Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/11/06 05:26 PM, Lidov wrote:

At 6/11/06 05:16 PM, MagicalPJ wrote: Not to mention that Mecca is in Saudi Arabia. . . NOT Iran. Unless Saudi Arabia is going to go and threaten Israel too, they wont do anything to Mecca or Medina. Nice try.

I find it hard to believe that even if Saudia Arabia will threaten us or even attack us we will destroy the holliest place to the Islam. We might attack other cities, but not Mecca or Almadina, or at least not the Caba (or however you spell all of these things).

I completely agree with that statement. To do so would be inviting the entire Muslim world to go to war with you.

At 6/11/06 04:39 PM, Lidov wrote:

At 6/11/06 04:13 PM, Robbodestroyo wrote: Well, if anything Isreal will bomb the shit out of Mecca, oen of the most holiest sites in Islam. Actually, I think that the threat of Isreal doing that has kept Iran from doing shit to them. So once Iran pushes it too far for Isreal, they blow up Mecca. But it would be a last move for Isreal because after that all the Islamic countries would retaliate.

We will never blow up Mecca, this is because we are, unlike Iran, conventional. Besides, the Muslim population of the world is over 1 billion people, we won't destroy their holliest place just because one country's mistake. If Israel blows up Mecca (which is the holliest place also to more than 20% of it's own poeple) I will no longer consider myself part of it. Good it won't happen.

Not to mention that Mecca is in Saudi Arabia. . . NOT Iran. Unless Saudi Arabia is going to go and threaten Israel too, they wont do anything to Mecca or Medina. Nice try.

At 5/12/06 12:02 PM, mackid wrote:

At 5/12/06 11:35 AM, RedScorpion wrote: "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. " - Benjamin Franklin.

Oh my gosh. Did Benjamin Franklin really utter those words? I can't believe it. That's such a good argument! I honestly have never even heard anyone use those words before! You really hit it on the head! And you're so original too! It's amazing! Wow!

Amazing. Rather than respond in a meaningful way, you've decided to be a complete pompous ass. Thank you for your incredibly valuable input.

That being said, you have to go easy on him. He's Canadian XD

I'll go hide now =(

I can't fully side with any party, but I lean Democrat.

At 5/9/06 12:19 PM, Begoner wrote: That\'s proof of how the American system doesn\'t work. We just condemned an innocent man to life in prison for crimes he didn\'t commit because of his perjured testimony, caused by his insanity. It\'s disgraceful.

He plead guilty of his own free will, therefore condemning himself. Would you rather he got the death penalty?

At 4/16/06 02:45 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: Hell is a metaphysical construct. It's also Detroit.

Anywhere but there :(

(I hate Detroit so much XD)

I hearby rename this thread, "The 'OFFICIAL' Name-Calling Topic"

At 4/15/06 09:09 PM, Big_SciZot wrote: The politics forum used to be a place where people only posted nice, clean, and well-thought-out posts.

Surely that was a very long time ago XD

At 4/15/06 09:03 PM, BFG_Nine-Thousand wrote: The only thing that really burns my ass about Japan is the government's singluar arrogance toward history. Not once have they apologized to the people of China for their military's actions during World War II. Not once.

The Rape of Nanking? Never heard of it. It's sickening how easily they can turn around and deny history.

They've actually apologized on numerous occassions, going back to the 70's I believe. However, history textbooks in Japan fail to make significant mention of such atrocities and that's the main source of tension between Japan and China, regarding that subject. Though, in my opinion, that's not much better.

At 4/10/06 10:16 PM, Hermannator wrote:

At 4/10/06 10:12 PM, AccessCode wrote:
Or maybe it's because we're in iraq and that this always happens when the US is at war.

It always happen when we're in a unjustified war that no one wants to be a part of, like like Vietnam. Besides he was the one that got us into it in the first place.

No, he's right. Even Lincoln and FDR took alot of shit during The Civil War and WWII. You never read about that in the history books though.

At 4/10/06 07:48 PM, chocolate_penguin wrote: Does anyone else think this thread is starting to look like a bad idea?

Well. . . technically any thread which allows 13/14 year olds to regurgitate their parent's political/ideological beliefs (no offense to those of you who have actually made semi-intelligent arguments) and then start to show their age when someone tells them they're wrong is bound to be a bad idea after 50 some-odd pages of posts

XD

At 4/9/06 11:54 PM, Joodah wrote: same, except, i'm sad to say, you got something wrong. gw's brother really is the governor of florida, and not his father. other than that, good job.

D

I think he knew that =P I'm pretty sure that he was saying that Bush got elected, not because of his governor brother, but, because of his former president father.

I don't necessarily agree with furball on everything, but I do think he's right about that XD

So I guess you've never tried to make a living on a minimum wage job? XD
I get your point though.

At 4/3/06 03:14 PM, inuyashaincarnate wrote:

good day to you sir!

Hahahahahahahaha! Seriously, this reinforces my post a little farther up. I giggled like a Japanese school girl when I read this. I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for being a complete D-bag ^O^

go fuck urself like u do everynight

Seriously, you're the funniest person I know ^O^
Thank you for being a part of my life. =D

At 3/28/06 04:36 AM, Jamsie wrote:

At 3/27/06 04:19 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: The American Revolution was an impetus for the French Revolution, but NOT the most important one, not at ALL.

the french revolution came befor the american one so i dont see how you worked that one out numbnuts

I can't believe no one else caught this one. You . . . IDIOT! American Revolution: began in 1775 (some would argue 1774). French Revolution: began in 1789. The American Revolution impacted the French Revolution in the following way: because king Louis XV spent so much money supporting our cause, he practically bankrupted France. When Louis XVI became king, he continued to spend money (on himself) like a madman, as did his wife Marie Antoinette. When everyone around you is starving, they get kind of pissed off to see you doing things like that.

The main influence from the US is seen in The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which is influenced by the US Declaration of Independence (though some would argue that it was simply influenced by the Liberal ideas of the time and not by the Declaration of Independence inparticular).

Please . . . if you're going to say anything in a thread with an historical subject . . . read books. They are your friend, as is knowing the correct chronoligical order of important events.

At 3/30/06 03:02 PM, inuyashaincarnate wrote:

ok for one thing its not a conspiracy thing there bud and im 16 there bud shows how smart you are for not lookin at my damn profile before u open ur "genuis" mouth and just shut the fuck up about this and get on to the dam topic at hand so dont fuck with me or ill find out where you live and kick ur ass

good day to you sir!

Hahahahahahahaha! Seriously, this reinforces my post a little farther up. I giggled like a Japanese school girl when I read this. I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for being a complete D-bag ^O^

At 3/29/06 11:37 PM, Dinodoode wrote: Look at the Chinese-American War this way, the US said they would be done in Iraq in 10 months, we've been there for 3 years.

The major difference between our situation in Iraq now and any potential situation in Taiwan is this: the Iraqis don't want us there, nor do the thousands of militant Islamic extremist that are fighting us. Therefore, we have a huge insurgency on our hands which we've been dealing with for years now. If war broke out between Taiwan and China, and I hope to God that it never happens, you would see an overwhelming support for US intervention within Taiwan. Assuming we got the Chinese army to withdraw from Taiwin in 10 months or less, the war would be over in 10 months or less, it's about as simple as that.

At 3/26/06 09:53 PM, GSgt_Liberal wrote: Doesn't count. Became indpendent in 1935.

The Philippines? They became independant on July 4, 1946 . . . .

Yes, please elaborate.

If you said something like "Man! I fu*%($(%ing LOVE the soldiers! May all of their bullets find the hearts of the enemy!", then I could understand some people thinking that. If you just said something like "You know, I really don't support this war, but I wish the troops nothing but the best and under no circumstance will I wish ill on any of them," then I they're reaction makes no sense.

At 3/24/06 04:23 PM, Imperator wrote:

Heheh, yes, I am a moron, I bow to your obvious mastery of the Eniglish language, and your reading comprehension skills too (I said you suck at math, you respond saying you're good at english, well done......).

Why don't we just BAN people like this? Seriously, what is it that they contribute, besides a good laugh?

We keep them here because we need a good laugh to counteract all of the other "conversation" on this forum. =P

Please . . . please don't take that away from me. XD

well this thread's getting locked

At 2/23/06 02:54 PM, Imperator wrote:

At 2/23/06 02:46 PM, MagicalPJ wrote:

At 2/23/06 02:45 PM, PowerRangerYELLOW wrote: I wacth the colbert report

I concede defeat

Fuck! Our U of M powers are worthless now..........

What good is a Wolverine against truthiness?!?!??!
Woe is me......

I know! I never saw it coming =*( Next time I'll be ready though. From now on, I'm getting my news from the Colbert Report, The Daily Show, AND random people that post things on the internet.

At 2/23/06 08:48 PM, Traced wrote: You guys are fucking stupid. The war in Iraq is partly a civil war also. The groups that operate within Iraw contain Iraqi citizens, and are clearly a group (I am not making a connection between them and Al Queda). And there are some Iraqi troops operating at the moment, so technically it is a civil war.

lolopinion

I'll agree with you to an extent. There are some Iraquis in the insurgency. However, it's largely foreigners. What we're talking about is full-blown civil war, which is NOT what's going on right now. Things are bad enough as it is, you throw in an actual civil war and things will get really ugly.

It's certainly a possibility. It's about the worst thing that could happen right now.

At 2/23/06 02:45 PM, PowerRangerYELLOW wrote: I wacth the colbert report

I concede defeat

At 2/19/06 12:41 AM, PharaohRamsesII wrote: We need a Senate and an Emperor!
*sniff* I miss you Rome....

A tear for those we've lost =*(

In all seriousness though: I'd like to see no political parties, just a bunch of guys getting voted on for their ideas, not their party's ideas. I also know that in this day and age a no parties system is just about impossible. So realistically, I'd like to see a bunch of small parties, instead of two big parties holding the monopoly.

At 2/17/06 08:50 PM, facksfunny wrote:

I don't think you understood what I was saying there. First of all the moon isn't called space. Going to space doesn't mean we're going to the moon. The ability to go into space doesn't grant us the ability to go to the moon. Not only is there the Van Allen belt, there is also radiation on the moon too.

Wow . . . it really is pointless to argue physics or astronomy with a high school student, because 99% of them have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. Please . . . promise me you'll go farther than looking at the notes you kind of sort took during class for your sources.

At 2/16/06 10:01 AM, 1Shot-Paddy wrote: Iran wouldn't attack Israel would they? From my recollection of history Iran are good friends of the Jewish faith, they saved them from Babylon I think. Plus, Iran isn't a Muslim country so there isn't the Palestine reason for nuking Israel.

Haha. That's cute. Iran is an Islamic theocracy. It has a president and all that other fun stuff, but it's the sheiks that really run the country. The only way you could get more Islamic than that is if Mohammed was running the country himself.

At 2/15/06 09:12 PM, Raging_Mormon wrote: well for one, white americans suck major balls and should be exterminated with extreme force.

All of them except me =D

Right? =o

At 7/15/05 10:47 AM, LJCoffee wrote:

At 7/14/05 11:08 PM, red_skunk wrote: So, who among us pretends to be psychic while making money off of sorry saps who buy our books?

Man I wish I could! Obviously there are quite a few people who would be more than willing to fork over a few shekels for prophecy... Anyone want to co-author it?

I'm in =D