At 9/2/08 02:21 AM, WolvenBear wrote:
In the peak of the USSR's power, they were unable to put down an armed rebellion in Afghanistan from backwards jihad monkeys. The Russians suffered insane loses. There's no way they'd be able to take over a country of armed people, many of which have the best military training in the world.
;;;;
I laughed my ass off at your Afghanistan comments.
THe U.S. at the height of it's military Power cannot control Iraq after 6+ years of trying.
Afghanistan is being occupied by U.S. forces along with their NATO allies...& still those backward Jihadist monkeys are killing and infiltrating & bombing unstopped.
The jihadist problem is becoming larger in Pakistan as well.
Somalia is a un Governed quag mire.
None of this has anything to do with Britian attempting to confront their growing knife related violence.
WOW ! keep your head firmly inserted up your ass ,You obviiously like the view from there ! But never forget, the USSR didn't try to kill everyone in Afghanistan. Neither are the U.S. & NATO troops kill everyone in sight.
My comments of the USSR, were IF <======see the little word IF? IF in a conventional attempt to invade & hold territory in the U.S. killing the civilian population was the only solution, because there are so many guns.
THAT was what the consenses was by the USSR high command of what it would take to occupy the U.S. your ability to bomb the shit out of them is not based in reality...you see if you do it to them...they'll do it to you & you'll both be HUGE smoking holes in the crust of this planet.
And then, there will be absolutely no need to invade a highly radioactive wasteland !
Nothing will be left, & then what will you do with your so called "right to inflict violence on each othe"...sorry I mean" right to bear arms" . ;)