13,861 Forum Posts by "Memorize"
At 6/29/06 07:42 PM, kidray76 wrote:
You want proof, here it goes. Now, what do you have to say.
And yet I still don't see any real proof of Bush being the one soley responsible. heh, especially considering he's trying to get us off oil (even liberal complain about that...lol).
At 6/29/06 02:29 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
So? Would you rather a potentially innocent person be executed then pay for appeals? I don't think James Madison would.
Today...there is a "potentially innocent" and "Absolutely Guilty". It's not like we're living back before there was such a thing as DNA.
PS3.
-You just took 3 weeks pay from be by your price alone.
-Games, you just took half a weeks pay.
...you suck.
The Supreme Court sucks. They're practically left overs of the hippie era.
At 6/29/06 05:14 AM, Zen444 wrote:At 6/29/06 05:12 AM, DKL-P wrote: imbicilLol, irony.
haha.
I've got a question for DKL-P then. If no one in my family tree was around during the civil war (other than Indian of course) then what do you say about me paying reparations?
At 6/27/06 05:55 PM, VigilanteNighthawk wrote:At 6/27/06 12:35 PM, AccessCode wrote: (My family didn't own slaves back then...im American Indian).Think about all the money we could get in backed rent.
Well, I mean even if you took the "white" side of me, it didn't come to the States will around or after WWI. The only part of me that was even in the US during the whole slavery era, was Indian. My mom's side is where all the "white" comes in. But her family tree didn't come to America til around WWI anyway so how can they say I owe reparations?
Being the religous person I am, I just have to say to myself, what's worse? Life in prison or Hell? But personally, I really dont want people who are deserving of the death penalty to be spending their lives in a nice, cozy cell and watching cable tv.
At 6/28/06 07:37 PM, Thespus wrote: Does it have a name? No? Then there's no shame in letting it go.
If the kid isn't wanted, what's worse? Bringing it into the world and having another dysfunctional family that the neighborhood would have to deal with or the parents waiting until they're ready to have a kid?
I guess I should be able to go around killing every retard on my block who lives with a dysfunctional family.
But I guess you can keep giving out excuses.
At 6/28/06 07:14 AM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
No, that's not a legal method and it's cruel, because she's killing beings that can FEEL and COMPREHEND pain. Fetuses cannot do so.
Anything to make yourself feel better.
At 6/28/06 02:56 AM, Angarfia wrote: I would vote for a Demorcrate, if I could, and bush didn't get elected the first time.
Well...he is president.
At 6/28/06 01:24 AM, Kamikazetomato wrote: I'm pro-choice, because I'm not a girl and I can't tell 'em what to do.
To be totally honest, it's pro-abortion men that disgust me the most. So basically what you're saying is that if you wanted a child and she got pregnant, technically that...unborn baby is half yours and you're admitting it's ok if she has an abortion without any input from you.
At 6/27/06 09:12 PM, TayNikki wrote: A women has a right to do whatever she wants with her baby. But I personally wouldn't do it.
Yeah like that crazy bitch who drowned her kids.
Once again, im very disappointed by the fuck heads who vote for this kind of stuff.
At 6/27/06 08:20 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
You guys seem content to debate pointless amendments for gay marriage and flag burning instead of actually turning to the real work that needs to be done.
Pft, you guys always say that when something "small" comes up that you don't agree with.
At 6/27/06 08:05 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
I would never suggest conservatives divorce their pointless pet political statements.
Alright then. Go ahead and don't do it.
Well, lets take a look see.
-he cut communication between Intelligence Agencies
-underfunded Intelligence Agencies
-Knew before hand about 9/11 (not the date, just that something was going to happen)
-had the chance to take out Bin Laden multiple times and ignored each one while getting a blow job.
yeah, i'd say he was actually quite soft on terrorism.
Anyone who is pro-abortion just doesn't want for themselves to have to take responsibility.
I love the flag burning amendment...it makes me laugh when liberals get angry.
Interesting since 1/4 of free blacks in the South owned slaved themselves.
Why are a couple of you people have that "well, it's not going to do any good" attitude? Here, a rich person who just donated billions of dollars and it's still the same ol' "it's not enough...the rich man should donate all his money".
At 6/27/06 05:29 AM, Dramacydal_X wrote:
What the government, rappers, black movie actors, etc, should do is get some money together and use that to clean up the black ghettos of america.
Well, personally, I don't want my money being taken away even more so than it is now, and being spent to clean up the ghettos. Just like slavery, it's not my fault it's the way is it (My family didn't own slaves back then...im American Indian).
Well this really depends. Did you have to pay for them to remove it?
At 6/26/06 11:36 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
Made things worse to say the least. By invading Iraq, the US effectively stated that "if you piss us off, even over a decade ago, we reserve the right to do whatever we want."
More bullshit. But what do I expect from the guy im replying to?
And, we also essentially made it clear that we'll do WHATEVER we want regardless of international opposition.
Even tho they never seem to back us...ever, no matter how much we help them out. You know, I want our money back from all those countries that we loaned them...with interest, but then we get idiots in charge who say "no, no you dont have to pay us back".
And, by removing Iraq from conflict in the region, we effectively ended the Iran/Iraq standoff. Standoff is better than potential for open war.
Even tho a stand off with mass killings could end up resulting in more lives lost...yay!
At 6/26/06 03:17 PM, VigilanteNighthawk wrote:
I like your reality. It's fun there.
Nothing like this gets done without a little opposision. Freedom comes with a price, but I bet you've never opened a history book to look at the Revolutionary War. But you guys are practically argueing that things were great in Iraq before we got there. Because you know, the rape rooms, torture chambers, gassing people must have been fantastic. I didn't see much crying when Clinton decided to send troops to Somalia...but you know, he was a democrat *thumbs up.
I like your stupidity. It's fun to laugh at.
At 6/26/06 01:05 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
By invading Iraq, the United States destabilized the entire region. Fin.
Well, that's got to be the biggest piece of a bullshit statement i've ever seen and read.
Excuse me while I drench my eyes in soap.
There's really only 1 of those which I see to have to be one of the greatest stupidities of the minds of the court. And that is the Death Penalty (9-0, not 5-3).
Half of France thinks Saddam isn't getting a fair trial.
Ah C'mon, we all know that all those who think abortion should be legal are just whiny ass teenagers who dont want to get in trouble (or already have).
As usual, the democrats are going to mudsling vocally while the Republicans are going to by advertising, shirts, stickers, posters, banners and books.
AOL and Yahoo will never be used by me again if that happens.
At 6/24/06 12:53 AM, GSgt_Liberal wrote:
Are you serious...? 99+% of SCIENTISTS in the WORLD believe that global warming is REAL and DANGEROUS.
99%?
:1 degree of change, dumbass, has a huge impact on the melting of the global ice caps. One foot could put hundreds of nations under water etc.
...hahaha, sorry couldn't hold in my laughter over something so outrageously stupid.
Dumb shits like YOU are the ones who ruin the environment for the rest of us.
What do you want everyone in the entire world to do? Quit driving?
