Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/31/04 03:16 PM, FatherVenom wrote:

At 8/31/04 03:14 PM, Quanze13 wrote: the real issue here is weather the ends always justify the means

No it's not. The point isn't whether anything gets done, it's just whether or not people have the balls to do what they think is necessary.

This issue SO IS ends vs means, weather the ends of, for example, saving unborn babies justifies the means of, for example, blowing up an abortion clinic with a pipe bomb and killing abortion doctors. You say that it is wheather people have the guts to do what they think is nessecarry, which is usually an evil act to further a good cause. It is ends vs means.

At 8/31/04 12:43 AM, GameboyCC wrote: the guy will not take a stand for what he believes in. He spoke about how great of a leader Bush was (albeit with very little enthusiasm) when he in fact hates Bush.

McCain is a good soldier. He always has been. He believes that the republican party is the answer for the US, and will stick with his party no matter how much he hates his parties candidate.

the real issue here is weather the ends always justify the means, and i think that they don't. A just ends making an ugly means right is the whole basis of fanaticisim. And I really think that violence should be the last resort in these matters.

with a figure like his? nobody would ever vote for him.

and i still think that he is a patriot, a fat ugly one, but a patriot none the less

At 8/30/04 07:45 PM, Agla_Aaron wrote: Its true. Liberals have over run the enternet. Why, its the only place they can go were they can instantly back out of a debate when things turns against them. thats why.

yes, while conservatives can go to the O'rieley factor and the Rush limbough show.

you know, we are totally acting like a pair of immature idiots, lets stop.

speaking of mothers, tell yours that i forgot to tip her last night. I don't know how she survives on $2.50 for a fuck.

yeah, and a "friend" that i know, says that you suck cock for heroin.

Most people who want "anarchy" want "hot topic anarchy" where everybody just wears black and listens to punk rock, not a real form of government.

memememememememememememememememe

yeah, i'd say that WWII was the most justified war, and the ethnic clensing of native americans in the west (if you can even call it a war) was the least justified.

At 8/31/04 12:29 PM, DrxFeelgood wrote: Did any of you from NY go to the RNC?

as in as a delegate, or a protester

Well, with the recend devil worshiping topic, i googled "666" and "the mark of the beast" and came up with what is probably the most interesting mathematical site i've ever been on about 666, the mark of the beast. here it is .

At 8/31/04 12:01 PM, Veggiemeal wrote: He's fat...... and ehm.... ugly....

Yeah, fat and ugly.

I hear he's a monster in bed.

i've met a couple devil worshipers, they aren't bad people. Its just that their, well,.... evil. I mean, if they want to worship satin, thats their decision. I wouldn't stop my kid. I would never do it, because i'm jewish, and we don't have hell or the devil./

At 8/31/04 11:45 AM, Quanze13 wrote:

At 8/31/04 12:52 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote:

At 8/31/04 12:46 AM, FatherVenom wrote: I know Quanze went the first day.

With the RNC supposedly being the group that wants to censor everything, and violate free speech, I wonder if there are any protesters protesting the protesters?

That would be cool.

There were, but they weren't republicans. This protest being in lower manhattan, there were tons of east village liberals: Anarchists, Socialists, Greens, Nudists (yes, nudists), and all manner of other people who wanted their candidate and not bush or kerry. But no republican counter protesters.

oops, sorry, i guess i was wrong. Just found out that there were 2 groups of counterprotesting republicans. Guess i just didn't see them.

ok, moore is doing what the press should be doing, exposing all the government corruption. The press these days has lost the investigative spirit that it had in the 60's. They now jsut take what the government feeds them, they don't dig. Moore, even though he puts his own spin on it, he tells us the things about the government that they don't want us to know.

asassinate the leaders. All those CIA agents are really wating their time hanging around in iraqi prisons all day.

At 8/31/04 12:52 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote:

At 8/31/04 12:46 AM, FatherVenom wrote: I know Quanze went the first day.

With the RNC supposedly being the group that wants to censor everything, and violate free speech, I wonder if there are any protesters protesting the protesters?

That would be cool.

There were, but they weren't republicans. This protest being in lower manhattan, there were tons of east village liberals: Anarchists, Socialists, Greens, Nudists (yes, nudists), and all manner of other people who wanted their candidate and not bush or kerry. But no republican counter protesters.

At 8/29/04 02:39 PM, Spookshow wrote:

Has anyone seen Gunter45, Kirbyman or Metal-Hed69 lately?

i duno about kirbyman or metalhead, but i talked to gunther 2 nights ago, he's just really buisy in college. oh, by the way, I'm not banned anymore!! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA. And in response to NotYouZ, of course, i'd love to be a mod. *puts away anarchy tshirt and dons a shirt and tie*

EGA, just a question, why are all of your posts incoherent rants?

and get your ass banned

At 8/26/04 07:02 PM, Maus wrote:

At 8/26/04 07:01 PM, Quanze13 wrote: it is by far the best online dictionary ever.

Except for the fact that it isn't a dictionary. :\

OK, a user updated dictionary

just as a sidenote, wikipedia is the shit. it is by far the best online dictionary ever.

OMG, SOMEBODY!! Conservatives, come and debunk the evil liberal claims in this topic!!

coffie, don't post here. Let it die. Let Funk and shrikey banz0r moose.

people, stop posting on this topic, and let it WHITHER AND DIE!!!!!

so are we beyond all dobut that subtle isn't just some dude's alt?

Isn't troling a bannable offense........... SHRIKE!!