At 11/8/03 10:21 PM, tpm wrote: cool flash work, i liked the hermander as peewee kicks ass. it was done well. so you got activated? where are you? i'm on active duty at fort bragg, nc. lots of reservists put up in hotels around here for months on end. hope u don't go to iraq, i have some friends over there. i just got back from afghanistan/uzbekistan and they are already talking about iraq :(. good luck man!

i'm at carswell naval/air base in FTt. Worth, i'm almost done with my year, but some people are talking about activating a few of us in my unit for iraq, i doubt it's gonna be since i ets in about 4 months though.

i actually am beginning work on the next celebemon, the "celebemon war on terror" which will have "osama dig laden" and his "dugqueda terrorists" (pokemon's diglits)

bushasaur vs french president Jacques Chirac

and saddam and his sons

and you'll get to be a dugqueda terrorist in training camp

it sounds promising, i just need some time to make the damned thing! as well as countless cartoons and other games i want to make, but time is not on my side at the moment.

oh well, keep a look out in the next couple months i may have some new stuff.

it's been a long time since i've had any free time to work on flash games (the army eats up all my free time), but i've finally finished Celebémon Tournament #2. now you have characters like jiggly christ and mew T to torture. as well as new evolutions and attacks. with any luck i'll get off of active duty and not go to iraq and you'll get even more fun* games.

*[by fun i mean offensive, immoral, degrading, and violent]

At 9/14/03 02:50 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Schroeder is my God.....

I'm a pretty blatant fascist, but in what I consider to be a good way. I believe that people are happiest when they take care of their own problems, as opposed to having their problems solved for them like retards and invalids. I believe that strength and simplicity are virtues. I also believe that some people are flawed (ex pedophiles) and need to be eliminated in order to benefit the population. I believe that some cultures are flawed, and must be reeducated. I believe a world dictatorship is the best government, because it is simple, efficient, and strong. I believe in a flat tax, and laissez faire. I believe in rewarding efficiency and punishing wastefullness. I'm a pragmatic. I don't believe in sticking to ideals if they aren't utilitarian.

I think you get the point......

you know our United States constitution allows for just that type of society, but without the dictator and oppression. the Libertarian Party www.lp.org wants a society free from the burdon of the lazy welfare culture. they want equal taxation for all citizens so those who are born lucky or are more productive don't get punished. they want a country that doesn't punish people for committing "victimless crimes" drug use, prostitution, sodomy, etc; because these are crimes against a person's beleifs and not against any persons! they want to promote responsibility with gun use rather than gun bans. they want politicians to be held accountable for their actions and they want the feds / state to be held up to the same standards that it holds corporations to (ie: pollution regulation, proper management of money and time). they want a country that encourages freedom of all religions and promotes no single one over all others. they want censorship to be erradicated. they want social security and healthcare to be privatized and controlled by those who depend on them, the citizens. they want schools to be privatized so that government waste does not decay the education of our children and they can be held accountable for their failures. they want america to fight just and honorable wars rather than being the world's police force. they want federal governemnt to stay our of social issues than focus on it's 2 purposes (regulation of trade & the defense of the Union). they want a country that doesn't require it's citizens to pledge alliegence, but rather want a country where it's citizens are proud to be Americans.

...and this is the country i want too...

At 7/18/03 03:33 AM, Shadydragun wrote: We're human. Nobody deserves to die for anything. I say nay on the death P. Lock them up for life. Torture them in jail, (torture them?) they still deserve to have a life unless he agrees that he should not live it anymore.

so you think torture is preferable to a simple death? we are not heathens, we are trying to create a civil society (even if it is an impossible task, we still TRY) and torture is just wrong.

there is no REAL right to life, life is fragile and those who do not respect it do not deserve it! the people who were killed had no right to life, so why should the murderers?

also 2 wrongs don't make a right, but how is revenge wrong? if a person breaks into my house and kills a family menber they'll find his body riddled wioth bullets on my living room floor! revenge by the state is still revenge and society requires a payment in blood for these atrocities!

even if the methods by which we convict suspects is inneficient, it doesn't make the death penalty any more wrong! it only makes the justice system wrong. don't toos out a good punishment, toss out the imperfect legal system and there will be no conflict anymore!

well if the rules aren't being enforced then the problem is not the rules it's those in charge of enforcing them, which means that if you fix this one problem, you no longer need a new scholl, because now you have a safer enviroment.

just because the peopel who get elected don't exactly represent your views, everyone is different, but you elect the one who has the closest views to your own.

as for the the whole christian thing, you equate politics with religion way too easily. i'm concervative, but being concervative doesn't have anything to do with religion; it just happens that many concervatives are christians.

and how many government funded christian missionaries were sent in to convert the muslims? i think you just are a bush hater and nothing he does will please you! maybe you should go and help fight off the americans from our oppressive assault that has relieved iraq from a tyrant. i mean, those poor iraqis, what will they do now that they have a chance to govern themselves in a fair political system?

At 8/4/03 12:17 PM, pillz wrote: bush is basically a cowboy who started the war wiv IRAQ for two reosons:
1) the oil, he dont give a crap about the lives of millions of innocent people dying.

2)he wants to prove to his daddy that his a big boy

number (1) : this is actually about oil! iraq attacked kuwait in 1990 in order to take its oil to fund it's war with iran (in which it uswed chemical weapons to slaughter thousands of military and civilians). we are in this war because iraq can't be trusted and even after we liberated kuwait and smashed the iraqi army, saddam still failed to comply with weapon bans imposed by the UN (which were created to protect the middle east from a rouge state).

number (2) : this makes no sense, why would anyone fight a war because their father was also involved in the same war? it just so happens that another bush came to power 8 years after that pussy clinton (who ignored the fact that saddam spat on the UN's resolutions for weapon bans! clinton had 8 years to go into iraq, but it took until he was gone for anyone to actually care about honor and respect for the USA and UN!

At 8/4/03 01:19 PM, RoyBatty wrote:
The government on the other hand has a duty to it's people. All of them, no matter how small or poor. And as such, it's the government's job to look out for those people, and use whatever assets it needs to take to do so. There are plenty of ways we can redirect money to more humanitarian efforts. NPOs pick up the areas the government can't hit, but we have unsubstantial power compared to the massive amounts that can be acquired by redistribution of wealth. Something the NPOs have very limited ability to do.

the government have a duty to regulate trade, war, and justice; not to provide food and money to those who can't support themselves. this is a capitalist nation, not socialist, don't toss around "redistribution of wealth," that's simply theft from the productive in order to pay for the unproductive. what ever happened to survival of the fittest? if you don't want people to die in the streets, then give them YOUR paycheck, not mine!

non of your arguements actually talk about the enviroment, they are mainly about concervation of resources and cleanliness.

sure it's a great idea to not toss trash out the window of your car, but it doesn't harm the eniviroment to any measurable degree, it just makes your city look like shit.

if a person wishes to drive an suv in the city then more power to him, the emmissions are negligable and really cause little harm to the enviroment, beyond annoying smog in the city. actually SUVs are our ticket to clean and efficient fuels and motors, because the faster they burn off the gasoline, the faster we run out and now alternative fuels can make way in the market.

At 8/2/03 06:28 PM, iAmVincent2 wrote:

At 7/31/03 01:15 AM, simply_forgotten wrote: Democrat is just a nice name for a Liberal.

conservative is just a nice name for republican

negative!

liberal and concervative are beliefs on how the nation should be run, republican and democrat are parties made up of representatives and platforms. the platforms may become more concervative, liberal, or moderate, but the party is nat renamed. just because a party follows one belief doesn't mean that they are synonimous.

i don't align myself with parties, i align myself with ideas. i'm a constitutional conservative, i don't think we need anything federally beyond the basics that are brought out in our constitution. regulation of trade between states and other countries and foreign affairs including assistance of allies in their wars and of course homeland defense. all the rest is up to the states everyhting having to do with abortion, marriage, drugs, etc. is the states' jobs, but no one wants the country to work this way even though it's how it is outlined in our constitution. instead they want the supreme court to strike down anti-gay-sodomy l;aws in texas, when there is no reason for it in our constitution!

it's almost impossible to find a person that beleives in states rights, but the libertarian party is by far the closest to this idea.

hell yeah i would accept money to learn about god, it might even give me even more ammunition for my website's atheist views and for a profit!

At 7/24/03 10:39 AM, Ted_Easton wrote: This is to continue the poorly named "Shooting hobos legal" thread.

Ok, to get the ball floating, let's take this in steps.
First, what is currently being done across the world for them, and which method is best? How can we improve upon it? Change it? What is the ideal solution to homelessness (a viable one, please).

the ideal solution is to let the charities take care of the situation. government money doesn't need to be paid to keep these losers off the streets, it's the job of the churches and non-profit donation organizations to help people. that is only if these people actually want help.

many homeless have mental problems or just liek the "freedom" so they will never be helped no matter how much money you throw their way.

i say we just move them all to feed lots and harvest their organs for transplants and eat their flesh. or if they are diseased or disabled in some way that they won't be useful to society, just set them free in an enclosed park and let hunter pay to hunt humans.

damn you're stupid...

At 8/3/03 08:40 PM, hureya wrote:

At 8/3/03 06:17 PM, n0g0d wrote:

The electoral college is undemocratic and counter to the will of the populace. I however would oppose the electoral college no matter who had won. Not to mention carping over illegitimacy is sort of aside the point at the moment.
Kicking terrorist ass is great, if only we could limit it to terrorist ass. Some eight thousand or so Iraqi civilians have been killed in this war so far. Considering the size of the familys in that country, it probobly wouldn't be extreme to say that there are one hundred and fifty thousand pissed off relatives.
Do you really think that this will help the war on terror?

The best way to fight a guerilla war is through intelligence. You can dump massive amounts of ordinance onto the ground and not get anyone, invade a country and fill it with soldiers and the guerillas will blend right in with the people. Yet there are massive amounts of evidence to show that the White House has manipulated and badgered the intelligence agencies into punching out the numbers Bush & Co. want. That could seem to undermine the effectiveness of our intelligence agencies, wouldn't it?

As I recall he did send reams of paper documenting the absence of weapons in this country. One of our excuses for invading was that we could not wait for the UN to find the weapons, we would have to do it ourselves. Thats why I don't buy the "only three months" thing. I'm actually inclined to believe a recent NYTimes article that suggested Saddam actually had the weapons destroyed but had all the information and scientists for the programs put on hold so that he could resume the projects at a later date.
HOWEVER- Even if we do turn up WMD's I still will not find this war justified. It has far to upset the international community and the arab world and sets a dangerous precident.
Just wondering additionally, but how does one give "proof of destruction" anyway?

I hope I covered every point that you made, and I also hope you correct your "exasperating ego" problem. I know sixteen year old conservatives who write a better argument than you.
I promise not to watch CNN if you promise not to watch Fox.

To say the least, I support our troops 100% as everyone should, they are just doing their job and a damned dangerous one at that; I have family in the military etc. etc. and so on and so forth.

First post. Figured I'd come out swinging.

ok i'll admit the electoral college is undemocratic, but it is so for a good reason: thjis is NOT a democracy, it's a republic. in a republic the people have the power to elect representatives who vote for them as best they can. a democracy would allow all new laws to be filtered through the masses in one gigantic vote. but with all the legislation and the size of our country we don't need to have our time wasted on tons of voting for new legislation when we can get a person with similar views to do it for us.

i know what you're saying, that has nothing to do with the electoral college, but it does. we chose a republic with representatives and the representatives in the college are chosen in a very similar way as our house and senate are. every state has 2 plus the number of house representatives. these are elected based on the popular vote of the state. all the electors represent votes for the party of the majority of that state, this way the state and the nation's masses both get a vote. it's the same reason why we have a senate and a house, so that the states and the people both get their votes.

it is a wonderful system, because we are a union of 50 states, not a solid country of 1 state.

---

saddam did send a shit load of documents outlining his weapons, but it was not complete and many weapons that we had known about were not accounted for.

----

the casualties you cite are not neccissarily caused by american soldiers, and many of the people fighting us are illegal combatants that do not wear insignia or uniforms and do so to blend in with the masses so that their terrorist attacks will be more efficient.

----

the war sets a precident, but not a dangerous one, it shows the world that we will not tolerate non-complience with UN resolutions, if a nation engages in dangerous and illegal attacks on our allies they will pay.

the war is justified, because it was justified when we attacked iraq in 1990 over the kuwait invasion. this is nothing more than an end to cease-fire agreements after the gulf war due to lack of cooperation on the iraqis side! we are not simply starting as war, we are actually ending one that began 13 years ago!

At 8/3/03 07:37 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: No matter how many balls they grow, a person can't stand up to a nation that contains people that would assault and kill them simply for being who they are. A person can stand up all they like to the teasing and the bullying, but they don't have to.
It is the requirement of the school to provide a safe learning enviroment, and because they have failed to do that elsewhere, they will do that here by eliminating the problem. As always, the homophobes.

sure if the school does nothing, then no no matter how tough the fags are they won't be able to cope, but you enforce the penalties for harassment and the problems will go away. the answer isn't isolating them, they must be exposed to those that hate them, but that doesn't mean you let violence go unpunished.

At 8/3/03 07:56 PM, _crossbreed_ wrote: This is for everyone who's convinced that they'll shoot a criminal if he tries to rob them.

CRIMINALS ROB PEOPLE WITH GUNS.
CRIMINALS WILL BLOW YOUR HEAD AWAY, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND. THEY'RE THE ONES POINTING A GUN AT YOU.

Do you understand now or shall I make a drawing?

the mear fact that they have a gun doesn't mean they'll get to use it. my quickdraw skills that were partially learned in the military police training classes, are far superior, he won't see anything but a flash and one more criminal will be taken off the street.

At 8/3/03 07:46 PM, stafffighter wrote: The producers make alot more money than the people who actually earn the money by makeing the music. Don't kid yourself there.

it doesn't matter you are still stealing even if the record companies are ripping you and the bands off. it's a capitalist enviroment, if you don't like the price you don't buy it (and that means you don't steal it either you heathens). just because a group of people are greedy isn't a reason to become a thief!

marrige is by license, not by right. you will find no mention of heterosexual or homosexual marriage in the bill of rights!

if the states only want to accept hetero-marriage, then so be it. however the states will bend under enough pressure and fags will get their marriage eventually if you all work hard enough at it. i think that it's perfectly acceptable for gays to have civil unions that give benifits to couples who make a commitment to each other, but leave us our traditions and tradition says that marriage is between man and woman for procreation. sure it might be a bit out-dated, but the current rules for marriage are fine, they just need a seperate form of union for gays that is somewhat equal.

the question really is, should gays have the ability to raise children as they are engaged in an abnormal lifestyle. it's obviously natural for homosexuals to exist as all animals have them, but it's not normal and no gay animal has children. and isn't it the fact that married couples have children that is the most important part of their union? children are our nation's future, so the government tries to reward our parents for their service to the nation in a small way. but what do gays have to offer? nothing as i see it, so why is it such a big deal i wonder... especially since many couples are not even getting married these days!

the record companies are not evil and they are not greedy, at least to the extent of the accusations you all are throwing around! they just want their money for their product that THEY produced! you didn't write or produce or record the songs, so why do you all think you have a right to take it without payment. sure you can play a song for a friend or le tthem borrow your CD but you cannot make a copy and give it away legally. will they prosecute you for making a copy of googoodolls? no, but you still did commit a crime. if anyone is greedy out there it is the individuals who are file sharing with each other and taking other peoples product without payment!

sure 5 years is a long time for making a copy of a song for your friend, but it's the maximum, not the norm. i doubt anyone will get 5 years in prison for any file sharing crimes, but they will pay handsomly for their stolen goods! don't kid yourselves, you are theives, and you are not noble ones like robin hood, you're just petty crooks stealing candy from the convenience store like a bunch of immoral heathens!

i want them to do a story on the sniper with the highest kill count during the iraq war! they are the heros the ones who slaughter their enemies and win wars, not the ones who get lost and crippled.

no one should kid themselves by saying guns are for collecting and sport etc. guns have a primary purpose just like everyhting else, to shoot a projectile and kill! i've only had the oppurtunity to kill paper and plastic targets so far, but if for any reason i'm walking through dallas at night (now the leader in violent crimes inthe united states, hooray!) and some scum bag decides he needs my wallet more than i do; well i'll be out of 5 buck of .32 ammunition and he'll be out of 1 head. i keep a concealed handgun on my person at all times in the civilian world and in the military i'm always armed while on post, guns are part of my life now. and with my military experience, i dare the government to ban guns and take me to jail for possession.

recently (1994) a ban on "assault rifles" (military service rifles) was made, already one couldn't own a full auto/burst weapon without a permit, but they went even further to ban this breed of gun. they said that they cannot have more than 2 of the following: bayonet, pistol grip, detatchable magazine, collapsable stock, threaded barrel (for silencer/flash-suppressor change-outs). this type of gun legislation goes too far they ar enow saying that certain asthetic and helpful somponents for customization are banned because they are too much like the military version. shit like this shows you how much the government doesn't trust it's citizens to be armed even remotely close to the level of the military. how could a population fight off a tyranical government (which is the reason for the 2nd ammendment) with single shot long-rifles and revolvers? it would be impossible and another holocaust could arise simply because the masses dont have acces to reliable weapons. and don't say that it's impossible for our government to be corrupted and start a new holocaust, because i doubt any one could predict the threat of the nazis until it was already too late.

i could see new york opening a school for retards so they grow up in a safe enviroment that will cater to their learning neeeds. but being a fag doesn't make you any more different than any other human, you just have abnormal sexual prefernces. weather the preferences are voluntary or involuntary isn't important. what's important is that people aren't sheltered and cuddled when difficult situations arise. they need to grow some balls andfight back against the intolerant homophobes or curl up in a ball and take it like a pussy, but they sure as hell don't deserve to be seperated from the rest of society.

the tipster was the owner of the home that was raided. he had relations with the hussein family and the sons used his place as a hideout, but 15mil per son just got too tempting and he turned their asses in after a while. also the sons had almost enough cash on their persons, that was confiscated by the US, to pay for the entire raid. so we didnt loose very much money in the end. i doubt this guy will leave iraq for the USA, but i'm sure he'll get the hell out of town and try to live as annonimous a lifestyle as possible.

the identity of the sons is true, they even show the metal bar inserted into uday's leg that has the same serial number as the one inserted after a 1996 assassination attempt.

the family did have body doubles to throw off assassination attempts, but when you are on the run and have no government left to control you have little money to pay people like this and it becomes too high profile for your own good. saddam's best bet is to change his appearence, not have body doubles.

i just hope that the 25mil reward for saddam is enough to sway his friends too.

damn i hate retards, firstly, bush was elected fair and square, all this shit about the election being stolen from gore due to the "technicality" of there being an electoral college is just plain dumb. there was no theft, if they had given gore the victory based on the popular vote then, the constitution would have been spat upon and elections would be based on who could get the best lawyers to argue their way into office.

bush is human just like everyone else; he has beleifs and personal flaws and sometimes he'll make mistakes. however concidering the situation he was tossed into, he's doing a fairly good job; this isn't a pitched battle between two waring nations, it's guerilla warefare on a global scale. terrorism requires tough leadership and bush is showing that he isn't going to pussyfoot around like clinton and just beg the naughty people to stop, he's going to kick their asses.

the soldiers of the us military (i'm in the Army) follow orders weather they like them or not. i didn't feel like having my reserve unit activated to pull guard duty, but the security of our nation depended on myself and my fellow soldiers leaving our comfortable civilian jobs and families to move to cramped barracks and boring jobs. the only up side is, we aren't in the desert fighting iraqis. no matter how much you liberal-hippie-treehuggers think you hate war; it's the soldier (sweating his balls off in the hot desert sun for a year while terrorists hide in the civilian crowds and shoot ak-47's at his head) that hates wars!

the war in iraq is not illegal and is more than justified. back in the days of good ol bush senior, we had a little war with iraq and saddam over his invasion of kuwait. the reason why saddam invaded kuwait was to capture the oil so that he could pay off his debt from his war with iran. the same war with iran in which he used chemical weapons to annihilate the soldiers and civilians alike. we came to kuwaits defense and drove the iraqi forces out and all but annihilated their armies. but before taking over the country we gave saddam a chance to give up his evil ways. the UN and iraq agreeded to cease fire, but saddam had to destroy and show proof of the destruction or turn over to the UN all of the banned weapons including his chemical weapons and longrange missles and similar offensive tools of destruction. he agreed to our terms, but eventually kicked out our UN inspectors and good ol clinton just looked the other way for the most part. now terrorism is a huge problem and we have a tyrannical state that has gone 12 years without complying with our UN resolutions and bush was the man to enforce our rules. so you see all saddam had to do was give us the banned weapons or simply give us evidence that he destroyed them and the tyrant would still be in power today. however he didn't and now he's been made an example of and iraq is on it's way to freedom. bush is confident that we will find the evidence we need for the chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, but it's only been 3 months since we took over iraq and we are still busy fighting back the guerillas in the cities, which leaves little room for a proper search and interogation of the country and it's leadership. give it time and everyone will get plenty of proof, but i don't see why you would need it, since the proof is the lack of complience. the weapons may never be found, but if they were destroted like he was directed to, then why would he not give us evidence of their destruction and avoid war?

i think i covered most every point thats been made and i hope that all you anti-american pre-teens will learn to read a newspaper or history book and watch the news (not CNN "communist new network"). ignorance can be fixed, but you actually want to know the truth!

At 7/8/03 01:34 AM, CrystalOmega wrote: I thought the army upgraded to the m1a2? I know the Saudis are doing it...

while the m1a2 is one of the best battle tanks out there, there are only a few units that have them, the m1a1 is by far a superior tank than most others out there today, so why spend all that money to upgrade them when in a few years we'll have a whole new tank in production?

At 7/7/03 12:37 AM, XXPyroskXX wrote: Hahaha, Mexicans are EVERYWHERE. They should all go back from where they came from. I'm sorta Mexican though =P...

i wasn't bashing mexicans, i was just joking in my own really dry sense of humor, it just so happens that every day i see tons of mexicans enter the base to do work and they never speak english, it's the same everywhere in texas, so making fun of mexicans is common here even iof you have no real problems with the fuckers!

oh that reminds me of a joke (i swear i'm not racist...)

Q: why didn't the black woman want her son to marry the mexican girl?
A: she was worried her grandchildren would be too lazy to steal!

At 7/7/03 06:50 PM, mwazzap wrote: Wow. I sure bitch a lot. BTW I never got to comment on the topic...
---------------
I love your games... they totally rock....
all though I am curious as to why you are in the army...
(you dont seem the type to join)

well thank you for the compliment on my games.

i'm in the military because i'm a patriot. i beleive in this country and i think we are just waiting for a good revolution to bring our people back into line with our constitutional basis. i feel that the us constitution is by far the most perfect governing document ever created. we have a fair basis for controling both the state's and the general public's powers. also our judicial system when used properly will destroy any unjust laws (as we have seen recently with the elimination of texas' sodomy laws). and our president wields awesome military powers.

if people would be a little more conservative with their lawmaking and just enforce the laws rather than create more restrictions we would be in practically a perfect society were freedoms are upheld while criminals are punished. however we have too many rediculous laws that encourage christian morality and prevent a lot of individual freedom of choice when it comes to our own bodies.

but the fact that we have some dumbass laws is no reason to throw away the constitution and piss on the american dream, it's an incentive for our intelligent youths to rise up and force outdated beliefs aside and bring forth an age of reason rather than morality.

so yes i am just the right person to be in the military and really i feel i'd be the right person to be in government office (except it's not really my passion to do so).

also i really like guns and you don't get to play with an M1A1 Abrams battle tank in the civilian world... :)

don't worry the celebemon #2 game has already been in the making for some time now and i'll be working on it as much as possible for the next few weeks hopefully i'll be able to finish it by august.

and so you know i tried to make as many different deaths as possible, by overdosing the jiggly christ as well as neglecting him, there are 9 differnt ways to die as well as torture, but sure it won't be hard to make other celebemon selectable for the game.

i mainly created this game. because it's been several months since i've even touched my computer and my flash skills are rusty, and well i wanted to let everyone know i'm not dead, i just didn't feel like i was much of an affiliate with no contributions for almost a year!