Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

It seems like there have been increasing numbers of revisions of the past, if this keeps on and the aged people passes away, no one will be left to recall real history. What good does it do to make war criminals look like the messiah and why are there fools who believe it??

Some revise history and or believe it all together because of resentment for Bush and all, but I think that is making bad to worse, creating even more aggression and division on the community.

I am kinda disturbed by recent increase in local tolerance with anti-semitism. In the next few decades, I predict the word "genocide" might be banned by extremists so that every nation in the world is seen as 100000 percent beyond perfection. Hitler and Gobbels will turn in there graves when all truth has been revisioned in the very near future.

I think that Revisionism is a very dangerous mindset, allowing authors to manipulate facts and subdue people to follow. Its getting harder to discuss history today too because 8 out of 10 probably don't know what the word genocide or war crime means.

What happens if you keep different cultures, religon, traditions all intact and as it is and everyone looks ethnically the same. Do you really think the world is a better place like that??

For example, there is a Pan-Turanian ideology that believes in creating a world where only one ethnicity should rule the world but keep the different kinds of cultures and stuff as it is to prevent life from getting too bored.

Many tend to blame other ethnicities for oppressing them and making their life hell and stuff and you have cults like stormfront.com and turania.com showing up wanting homogeneity and equating it with world peace. Will ultra-nationalists still sing the same tune if the world is homogenus?

Is there evidence to support such claims? In a neutral point of view?

Alot of people know about WWII, but does anyone know of the existence of an entire army division of nearly half a million muslims into the whermacht, SS, luftwaffe etc..??

According to http://stosstruppen39-45.tripod.com/id10 .html and a few Pan-Turanian sites as well as wikipedia states that Muslims, many of them Turks, Mongols, Tartars lead by fundamentalist Mullahs, Muftis and corrupt politicians to aid in the Axis side of the war. It would appear that they have joined willingly.

It seems that middle-east muslims actually participating in killing pows, civilians and enslaving concentration camp victims mainly on the Russian front. Even after the war is lost many muslims like Iran's dictators still cling on to these Nazi ideologies. Why? Also in the post-WWII trials, how come we don't see any muslim names on the defendant list? Are they excused just because they are non-German?

Of course many know that Hitler used propaganda to rally more allies, but why are so many Turks and other middle-easterners treat Hitler's atitude as being genuine towards them even today??
Search google type in "Turkey" and "mein kampf" in the same line and you will obtain results that recently in the past its the best selling book within Turkey. Why is that?

Besides why is Germany and Turkey such good friends throughout history? Is it strategic? or Family? or an alliance formed only by greed with Germans and Turks seeing each other only as tools when ever convienient?

The thing with the Turks is the whole thing with the grand pan-turanism theorem. I don't know if its genetically proven but almost every nation in the middle east to mongolia to japan is claimed to be ethnically and culturally identical, same language, same family, same DNA, bloodline etc. That is what I found Pan-turanists or Pan-Turks to believe. They even claim that the US is rightfully theirs to reclaim because the natives where suppose to be Turanian-Turkic also. Sounds like a declaration of war does it not??

The most infamous and most vocal Pan-Turanian seems to be the Grey-Wolves, which consists of Turkish and Central-Asian fundamentalists whos opinions I find a bit biased and extreme due to their mistreatment and discriminating atitudes towards Kurds and Armenians and christians in general.
There is a map on wikipedia that shows a united Turanian empire. If you consider central asian countries all the way across the stans to palestine, it would be even larger the Russia.

Some muslim countries have a navy, although really small, but when every turanian nation combines together what fleet do we have??

I am not trying to single out a group or anything but just about anything I found states of the outrageous brutality praticed by Turkic and other islamic fundamentalists in many wars. The way Turkish soldiers treat pows is through disgusting mutiliation. "See Kurdish Genocide", "Cyprus conflicts". Alot of them don't show regret. Also after 9/11, the middle-east and these Pan-Turanians where basically the most vocally in the mood to dance at the death of those that have nothing to do with them.

But it seems that today's media and the Bush Admin's mistakes, the popular opinions seem to favour the Pan-Turanians. The Grey-Wolf pan-turanians are quite notorious for prancing around the streets demonstrating ranting biased opinions. They love to intrude Cypriots who want independence demonstrations, Kurdish demonstrations and Armenian demonstrations.

Search through sites of Cypriots, Kurds and Armenians and you will find that they freqeuent have their demonstrations for human rights and stuff intruded and sometimes attacked and no effort is made by authorities to stop the Turks. Of course if it attacker was a KKK member instead he would be in jail faster than the speed of light.

Alot of sources, including books seem to state that Turks originated from Mongols, plunged through asia and middle-east, done whatever crimes imaginable, and slowly converted to Islam. That is what many texts say.

By the way in one of the quotes by Enver Pasha, the dictator of Ottoman Empire aka Turkey used to word "infidel" not only to describe non-believers but also to label someone as subhuman or racially inferior. Basically its racist to call someone an infidel. Infidel was what Armenians where labeled with during the 1915 genocide of christians. Its as derogatory as the N word but many don't seem to care as long as the racist word is not aimed at people of color.

Basically I condone racism because hate from one side tend to reinforce the hate from the other side and the cycle continues. I think both sides whether christian and muslim should be given a neutral footing to disallow imbalance from both sides.

As of now it seems that the Pan-Turanian thing is starting to get out of hand with more and more showing support for crazy fellows like the Iranian pres and Bin Laden. I see more bad coming from a Pan-Turanian movement then good because many of the websites made by these guys don't sound peaceful to other ethnicities at all and hostile to anyone who disagrees.

Not all terrorists are invented by Bush. 99% of the Pan-Turanians and the Grey Wolves seem to be acting on their own free will even before America became a country. I can't stress this enough but there does exist some racist folks with quite a bit of political leverage whos only goal is to destroy those they consider racially inferior. With a population this huge, weirdos of any type imaginable exists sadly.

As odd as this whole post may sound, it is not conjured up. I only collected together what I searched through and sumerized it here. I noticed in the media recently that support for fundamentalists has gone up, but I don't think this is very constructive anti-U.S. protest method.

While I do like the idea of cultural unity, but once any organization starts mentioning things such as "racial superiority" and "racial inferiority" and "revising history" that is where I draw the line. This is not constructive. Besides such hateful thoughts being drilled into people isn't healthy, in both mind and body.

I looked up some history of Germany and it appears that throughout history it seems that its settlers where conquered and assimilated by settlers which in turn are assimilated by other settlers. It was basically a battleground for Romans,Vikings, Turks, Mongols, and even nations from the caucacus and central asia.

It doesn't seem that everyone is killed off, at least in seemed like survivors ended up blending in with there victors. Actually it seems that Russians are more Caucasian than Germans, but anti-communists don't seem to want to admit that.

I am not trying to be offensive now, I am just wondering why it has become a people tend to point Germany as the genuine caucasian.

Even though Russians are more closer to the original caucasians, then why do KKK and Nazis hate them? Is there another reason aside from communism?

I really don't get it, you know how when parents whip their kids for misbehaving and get a whole lot of trouble for it?? Unfortunatley, police officers can beat bad kids and get away with it scotch free or with a lesser punishment. I don't know if its true that here in the west, corporal punishment is encouraged by authorities to teach "bad guys" a lesson and to make them paranoid to the point of obeying rules. I don't know if that works though.

I guess governments don't want parents to get their hands dirty so the authorities do the dirty work of beating the bad kids in their place?

I sometimes wonder if infamous occurances of police beating panhandlers is a message to lazy people who don't work, to get a job and be a good kid or something like that. Perhaps the officers where telling the bum : "Hey boy don't bum and be a good kid and work"(spank spank).......

Okay here is what I don't understand, sometimes I hear these same officers who openly voice against corporal punishment to make bad kids behave but then turns around and does just that to teach bad kids a lesson......

I guess its okay to spank spank spank as long as you have a badge? I wonder if corporal punishment is really a government order used to keep order.

Moral of the story, bad kids eventually get corporal punishment by authorities one way or another. corporal punishment is still corporal punishment even if excercised regeardless by parents or police or wardens.

Your opinion on government enforced corporal punishment?

I have read some history regarding WWI and noticed how underrated the middle-east/african campaign was back then. Geographically wise of 3 central powers it appears that the Ottomans, now Turkey had most of the territory, both in Africa and in the Middle-east.

Back then, the Turkish government was controlled by ultranationalists or extreme-right-wingers, and their goal was to build a Turkish only empire, meaning that anyone not of Turkish blood will be eliminated. Thats what happened with alot of the Kurds and Armenians back then. Basically the top guys running Turkey were the Nazis of WWI except its a pro-Turkish instead of a pro-Aryan group.

Brutality wise, they seem to have took it further then even the Japanese. During WWI the Turkish Army forced the non-Turks into a Bataan style death march with equal brutality as with what the Americans have been through in the Pacific War.

Turks treat POWs be they British, Russian or whatever, they are treated not many different then how the Japanese have treated them.

Even after WWI, during the time around 1922, the Aremanian population would have been wiped out if it wasn't for Soviet occupation during that time.

The Turkish government seems to have alot of flaws that allows the most ruthless to gain power, alot of liberals were assasinated because of their views of co-existing with non-Turks. The Turkish nationalists want only a Turkish only Ottoman empire.

It appears that many of the authorities from police to military levels seem to be exempt from the laws and have a history of abusing prisoners, participating in coups of certain officals etc.

I don't know about democracy but freedom of speech is even more strict then here in the U.S. that makes the patriot act looks as if its nothing. It is actually a crime in Turkey to criticise them, it some recent news, some citizens were arrested for speaking out the negatives of Turkey, human-rights abuse etc.. It still seems like the ultranationalists are still at large running things as there is still huge discrimination that is government supported. Kurds and Armenians for example are sometimes outright refused jobs because of their race, not to mention that its illegal to complain when you are on the receiving end of racism.

There was also a case where the Turkish army infiltrated non-combat zones in Iraq to eliminate Kurds and at the end the Americans and British end up taking the blame for Iraqis that they didn't kill.

Military wise, Turkey has more advanced weapons then Iran, 9th largest army and a sizable navy. During WWI, The Turks stood much better against the Alliance then Germany and Austria. While Germany was losing battles, the Turks were winning battles. The defeats the British suffered were so humiliating that most survivors prefered not to talk about it. The Turkish alone took out advancing armies from both fronts during WWI.

Media and Education is government regulated, school-books are white-washed, and scholars are refused certain positions unless you think the government wants you to think.

There were also a few past skirmishes were neighboring nations are at threat of being invaded during land disputes. Actually Turkey's army is pretty much on equal caliber with the Japanese during battles.

I kinda think the Japanese army is being put in more negative light then Turkey's army even though its a lot different now.

I am kinda concerned because the middle east still seems to be in the 1930's with all the dictators running around. The high morale and rising numbers of Islamic extremists might just give Turkey's nationalist party the very edge they need to build the empire.

I gathered bascially most info from wiki, and a few sites talking about genocides in the middle east and during WWI.

Many American folks here seem to be confident in being invincible, but weren't the French behaving the same way right before they lost in 1941?? Being occupied by an army as cruel as the WWII era Japan might not be a good thing though.......

I am not bashing anyone, just voicing my concern. I don't remember Turkey being defeated before.
I feel safer being conquered by the U.S. then by Turkey though.........

I don't know how some of you get information about what U.S. sells to its allies. I was wondering, does the U.S. really feel safe selling everything they have to others?

I heard that the some of the best ships like the Aegis cruiser are being sold to Japan. I understand the fear of North-Korea by Washington but I heard that the recent Prime Ministers and the Tokyo Govenor having nationalist grudges against Washington.

Is arming the JSDF with everything fresh out of Pentagon labs a really good idea? Giving the JSDF with ranger/seal training etc... Can you perceive a world with 2 USAs?? dunno it kinda smells like a bad sign.

But then again, the Japanese are one of the many countries that have 99% support for Bush and anything USA so I guess we Americans can feel safe with their non-questioning loyalty.

Opinions? Corrections? I compiled this from a few forums so I don't know much about the details so I may not be 100% correct.

Also, wasn't the administrator here involved in a lawsuit just for parodying some teletubby show? I don't know the exact details but I didn't think it is damaging in anyway. What about the hundreds of other parodies here, are the authorities going after them too?

So even disclaimers in fanfictions cannot protect the authors? Kinda reminds me of that monty python movie where the emperor guy cannot accept any laughs about anything in his turf.

Another problem is, so much time of courts are spent on meger things that the bigger stuff tends to get bogged down for so long that its the real baddies that get away at the end.

It is kind cruel to young students who just graduated in going out into the world. I don't remember if it was in this forum, but there was a forum member who said he/she got expelled from the school for talking about a violent video game in school. One student took it too seriously or has never seen a video game console before.

Canadian members also are aware that they also have some anti-online bullying policies that makes online trolling and flamming a criminal offence. So you cannot go online and whine about how so and so sucks. This also gives the politicians and Ottawa to spread propaganda now that know one can flame them openly anymore.

Does anyone believe that freedom of speech in western nations such as Britan, U.S., Canada etc. are almost the same as if you are in lets say Iraq when it was under Saddam?

Yes saying the wrong things even if you mean no harm can still get you some brutal treatment by Jail-Master BUBBA. This way the government hands are clean you see. Not to mention there are also nasty after effects (in various ways) of saying the wrong things such as employment restrictions. You have to be careful not to tell the wrong person to F*** off regardless of how warped their opinions are.

All jokes are considered dangerous by western governments and law since 2001. Speech Facism is only spread more evenly in the west than in the other countries. In dictator nations you only have to watch out for governement goons when talking.

Here in Caucasian run nations, all citizens can be speech facists if they choose to. Voluntery freedom.
Not that its a bad thing but if you are surrounded by people who believe in using the full might of the airforce just to squash a fly then it might be a bit dangerous. Citizens can send a false report if they don't like your face. You might not get convicted, but BUBBA is sure to get a piece of you no matter the outcome. Hidden Facism in the west it seems.

I don't know, but it seems like anyone can be dangerous to you when you slightly say things that even slightly provokes their anger. They might not kick your ass but they might sue you to the point where you work your whole life to support the guy you told to "F*** off*.

I don't know but I have been hearing that even the smallest things are well to overblown here in the west. Not just U.S. But Canada and Europe too.

In the west anyone can be a dictator because of constitutional powers given to citizens, they don't like you they will call the authorties and you will have to deal with BUBBA later.

We have freedoms but nothing to stop people from going overboard and making a huge mess of things, thats the flaw.

I am not trying to generalize, I am just stating the potential the the masses in the west have.

Say from what I hear, the military only destroys buisness that is not U.S. based or run by U.S. citezens right? In other words as U.S. citizens it is alright to do buisness, with full protection of the constitution even if the sucess of a company may cause lets say Cheney's company to lose a few sales??

War is over resources right? Capatalism is compete for who can sell the most and get the most customers to like them and keep them comming back and make them lose interest in the product of your competitors right??

I don't know what personal company's government employees own but I am sure they can't send the air force against their own citizens for making better products then they do, like new cars, better computers, cleaner energy etc.

As long is the buisness is legit, and does not cause harm or damage, the U.S. law should allow its citizens to perform international buisness.

Okay so some U.S. General owns an insurance company overseas right? Lets say you are a U.S. citizen, came up with a better product that provides better rates and coverage which causes the poor general to lose a few sales.

Technically according to the U.S. law, it would be very difficult for the army or CIA to use force against their own citizens like this right?

I mean you don't see tanks rolling into Bill Gate's real estate do you? (assuming that the way he sells his shares aren't the way the government is liking it)

At 7/27/07 11:06 PM, Memorize wrote: ...Rape?

See nicaruga/honduras (sp?) CIA has particiapated with Somoza around 1980s.

Many posts seem to say what the CIA has done and stuff but I haven't really see many wondering:
"why does washington endorse rape and torture of pows" to begin with?

Okay lets say the army doesn't torture the prisoner, how will it hinder U.S. interests? Financial wise, is wall street gonna go bankrupt or something?? If the pows are considered that much of a hinderence why doesn't the army just quickly gun them down in one shot and be over with? Why spend the time to torture someone that are gonna be disposed of anyway?

Okay say that they want to keep the prisoner for trial, wouldn't giving the prisoner normal prisoner treatment. Even if the army doesn't want to release them they don't have to torture them.

Also, CIA and Military atrocities were not direct or forced orders to begin with. It appears that the warren did it volunteerly for sometimes personal reasons. Either don't touch the POW at all or eliminate them quickly, but no torture, is that too much to ask??

I don't see how Cheney's haliburton will get any healthier from whipping someones ass all day.....

This is just from my personal experience guys, but feel free to share your own if you object to my observations. As the topic states, I am wondering if one person's charm affects how that person's brain works in a way more chemically than psychologically.

I just sometimes can't seem to figure out the reason why beautiful girls tend to be more cold than regular girls. I know its wrong to judge people by looks but the human-ego always makes us attracted to whats beautiful on the outside than on the inside.

On the other hand do you think it is the natural way of nature? Like you know how a beautiful rose has thorns, a kitten would eat a mouse, and some beautiful looking fish is actually poisonous when you eat it. Applying it it to a beautiful person you get someone that looks perfectly cute and harmless but is arrogant, apathetic, rude, and just plain mean when you turn your back.

Do you think beautiful people can be as friendly as regular people or is it a nature thing that we are born with that is out of control?

I am posting this because from all the girls I have met it seems that the beautiful ones often make more irrational decisions and are more colder than regular ones.

What have you experienced? Are the mean people you have met tend to have charm and beauty? Whats the percentage between good-bad regular people vs. good-bad beautiful people usually?

As the title of this thread says, I believe that the act of scamming people should be treated as a serious offense of hate, discrimination and high-treason. If the con-artist is to be found guilty, he/she should face a mandatory sentence of 20+ years with no probabtion.

Honestly I think that the crime of scamming others is treatly far too mercifully and there are far to many loop holes in the legal system that many just get away with. An example? Look up Primerica, Ontario Energy Savings, Superior Gas, etc. I don't think an explanation is necessary.

Scamming is a hate crime because it fuels racism and discrimination. Most leaders of scamming companies target on innocent minorities who first land in Canada, US, etc. and have them scam people and then the innocent guy gets punished for being mislead into scamming people while the head honcho gets off scotch-free for making his victim "employees" sign a contract that dismiss any all all responsibilities of the head-honcho guy saying that those "employees" are independent agents.

Cunning scam eh? Unfortunately, scams don't just con people of there money, it puts fear and xenophobia into the public. The general public will begin to fear, be racist and discriminate thinking they are going to be scammed by so and so of so and so ethnicity. Extremist groups such as KKK will begin to feed on this stuff and spread even more misunderstanding. So you see scamming people sets of a huge chain reaction of unnecessary phobia symptoms into the public.

It appears that the head-honcho of scamming operations are more than just about making money. But rather, the head-honchos of scamming operations are extremist people with a political agenda and are trying to hide it. If not then ask yourself, how come scammers always target minorities and people of color?? Whether they are trying to hire "employees" or selling trash, they always, always target minorities. This fact alone tells you that scamming operations are not just greed motivated, but hate and racially motivated.

Finally but not least, I think that the act of scamming should be considered as treason according to the criminal code. Scamming is treason because this act betrays to nation, financially, emotionally, and ways that hinders the country from operating effectively. Now many people hardly trust each other fearing that the guy next to you might scam you. This creates division and confusion to the point where a country could be left defenseless to enemy attacks. If this is not treason then I don't know what is. This is why scam artists even if they scammed only one penny should be branded publically as traitors of their own country and serve lengthly time in maximum security prison working in gulags for extended periods of time.

Nowadays it has gone to the point where salesman are hated for their ethnicity, not what they are selling. And the national dollar is dropping like flies, heading for another great depression maybe by tomorrow. How is it possible for anyone to just sit back and relax while this apoclyptic event is occuring?

As the title questions, Americans should really give this question some deep thoughts of whether they are supporting/prentending to hate nazis. In many cases I have come across Americans on many forums claiming how they hate the Hitler and his ideals in one sentence and saying things that Hitler and his minions would have said in another sentence. Contradiction? Hyprocracy? or just plain old American culture??

From my observations, it appears that Americans are denying their love and passion for Nazism. The real reason why Americans hate Germans because German authorities are not supporting America's wars.

Americans are close to Nazis is because for one reason. Americans hate foriegners and people of color. I find that on many posts on this and other forums where Americans say things as if they want to incite anger in their targets and sometimes even supporting aggression (usually an ethnicity group they hate).

American support for Isreal doesn't make an American less racist but rather have their racism focused in another group. i.e. Americans supporting Isreal but hating the rest of the middle east. Isn't this kinda biased though? Just hating one of any group of people is enough to make one racist.

What bothers and offends me is that the online right-winger/extremist always turn out to be American. I don't remember seeing extremists from other countries online. Yet at the same time the American says the same things that a nazi would usually say and then finish it by saying they don't support nazism.

It seems more like Americans need a reason to hate Europe for not supporting American interests. Or perhaps Americans are envious that there are European countries that are more prosperous and has a higher standard of living than America??

I love how the way a beer helps me relieve the harshness of a day's life. However I don't like how it takes so long to sober. I usually take 3-4 beers in a roll on a bi-weekly basis and each time it takes about 6-7 hours before I lose the redness on my skin and eyes. Then for another 2-3 hours I get a wierd feeling in both my head and gut. To simply put, the after feeling of alcohol sucks.

I have heard that some people have a method of getting sober and out of alcohol sickness faster. Is there such thing is an anti-biotic or whatever thats out there that can help me sober faster as well as getting rid of skin redness, strange gut feelings and hangovers fast??

I don't want to be drunk for more than 2 hours. Is it possible?? What are your sober fast strategies?? Or what sober-fast strategies do you know of??

As I surf the net and visiting forums from within and abroad I notice that more and more people are blaming all the socio-economic problems on immigrants. Also from what I have noticed, people tend to picture immigrants as visable minorities. So for some reason a caucasian immigrant is rarely treated as an immigrant but more often as a native citizen.

What is convieniant for people to blame immigrants is when the ecomony is slowly decreasing from all the way back to the 80's or 70's which is when alot of post WWII and Cold War people going to America, Europe and Japan. So what end up happening is native-born westerners began to shun immigrants for rise in poverty, unemployment, low wages, crime and just about all the bad things are pointed towards immigrants. Though there maybe laws against discrimination in most western civilizations but do the citizens believe in the law of equal rights?? If enough citizens vote against giving rights to minorities will the part of the law be erased? That is slowly happening btw if you search through the net, you will be suprised by the number of ultra-nationalists there are.

Also I remember a source saying that the BNP, a super-right wing political party has gained an increased support as time went by. In Japan, racist politicians like Isihara Shintaro have already gained 80-90% of Japanese support for booting out every last minority even if they are born in Japan. So as you can see we are slowly going back to those days when it is alright to use racial slurs, banning visiable minorities from buisnesses or work etc. The most advanced nations seem to harbor the most discrimination for some reason.

Here are some questions for you:

a) Do you really believe that visable minorities are responsible most if not all the socio-economic problems?

b) When you see a visable minority is the first thing that come to your mind is that he/she must be an illiegal immigrant or some wanted criminal??

c) Will the world be a very dangerous place for minorities in the future?

d) Seeing as how George Bush is making extreme laws, do you think certain groups of people will be rounded up and placed in camps or deported even if they are citizens and have done nothing wrong?

I am posting this because I like to have a broader opinion of the computer technology work field. I am kinda concerned because I have heard alot of bad news about the computer field especially the software section is doing poorly at least economically. Software meaning (programmer, database administration, network administration, internet applications such as java etc.).

The problem is I am at a fork road in college and I must decide if I should pursue with specializing on software or hardware. On the skills side, I am better at computer software than on hardware by alot. Of course you might say "choose the one you are better at". But I am wondering if studying to be a programmer is worth it. I am concerned because the people getting laid off or getting salary cuts seems to happen more often to software specialists than hardware specialists in the IT field. But one thing for sure is that on the hardware side I am doing poorly at least academically as I find electronic circuits a bit too hard for me. I don't think I can do PCB design.

So the conclusion is, do you think there is a point for me to stay in the computer technology field if I am only good at software and not hardware? I can assemble and upgrade a computer but thats all I can do on the hardware side of it. I have no problem understanding operating systems and compilers though. I only get lost when it comes to analysing things at the component level (i.e, ICs, MOSFETs, resistors, diodes, etc.).

What is your opinion about the IT field?? Does the software section really suck? Is choosing the IT field a bad choice to make?

Well the unfortunate situation is that the whermacht mostly got the easy way out. They live like kings after the war to the day they perish. Most of the already dead whermacht died only of age and other natural things, they weren't punished. Alot of the still living whermacht are also unpunished and are living like kings by leeching off people's tax dollars while the continue to plan doom against mankind. The whermacht seems are also currently protected by human rights, which isn't one bit fair because the whermacht never respected human rights in the first place. Many still alive whermacht aren't even given minimum punishment.

I heard that the whermacht where an all volunteer army and none was conscripted. That is what makes me sad, the whermacht is nothing more than a cult that just wants to kill people for fun.

Its not just me, but alot of holocaust survivors claim that the whermacht wasn't punished enough and many are continued to be harassed by the remant whermacht who just seems to endlessly thirst for more fresh human meat to quench their unquenchable desires. Such is the ways of the whermacht. The whermacht was created to kill civilians, not to fight nor to defend Germany. According to statistics, the whermacht killed thousands of times more in civilian casualties instead of military casulties. Their tactics in avoiding military contact and purposly attacking and hunting down civilian targets proves the truly dark goals of the whermacht. The whermacht motto is civilians first and military second in target. Youth centers, hospitals and kindergardens are the first targets of the whermacht. Many newbie whermacht are given missions to burn down civilian hospitals and nursing homes. The whermacht enjoyed it, they where volunteers after all. They would do it for free even as long as they get a constant supply of humans for their meals of course.

Lets petition for justice.

I just finished watching history channel on World War 2 and left me the feeling that justice isn't properly served. It appears that everybody just wanted to get it over with even if it meant lighter sentences. I even heard that a whermacht soldier got lighter sentences than someone caught with possession of cocaine. Something tells me that is not right.

I don't understand why the Whermacht wasn't given capital punishment. There where at least several million of them and ninety percent of them are unpunished.

Wasn't the Wehrmacht made of volunteers who wanted revenge against the world? Evidence says that that is considered consent right? The Whermacht volunteer would at this point joined has consented that he wants to maime, rape and murder civilians and children for the sake of entertainment purposes and wants to be known to the world as a mass murderer because according to the psychotic scumbag of a dogmacht volunteer, its fun, according to this sonofab**h that is.

I am angry why? because the footages make the whermacht look so evil. They are always smiling in the camera. When they are underseige, they smile. When they are droping like flies, they smile. Lost an arm or leg? they still smile. The footages seem to tell me as if the whermacht are enjoying every moment of of the war, alot of pictures make them so look so sinister. That is what makes me angry. If there is a living tangable example of a hell-spawned daemon than it would be a whermacht slime-bag. The only good whermacht is a dead whermacht. Sure the majority are dead but they are nowhere near being punished as harsh as the Waffen SS for example. Whermacht and Waffen SS are just as evil, they both killed and ate children on purpose for fun.

Well the bottom line is. Do you believe that alot of the trials where not taken seriously enough?? Sorry if I offended some of you, I personally know people who are both holocaust survivors as well as those who are relatives of those who got KIA during WWII.

What the alliance did was to punish the head honchos of the third reich such as the gestapo, waffen ss and nazi politicians. What was missed was the facts the its the little insects like the whermacht who does all the killing enthusiastically and with a passion. Those who haven't died of age yet are probably bragging about how if they are given another life they will probably go kill and eat people again for fun the moment they get a chance.

Understand that through the whole post, I am not discriminating as that is not the goal. Sorry if I offended anyone. I am frustrated only at the whermacht who is still alive. Alot of them are retired in their cottages when they should be jailed and atoning their sins by generously giving their rear to the jail lord named bubba.

I mean I watched this documentary the other day where this former whermacht was being interviewed on history channel. This guy killed like 20 guys, including civilians. Talking with a big smile on his face as if he has enjoyed his murders. I was like WTF? why is he not punished then? He should be locked up because he is a whermact and still wants to kill and canabalize for fun.

outragous. I say we should punish the still alive whermacht before they die. They need to feel the pain the alliance has endured.

During the documentary about the blitzkreig of 1941 for example, the whermacht were shown marching through a burnt down village filled with bodies everywhere with a big smile on their face. The fact that the whermact animals beaten ,consumed ,humiliated, maimed,murdered and raped the most and got punished the least is infuriating.

I hope I didn't pass the line today. I really needed to vent today's stress somehow. I am open to corrections btw.

I am thinking of campaigning and petitioning for the punishment of the remaining whermacht remnants. I mean come on a gram of narcotics get you seven years in jail and a serial killer wannabe whermacht who burned villages and killed unarmed children for fun gets to live his life in a cottage feeding off citizen's tax dollars?!?!?! This is outrageous!!

also the allies lost more than the whermacht and it isn't a fair fight. evil needs to lose more than good.

Although somethings might sound unbelievable, but I do remember a quoting from a whermacht saying something like "nobody will believe what we done here after the war."
You can find the quote in just about any holocaust textbook.
I haven't found any reliable sources yet that debunk my predictions for some reason and whenever I do, the dubunks are made by neo-nazis.