Be a Supporter!
Response to: The french Posted June 5th, 2003 in Politics

The French don't like us though. But they also don't like Iraq. The only reason the French didn't support us in the war was because they have contracts with Iraq. Iraq owes them about 40 billion dollars in debt plus all of the contracts in oil they have together. It was all about the bottom line. But thanks to american propaganda you never hear about that.

Response to: Do you trust the government? Posted February 7th, 2003 in Politics

people must understand what their gov. is doing and limit their power accordinly

Response to: Death penalty Posted February 7th, 2003 in Politics

the death sentence goes back to an eye for an eye. it doesn't stop people from murdering others justs gives them a place to go after doing it.

Death penalty

Response to: PICK IRAQS D-DAY Posted February 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 1/14/03 09:31 PM, nathan1313us wrote: feb 12

i would like to change to march 4-7 based on the fact that their is a new moon and it would be the best time to invade. we invaded iraq in 1991 under a new moon and we will do it again

Response to: Why not search the USA? Posted February 7th, 2003 in Politics

its because we won the gulf war you dumb fuck. one of the terms we enforced upon the people of iraq is the fact that they now have to let the u.n. search anywhere they want.

Response to: affirmative action good or bad? Posted February 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 2/6/03 02:47 AM, Spike_J_Wolfwood wrote: Sometimes, eventhough minorities have the qualifications they are still not hired, because of the way they dress or their unique ability to express them selves.

this is one aspect of affirmative action but another example is that a minority that cannot express themselves will be hired over a white male that can just based on their race.

Response to: tollerance Posted February 6th, 2003 in Politics

forced tollerance is a way of control by your government. lash out and don't let them tell you how to think.

Response to: 02/06: Hate Crime laws include Gays Posted February 6th, 2003 in Politics

this is another example of the government butting in to an area of society that does not have a problem. people can work out the problem of homosexuality just as they can work out the problem of race. if the gov. doesn't drop its ways of forceing tolerance then we will all fear eachother. fear leads to anger and anger leads to hate. this is not a new subject. the only way to stop hate crimes to ignore them. now this may seem like a bad idea at first but after a while society will realize their flaws and work together to find a cure. this is a remarkable thing individuals do while influenced by society. they work together to find a norm that they all can agree with. now if our gov. can do this we would all be fine.

Response to: Life after DEATH? Posted February 5th, 2003 in Politics

i agree its a waste of time. if we devoted the money that went to the church to finding a cure for cancer there would be alot of people alive today that would be dead otherwise.

Response to: War=Bad Posted February 5th, 2003 in Politics

At 2/5/03 10:30 AM, Killathon88 wrote: yes i beleive that iraq is dangerous to the world they have biological weapons and they will attack given then chance we need to take thme out asap

if iraq uses chemical or biological weapons againsts the united states or any of its allies george bush will not hesitate to use a nuke or two. he will do this not only in retaliation but to send a message. if you want to fuck with the U.S. the U.S. will fuck you up. do you think any other country will try to bullshit with us again? i dont. we should nuke iraq and piss on their ashes

Response to: affirmative action good or bad? Posted February 4th, 2003 in Politics

i belive that if all laws based on race were elimintated their would be murder and discrimination but people can work out their differences if they try. over time people would learn to respect each other and see each other as true equal. people in our time will never see it but it will happen. whats stopping the process is that the government keeps making laws that have to do with race. people will never work out racial tensions for themselves if its being shoved in their face by the government all the time. the only way to fix this is to get rid of the laws regarding race. yes people will die and yes people will discriminate but arn't these laws just delaying the inevitable.

Response to: what would happen if... Posted February 4th, 2003 in Politics

it wouldn't matter because he is just a puppet to his cabinet.

Response to: Is Osama wrong? Posted February 4th, 2003 in Politics

he is wrong and a terrorist. when ppl want change they ask the leader of the country first. then you terrorize. i never saw osama asking for us to talk about the problems he has with us. he just went out and did it.

Response to: War=Bad Posted February 4th, 2003 in Politics

At 2/4/03 02:40 PM, Slizor wrote: Anyone who thinks war is good does not value the worth of sentient life. Much like people who are for capital punishment.

yeah lets just run around putting flowers in gun barrels until we get our head shot off. its a good idea in theory but you better make sure that the people who used to be your allies agree with your theory; if not then your dead. its better to react then delay. and in this situation a reaction with war is the only way to fix this problem. we have talked to saddam for 12 years trying to save you sentient life but its not going to happen.

Response to: War=Bad Posted February 4th, 2003 in Politics

it wont help the economy but i just belive that their sick of saddams crap. hes been jerking around the us and england and it needs to stop. people are just waiting for another 9/11. if they wait long enough it will happen. bush and blair are trying to stop another 9/11 from happening. i cant believe that the people of america dont support them. i can see why russia and france are against it. they both hate the us and england. its going to be america and england vs iraq and iraq is going to get smoked.

Response to: Legalizing Pot? Posted February 3rd, 2003 in Politics

good theory bad idea. people would over react and all we would here on the news for two years would be what a bad idea legalizing pot is even though the people who clame that it should be banned have never even smoked it. what it comes down to is that pot is a change in peoples lives. and in america as in the world change=bad. people fear change and an unknown one at that. you cant describe how a person feels while high so people fear it. they don't know what is going to happen thus rather than take a chance and try it they instantly want it banned. yes it will be legalized but not in the near future. people have to get used to the idea. the way canada is approching the issue is about the best way i think that it can be done. let people get used to the idea for 10 years before they intirely legalize it.

Response to: if you were a dictator Posted February 3rd, 2003 in Politics

I would take all of the countries around me and make a modern day empire.

affirmative action good or bad? Posted February 3rd, 2003 in Politics

do you belive that affirmative action should be done away with due to its reverse discrimination?

Response to: Suicide Posted January 31st, 2003 in Politics

people motivate themselves. individuals in society want to be on top. if that means having the coolest suv at the soccer field or having the best grades in the class. these power hungry people go on to take on jobs of some importance and some even take jobs in the school system. these people they decide what the standards should be. they think that because they could achive a high grade that school for them was easy. thus they need to increase the requirements. if you are a loved one of these "i gotta be the best" type of people urge them to get help. they have a problem. they desire the unreachable and they put themselves at risk.

Response to: Child Porn Posted January 25th, 2003 in Politics

i think its wrong but its just like a cop acting like a drug dealer in a bust or a fake prostitute. the gov. has trampled the constitutional protected rites we all have tried to achive.

Response to: Should Humans Be Cloned Posted January 25th, 2003 in Politics

with cloning we could make a super race of individuals that the common civilians could use as slaves. also we could clone an army. we could use them as a distraction for the real army made of civilians or just have an all clone army. we could use them to storm a beach or a machine gun nest. it would save thounsands of inocent civilian lives.

Response to: is euthanasia moraly acceptable Posted January 22nd, 2003 in Politics

morally*

is euthanasia moraly acceptable Posted January 22nd, 2003 in Politics

do you belive that human euthanasia is moraly acceptable in society today.
ie assisted suicide.

Response to: video games Posted January 22nd, 2003 in Politics

yes there should be an age requirement on games just like on porn and beer. children are easily courruptible and need to be protected. i dont agree with a ban against children buying games that have a mature rating i just think a parent should be there at the time of sale. this kind of censorship is being used at such stores as toysrus and works well to keep a moral high ground for the store while being able to still carries the mature and adult rated games.

Response to: Affirmitive action: Good or Bad? Posted January 17th, 2003 in Politics

affirmitive action is a one way street. if a business only hires minorites then arn't they discriminating then also. affirmitive acition is a racist idea and should be done away with. people as a society can solve their problems without having to be forced into it by the federal government.

Response to: do you like what you are? Posted January 16th, 2003 in Politics

i hate america not because of the people but the gov. the gov. is so screwed up that all they can do rite is attack other countries. they do this to divert from their real problems

Response to: violence among youth Posted January 16th, 2003 in Politics

kids dont go around killing people randomly on the street due to some game. they do it because they have a serious mental condition. video game are not the problem. they infact delay what the mislead youth is about to do. if he can kill in a game he most likely wont kill outside of the game. he can vent his frustration on this piece of inate plactic than go rite ahead but when politicians go on these anti game sprees they convince the mothers of america to take away their childs games in order to protect them from the big bad world. this goes all the way back to 9/11. people trading their freedom for safty. they believe that if they stop little timmy from playing with fake guns as a child he wont do it as an adult. unless of cource he joins the army. then every value we taught him as youth will be destroyed. but back to the subject if timmy doesn't get his games then he gets to sit in his room and think about all the bad people in the room. you know the priest that rapped timmy and the teacher that failed him. but what timmy is relly thinking about is his game and how he cant play it. then timmy makes the connection that he can kill two birds with one stone. he can "play" his game in the real world but he is faced with a choice. does he play it with his priest or with his teacher. well after a few more days without his favorite game timmy decides that the teacher will be getting it and he will blame his anger on the priest rapping him. then he has to decide what weapon to use. he will steal his dads gun when his mommy is with the neighbor man getting "serviced" as she puts it while daddy is drunk and passed out on the couch. he does this and in the morning thers 3 dead studens and a teacher while a priest is getting hauled off in cuffs.

and whose fault is this why the video games. its not the rapping priest or the drunk dad. its not the never around mom. no its the video games. people jump to conclusions to fast.

Response to: Do schools take away freedoms? Posted January 16th, 2003 in Politics

they don't realise that we have rights
on monday the supream court threw out a case dealing with colombine. students wanted to put up writings on the wall to remember what happened. 50 of the sayings were rejected. parents were so outraged that the fought the thing to the spream court. the supream cout did not hear the case because student dont have constitutional rites. thus making us slaves to the dictator that the school is. people have to realize that we do have rites and were not going to sit by and watch them go out the window

Response to: Anyone Really Our Ally??? Posted January 15th, 2003 in Politics

countrys are friends with the us when it benifits them i cant think of one true ally of the united states

Response to: us=socialism Posted January 15th, 2003 in Politics

dont post that porn shes not real