Be a Supporter!
Response to: assult weapons ban Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:54 PM, mabzie wrote: ok,
but for all u non-gay hippies, i say this sweet AK modified to shoot a .306 sniper rifle, but the price was to high.

but this weekend im goning to buy an AK-47, why?

1) fun to shoot

2) self defence

3) to piss off all the hippies.

Be careful, they may beat you to death with a flower. But really, people shouldn't be able to go out and buy an AK. It has NO practical purpose other than to bring it into work and shoot up your boss and all of your coworkers.

Response to: Michael Badnarik Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

thats exactly what lucifur said a few posts ago.

Response to: un-ferenhight 9/11 Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 01:18 PM, mabzie wrote: michial moore? TRUTHFUL??? AHAHAHHA! thats the best joke ive ever heard.
how can you say someone who trys to show that the KKK and the NRA are the same thing truthful?

When the HELL did he say that?

Response to: Is the death penalty wrong part 2 Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

The death penalty is only acceptable if we apprehend only guilty criminals. The death penalty leaves no room for error. If later, we find that a conviction was false, there is no going back. Our legal system is very faulty. Poor people unable to get good legal defence, and they usually end up in jail for crimes they didn't commit. Thus, there should be no death penalty, as many people are wrongfuly killed.

Response to: anyone going to see Fahrenheit 9/11 Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics


You mean to tell me that America is not any safer with all the terrorists that we have captured and killed not out planning more plots? I fail to see the logic in your argument.
even with us killing the terroist have u seen a improve of life on our soilders. No more have died since the "end"of the war. do u think that their just going to give up and say ok we give up. their been in war within their own coutry for years as long as we have troops their it won't stop

In other words, we cant stop them by killing them. We just need to leave them the fuck alone.

Response to: Do you believe in god? Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:27 PM, sn1k wrote: I guess i dont. Although if he feels he wants to show himself to me i'll follow him till the end of time i suppose.
But i have to agree that the brainwashing of children used by nearly all religions is wrong nomatter how you phrase it, and that basing your beliefs on books (like the Bible) that have been translated from differnet languages and whos stories were altered before ever being written, is a bit strange.
On a more agressive note, to the people who say "prove he doesnt exist!" is say, "i dont need to because i can prove what I believe in."

Well, i can prove that i believe that there are invisible, intangible faries floating around me. God is no less stupid than that.

Response to: Michael Badnarik Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:53 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote:
At 6/23/04 12:51 PM, mabzie wrote: how could they be stepping on each others rights if they cant infringe otheres rights? think about waht your saying.
People aren't suppose to rob banks, yet some still do. See the logic?

Actually, I don't.

Response to: un-ferenhight 9/11 Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:48 PM, mabzie wrote: all michial moore dose in ALL of his movies is lie, or distrort the truth to fit his socalist views. he literly edited things word for word from speaches for "bowling for colimbine". show things that never happend as true, and made fake "home viedos" to put in his gay movie.

if you want to know the TRUTH about the propaganda file "bowling for cloimbine" go to: www.bowlingfortruth.com

WOw, you neocon bastard. Michael more is alot more truthful than say, the justice department. They said that terrorsim had fallen 45 % since 9-11. But then they got PWNED by an independent survey group headed up by a very respected senator or congressman (i forget). When they were shown to have lied, they fell back on "well, we are only human, we make mistakes." One way or another, these fools should be voted out of office, becasue either, they lie to the public, or they are horribly incompitent.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:56 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: We ot to do something about this mabzie kid. He's like the gum under my soe, except sometimes his sheer stupidity is quite funny.

VOTE LIBRATARIAN! DOWN WITH MICHIAL MORE!

VOTE ANARCHIST DOWN WITH LIBRATARIANS

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

yeah

Response to: anyone going to see Fahrenheit 9/11 Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:31 PM, The_Enforcer wrote:
At 6/23/04 11:23 AM, Ravens_Grin wrote:
At 6/23/04 11:07 AM, cjt321 wrote: Ravens_Grin which ru a supporter of bush or against him just curiose
I am really against him. I don't like what he has done, he has jeopardized the safety of americans more than improve it.
I'm really disappointed that a fellow like you can't stand the president. The war on terror is in place to secure safety for Americans. These people can't be reasoned with, they behead people with knives and think it's okay. The only way to guarantee that America will be safe is when these nutcases are deceased. They won't stop until every American is killed, we shouldn't stop until every terrorist is killed.

You mean to tell me that America is not any safer with all the terrorists that we have captured and killed not out planning more plots? I fail to see the logic in your argument.

Well, people all over the middle east are seeing our war against terror as a war against Islam. Weather this is true or not, militant terrorist organizations use it to recruit dozens, if not hundreds of new terrorists for every 5 or 6 that we capture or kill. But I digress.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 12:00 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote:
At 6/23/04 09:29 AM, LeapOfFaith wrote: One way glair screen? Tell us more!
Yes! I wanna know how those things work.

They work like this. You buy it. You hook it to the front of your monitor. When you look at it from any angle other than directly in front of it, all you see is black. It keeps people from looking over your shoulder.

Response to: Election Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 10:36 AM, cjt321 wrote: as long as it's not bush ! i don't give a fuck about who screws this country over

Me no want bush.

Response to: anyone going to see Fahrenheit 9/11 Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

At 6/23/04 10:51 AM, cjt321 wrote: it is a great movie on how on goverment has screwed us over

HELL YEAH. Everybody should see that movie. It will really open your eyes. Of course about half the country won't see it, the republican half.

Response to: - The Regulars Lounge Thread - Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

One way glare screen rocks hard man! except i use it against my mom, not my boss.

Response to: The thing about advertising... Posted June 23rd, 2004 in General

They write like "ask your doctor about ZITROMAX." Hey people, shouldn't my doctor be asking ME about zithromax? After all, he is the guy who went to MEDICAL SCHOOL for 4 years. This is the guy who knows about medicine, mr. zithromax advertising executive. If I need it he will know it. I hope. Don't get me started on incompetent doctors and malpractice.

Response to: Bush Has Good Reasons For Torture Posted June 23rd, 2004 in Politics

wait, i am assuming the topic is sarcastic? ok, it wasn't the fualt of the soldiers, that was for sure. No human being would do stuff like they did in the iraqui prison without being explicetly ordered to. Anyway, there is a memo going around that was leaked to the press that tells interigators how to TORTURE PEOPLE WITHOUT BREAKING THE LAW. This memo, came out of either Cheney's or Ashkroft's office (i dont remember which), so bush HAD to know about it.