I hear the commets of how the bush adminastration could of planed it, but what would they have to gain?
ya im sure Thailand has a great chance of being the best country.
At 10/30/05 07:21 PM, Agent-Noodles wrote:78% of all statistics are made up on the spotHmmmm?
ha no way. Bob and Tom?
At 10/30/05 07:17 PM, -TheFaces- wrote:At 10/30/05 07:17 PM, Solidsnake503 wrote: I sense 'afterschool teaching sessions' ?
amen
At 10/30/05 04:15 PM, thebigo1081 wrote:
You need to not argue politics with women you're trying to sleep with. Or rather, not take the argument seriously. There's a time and a place for everything.
Why shouldnt i.(and who said im tryin to sleep with her) and it would be sexist of me not to take their argument seriously.
Bad_bit said:
"I think you have the two mixed up. Conservatives/republicans are anti abortion and democrats/liberals are pro-choice. Though it's really more of a spectrum as far as individual beliefs go. I'm a democrat and fairly liberal, but I choose to not have an opinion on abortion. I can understand each side of the argument, but I'm just going to stay out of it. Unfortunately, since there are only two parties, it's kind of a deal where you pick a party and support a whole group of issues without the ability to pick and choose."
you didnt get what i said. The point was that they were conservitive BUT pro-abortion. and so on.
im not tryin to sound conservitive but some people just desirve the chair.
It seems there is hardly a difference between political belifs. Im not talking about the political leaders, but the most the people who call themselves a Republican or a Democrat. I cought myself at a party last night arguing with a very conservitve women about abortion. She was pro-choice but of course only under the circumstances of rape or incest along those lines. And on the other side I talk to "Democrats" that once we get on the subject of abortion their completly against it. Its not just the subject of abortion, other subjects like tax cuts, gun laws, and 9/11 stances. Its hard to call your self Conservitive or Liberal when people have such difference stances.
I dont know what your sayin. Of course were goin broke were like 8 tril in debt. the only thing that we have is our name. we buy everything we need on our word. Unless our gov't find 8 trill on the sidewalk somewhere we will always be on the virge of "broke"
ok there might be a difference in the hourly pay of men and women, but what im sayin is bigger stuff. if women were so equal how come they need half our stuff?
At 10/25/05 09:22 PM, DMXRoid wrote:
IF by "equal rights under communism" you mean "everybody can have no rights under communism", you're dead on.
Communism is a great idea, it eliminates all finacal classes. Could your mind possible comprehend a soceity that has no ghettos, no trailer parks, and no mansions. sure you dont get super rich but imagine all the crime that would be reduced. Communism gets a bad wrap beacuse of leaders that dont have the greater good in mind.
At 10/25/05 06:11 PM, ZhaoYun44 wrote: Equal rights does not, has not and cannot exist. Everyone is biased. Anyway if you think your pay should be based on how much effort you put into your work, your a total Marxist.
there can be equal rights it isnt impossible, the easiest way is by communist rule. communism is a good alternative the only reason that there are no good communist examples is that the leader is usally at fault. What im saying is that if women want to get the goods they have to take the bads.
If women want equal rights then they should take the good with the bad. If we have a draft they should be right in line with us men. when divorces are settled there should be no cutting in-half all the stuff, and when women that go for the movie stars and they need a ceartin amount of money to "live the lifestyle" they shouldn't get it. I just dont understand why women need handicaps on ceartin aspects of life, and if they want to keep them then they should go back to making .75 on every dollar we make.
At 10/14/05 08:23 PM, TimeFrame wrote:
it may be what most people would do but it is illegal dumbass.But no one's going to get arrested for it.
ya they would if someone else saw it, or better yet had it caught on camera. someone would bring them to justice.
if cops show behavior like this no one is going to like em. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW FOR THEM TO ACT THE WAY THEY DID.Reminds me of the thread about the lady with the "meet the fuckers" shirt who was thrown off the plane. It was entirely legal for them to do so, yet you defended her anyway.
when i was defending her i was fighting how the airlines were so bad on controlling the situation and it may have been her fault for not covering it up, but people should still shouldnt take shit like that to heart. Now in this case im on the right side, a man who was resiting arrest was subdued using illegal procedures. I am defending a person who should of been taken into control using proper police procedures, the cops could of used pepper spray they could of simply stuck a thumb in the preasure point on the back of the neck/ shoulder region. But they didnt and they should be procecuted and found guilty for their wrongful actions.
At 10/14/05 08:11 PM, Nitroglys wrote:bull shit if it happend to a white guy it would be in the supreme court.No, everyone would just ignore it.
Why would they ignore it?
no but the fact is they didnt use pepper spray they hit him in the face. even in the police training they say to hit them in the back of the neck to shoulder region, not the face.The cop was hitting him IN THE BACK OF THE NECK (the beginning part of vid).
Ya right watch it again you see the guy's HEAD bouncing back and forth against a wall with a fist to the back of the head.
At 10/14/05 08:05 PM, TimeFrame wrote:
(ok one last post this half hour)
if your on the ground, hand cuffed, and still getting beat it doesnt matter if you killed the presiden if your in that situation the cops have NO right to continually beat him.That's quite a gigantic leap. If someone kills anyone, then anyone should continuously beat the shit out him.
it may be what most people would do but it is illegal dumbass.
I swear, it's like people only go against the cops because they hate the cops themselves.
Damn protestors.
if cops show behavior like this no one is going to like em. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW FOR THEM TO ACT THE WAY THEY DID.
At 10/14/05 07:05 PM, TimeFrame wrote:
Because, if this were to happen to a white guy, no one would be complaining.
bull shit if it happend to a white guy it would be in the supreme court.
And it just looked like to me that he had his arm around his neck and that the other had the guy's leg was because they were trying to keep him down. Would any of you be bitching if they had used pepper spray instead of hitting him?
no but the fact is they didnt use pepper spray they hit him in the face. even in the police training they say to hit them in the back of the neck to shoulder region, not the face.
At 10/14/05 04:25 AM, FAB0L0US wrote: Seriously, am I the only one who finds it odd the guy with bum fights in his sig pic is complaining about overdone violence?
I mean, hell, bud. You support bum fights but get a little mad when a 65 year old is beaten (like some of those bums arent) but bums getting their ass bet for enjoyment is ok?
give it up man. its just a fuckin sig. look at yours obseasing over something as stupid as a comment.
At 10/13/05 11:31 PM, TimeFrame wrote: Mistakes like Rodney King; speeding from the cops, nearly running people over, wont cooperate even after being shocked because he's on pcp...yeah, blame the police and not the black guy...cause he's black.
if your on the ground, hand cuffed, and still getting beat it doesnt matter if you killed the presiden if your in that situation the cops have NO right to continually beat him. god thinking im playing the race card.
At 10/13/05 10:52 PM, TimeFrame wrote:At 10/13/05 10:49 PM, Nitroglys wrote:No cop just walks up and beats the hell out of people.
they dont if their following proceder, but then there is the cops in Rodney King and in many other videos. their human they can make mistakes. mistakes like punching a 65yr old man in the face multiple times.
they then got more cops to beat the 65 yr old man and bring him to the ground where they continued to punch and kick him.for continuously resisting.
Maybe the people should GET OUT OF THE FUCKING WAY WHEN THEY'RE TRYING TO MAKE AN ARREST!
Did you even watch the video? the guy wasnt in the way.
At 10/13/05 10:43 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:
So says the dumbass with bum fights as his sig pic.
Jesus, you are an idiot.
And new Rodney King? Hell no. They bit the crap out of King. This guy got a violent enough arrest but nowhere NEAR Rodney King.
i may be jumping to conclusions but the asshole for siding with the cops. this guy in the begining wasnt even resisting arest he was talking to the cop(probably some curse words) and then another cop came up and beat him in the head. they then got more cops to beat the 65 yr old man and bring him to the ground where they continued to punch and kick him. not only this but you can see how on edge and obviosly pissed the cops are by seeing how a fat cop grabed a press guy and pressed him onto a car hood(thats assult). it may not be as bad but it is still assult.(dumbass)
At 10/13/05 10:40 PM, TimeFrame wrote:
Anyway, maybe if the guy would just cooperate, they wouldnt have to use that kind of force.
im gunna ignore the other quote about Rodney, beacuse police officers still shouldnt hit him after he is handcuffed. but any way the guy in the video was 65 and if you see the first part he wasnt resisting very much. but he is being punched and kicked in the head after the guy is on the ground.
At 10/13/05 10:32 PM, Nitroglys wrote: http://www.cnn.com/video/
Im ready to riot.
im sorry go to the NOPD police beating video
Have a topic, but you dont wanna post. post i here and discuss.
