Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/2/14 02:20 PM, darkjam wrote: Shit troll attempt, and if you're serious, then why the fuck do you love Pokemon when you said "fuck nintendo"

that logic was so terrible i think you gave me cancer..

gamefreak made pokemon, not nintendo.. even if all its games are for nintendo, it doesnt mean they needed to continue to make them when they found out the wii was shitty.

now, as for the troll attempt of his, i can totally understand that.. just give a better reason than that as to why..

At 7/4/14 12:06 PM, Jackho wrote: I'd go for an XL. The games look slightly worse blown up on the bigger screen but I can't stand using a regular DS for more than a few minutes. Absolutely hate the size and shape of it.

If playing gameboy games is a problem just spend $30 on a GBA SP.

the problem with gba sp is that it has a fatal power system bug in its design.. if you plug the charger cord in redundantly by mistake, it will eventually ruin your system AND any future battery packs you try to use in it...

not to mention, they stopped making new games for it already.. backward compatibility from new systems is the only solution short of reviving the old.

At 7/5/14 04:38 AM, Entice wrote: Depends on the type of relationship. Two adult siblings? Cousins? Fine, who cares.

I shouldn't have to name the ones that wouldn't be okay (hint: pedophilia is bad).

i dont care if it were gay pedo furry and incest all at once..

if its consensual, its okay.

meh, i'd just say "i dont want to live on this planet anymore.." and stowaway in the next shuttle to the ISS.. then hijack that, modify it into the moonraker space station, gas the planet, and be done..

i get everything. i win. great day sir..

nah.. but i would be stowawaying so that when the earth ends on its own, i'd be one of the few survivors..

unless it ended by deathstar, in which case there'd be nothing for the ISS to orbit.. i'd have to find some other habitable place in range of human travel, fast..

i highly doubt any melee weapon would do against frikkin zombies, let alone a lolipop.. seriously, if albert wesker, alex mercer, vladnar the lich, baron brixius, the gravemind, kerrigan, or the fake trevor belmont zombie were among their ranks, we'd all be totally screwed..

At 7/5/14 08:25 AM, Kel-chan wrote:

At 7/5/14 08:22 AM, Entice wrote: I only avoid eye contact when I'm embarrassed or when I have no desire/have lost the desire to listen to someone speak.

Some people don't get the hint though, like seriously if I glance down at my phone and say "mm hmm" in a disinterested tone that's not an invitation to continue your monologue for another 10 minutes

Without letting the other person know your intentions to discontinue a conversation, how would they know?

Sounds like you have crappy social skills

this. i apparently am told i avoid eye contact all the time without realizing it, and that i apparently speak in mumble when i believe i'm speaking loud and clear. doesnt mean i wish nothing more to do with the situation.

if i didnt want to talk anymore, i'd get up and leave the room. takes less energy than repeatedly attempting to speak what my intentions are, and has more effect.

lethal rpg was decent. though, i cant seem to find all of them here on newgrounds.. instead, i just use this: http://flashrpgs.blogspot.com/2007/10/rpg-14-lethal-rpg.html

then there's starwish, book of mages, trigger knight, sonny, fantasy xf, and megaman x rpg chapters 0 and 1.

really cant decide among these.. or anything when it comes to favorites really.. unless you count anime or food, but i digress..

At 7/4/14 11:18 AM, Camarohusky wrote:

Your example isn't a very good one. Redskin peanuts, first off, are NOT trademarked. Second, they are merely describing the product, which is a peanut that has a red skin rather than a brown skin.

It would really help if people took more than an ounce of brain power to actually look into the issue here. It seems that most of the people who dislike the tm removal are throing out the first terrible argument their mind can think of without even trying to see if it holds up to the slightest scrutiny.

to be fair, i never proofread.. but i wouldnt say "terrible argument"..

plus, there are cleaning products titled "white power" that people actually DO find offensive.. regardless, be it the product itself or something else entirely, it matters not. what matters is the fact that either people take offense, or they dont.

it isnt the lack of a trademark, but rather, the reason given for that lack of trademark, which is the problem.. i may not know much about law, but i do know the obligation a government has to society, if it is to exist as their ruling system..

i would much prefer a semi-anarchic state, where only codes of conduct exist.. but if i must have a government, there needs to be protecting and serving of everyone, from the most deranged criminal or laziest slacker, to the highest ranking authority figure or most successful business person..

i dont believe it possible at this point in time to successfully do so, but it still doesnt change our duty to work towards achieving that end, so that one day it will be. until we do achieve that, we will be under a form of oppression. not the same form of oppression as nazi germany or the soviet union, but oppression nonetheless.

i suppose i should explain precisely why i believe "lynching and slavery" of whites is inevitable if things continue down this road..

in my experience, people tend to vote on impulse. they choose whatever makes the best first impression on them, and if all are equally represented, they choose the one which best appears to embody their idea of progression at the time.

so when the 44th presidential election came along, and nobody seemed to have been better than any other, they (rather ironically) chose barack obama, because they believed it would help the cause of racial equality to simply have a black president. they didnt bother to think over in depth who's policies would have what effects in the long run to try and eliminate their first impression dilemma, they just rode the waves of his calls for "change".

hell, if condoleezza rice had run, she probably wouldve been the one who made it due to her gender..

anyhow, given that its human nature to react to first impressions, which affects voting, its very conceivable, even probable, that, over the course of time, as more and more questionable people are voted into public office, america's policies would slip further and further into corruption. corrupt people are selfish creatures, so they would naturally choose their own demographic to prioritize in improvements over the rest.

now, i can see this having a pendulum effect at some point, when the whites reach a point where they cant take any more, but the cycle would remain in perpetuity. blacks would once again be slaves and murder victims. then white, then black then white, etcetera, etcetera..

the only way to break this cycle is to begin to understand one another, to accept all their flaws, to take actions based on what matters, instead of what one takes offense to.

to change the definition of "offense". to change our society itself, then change... the world..

i clicked on the link, saw the title, was all like "a convention? hell no.." and immediately closed the tab.. i couldnt even bring myself to watch a single nanosecond of the actual vid.

ive been broke myself, which is why i never played the full version instead of the demo and thus never got to functionally play as anyone except filia and cerebella.. but the way things appear to work, i'd have to choose between double, ms. fortune, or peacock..

as for character design, i prefer either valentine or cerebella.

parasoul and filia are far too average all-round for me..

.... the system sucks, the game sucks.. the fact that capcom took priority on megaman being in the game instead of a new game in his own series sucks..

is there really any more to say? i love super smash and all, but they shouldve waited until the time was right to make a new one..

ds lite. still, i find the gba itself to be superior to any form of ds.

At 7/1/14 07:34 PM, Cabbster wrote:

At 7/1/14 01:59 PM, Ragnarokia wrote:

I would love to have breasts, it would be an extra whole new part of myself to pleasure my partner with! Sadly I doubt it would happen though~

are you gay though~

hah.. gayness isnt mandatory in such a thing.. the partner could be bi, or another tranny.. possibly pansexual.. or, like myself. have a fetish that randomly changes periodically to suit the mood, but otherwise are 100% straight..

it could be though..

i dunno why i mention this, and i dont wish to diss anyone's opinion, but i must disagree with people who say america is good.

we are far too self-righteous, naive, and corrupt.

At 7/1/14 03:45 AM, Combatboots wrote:

At 7/1/14 02:52 AM, Wriggle wrote:

Please stop pretending to wear combat boots and presenting yourself as part of some sort of a military organization when by law you are not allowed to own or be near firearms. Please.

"Law" is a politicians scribble.

Luckily mental stability is not.

actually it kind of is, so long as those who practice medicine comply with societal views. people think others to be "insane" all the time, regardless of whether or not something was really abnormal in their brain, just because they've done something controversial.

sometimes, its warranted, since we dont yet fully understand the brain, and do need to look for any new potential disorders out there, however, people go about this in the completely wrong manner, abusing the process..

for example, paraphilia does not exist. nor does oppositional defiant disorder.

At 7/1/14 12:58 PM, kazumazkan wrote:

At 7/1/14 12:55 PM, SCTE3 wrote: Because the teens are horny and can't control their hormones.

and because how media glorifies sex

actually, they demonize it. porn is not mainstream media, the news is.

also, people know what the difference between fact and fiction is, so porn glorifing it shouldnt be an issue, so long as they know the risks of pregnancy and stds.

At 7/1/14 12:52 PM, Avery wrote: Why in the hell are young teens spreading their legs? Why are they sucking dicks, or fucking girls at 15, or 16? I already seen at least 3 people in my school that are pregnant right now, they are receiving praise. Why? Do they not know the struggles that are going to follow them up until the day they die? I fear seeing one of my close friends having to be a Mother, or Father, at a young age, and watch their lives get ruined, over a 10 second orgasm which felt good at the moment, but costed them their life. I don't even know what to blame it on, Parents? Society? Fuck..

yes, blame it on society for not accepting it, or yourself for thinking it "ended their life" its perfectly okay to do.

to each their own, man..

hey, i loved this show back when it first aired on kid's wb.. cable channels tend to screw around with and corrupt animated series though.. so its not beyond my comprehension why people might have come to hate it..

japan, south korea, and england. not that they're ideal in any way, they're just the closest i can find without actually looking.

At 7/1/14 02:01 PM, Makakaov wrote: Even with gynecomastia men don't have boobs you imagine they might have. Just get implants.

something like this.. gynecomastia, ive seen an example of on that show "the doctors". it looks like ordinary flab that any normal man would have if he got sufficiently obese.

At 7/1/14 01:30 PM, Ragnarokia wrote:

You seem to be ignoring the ease to glitch, to glitch sonic 3 and knuckles to do the zip glitch to beat levels in a matter of seconds you will either find it almost impossible to pull off playing normally, or prefer to tool-assist it. Also the zip glitch is but 1 glitch, and if going for numbers of glitches the game has few.

i call bullshit. ive glitched equally if not more easily in every single one of those games than sonic 06. side note, its almost impossible to fall through a FLOOR in sonic 06, believe me, ive tried. only WALLS can semi-reliably send you to your doom.

not that you necessarily stated that it was, i just said that piece about floors and walls to get scte3 off my back..

Sonic 2006 on the other hand has glitches which can easily happen by accident and on purpose, it is almost impossible to go through the game without experiencing more than a handful. This naturally makes it a more glitchy game, as everyones experience playing it will be glitchy.

not if you're not already abusing goodbad bugs, or dont suck so much at playing that you repeatedly get sent flying by enemy attacks, or are using the xbox 360 version of the game, or not trying to trigger the majority of these glitches it isnt. i swear, play fusion: genesis and tell me there's fewer unavoidable serious bugs in it.

i highly doubt you'll be able to back it up with a shred of evidence.

So it is more than understandable that people's experience with Sonic 2006 would classify it as being one of the most glitchy, as they experience said glitches. If they don't experience many glitches in other games they clearly wouldn't classify it as a game with many glitches

if they dont experience many gitches in other games, the pool of games they've played is insufficient to be a good judge. it may be opinion based to some degree under these certain conditions, but it doesnt change the fact that their experience and/or memory are in question.

Anyway, if you actually want to argue that Sonic 2006 has fewer glitches than other more enjoyed games, you are in bad luck as the game isn't liked. It is a simple matter of preference for how many glitches "exist". As it comes from people enjoying the game and trying out new things that glitches are found. That is how Tool-Assisted Speedruns come to pass and how people can beat Super Mario World in less than 2 minutes and at the same time execute an arbitrary code in the game programming. Because people love Super Mario World so much that they found a way to do this and break the game to the point where it will either jump to the last screen of the game or execute a arbitrary code. So surely this would mean that Super Mario World is technically one of the most glitched games according to you, or Pokemon Yellow which can also execute such a code, or Super Metroid which also got glitched to skip right to the end screen? What is to say that Sonic 2006 if played as much as these other games wouldn't also be found to have more glitches, including ones able to skip to the last frame of the game or even execute an arbitrary code?

no, it isnt. people tend to AVOID playing things they hear are "terrible".. thus we see tons more hard evidence for faults found in things people LIKE, such as pokemon gen 1. compared to about 24-32 glitches people found in sonic 06, there are literally hundreds in pokemon.

Sadly, what it comes down to is how much people are prepared to put time into dissecting something apart to find out how to break it. So I wouldn't go jumping on preferred games which are tool-assisted to be speedrunned via glitches and claiming they are worse as a result.

ha. its still jumping on a bandwagon heading for nowhere.

You're taking this many steps too far. The changing of the name has nothing to do with stamping out discrimination. What it hs to do is with government sanctioned discrimination. A Trademark is an entirely government created concept. Everything that is protected sends a message out to the public that the government approves of the mark and its message. The government in its attempt to not support and saction discrimination has decided that it will not provide protection for any mark that is shown to be largely discriminatory and without other meaning.

no, i'm not. by stating they dont sanction it, they're saying they will not tolerate it. intolerance by the federal government can only lead one way in this situation, and that is to precisely what ive described.

By removing the Redskins trademark all the government is essentially saying is that the government does not label native americans as such and that it will not protect and supports marks that do either.

and by not supporting something, they're working against it. i ask you a simple question: is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? no says the man in washington, it belongs to the racially oppressed, no says the man in these forums, it belongs to nobody.. no says the "man" in the sky, it belongs to me.. i reject those answers.. instead, i chose something different. i chose the impossible.. i chose.. freedom.

The removal of the TM does not mean that the Redskins have to change their name. All it means is that so long as the name is considered largely discriminatory the government will refuse to protect the name.

that isnt relevant in any way. a government that does not support ALL its people oppresses its people. there is no middle ground.

This is both true and very naively wrong. It is true that i a perfect world the best way to undo the pain of slurs is to capture them and make them one's own. Heck, it has even happened a few times in our very much imperfect world. However, in our imperfect world it's not so easy. The words themselves are pretty meaningless. It is the hefty baggage attached to the words that carries the punch (which is why you'll be very hard pressed to find a slur against white people that actually offends). The term Redskin is largely harmless on its face. When you look at the term as harkening back to the 1950s when native americans were merely fodder for cowboy rifles, they merely smoked the peace pipe and terrified white women, the portmanteau of a color and an organ no longer seems so hamrless. Add on top of the America's not so friendly history with native americans and it gets even worse.

you're speaking of it as if i actually SAID it would be an easy task.. i never said it would be easy, quite the contrary, it will be quite difficult for them. but that doesnt change the fact that a: its possible and b: its the right thing to do.

The words are not the issue here, rather the emotions and connotations that people carry with the words are. When a white person uses the term redskin it may just be a football term to him, but when a native american hears it, it is a reminder of every problem they have had for hundreds of years.

it neednt be so is what i'm getting at.. they can learn to take the words the same way a white person would in time, if they would just try.. it helps that eventually, if they stop telling stories of how bad it was, nobody who remembers what it was like would be left to tell of it.

instead, people scapegoat this as being the reason history repeats itself. we dont need to know the full extent of the past in order to "forsee" the future (quotations used because churchill's "the further backward you can look.." is just a metaphor) , but people refuse to accept this.. all we need to know is the definition of equality. that is all that matters.

It's a balancing act: weighing the size of the offense with the need to use the word. Guess what, the need for ANY American to use the word Redskin is very low, so the threshold for their offense need not even be that high for the word to be considered a problem.

no, it isnt. its their right to use the word, need be or not. we have to accept that. the offense is all that matters, and if the slur no longer endangers them, they need to get over it. its not like a threat, where something may actually happen to them if they ignore it, or an action, where they are directly harmed, be it their person or their property, reguardless of what they do.

this isnt exactly a case of slander here, where people actually believe what the name-calling implies, so it doesnt financially impact them..

emotional impact is people's right to have, but making decisions based on that alone results in poor judgement calls. is the emotional impact founded upon on a real danger is the question we ask here, and the answer to this instance is no.

therefore, the government has no jurisdiction over this.

At 6/25/14 10:32 PM, Vnzi wrote: Xbox is based on a gimmick and wants to become a second rate PC, meanwhile the WiiU is built like a gaming system and nothing else, so it's clear who wins this outcome.

"gaming system"? more like "laming system".. a piece of crap controller the wiimote is, clearly they didnt learn from the power glove mishap..

true, at least, on the original wii you could use gamecube controllers for some games without an adapter, but here you flat out need one..

and then there's the fact that it lost its backward compatibility with gamecube compared to the original wii..

seriously, one fucked up piece of work it is..

final fantasy 7 had decent summons, good overall music, and one of the better scifi themes of the series, even if it had gay overtones, some of the most retarded villains of the series, and an obnoxious fanbase who thinks the song "one winged angel" is good just because the game is decent..

news flash, it aint, everything about sephiroth still sucks.

At 6/30/14 08:23 PM, SCTE3 wrote:

Or maybe we just have different opinions of what we consider the glitchiest game based on what all we've played. I've played well over 450+ video games.

its not an opinion based thing, unless you're going off how badly the glitches affected you, in which case, i'm all the more baffled why anyone put sonic 06 as their answer.

going by amount of glitches, sonic 06 pales in comparison to knuckles chaotix, or even sonic 3 and knuckles.. or overlord 2, or fusion: genesis, or ocarina of time, super mario 64, final fantasy 4, guilty gear xxacp, any fable game, and the list goes on and on..

perhaps it could work like cell, we gather the dna of all the people who claimed to be jesus over the years and mash it all up into one ultimate synthesized mass..

however, if we took ALL of those who claimed that title, it would probably be something more like the human instrumentality project....

At 6/30/14 08:27 PM, Weeaboo wrote: Im glad my 2 GB worth of loli hentai and doujins arent considered CP.

i'm glad i dont bother downloading in the first place.. setting aside the assload of viruses implied to have been contracted by the computer responsible for doing such a thing, its not exactly like my mother wouldnt see it eventually.. the least i'd be risking is eviction from her house...

At 6/30/14 04:42 PM, Splats wrote: I didn't even need to read the thread to know you took "Jagten" waaay too serious

actually, from the synopsis i read, it seems to be quite accurate...

xenomit is half-right.. not all pedos are molesters, nor is their sexuality relevant to mental health the way i've heard it implied here... however, even if they were, a molester deserves nothing that people wish upon them. not even if they are among the even smaller percentage of molesters who actually did to their victims what people want done to them.

being in favor of gandhi's philosophy, i may not agree with some forms of public opinion, but i think we can at least all come to reason after careful thinking, if we're level headed enough at the time, that if nobody killed anybody, they shouldnt be killed. its just common sense.

to me however, punishment in any form is not humane, let alone a form of justice. we must instead find some way to help them back to the point where they no longer mix fantasy with reality. thats it. nobody needs to be imprisioned in a facility where hundreds die from negligence every year all because some hotheaded family member of the victim wants revenge.

seriously, anyone who thinks the xbox 360 version of sonic 06 is one of the glitchiest games of all time needs to get their head checked for bit errors..

and i mean it. they either are completely insane, havent played a sufficient sample pool of games to be a good judge, are yes-men to popular belief, or all of the above..