Be a Supporter!
Response to: Atheist Funerals? Posted November 27th, 2008 in Politics

Step 1: Find empty land
Step 2: Dump corpse in side hole in land
Step 3: Say some nice shit about the the funeral
Step 4: Cover the hole
Step 5: Haul ass, eat dinner and go to sleep.

Done.

Response to: Science VS Religion Posted August 29th, 2008 in Politics

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/are a/faq/dont_use.asp

I'm sorry. It doesn't matter what you do, blind faith can never win in a rational argument against logic.

http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/

Response to: Communism is awesome! Posted August 16th, 2008 in Politics

Communism is wonderful.
I do support it.
Shame IT"LL NEVER WORK because of human nature.
Even if the entire world were willing to care about everyone else and make sacrafices, you'd get one dickhead who would screw everything.

Response to: Anonymous vs Scientology Posted August 4th, 2008 in Politics

At 8/3/08 08:56 PM, bye989 wrote: Yes you can. If they had balls they wouldn't hide behind masks.

There's a diffrence between having balls and being a retard.

Response to: Show NG your desktop! Posted August 3rd, 2008 in General

Yup.
Here it is.

Show NG your desktop!

Response to: If you were evil, your last words? Posted August 3rd, 2008 in General

After I die, my assasins will kill one person I knew every day.
Have fun!

Response to: Allied Powers Couldve Prevented Ww2 Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

If anything, Britian and France are to blame. When Poland was invaded, Britian and France promised help. If they had gotten in early, before any really huge buildup, there's a good chance victory might have been achieved and hitler crushed.
But the help never came.

The USSR also didn't help by invading Poland, although the're partially forgiven for basically winning the latter half of the war.

Response to: Atheist soldier loses position. Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

At 7/22/08 08:26 PM, homor wrote: if you really think that the terrorists aren't real you're a fucking idiot, theres no hope for you.

If you really think you can stop terrorism with bullets, you're a fucking idiot.
Terrorism is an ideal. These people hate America, right? Going into countries and killing people who would be predisposed to not liking terrorists in probably not a good idea. A mixture of guns AND gifts would be a good idea.

Response to: Atheist soldier loses position. Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

At 7/9/08 12:51 AM, MultiCanimefan wrote: Okay, I don't know about the rest of you but I am pissed off that an atheist soldier, who was formerly a Christian, has been discharged from the Army of The United States of America because he decided to go public about his new belief. This is exactly what the First Amendment prohibits; this is fucking bullshit. A good solider cannot serve his country because he is an atheist?! Who gives a fuck?

Agreed. Anyone willing to fucking DIE for his or her country should be allowed to serve. I don't care if you're a muslim, athiest, pagan, wicca: I DON'T CARE.
This is seriously retarded. Especially given the potentially unsound reasoning behind the Iraq war.

Response to: Violent Games effect on Children Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

At 7/31/08 04:46 PM, Gunter45 wrote: The violence in video games is nothing like real violence. Only someone who has never seen actual blood and viscera would make such an asinine claim.

Which is entirely the point. Nobody is exposed to actual violence in their daily life. When's the last time you've had to kill and skin an animal for food? Hell, when's the last time you've even been in a fight? Let's face it, modern society is soft when it comes to violence; the majority of us go long periods of time without seeing so much as a moderate cut.

Totally agreed. Anyone who claims "THOSE KIDS KILLED PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY PLAED VIDEO GAEMS OMG ZOMG BAN GAMES" need to get a grip.
I play games all the time; been a gamer for more than 10 years, yet *GASP* I haven't murdered everyone I know. People who kill other people (Bar the military and police) are generally "missing a few gears" up there.

Response to: Anonymous vs Scientology Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

At 7/27/08 08:33 AM, ThePretenders wrote: The government should seize its assets and it should be banned becuase it is a cult.

Agreed as for assets. Any "religion" that charges craploads of money to "level up" needs to be stopped.
As for the banned? Good idea. People who want to believe in Xenu and all that can go hang with the Freezoners. They believe in all the OT stuff, but DON'T CHARGE PEOPLE FOR IT and, as well, they don't try to control the doings of their believers.

Long live anon.

Response to: "official" atheism vs. non atheism Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

At 8/1/08 03:03 AM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote: I believe since atheists believe in no God and believe in the bullshit big gang theory,

Nice. You wanna tell me about this big gang theory? Also, how is the big bang theory bullshit?
:nothing is impossible meaning there is no way in hell you can say there is no God,
Yup. There's also no way in hell you can say God does exist, or for that matter, the Invisible Pink Unicorn or the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist.

if you blieve absolutely nothing, Is, impossible, you contradict the very thing you are trying to say making you a complete dumbass.

What?

Also if we were made in a b ig bang, everything would have come random as you resistantly say, but everything here fits together, no randomness at all, you don't see ants who can rip your head off, you can't grow your arm back if you have it torn off, why?

BECAUSE IT ISN'T RANDOM. Chaotic, yes. But patterns exist. Rules exist.

Becuase there are rules here, how are we to say the rules are the same in other galexies, we don't, you assume your knowledge n predetermined conclusion is right everywhere, which ofcourse means again that you are a dumbass because again, you believe in randomness n that everything came from nothing, impossile as it is you still believe in it, your way of thinking is complete randomness by your belief then, your reply will be completely random huh?

IT ISN'T RANDOM. Also, science is not the belief that "a predetermined conclusion is right everywhere." Example: Newton vs Einstein.
F = MA, says Newton.
However, science DIDN'T just take it for granted that Newton was right.
F = MA, but under certain conditions F does not = MA.

SCIENCE CHANGES. Religion doesn't.

The fact that Jesus came and died for your sins was random?

Prove Jesus existed. Prove that he died for " our sins."
Also, IT'S NOT RANDOM.

Your very existance is random?

See above. My existence isn't random. My parents had sex, and I was born later.


So very well, have your gloomy outlook on life n all it stands for, nothing.

Gloomy? I love life! I know that every day is another day before I die, so I had better do what I enjoy. You, on the other hand, must live your life making sure you don't piss your god off, etc etc etc.
I'm not remotley disturbed that "Life has no meaning, it stands for nothing..."
I'm glad life has no meaning. It means I can do what I want.

Response to: Is the Bible relevant? Posted August 3rd, 2008 in Politics

At 8/1/08 07:45 PM, dySWN wrote: Regardless of whether or not we believe the Bible to be of spiritual significance, I think that we can all agree that it is at least relevant in terms of the cultural significance it has.

Agreed. Although I personally think most of the bible is scientifically junk, culturally it's a goldmine.

Response to: Show Your Mech Posted July 15th, 2008 in General

NISE

Show Your Mech

Response to: World's Worst Video Game Character Posted December 7th, 2007 in General

obviously its the guy who drives the truck in
Big Rigs

u know, the trucking game
google it

Response to: If you shat a toilet... Posted December 7th, 2007 in General

An alternate universe where radioactive blobs shit out entire toilets. Discuss.

You are either a genius or insane.
Or both.
Either way, you've got way too much free time.

Response to: global warming is filled with lies Posted December 7th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/6/07 06:08 PM, Elfer wrote: But anyway, global warming, huh?

Here's what I'm going to say on the subject:
isn't whether or not humans are causing the temperature change, because we aren't (global warming and cooling is a periodic cycle), but the question is whether or not human activity is accelerating the process.

And we don't really seem to have enough data yet to determine that.

We may not.
But I live in Canada, and yes, something is happening.
The ice is melting.
.

Response to: Pope Criticizes Atheism Posted December 7th, 2007 in Politics

At 12/7/07 03:25 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote:
At 12/6/07 04:19 AM, Diggadu wrote: Well he is the pope of course he doesn't like atheists.
I don't care so much that he dislikes Atheism, it's the hypocritical scapegoating of Atheists as the source of the world's evil and suffering that really annoys me.

Exactly. I'm not saying religion is a terrible thing, but it's had its share of
"mistakes"
shall we say.

Response to: A rant that I had to make Posted December 7th, 2007 in Politics

At 11/14/07 06:17 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/14/07 04:05 AM, MightyComradeLenin wrote:
So how much do they take out of you're paycheck every week so you can "free" health care?

Surprisingly, not enough that I care.


Anti-War: Is that a problem?
Not really, but sounds more like campaign time propaganda than anything. A lot of the candidates have come out in opposition of the war, but have admitted that they would continue on with it if elected.

State Sponsored College: Also, how is that a problem? Education is bad for you?
I don't like the idea of paying for someone else to go to college when I can't even afford to do it myself, much less qualify for government loans.

The idea is that EVERYONE gets to go to college.
Yes, even you.


then look at reality.
The reality of the war being WHAT, exactly?

The fact that there HAVE BEEN NO WMDs found in iraq?


Thanks.
"There's a gullible side to the American people. They can be easily misled. Religion is the best device used to mislead them." -Michael Moore, the left's biggest mouth piece and - ironically enough - biggest liar to boot.

Liar, yes.
But he's right. Religion is the best device used to mislead anyone.

Response to: Vladmir Putin = The next Stalin? Posted November 14th, 2007 in Politics

Putin, if he did attempt a reform of Stalin-like proportions, the nearby world world would probably crush him.

Also, you have to be at a special level of insane to support Stalinism. Putin, I think, is not that crazy.

Response to: Fascism, the truth! Posted November 14th, 2007 in Politics

At 3/12/07 09:46 PM, JakeHero wrote: While fascism is misunderstood and there are many other ideologies that are even worse *cough* communist *cough* it's still pretty shitty.

And how, sir, or madam, is communism worse than facism? How? Communism, when executed properly (which is basically impossible) would usher in an era of utopia.

Response to: A rant that I had to make Posted November 14th, 2007 in Politics

At 11/12/07 12:30 PM, Proteas wrote:

He's for abortion, for state sponsored healthcare, anti-tax cuts, anti-war, for state sponsored college education, for the government paying for every home in America to have highspeed internet, and anti-fox news.

Basically, the guy wants to the people to depend on the government more than the government depending on the people. That's pretty much what socialism is.

Abortion: OK, I can understand that.
State Sponsored Healthcare: As a Canadian, I really do enjoy not having to pay large amounts when I get hurt or sick.
Anti-Tax cuts: You've got a point.
Anti-War: Is that a problem?
State Sponsored College: Also, how is that a problem? Education is bad for you?
Government sponsered internet: You've got a point.
Anti Fox News: Alright.

WHAT?

Fox News is one of the most biased, racist, incorrect newscasts in the world. Just go watch the Iraq War newscasts, then look at reality.

And to finish with a quote from Ann Coulter of Fox News on Islam:

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

Thanks.

Response to: World War 3 Posted November 14th, 2007 in Politics

I would think that WW3 would be the result of a massive screw-up on a superpower's part (America, China...) of invading someone else's country for whatever stupid reason (ie like lack of any evidence for iraq), then that escalating into a massive killfest.