Be a Supporter!
Response to: Mistaken Priorities Posted April 25th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/25/06 05:50 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: Thanks for that, JMHX. That's exactly what this country needs: We need to stop legislating morality and start helping people. So stop caring about gays getting married. Start caring about Sudan.

Fuck Sudan, we need to start looking out for America.

Forget sweatshops in Asia, we need to look at the deplorable working conditions in the Southwest and Florida.

Forget funding eastern european education, start doing it America, where there can be a computer for every 3 kids.

Response to: Raise Taxes Posted April 25th, 2006 in Politics

Or we could stop spending unneccesary amounts of money and and sending foreign countries Aid packages, like Isreal.

Response to: Cannibal Corpse live Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

I hate Cannibal Corpse.

I saw Paul Mcartney live though.

Response to: Keep Weed Illegal Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

No, we should legalize it, that way we can make it a controlled substance and tax the hell out of it, brining in funding for our staggering defecit.

Response to: The uber interactive BBS webcomic! Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

At 4/24/06 06:39 PM, -TheDoctor- wrote:
At 4/24/06 06:37 PM, The_Green_Kirton wrote: i think you should have a token seal for ethnic minorities to relate to
NO GOD DAMN IT

Racist

Response to: Attn: Tranvestite Users Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

At 4/24/06 06:37 PM, Fiction_Is_Real wrote: How does it feel having a sex change?

Is it really a sex change, because there still the same sex.

Response to: PS2 Disk wont spin Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

Pray because that piece of shit is busted.

Response to: Prostitustion should be legal, Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 06:30 PM, LadyGrace wrote:
At 4/24/06 06:27 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Most of the legal prostitutes are actually married with children (moral implications aside), they're normal people. They prostitute because it's easy and they make a lot (and I mean a lot) of money.

God, I hate modern society so much.

But thanks I guess somewhat with my new definitions for prostitutes.

Response to: Prostitustion should be legal, Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 06:24 PM, red_skunk wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:57 PM, YankeeFli wrote: Most prostitutes are usually run aways that have no where left to go and then stopped, maybe physically from ever leaving.
I'd like to hear where you got that tidbit.

I'm sorry but there doesn't seem to be a census on prostitutes.

I'm mearly assuming that no woman wants to live a life on the streets whoring herself out for her next fix, frequently getting jailed by the cops and living in crap.

I'm not talking about pornstars or playboy playmates here.

I'm talking abour your abused prostitutes that is indebted to her Pimp.

Response to: should i kill myself Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

Are you Christian?

Response to: PETA and your opinions Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 08:29 AM, Penal_Disturbance wrote: Is there *any* "Liberal" organisation that Cons don't bitch about?

I think an organisation that compares cows to african slaves or holocaust victims, is extremely hipocritical, supports domestic terrorist are pretty bad.

Response to: Public school uniform VS no uniform Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:40 PM, fli wrote:
At 4/24/06 11:27 AM, hungapoe wrote:
Parents with children with a dress code are able to save money on wardrobe. I mean.. it's just a white polo shirt with black or blue jeanes (not baggy).

But Fli, most communitys are in extreme poverty where buying a pair of jeans, a tee shirt and a flannel shirt is that big of a deal.

Response to: Transsexuality. Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:57 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:29 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:

Most TS can't afford all that crap and have to live miserable for many years. Some countries DO offer it on their health service, purely because it's so rare and so severe. Many provinces in Canada do. And you know what? It works out fine.

So we should pay our women to help these people with thier surgery then.

Right, just try to reason that one out with voters.

Response to: Prostitustion should be legal, Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:55 PM, DasModel wrote:

Just ask this woman.


http://www.anarcha.o..SEXWORKERSRIGHTS.htm

Those are usually a small minority.

Most prostitutes are usually run aways that have no where left to go and then stopped, maybe physically from ever leaving.

Response to: Lobsters or crabs? Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

Crab

Though Lobster is great, I just have it way to often so it's not that big a deal.

Same with Clams but crab is a rare treat.

Response to: Reverse descrimination Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:50 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:46 PM, Gunter45 wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:41 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:

Ah, thats right; you could beat your wife to within an inch of her life. Probably daughter too.

Actually medieval england the switch could only be the size of the thumb.

But most husbands were loving and respectfull people.

Response to: Hitting Women Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

At 4/24/06 05:27 PM, stumpy2 wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:13 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Why? If they're being bitches, we should hit them back. They aren't any different from guys. And any girl that says, "We're dainty," or "fragile" or shit like that is the same as admitting, "We're weaker than men." So, I don't see the problem.

Because a women is fucking weaker and dainter then us.

I was brought up in an enviroment where you love, provide, protect and respect woment to the utmost degree.

You never insult one, you never hit one, you never speak down to one.

Anyman that hits or abuses a girl is fucking trash that isn't even a man.

Response to: Reverse descrimination Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:41 PM, altanese_mistress wrote:
At 4/24/06 04:40 PM, YankeeFli wrote:
Its funny you should mention that, because back then a man could beat a woman within an inch of her life, and if she lifted just one finger against him she was arrested and sent to a jail/dungeon or whatever where guards would beat her.

Actually thats only if your married to her.

But still back then, Chivalry went to the "innocent women"

Mid 17th century, it changed to all women.

For me, hurting a woman is beyond what I can do.

Its just ungentleman like.

Response to: New Law That Suck For Students!!! Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:42 PM, Dudeman101 wrote: ah man you're lucky. The halls at my school are very long so being tardy is quite regular for me. i should start jogging to class now

We are overcrowded by 600 kids.

That isn't lucky.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:43 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:32 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

I am all for reciporical treatment. If someone treats me like an ass, I treat them like an ass back. I wont hit, I wont threaten physical violence but I have no problems with telling someone if I am pissed enough exactly what is on my mind.

Theres a difference from verbally assualting a woman and abusing here.

And we don't get walked over by them.

Usually men with this view of women get a respectfully, kind, loving girl.

Jew

Response to: Parents pushing kids. Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

Because parents are usually looking out for thier children doing this.

Your parents rather want you to do engineering then music or film because of the high amounts of people that take these classes and then become unemployed due to lack of jobs and talent.

Parents want kids to do sports because it's healthy and looks good on college.

Response to: New Law That Suck For Students!!! Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:38 PM, Dudeman101 wrote: They have a new rule at my high school, If you are absent more than four time OR tardy more than three no matter what the excuse is, you do not get credit for the term which is FUUUUUCKed UUUP

So, don't be tardy.

Though they'll let it slide if it's a real excuse, not I slept late.

Our is 9 times a semester.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:36 PM, Gunter45 wrote:
At 4/24/06 04:55 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Geez, settle down, it was a joke.

It's the internet.

Unless you pull a Fli, sarcasm isn't dispalyed that easily.

Response to: New Law That Suck For Students!!! Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:34 PM, KIRBY_LINK wrote: ya i know the contastution says execsive fines. but who diesides whats execessive?
o.0

The Supreme Court.

And thats not excessive.

Response to: Transsexuality. Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:30 PM, Dudeman101 wrote: ANYONE who cross dresses is a fag, i dont care what you say

Thats not Transexual.

Thats a crossdresser.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

Why does it seem that reason can't get to these fuckers.

http://www.newground../topic.php?id=474207

God, i'm ashamed of my generation.

Response to: Prostitustion should be legal, Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:25 PM, red_skunk wrote: I camped there once. it was OK.

I lived right next to Rhody for years.

It's not a very pleasent place to be.

Though It has it's nice spots.
Which is usually the south west or south east.

The north isn't that great.

Response to: Hitting Women Posted April 24th, 2006 in General

At 4/24/06 05:24 PM, Gunter45 wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:18 PM, F_R_C wrote:

That's when the bear hug is employed, at least, that's my method.

Thats when reasoning is employed.

Response to: Illegalize Masturbation Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:22 PM, Gunter45 wrote:
At 4/24/06 05:13 PM, Dudeman101 wrote:

You sicken me.

Whats with people and believe in that bullshit anyways.

And why can't they learn to keep it to themselves.

Response to: Prostitustion should be legal, Posted April 24th, 2006 in Politics

At 4/24/06 05:18 PM, red_skunk wrote:
At 4/24/06 04:59 PM, LadyGrace wrote:

I believe the Netherlands model is a much better one than Nevada or Rhode Island. Minimal government interference.

Completely legal, safe and unused.

Not that many people want to go to Rhode Island though.