Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/25/06 09:59 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 4/25/06 09:44 PM, Elfer wrote:

Combine that with the permanent problem of what to do with the waste, and the connection between nuclear power and nuclear proliferation, and it seems like a negative sum game.

The waste is easy my slightly canadian friend, we hide it in Canada.

But in all seriousness, we have an energy crisis and a dependency on foreing oil, what do you propose to do

At 4/25/06 09:55 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: Hmm. Ku Klux (lol klux, as in clucks like chicken) Klan (as in clan). Oh, I get it... But burning a symbol of christianity seems a bit extreme, why not douse people you lynched in alcohol and burn them?

Sorry, my mistake a burning cross was a declaration of war and for clan members to meet and and defend the area. I forget the declaration of war part.

The last time it was used was in the Revolution of 45 or one of the Jacobite uprisings.

So naturally a burning cross was a declaration of war or a warning to the person.

Fucking klanners taking good ol' Scottish practices for internal warfare or trying to kill the enlish and turning it into something bad.

At 4/25/06 09:49 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 09:43 PM, -Wraith- wrote:

And if it's burn it if you hate it, I wonder why the KKK burned crosses...aside from their "alleged purpose." Deeply hidden desires?

In medieval Scotland, burning crosses was a sign for your clan to assemble or meet.

At 4/25/06 09:48 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 09:02 PM, Elfer wrote:

It was a trap from the beginning. I took anti-incest because it'd be funny for me to do so as I earnestly support homosexuality. I'm concurring with you, Elfer, on the actual issue-do as you want.

It's not that I want to refuse gays thier rights to marry(but I don't agree with it) is that I wanted to see what people think if I used the same argument based on a more taboe subject.

And the answer is that some people are actually against thier own opinions and reasons.

Damm, I remember when Fli would drug me and stick pencils up my ass.

What happened to you Fli?

At 4/25/06 09:43 PM, -Wraith- wrote: *Walks in*

One more month. One more goddamn month and I get to go home for good and finish out high-school normally. My party's going to involve all my military school uniforms, a huge firepit, and gasoline. Classic Southern tradition, if you hate it, burn it.

And alchohol and fireworks.

It wouldn't be a southern party without Alchohol and Fireworks.

At 4/25/06 09:37 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 4/25/06 09:30 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

And my current toaster oven is functioning fine. This is no guarantee for the future.

If your toaster oven could help us to get off oil and to seperate ourselves from the middle east, then the outcome overshadows the risk.

At 4/25/06 09:27 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 4/25/06 09:18 PM, BFG_Nine-Thousand wrote:

Humans themselves aren't infallible, which is the sort of degree that I require out of my nuclear appliances..

Which is the reason for Three Mile but the safety features contained what could have been a extreme disaster.

At 4/25/06 09:24 PM, fli wrote:

Actually, I'm very impressed with the Romanc Catholic Church lately for being the forerunners of this whole entire thing.

The Roman Catholic church is life int the latino community.

It is bigger then the Catholic Church in the Irish community.

So why is he coming on D-Day?

Why didn't he come on 6/6/1906 or 1806 or 1706 of 1606 ect ect

At 4/25/06 09:19 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 4/25/06 09:17 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

I had to check your contact e-mail address to remember your original screen name.

Thats just cold.

Valuable.

In the history of Nuclear Powerplants and energy there have only been a few critical conditions and bad moments.

Chernobyl was one of the them but due to inferior technology and lack of safety features, it spiraled out of control.

The American equivelent is Three Mile Island where security and safety features subdued it extremely with verly little loss of life.

Skunk there are reasons why I hate you.

It's not really going to effect most of us.

The Latino population for the North is so minimal that they barely have an impact.

A couple years ago, a cleaning crew went on strike due to healthcare, being maingly made up of hispanics they thought that the companies should grant them health care.

The company fired them and hired a new cleaning crew.

I should really start a religion based of the Beatles.

I'm sure I could get some gullible celebrity in it.

At 4/25/06 07:14 PM, peedee wrote: In Soviet Russia, car drives you!

In soviet Russia, land owns you.

In Soviet Russia, TV watches you.

At 4/25/06 07:10 PM, -poxpower- wrote:

At 4/25/06 07:04 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Shit, get this man into the carbon-freezing chamber and quick!

No need to worry yet, Ringo will die first.

I ordered some DVDs from amazon and I want to watch them before the apocalypse.

What.

As I am still a geek, I'm waiting for my Red vs Blue season 3 DVD and my Seargent Pepper's Lonely Heart Club Band

Basically anyone that doesn't agree with me is an Incestophobe.

I'm going to with Beatleism.

It is the worship of the Beatles, thier messages and how they are the messiah to the new world.

Likewise, When John Lennon died, our sins were purged.
When George Harrison died, Beatlemania was in reach.
When Ringo dies, Paradise will be in view.
When Paul dies, it is the sign for the apocolypse.

So sayeth, Billy Shears.

You know...

I'm back in the USSR
You don' t how luck you are boy.
Back in the USSR

At 4/25/06 06:55 PM, peedee wrote:

At 4/25/06 06:53 PM, MarkyX wrote:

You missed the point. Harper isn't blocking the photography of the coffins for they sake, he is doing it to try and persuade Canadians the war is not as bad as it is. You're naive to think otherwise.

Does it matter.

Your taking pictures of the coffins of dead soldiers.
I'm kinda thinking that parents wouldn't want thier kids dead bodies to be a political message.

At 4/25/06 06:20 PM, GunNinja24 wrote: Thats a little extream of the goverment...$500 for a school prank!?!?

They walked out of class, stopped the education of students who didn't want to do that and then marched from school to wherever.

At 4/25/06 06:29 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 06:24 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Of course they do.

And they have thier rights to say whatever the fuck they want.

You don't have to listen. You can say minster jokes if you want.

Much like you.

Just talk about stealth jews or something.

At 4/25/06 06:37 PM, yct wrote: you talk about your air supremacy like it's in danger of extinction, you spend at least 234 billion dollars on military spending, the government can afford a little cut back to reduce national debt.

I'm agreeing with a cutback, he's talking about a complete stop.

At 4/25/06 06:28 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 06:20 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Not that terrible, actually, when compared to other things.

But remember this isn't considering the military secrets we have given the Isrealis.

Not a biased source at all. I don't care though.

Want me to get another one.

We are. Update what we have that's already 20 years beyond what the enemies have.

And let us continue that gap.

We live in an age where air supremacy is the military.

Uhm, Tough.

People have rights you realize.

Much like I have to listen to catholic priests jokes.

At 4/25/06 06:12 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 06:06 PM, FAB0L0US wrote:

I don't see anything wrong with supporting Israel. Could I have some stats about how much we actually give them?

Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid
Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)

Foreign Aid Grants and Loans
$74,157,600,000

Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)
$9,047,227,200

Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
$1,650,000,000

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Total Benefits per Israeli
$14,630
Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel

Grand Total
$84,854,827,200

Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000

Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200

Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240

Yes this Information is based till 1997 so bear with me there.

http://www.washingto..us_aid_to_israel.htm

We have the F-15s and the new F/A-18s coming into circulation. No other nation can even match the F/A-18. Seriously, not even China. Russia's selling their advanced planes like hotcakes and doesn't have the resources to man them.

But we should be looking towards the future.

I can agree with a reduction but not a total stop.

At 4/25/06 06:10 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 06:07 PM, red_skunk wrote:

So how do we permit it with these morality-legislating conservatives in office? I do agree that the criminalization of marijuana is uneccesary. Treat marijuana like alcohol, that's my point.

Treat it beyond Alchohol.

Treat it more like ciggaretes.
An extremely controlled substance.

At 4/25/06 06:05 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:

At 4/25/06 05:59 PM, YankeeFli wrote:

Or we could cut programs that cost too much, like the F-22...while stopping Bush's tax plan, stop the "War on Drugs" and cut corporate subsidies...

And stop sending money to cleary updated first world countries that use it for a military program.

Hey, that would save us loads of money.

And you realize the cost of having air supremacy right.

Look I don't agree with this war anymore then any of you.

But taking photo's of a soldiers coffin is beyond this.

You show respect for the dead.

37 years ago, my grandmother recieved a box the size of a cigar case with the last remains of my uncle.

I take extreme offense to the dishonorment of a dead soldier.
You don' make thier corpse a political movement.