2,905 Forum Posts by "naronic"
At 1/1/11 03:21 PM, SpiderTaco wrote:
Or if i'm playing hostage rescue then I just quit the game because they fucking suck.
why?
I just want to know personally I don't find hostage rescue as fun as disarm the bomb
COMPLETED ON VETERAN
this game had the best ending ever, even rivaling half life 2...
gameplay so awesomely weaved into story-telling cod take notes.
So anyway I thought the campaign would be longer but Bungie really outdid themselves
best game of 2010
For me the first pistol round = Deagle/ or on hostage rescue maps i get the USP and silence it
especially on assult
If I rake in the money i always go for the M4 or the AUG or SG552 with multiple flashbangs (not smokes GOD no I'd lag too bad)
If I die on the pistol round I almost always end up buying the TMP or the P90 for those scrimmages where I need fire power and usually stick close with my team.
or let them get eliminated or win
At 12/31/10 06:55 PM, ThadsPark wrote: Your resolution should be to make better threads on the BBS.
a resolution is something you have to do
not something you already have done...
mine is half life 2
taking physics engine out of the realm of eyecandy and weaving it into gameplay in such a suttle way
welp were of a rare kind on this forum
the endangered species of people over 15 years of age
UPDATE
almost through the pillar of autumn
Generic, greyish brown fps built to juice money from to call of duty fans
at least the new one, Idk about it's predecessors
At 12/30/10 02:05 PM, Jackho wrote:At 12/30/10 12:02 PM, naronic wrote: Cod's multiplayer just seemed like a dumbed down counter strike IMOYeah, especially since CoD has more features than CS.
Doesn't matter cs is still more competitve
At 12/30/10 10:52 AM, H-A-X-O-R-Z wrote: Yes I know the industry needs more innovative games, however, I would also like to argue that games such as CoD, Bad Company and Gears of War all were innovative when the first game came out, CoD has made the most enjoyable multiplayer since co-op games came put,
I never found Cod's multiplayer enjoyable, or even engaging.
It just seemed like a dumbed down counter strike IMO
Battlefield added massive maps and vehicles in a very realistic fashion
Vehicles and massive maps have been a longstanding trait in fps multiplayer since tribes and halo CE
Plus modifying it to be realistic isn't really that innovative as much as additive.
and Gears of War caused a huge uprising in cover based shooters.
This I do agree with
but THERE ARE TOO MANY NOW
Every new fps game needs to have cover based shooting now and its getting worn out.
You seem to e blind to the fact that if any of these innovative games became mainstream series they would get the same press you are giving previously innovative games now.
What I'm saying is we need to KEEP INNOVATING
We can't simply ducktape the same 2-3 formulas to everysingle game that comes out.
games don't evolve that way, they just get repetitive.
At 12/30/10 11:27 AM, RDSchley wrote: No innovation? Casual is a direction in gameplay and has nothing to do with innovation.
Innovation is like teh Wii motion control or Online play or DLC (oh i hate you so)
No, I ddin't read past, like, the second paragraph because your comparing apples and oranges.
maybe if you read further, instead of speed posting
you'd get a feel for what I'm saying
At 12/29/10 04:08 PM, Samen wrote:
This is also the first Halo game I've ever owned.
^you just answered your own question
It seems that I've been spending half my last 2 years of mainstream gaming hiding behind mounds of grey-scale rubble waiting for red cough syrup to wash off my face and the other half playing hackened narritively linear rpg/"adventure" games then I have been eating.
It was only yesterday, that I managed to break free of the shackles and take a look at a volume of gaming where intresting things are happening. Games that you can shoot birds at obsticles, games that you can draw objets to get you around your world, games that you can practically paint, build, rocket your way through the levels on your own accord. Groundbreaking vessles that are stuck sitting in the casual lobby of wii and portible consoles just trying to get admission tickets onto the mainstream express, are tossed away for the same tired formula's that sell to NJROTC James Bond enthusiests.
It seems that we have allianed innovation and creativity with casual and kiddish, something I don't like to think that's happened but no matter how much I imagine the situation different I can't shake the truth. And fps games are getting the glut of the new world order.
Serously, I can count the number of intresting mainstream shooter/first person games that have came out since 2007 on one hand, (ex: mirror's edge, fallout, bioshock, left 4 dead, portal, possibly reach) can't count the number of uninspired failed Call of Duty/Gears of War/ and yes, Fallout abortions on all my fingers and toes combined, (right off the top of my head Army of two, Mag, Bulletstorm, Singularity, Killzone, Kane and Lynch, Ghost recon, bad company 2/ medal of honor, serously Dice). I won't beat a dead horse on this one.
The 2 most mainstream adventure games are completely overrated and generic.
Uncharted 2 bieng a catacomb of weak cutscene driven farce that I wasted my money on and assassin's creed 2 being more toothless and unchallenging than a cavity addled whale.
Although Infamous really broke the ice, we really don't have enough of those kind of games in mainstream media circles. Games that break the ice seem to only be found in a casual light.
Serously I've been more impressed with Epic Mickey and varous Iphone games than any of the HD multiplayer driven simplistic, conformist vessles that have came out last year. It's kind of sad because since these casual games aren't neccessarily mainstream or popular not a lot of effort is pumped into creating them. There just time-waisters, never to see thier true potential.
Heck, they're even branching out in the gaming universe as thier own casualistic subcategory while the "hard-core" or at least percieved hardcore games continue to get more and more generic every release. Jesus how many times can we trudge the same land before it gives way? I'm litterally hoping for an avalanche or a land slide so gaming is FORCED to take new paths. Maybe we'll see developeres creative juices pumping agian when the next dimention jump occurs.
Until then...
At 12/30/10 01:26 AM, Samen wrote: My vote goes to Half Life 3.
^If only...
i'm suprized nobody mentioned or even hinted castlevania
THAT GAME WILL MAKE YOU RAGE QUIT ON FIRST CONTACT.
HALF LIFE 2
the op is 12
At 12/28/10 09:32 PM, Alexman159 wrote: i did that a while ago. It was really rewarding since i did it solo and hadnt finished the campaign on heroic before it gave me like 350 GS at once.
I just started playing on normal to get a feel for the game
and then just switched to LEGENDARY
AND ITS A BEOTCH
died about 10+ times in the last level from getting blown up
current level
NEW ALEXANDRIA
last level gave me heck
i have half the campaign completed on veteran
The game's difficulty curve is unusual
Extremely hard at the beggining
becomes narritive and looses its edgyness until half way through it suddenly becomes hard agian
At 12/28/10 03:22 PM, naronic wrote: Completing it on legendary with muliple skulls... NOW!
SCREW MY IMPULSIVE POSTING.
Completing it on veteran with muliple skulls... NOW
At 12/6/10 11:05 PM, Grubby wrote:At 12/6/10 10:55 PM, Liquify wrote: Quick question while on the little mini topic of black ops.Well that's basically all the Call of Dutys, but that doesn't stop it from appealing to millions of gamers.
Is the game turning into an unbalanced one gun whore fest, with boosters, campers, and overall unbalanced annoyingness?
millions of gamers in 2nd world countries whose only access to the gaming market is through IGN
2 words
spray-sniping.
Loweres the skill requirement and is always present in the call of duty games.
I think we have a verdict.
Halo reach campaign on veteran with more than 4 skulls activated
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6_PSJJFq mk&feature=related
more like aeroshock
At 12/26/10 09:15 PM, DukenukemALT wrote: Is looking great.
game based movies
and movie based games all have one thing in common
they always suck by law
At 12/24/10 08:53 PM, Conal wrote:At 12/24/10 08:36 PM, naronic wrote: ^if anyone can tell me how to do this that would be EXTREMEMY HELPFULLets find out, also.
oh thank you
your my savior
OH WAI-
I CAN'T BOOT UP MY COMPUTER!
You can actually take files from your HDD without being logged in. So long as you've got power going to the motherboard.
^if anyone can tell me how to do this that would be EXTREMEMY HELPFUL
