Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

First option. Remember that you are no more deserving than the other guy. Heck, just find another girlfriend and spare yourself some stress.

There's your reason. It's always used in racist content. Would it really kill you to use another word? Really?

At 7/22/10 01:10 AM, Blaze-Heatnix wrote: You wake up to find that nobody can see, hear, or touch you. You can't be perceived by human senses. You're incapable of being realized or defined.

What do you do? Stalk people? Fap in public? Fuck with inanimate objects in front of people so they'll think you're a poltergeist?

No sex... No beer... No video games... No food...
IMA KILL MAHSELF

I know, serious gamers like you might hate the Wii. However, it did open up gaming to a lot of people (i.e. women, younger people, older people).
Now some gamers think that they shouldn't be gaming, but wouldn't be unfair to let only gamers game? Everyone should be able to join it, whether they are good or bad. What do you think? Discuss.

Watchmen. It wasn't good weird, it was sucky weird.

At 7/22/10 12:08 AM, Liquify wrote:

At 7/21/10 01:09 PM, NinjaLlama15 wrote: The real golden age of gaming was the late 90's. There was:
Tomb Raider
Crash Bandicoot
Super Mario 64
GoldenEye007
Half-Life (this was back when shooters were still good)
Legend of Zelda: Ocinaria of Time (highest-rated game ever)
Starcraft
The Pokemon Series (those used to be good too)

Sorry for the double post, but you are a tad misled.

The entire decade of the 90s were the golden age of gaming.

You have named several excellent games and a few that are and aren't my faves. Now, let's incorporate the early 90s to...

Mortal Kombat
Chrono Trigger
Final Fantasy 6
Super Mario Bros 3
the list goes on

Sure the late 90s had the best game of all time in my opinion, but you know damn well that if you compare early 90s to late 90s... early 90s wins overall.

You forgot Civilization, Doom, and Myst, possibly 3 of the best computer games to ever exist. After 2000, the games just didn't have enough appeal. The focus was on graphics rather than quality. Companies saw successful games and pretty much duplicated them. Games started to divide: The easy games got easier and the hard games got harder. That trend worsened in the late 2000's. On one side, you have the Wii, which has mostly low-budget, hyped games for a new audience, and focuses on profit rather than fan appeal like it used to. On the other side, you have the Xbox 360 and PS3, which rely on third-party games (they don't have the same appeal) which are violent, too long, and dark, which is completely different from what games used to be: fun.
However, I will say that the quality of games is improving. We just need better storylines and ideas.

At 7/21/10 09:49 PM, puddinN64 wrote: Link

Bad pun.

At 7/21/10 08:28 PM, thenewbies wrote:

At 7/21/10 06:12 PM, Oolaph wrote: All your base are belong to us?

Uuhhhh, Zelda?

Zero Hour, I think.
Buy Somethin' Will Ya!

At 7/21/10 07:00 PM, pacmanlover wrote:

In their future, they are going to get nostalgic about Halo instead of agmes the should be getting nostalgic about.

Just be happy we lived during the golden years of gaming

I was around 2 then...
But the sad fact is, most kids will remember Addicting Games. I don't know why they even like that site, they just do.

Every boss in New Super Mario Brothers DS and Wii.

ROYAL RAINBOW!
Extra points for figuring out that last one.

At 7/21/10 06:05 PM, joshylikes2smash wrote: I'm so clever.

I KISSED A VEGGIE AND I LIKED IT

Um, pears are fruits...

This is a thread where you can post inside jokes from video game, particularly, quotes or lines (do a barrel roll!) and then others can guess which game that came from.

The series rocked...
And the movie came...
And now I hate all of it.

I'm hoping Civ 5 won't be too overhyped.

It's not that big of a city, but anyone ever been to Albuquerque?

Couldn't find one so I'm making one.

Someone should make Chris Rock or George Bush.

Phoenix (visited 2009): Hot as hell. Don't go there in the summer.
Chicago(visited 2004): Awesome food, awesome architecture, awesome features. But the Cubs suck.
San Antonio(visited 2006): Pretty cool, actually.
San Diego(visited 2007): Great beaches and attractions. Great place to visit, horrible place to live in.
San Francisco(visited 2005): Lots of history, great seafood.
Paris(visited 2009): Awesome, you have to go there in your life. But it's like San Diego: Great to visit, horrible to live in.
London(visited 2009): Great to live in and has lots of culture, just not as cool as Paris. The food isn't that great, though.
I'm visiting New York next year.

Not overrated, overhyped. There's a difference. Overhyped games had frequent advertising, high hopes, and much anticipation, but when they came out, they turned out to suck. The only examples of these that I can think of are Wii Music and Spore.

Is anybody going to make one for Bill Gates or Tom Cruise?

At 7/21/10 01:13 PM, Robotchk12 wrote:

At 7/21/10 01:09 PM, NinjaLlama15 wrote: Half-Life (this was back when shooters were still good)

So all shooter suck now, eh?

Well, no, they just all repeat themselves and they are way overhyped. They're like the only must-buy games out there.

Come to think of it, computer games are dying in general. They went downhill after 2000.

It should be called Super Smash Bros: Showdown or Super Smash Bros: Conflict.

Wii games would actually be perfect in 3D. Think Super Mario Galaxies 1 and 2.

SimCity 4 was great, but left much room to improve. Six years later, and no SimCity 5. Is another great computer game series going to die? If you have any ideas for a SimCity 5, please post below.

The real golden age of gaming was the late 90's. There was:
Tomb Raider
Crash Bandicoot
Super Mario 64
GoldenEye007
Half-Life (this was back when shooters were still good)
Legend of Zelda: Ocinaria of Time (highest-rated game ever)
Starcraft
The Pokemon Series (those used to be good too)

Yeah, the sad thing about these shooters is that they're all the same and too violent. Kids think that the more violent the game they play, the cooler they are. Games aren't games anymore, they're status symbols.

Actually, saying that Super Smash Bros. isn't a fighting game is correct, because it isn't.

First of all, that line sounded really stupid.
Second of all, it is a fighting game BECAUSE YOU FREAKING FIGHT. If you're an Xbox-obsessed gamer who needs to see blood in their games, then you have no business talking about Nintendo.

They need Bowser Jr., Diddy Kong, and Mewtwo. I don't know any other characters to add, but here are some to get rid of:
Sonic
Solid Snake
Luke
Marth