At 11/28/03 04:03 PM, Shrapnel wrote:
I disagree.
Canada made important contributions during both of the World Wars.
You didn't quite understand me I don't think. I didn't say we were unimportant in the wars -- quite the contrary, I agree with you that we were important in many wars. What I meant was that we don't find glory in war, or boast about wars we've been in as much. When we participated in wars, it was because we felt we were obligated to. I guess to explain my point, I should offer the following comparison: America tends to fight for freedom, something obviously developed from their history. Canada tends to fight because there are no other acceptable options. Of course, acceptable is an arguable point here, but that's the best I can explain it.
The lack of identity is more due to the fact that we don't have a lot of history.
We haven't been around for as long as other nations in the world. We're a very young country.
Keep in mind that America's history is about the same length. They were officially a country before Canada, but both countries developed at the same time. I think Canadians are just less forward about our history in war. We don't flaunt it or glorify it -- similar to my argument above that we fight when we feel we must, as opposed to America fighting to promote a cause.
In short, my point is that we do have an identity. Our identity is, however, forged differently from America's. America forwards its causes often through war in their history, while Canada attempts to do so diplomatically in most (but certainly not all -- consider the Metis rebellion which was put down) situations. Diplomacy has a less obvious historical impact than war, and therefore a less obvious, but equally solid identity is formed. As for most other countries, it's natural that they would have more history than us, and I don't think that reflects on our national pride or identity.