At 11/21/09 02:38 PM, Bjra wrote:
they all gave up after they herd my entry

You wont win if you don't compete, so it does't matter if it is impossible to beat someone.

I got the 100th view.

It is weird how many people say they want to compete but haven't composed their song after about two weeks. maybe they just forgot about the contest, or they are procrastinators. I hope for the first because I would rather not win a competition because my song sucks as opposed to not winning because there was no contest, so I will say this again.......

BUMP?

At 8/2/09 08:51 PM, urbn wrote:

At 8/2/09 08:45 PM, mikkim wrote: Bump

a) 4 months old
b) who would want to use "programming" that old?
c) who even has the ability to run these?
d) why do we need a whole thread on this?

It obviously didn't catch on 4 months, so I would take a guess that it wont catch on now...

a) so what
b)the main point of this is to have fun, not do something useful
c)people with minds as computers
d)where else should I put this?

bump to the bumpity bump?

At 11/16/09 09:56 PM, amaterasu wrote: ZOMG I'm posting with fail tonight. Monome's are groovy but I meant a Tenori-On. Epic little hardware arp thingamajig.

what's that?

why waste your money on t.v. shows if you don't want them? Anyways, we don't know what type of music you like, even with that list, as there are many types of them. But I guess that someone could use the band you listed and the song you listed, but that's not very detailed.

At 11/14/09 08:10 PM, loansindi wrote:

At 11/14/09 08:07 PM, mikkim wrote: stuff

c. the user has chosen to have their music uploaded to newgrounds. this is probably the most important part. Even if it's then released under a CC license, the mere fact that the user opted to host it on NG's servers means they've kind of implicitly accepted whatever use newgrounds makes of the music.

there was no such understood agreement with IGN.

that is essetially part b, just with adding that IGN hasn't made that agreement, which I guess adds 1% more accuracy, but they are the same thing.

At 11/15/09 04:52 PM, Keli1989 wrote: I watched the video and to simply call that an arpeggiator is a bit of an over-simplification.
If you cannot see that then you are a douche.

It is an arpeggiator

are we allowed to request art reviews? if so I would like to request http://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/mikki m/hyper-warp

that sounded confusing. what I meant is that you can't save it without buying it.

sorry, but unless your not going to get it saved without paying the full price. It's called capitalism. :(

:you could hack it but I'm definatly not going to help you with that as it's illegal. I don't even know if it's easy to do.

Guh... if I see one more line of code, I'll...

goto.And_Play:(line of code)

At 11/14/09 07:33 PM, MaestroRage wrote: the ad rev is a recent thing introduced early 2008. Has NG been breaking the law then since it's conception? The website does not directly make money off the songs, at no point does it charge the user. When you have your own site, blog or whatever, does having a song with CC license automatically mean you are breaking the law against yourself because you are making money, no matter how tiny against yourself?

No.

If the song WAS TAKEN from Newgrounds, and put into a product, game, even paid webcast what have you, then it is breaking the law.

Just because IGN paid some guy to put together a video, which makes the video a commission, does not automagically make it a commercial product. There are loads of people who are paid to create open source material.

If NG removed it's rev share program today, just like how it was before the rev share, it would not be breaking the law.

This looks like an example of a person not thinking correctly, because it should be obvious that
a. they didn't give credit, and
b.Newgrounds doesn't need to give a share of the ad revenue because they are giving specific permission to Newgrounds to make money off of the ads on the songs main page by uploading it, as it is a known fact , at least for those who have posted music alot, that ads are used on it that are not giving the composer money, and as such it is licensed by context.

there is an icon that looks like a disc, if you click on it you will start downloading it.

:)-smile-Mik W, by mikkim Type: SongGenre: Miscellaneous

Multi Point three..., by mikkim Type: SongGenre: Techno

canon's theme, by mikkim Type: SongGenre: Miscellaneous

review and be happy.

this thread is dead. better revive it. there are more people who want to participate, but they havent posted, so ...
BUMP!

At 11/9/09 09:36 PM, jarrydn wrote: Hey, what's this?

Something useless that nobody actually reads. I tried using it once, and guess what? NOTHING HAPPENED. Not even ONE veiw was added.

At 11/2/09 08:47 PM, pr0ded wrote: lol^
i bet nothing will come of this other than a bot finding your email adresses

I pm'ed it to him, so I don't have to worry about that!

At 10/28/09 02:04 PM, Alchemist94 wrote: Awesome, I'm in :)

just make a song quickly.

My giftee may or may not like what I made. I was told to do what I consider hard. :)

I use the DEMO version of f.l., so that way I dont have to pay, but I still am keeping it legal. the demo is actually quite powerful.

wtf??? what is this?

I know of an awesome way to do it. download the free verion of fl, open your midi in fl, and right click on every channel, and choose "sytrus' then find presets that make it sound awesome, and click on file -> export -> mp3, and you have made mp3 from midi

At 10/27/09 02:00 PM, nathanallenpinard wrote: Who wants to bet money what he submitted isn't his?

These threads always end up being that way..

I wouldn't go as far as betting money on it, but yeah generally these threads end up this way, because:
A.people who don't read the rules also dont read what it says when they submit it, and
B.people who steal have better sounding songs, and thus better sounding songs take longer, causing better sounding songs to take for ever to submit, causing longer wait periods. I know that I was approved very quickly, probably beacause the song sounds like shit.

At 10/27/09 07:32 PM, Trancik wrote: BETA's out now!

where do we get the beta?

At 10/26/09 12:06 AM, Bjra wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/2 83331
now I know what you are thinking, and let me assure you, this song is absolutely within the regulations of this contest, I only used samples in the windows media folder

I don't think he meant we can put samples in our windows media folder and call those "windows sounds".

At 10/24/09 10:08 PM, Killa5o9 wrote:

At 10/24/09 10:07 PM, Killa5o9 wrote: Exactly why your songs aren't that good

Crap, wrong thread, sorry...

I thought you were saying that to me, because making songs quickly is a good reason why a song would be bad.

consider me a tester. I don't know my graphic card's stats, but I will be willing to test Tonescyth.

I never take a long time to make music