Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/6/14 06:11 AM, Pkmn2 wrote: Ah, fuck no.
It's "Salva Nos"

Either way, you should check the OST of that anime. It's godly.

You. Rock! Thanks! There will be pie for you in the afterlife. It really has been on my mind that long. I'll follow your suggestion and check it out. Thank you again very much!

I was wondering if anyone knew what the first piece of music in this flash is, or if it is any sort of track at all. I've done searches various times before but turned up nothing.

• 
  Melon Glock by DiaDz

  The Birth of Melon Glock.

  Score

  3.16 / 5.00

  Type

  Movie

  Popularity

  59,721 Views

  Rated

  Ages 17+

This has been on my mind for about 8 years now. Thanks in advance for any help.

At 8/6/07 02:50 PM, Luxury-Yacht wrote:

:...flawed.

I couldn't say it any better. ;)

A lot of it does have to do with the lifestyle choices people make since that is the most immediate area they can have a direct effect on. I would also like to know how cycling changes the equation.

I think a lot of this comes down to labeling and what one considers male or female. Sure you can argue genetics, but if the person has the character traits and physical makeup of the opposite sex then the genes don't seem to have much influence in determining what would usually be their traits. The role and power of genes seems seriously downplayed then. There could be, and are, people who have the genetic makeup of one sex but all the characteristics of the other (social characteristics included) and people have no clue. One could argue that for all practical purposes the person is the gender they appear to be.

Academics typically likes to break it into two groups, gender (more psychology, personal choice, and social rules) and sex (biological). Being that I find too many exceptions in the biological realm I like to give more credence to the gender perspective. When it comes down to it, people have a harder time coming up with defining male and female and arguing over definitions. It gets even worse when the person is a hermaphrodite.

As for throwing a transgendered person in prison with people of the opposite gender, that would create too many potential problems. Prisons suck for various reasons and having transgendered person in general population would expose them to too many dangers such as rape and physical violence.

At 8/6/07 12:59 PM, ImaSmartass2 wrote: Okay this is getting retarded...If that was true then the earth would have burned out hundreds of years ago..

I'd definitely agree.

Also, this article seems to be talking about carbon intensive food production methods, and not so much about walking vs. driving which is an entirely different subject. Furthermore, I'd like to know how he crunched his numbers because it seems to contradict everything I've learned in t least 27 credit hours worth of classes ranging from chemistry to environmental biology. Chemistry being one of the more important and relevant ones. Maybe this guy has ulterior motives for publishing something like this. It sounds sketch.

At 8/3/07 07:45 PM, GaiusIuliusTaberna wrote: That's nonsense every one knows Diogenes the Cyanic is the only Greek philosopher worth thought.

Ha ha Ahhahaha! I seriously hope you're kidding. That dude was taking crazy pills and it's funny.

Man, a lot of this is just a smaller debate in metaphysics between Plato's Ideals and Aristotle's "relativism".

At 8/3/07 05:45 PM, Politics wrote:

:...a certain user on this board, and then reading in awe as people actually try and explain minor ideas to him.

Is this the same person I'm thinking of? If so, very frustrating.

At 8/3/07 05:44 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: Well, you don't know it, it's called El Cronista Comercial, a libertarian newspaper. It really frustrates me because he criticizes in a very good way, unlike Ámbito Financiero, which is rather childish, too direct.

¿Tengo que traducir? ¡Al infierno con eso! Libertarian papers aren't my usual read but this one seems a bit interesting. I'm not surprised that you might get pissed off though. If he has some valid claims in his criticisms it is not as bad as the numerous baseless claims and thinking-free sound bites you see on TV and on some of the other threads here. I respect someone that can back up what they say more than the mindless drones, even if I disagree with them.

I usually stick to the NY Times, Washington Post, BBC, and local papers. Every now and then I'll cruise Rush Limbaugh just to shake my head and laugh.

At 8/3/07 05:35 PM, Brick-top wrote: All religion causes is intolerence and hatred to other people.

I'm not a religious person myself but there are functional perspectives to religion that can be beneficial. It offers a social network of support. Many churches also work to feed and cloth homeless and do other volunteer work. Finally, they seem to offer people peace of mind when it comes to issues such as death.

All that aside, religion can also be bogusly used to "justify" some bad shit. To say all it does is that is a bit short sighted though.

At 8/3/07 05:34 PM, Der-Lowe wrote: Reading the newspaper makes me feel very frustrated.

Any paper in particular?

At 8/3/07 01:48 PM, tony4moroney wrote: nsfw

I feel so dirty now.

At 8/3/07 05:11 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: Oh yes... and Jesus was asian.

I most certainly am not!

At 8/3/07 04:58 PM, tolkien1138 wrote: I apologize for foiling your plans for world domination

Back to the drawing board. In the mean time there is beer.

At 8/3/07 04:30 PM, MoralLibertarian wrote: Inspired by a call on the Rush Limbaugh show today:

You own a company that makes "smartf" lights for office buildings. Your light can sense when a person is in the room and turns on and off based on whether a person's using the room. The sensors are x amount to install but are expected to save business owners hundreds of thousands on their monthly utility bills.

If you sell this product to businesses, how would you market this product? Obviously the cost savings are the first thing you'd highlight, but would you try for a global warming angle, even if you think global warming is bullshit? Would you incorporate environmentalism at all into the sales pitch?

In general, how effective is global warming as a marketing tool? We here about people switching to hybrid cars all the time: how much of that is based on environmentalism and how much of that is based on energy consumption?

Who's to say environmental incentives can't also be economic? The topic of "environment" affects and influences so many other areas such as the economy, public health, and social structures.

From a marketing perspective the money saving aspects will probably motivate more businesses/people seeing as how it is the bottom line that matters to most of them. Unless businesses want to have it for a PR aspect saying "look how green we are" giving their possible target audience warm fuzzy feelings about how much they care.

I was about to start my own pseudo religion and take over the world using similar tactics. Now however I'd hate to have all these negative responses on the newgrounds politics posts. ;)

I often like to claim I am the next best thing in human evolution. Also, I didn't come from a jar of peanut butter. I instead came from a can of whoop ass.

Speaking of space flight...

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-As tronaut-Drinking.html?hp

At 7/27/07 03:47 PM, reviewer-general wrote:

At 7/27/07 03:39 AM, BeFell wrote: I hear those crafty Asians have come up with square watermelons, you could stack them or something...

As opposed to simply placing them in a container, tightly enough packed so they don't roll around?

I want my name grown out by a watermelon.

At 7/27/07 04:06 PM, Korriken wrote: well, what do you expect? its making the other public schools look bad! I personally find it scary that the government screws over the good schools :\

You know, there are a few theories on that that are borderline conspiracy theories.

At 7/27/07 03:59 PM, Project-Nemesis wrote:

Well, your buying teh beerz contributes to our economy, I guess... and if the products are American-made, I suppose that shows some Patriotism, but yeah, mostly it's just killing your brain cells. :P

Oh the sacrifices I make for my country. I want a medal.

At 7/27/07 03:44 PM, Project-Nemesis wrote: Well, if NASA gets enough funding, they could find a way. And plus, it would be disposed of gradually, every little bit of the stuff gone means more room on Earth, and a better environment for all of us.

Agreed. But then you couldn't you make the same argument for subsidizing renewables? At what point would it be just as costly or less costly to invest into alternative fuels which produce considerably less waste and less hazard?

At 7/27/07 03:34 PM, Project-Nemesis wrote: Of course I am. We are in our own way by simply doing what we do to contribute to a better America. Not always in war is one to be proven a patriot to his homeland.

How bout drinking beer? I'd like to think my beer drinking means more than just destroying my brain cells.

At 7/27/07 03:30 PM, Project-Nemesis wrote:

At 7/27/07 03:25 PM, Modern-Hippie wrote:

At 7/27/07 03:23 PM, Project-Nemesis wrote: Well, as long as we dispose of it properly, who the hell cares? Launch it into space! Find another use for it!

I've head of some people talking about breeder reactors but I don't know too much. As for launching it into space, it's very expensive and you're burning a lot of fossil fuels to do so.

All this still doesn't deal with the tailings.

Well, what I mean by launching it into space, is trying to include some of the waste in space expeditions by jettisoning the waste when not in any celestial body's gravitational pull, to kill two brids with one stone. Does that make a little more sense?

Yeah, I thought of that. But I also know weight constraints are a big thing on those missions. For the more serious stuff you'd need shielding and such. Furthermore, how much could you really fit in there?

At 7/27/07 03:14 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 7/26/07 09:31 PM, SevenSeize wrote: No recess for me?

Oh yeah baby, uh huh.

*porno music starts playing in the background*

I've clearly walked in at the wrong time, have the wrong place, or both.

At 7/27/07 03:23 PM, Project-Nemesis wrote: Well, as long as we dispose of it properly, who the hell cares? Launch it into space! Find another use for it!

I've head of some people talking about breeder reactors but I don't know too much. As for launching it into space, it's very expensive and you're burning a lot of fossil fuels to do so.

All this still doesn't deal with the tailings.

It could be worse. It could be something like this.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/1 6/ap/national/mainD8FQG86O2.shtml

I'd be ok with it if it weren't for the problems involved with the mining of uranium and radioactive tailings and waste storage.

At 7/25/07 06:48 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 7/25/07 06:33 PM, Modern-Hippie wrote:

I have it because I think it is funny. Again though, this has no relevance to the question. I could change the name to whatever and it would not mean anything about what I said.

Actually. Our names are locked on the site.

Doesn't change the fact that if I could it would still have no relevance and still is an ad-hominem fallacy you're arguing there. Familiar with informal fallacies?

Then why haven't you talked about how it relates to human life and self?

Did you read the comparison?

Maybe you think you did in some previous reply but you make no mention of their ideas and how it could relate to abortion. This leads me to believe you didn't. If not, feel free to quote where you did before. Till then you're just lying.

You could have fooled me.

Hah!

:)

2. If you read the readings I mentioned you would know that it has nothing to do with race or gender discrimination.

I see you've failed to recognize a comparison when you see one.

Are you on drugs as your name suggests?

Seeing as how I don't see it I'm going to have to ask if you're the one on drugs here. It's gotta be one of us, and again, you're assuming something about me based on a name. God forbit you ever meet a person with the last name shoemaker or something.

The point was that why should I look back on those characters and base all of my opinions on what they write?

That's why I mentioned the founding fathers. We look up to them a great deal, but does that mean we should follow everything they believed, like blacks and women having no rights?

I see what you're trying to say here but you have to take things in context. No, they are not people to be put up on a pedestal. What I'm talking about is not their faults but their contributions they make to the world you live in today. I'm not saying that you should live, breathe, and die what they said. They have bad ideas and good ideas. Pick what you like and don't like and state why. If anything at the very least learn to think critically and with an open mind. If anything for the fact that it is their ideas that influence your life, how our society is structured, the laws we have, and the morals and values many people claim. So, knowing what they thought and why they thought it is important. If you're in college you should be learning about thinking critically.

So again, where's your comparison? Feel fee to quote it.

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism."
-Thomas Jefferson

I think you can find a quote that says almost anything though. By T.J.'s statement, I'd say I am.