At 3/25/09 08:39 PM, SevenSeize wrote:

At 3/25/09 08:17 PM, fli wrote:

Also, I'm not a scientologist. I'm protestant. WHICH MEANS IM A HEATHEN

I heard about you folk.

Yeah, they told us at Catholic school that you people put babies into brownies.

Which would explain why your peanut butter brownies are quite renown.

So basically Skunky.

My bad

At 3/25/09 06:12 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote:

At 3/24/09 11:11 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:

It has nothing to do with your definition of suburb, it's a basic truth of the DC metropolitan area. No true suburb of DC is in fact inside the District's borders.

Thats what I didn't know though. I mean, when the word suburb is used, I usually think of it as a residential area within a town, as in the Pine Hill suburbs of Plymouth or Kingston.

Not like, Braintree is a suburb of Boston.
I thought that you lived in the confines of DC, not outside of it.

Which would be the reasons for my critique on DC gun laws

At 3/24/09 07:41 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote:

At 3/24/09 11:18 AM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:

Reading comprehension, dear.

Well now I'm sorry that I didn't infer your view of suburb in comparison to mine.
But really, was the tone needed?

At 3/24/09 12:11 PM, bcdemon wrote:

At 3/24/09 11:14 AM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:

Let's say you have a child under 12 that likes to ride off road vehicles (there are a few million of these kids in the USA), that should make you care.

Oh God no, the horror.
I was going to worry about thier chances of having a decent public education, but this clearly tops that.

But to further add onto this point.

Maybe there's something good here, you know to not have your child drive a screaming metal death trap.

At 3/23/09 10:45 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote:

At 3/23/09 10:34 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: Move to... erm... Massachusetts?

And give up my guns? No fucking way.

I'll stay where I am, thanks. DC is probably the most balanced, blended city in the entire country, and I'm in a suburb of it.

Wait...your bitching about gun control in Massachusetts, but you live in DC.

Uhm, yeah.

If you want a reason for to not live in Massachusetts, I think Ted Kennedy is enough.

Excuse me for asking this.

But where in this is the reason that I should start caring?

I mean, law passed that limits the amount of lead used in products related for children.

Children can no longer ride certain sized ATV's due to lead count.

Maybe I'm missing the important part here, because from what I seeing this is about as big as the Chicago Cubs world series chances.

At 3/23/09 12:17 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 3/23/09 10:40 AM, morefngdbs wrote:

So... be careful.

Wait...

Why was he actually shooting at the people on the property?

I thought scarring off equalled wave bow around.

At 3/23/09 11:17 AM, morefngdbs wrote:

At 3/22/09 06:14 PM, Christopherr wrote:

Just by using only a couple of edited stories of the possilble 12 gospels PROVES TO ME BEYOUND A SHAWDOW OF A DOUBT, that in writing the early "christian" version of the new testiment was done by throwing out all the thoughts & stories by MOST OF THE DICIPLES, that the 'church' of the day didn't like or didn't go along with the OFFICIAL Church line..

Problem is, there was no official church in that day yet. The Bishop in Rome(the soon to be pope) didn't have the religous supremacy that he did in the middle ages as was competing with the Bishops in Alexandria, Jerusalem and Damascus. There was no unified church at this point (which was a reason for the meetings that they had).

Likewise, you seem to cast doubt on the included gospels, citing thier age and the lack of real connections, yet the minute one comes out that you agree with, it's the complete truth and nobody can argue with it.

There's a reason that these "gospels" if they even can be called that were cut out and included. When you can't cross check these gospels, when there are accusations or claims that aren't in any of the others, it puts a bit doubt onto the intent or the actuall accuracy of these gospels.

At 3/21/09 11:27 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

At 3/21/09 08:49 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:

That's not seeing hte wind, that's seeing the effects of the wind.

And to any person that believes in empirical research, that would be seeing the wind.

Well perhaps not, but it's still a stupid point to make (ie, something must be actually SEEN to be believed in).

Understood.
But what I think she is referring to is that some scientific theories and rules are currently so far out there (String Theory) that it take's some form of, well faith may not be the best word for it, but unquestioning loyalty to the idea.

At 3/21/09 08:54 PM, LazyDrunk wrote:

At 3/21/09 08:49 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:

At 3/21/09 06:54 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

At 3/21/09 02:11 PM, Maus wrote:

Do you mean this?

Or been temporarily blind after whacking the mole ad nauseum?

Whacking the mole?

At 3/21/09 12:17 PM, KemCab wrote: This is why cops on patrol should be armed with less than lethal weapons. They should carry firearms in case of a heavily armed suspect, but for the most part they wouldn't have to. As far as normal people go, you shouldn't need a handgun for self-defense.

4 cops just got shot in Oakland.

Are you seriously going to try to tell me that normal people, or any person, much less the police shouldn't have the means to protect thier own lives and enforce the law in a violent and degrading society?

At 3/21/09 07:43 PM, SkunkyFluffy wrote:

At 3/21/09 07:32 PM, Scarab wrote: May I ask what is the bother madam?

My stepson is driving us crazy. Way too complicated to deal with here, but suffice to say it's not helping my stress levels. Not necessarily atypical behavior for a teenager, but intensely frustrating.

What's the behavior, typcial moody teenager stuff. As in, no one understands me I'm a tortured soul type of deal?

Or just being an annoying dick?

Small amount of people= less political and financial clout.

Lots of people= lots of political and financial clout.

Answer.

At 3/21/09 06:54 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

At 3/21/09 02:11 PM, Maus wrote:

Do you mean this?

Also, by this logic, belief in the existence of wind is a religion. I mean, have you ever SEEN wind??

You've never seen a breeze go through a cloud of smoke?

Well, I feel that Stallin was truly connected to his faith about the workers revolution.

Therefore, 100% respect for the man.

Or how about this, you don't respect someone who puts thier faith into any activity that requires ( I swear to god if I hear somone bitch about comparitive morality) you to take away someone else's rights or life.

Wait,

let me get this. People are hypocritical towards authority figures, and more importantly the police. Who would think.

But in reality, while seeing the general truth about this, and how I agree with. My sense of the human character still says that cop haters are going to completely ignore this.

At 3/19/09 10:17 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 3/19/09 07:40 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:

Anybody want to challenge me on that?!

You should like...

I don't know, join speed dating or something

At 3/19/09 07:30 PM, SevenSeize wrote:

At 3/19/09 07:22 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:

NE way, despite all the siezures and a little sister in the hospital, I have calories to burn. Gym/track get.

I would really recomend a hospital visit.

Seizures can do all sorts of damage to your body and your brain.
Not to mentioin what you could do to yourself during said seizure.

At 3/18/09 09:57 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote:

At 3/18/09 09:26 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote:

and that is very sad he is completely sane no mental health problems what so ever other than his obession of communism.

I wouldn't say that. Anyone who thinks about burning down his school clearly is fucked in the head to begin with. Sure, many of us have/do have difficulties in school, but are rational enough to not resort to violence.

I wouldn't believe that.
I'm mean, sure the kid was pretty bullied to complete hell for him to consider this, but the person was still in controll of his senses and his mind throughout. I mean, he knew what he was doing amd all that rot.
While his social ennui and malaise may have been "more severe" hoping to iniatite and maybe actually enact violence upon people doesn't mean the person is sick in the head.

It means he's human, like all of us. Were a violent species.

At 3/18/09 07:05 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote:

There was also a guy who brought his pet snakes to the park. That was interesting.

If you want to see something interesting, you should try Mount Washington in New Hampshire.

In march they have like a carnival/skil things. Basically it turns out to be a bunch of people dressing up (or not at all, nude is often times one to) in different outfits and going down a 20% grade slope.

I saw a guy dressed up in a yellow chicken outfit do it once.

That level of paranoi and community activeness is suprising.

I just no that I wouldn't do anything about it, because it's the internet.

And damm you Seven and your ban stick, I have the best idea for a joke thread to.

Who likes the 4th of July?

At 3/17/09 07:42 AM, SevenSeize wrote:

At 3/17/09 05:30 AM, fli wrote:

Two people in here will understand this pic. Maybe 3.

Irish Jurassic Park?

Who has the over/under on how many pages this will spawn by 2012?

At 3/16/09 10:44 PM, fli wrote:

At 3/16/09 06:57 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:

Viola...
And you got yolk sauce for spaghetti.

Then, you can cook up the whites and eat that as a side dish...

Or you could take the path for those less culturally gifted (I could have used gay stereotype, but you'll pardon me for that of course).

Make some dropped eggs on toast with spaghetti sandwich

Hey, your problems in the future. I'm hoping on not being there.

I think Neil Young said it best, it's better to burn out then to fade away

At 3/15/09 12:23 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 3/15/09 11:25 AM, morefngdbs wrote:

Do you smell bullshit here? I do.

Don't worry, they need something to put down the moose.

Or when thier wives come back. You can never really tell a difference.

I'm surprised, you guys have matured very quickly. Not once was there a mention of going nude

At 3/10/09 08:10 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: Tax cheats as revolutionaries fighting the system? hahahahahahahahaha.

Or people simply recognizing thier own self interest. bum bum buuuuum

Maybe we should apologize to Al Capone's descendants (if he has any) for locking him up for tax evasion too. Because as we now know, tax evaders are true patriots fighting an unjust system.

I mean beyond the obvious reasons for locking up Capone for tax evasion, I see nothing wrong with tax evaders.

Any person that wants to try to get the government's hands off thier money is like any other sane human being

At 3/13/09 09:22 PM, Korriken wrote:

At 3/8/09 12:58 AM, JackPhantasm wrote:

You think that, now look to many parts of the world and see the oppression that exists already. They won't care about the economy once a world government is in place.

I think your putting way to much faith in the ability for humans to work together to actuall form a world government.

We barely manage to make our own government work, much less a world government. Any attempt will fail, it's human nature.