Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/26/08 03:11 AM, zoolrule wrote:

At 7/26/08 12:58 AM, misterDAK wrote: American muslims are very peaceful in comparison to American christians.

American Christians are very peaceful in comparison to any other kind of Muslims in the world.

Therefore the argument is stupid.

Religion is something that can be interpreted to whatever people want to hear.

At 7/26/08 02:15 AM, Zeistro wrote: Since when did they lower the bar of intelligence to encompass those with an IQ of 70? No, you don't know anything anymore than the rest of us. The simple-fact is the political parties are not hive-minded, meaning you'll come across a great diversity of opinion within each group.

Well too bad you don't actually know me other than a few posts I've made. So shut up and fight above the belt (if you respond to this I'll just assume you still want to fight dirty).

And no, there is not much diversity within parties. That's why they are parties. If there was too much difference, the party would not be able to assemble and fight in the election. Republican party, democratic party, they both organize along ideas to battle in an election.

Break down the parties and you will see a new era in free thinking politics and a big blow against American burocracy (I don't think I spelt that right).

At 7/25/08 01:00 PM, dySWN wrote: And how would you know that? The media is not a good resource on these things, and unless you're a savvy congressional insider I sincerely doubt you're privy to any knowledge that the rest of us aren't in regards to ANY of the major parties.

Well, besides me being of gifted intelligence (I also believe only smart people should vote) I can see the patterns in the party. They are very stagnant. This doesn't mean they always are, but nonetheless republicans tend to be the guardians of the status quo.

At 7/25/08 06:15 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote: Just because most Muslims don't blow themselves up, doesn't mean they're moderates.

American muslims are very peaceful in comparison to American christians.

At 7/26/08 12:28 AM, CommanderQ wrote:

At 7/25/08 06:16 PM, misterDAK wrote: Why do the aliens always resemble small humans with large craniums?

Because it's easier to put a guy in a suit than to fully render a CGI tentacle monster.

True. And if there was some sort of intelligent life out there, I doubt it would resemble humans or anything on earth in any way, shape, or form.

Why do the aliens always resemble small humans with large craniums?

At 7/25/08 02:32 AM, zoolrule wrote: Also the thing i hate the most about Muslims, is that they are fighting against the "West" all the time, in their TV shows, all they talk about is not to join the evil West etc etc. But on the other hand they leech our technology, because they didn't invent anything in the last 1000 years. How do you call it? Hypocrisy?

A good 80% of Muslims do not hate the west. You can be American and Muslim too, FYI.

Just because they pray to a different invisible man than you do doesn't make them any less human.

At 7/25/08 01:05 AM, dySWN wrote: LOL. You say that as if politicians from other parties are any better.

Not really. But I know well how the republican party functions.

At 7/24/08 03:04 PM, Elfer wrote: Not really. There would be a threshold where the effects of aging become so minor that the ability to counter it progresses faster than aging itself progresses, i.e. the point at which it only takes one year to develop the technology to extend the human lifespan by one year plus an arbitrarily small amount.

Yes but then there is the question of the end of human civilization (well, I assume at one point it won't be just humans... so we'll say the end of our current civilization). Is it not a fact that even if it takes billions and trillions and countless years that our great organization must fall?

P.S. Shags, evolution doesn't imply that death is progress, it implies that birth is progress. Word.

True dat.

At 7/24/08 08:09 PM, trogdor136 wrote: Eugenics. Read about it

Barbaric. If you do not see technology as being better for mankind and allowing everyone to evolve through technological advances, you will never have an advanced society.

Arguing about religions is like arguing who's dad can beat up who's.

At 7/22/08 11:23 PM, FifthAvenue wrote: George Bush is by far not the worst president.

Lots of things went wrong in his presidency, so he is definately not in the upper 75% by any means.

At 7/24/08 01:02 PM, callofdutyfreak wrote: you do realize that 90% of the time the republicans are right, right? Lets look at congress all the dems do is point out flaws in the plans, they dont actually have their own idea on how to fix those flaws... it gets annoying after a while.

Point out some examples as to why republicans are "right" 90% of the time. That is a pretty bigotted statement that needs proof as to why republicans can make all the "right" decisions you say.

And if by "right" you mean "enabling human progress", then they are wrong 90% of the time.

At 7/24/08 05:05 AM, Toast wrote: Here's an interesting question: if our technology didn't prevent weaker beings from dying more often, would people who can contribute more to technology be naturally selected?

Or more simply put: if we kill all idiots, will technology advance? Can intelligence be naturally selected just like animals with bigger legs or better wings?

There isn't much point to technology if you are going to kill the people it intends to save. And why kill off the stupid people? Why not have them contribute to society in other ways not having to do with technology? Let the better adept deal with technology.

Well, bottom line is that it's never going to happen, and most civilized nations won't recognize them.

By the way I would like to take this oppotunity to announce the founding of the United States of DAK. It encompasses my house and my neighbor's front lawn and swimming pool.

At 7/22/08 02:28 PM, dySWN wrote: I'm not so sure about that. Maybe we've developed a reputation as a nation likely to jump to military action before diplomacy, but on the other hand that means the threat of our military being used on someone carries a greater sense of seriousness.

Don't be insecure about America. We are big. Everyone knows that.

And military action in any nature except defense is intollerable.

At 7/23/08 01:51 PM, AbstractPathologist wrote: Like there's anything wrong with that. Thank you for posting something that is pointless.

No. Just pointing out that your lingo indicates you watch him.. and he is a notoriously rampant idiot.

Sure. So long as he doesn't let it affect his presidency or infulence his politics in anyway.

At 7/21/08 09:22 PM, AbstractPathologist wrote: Well, it seems like the maker of this thread does not know anything about Republicans and instead wants to use ignorance and hate to make this silly thread. Typical Kool-Aid drinking liberal.

Typical Bill O'Reilly watching conservative.