Hy guys! Some new stuff is on my page: a Pirates of the Caribbean remake - and I could use some feedback! The stuff is in two parts and in 160 Kbps bitrate quality. Enjoy and review them! Cheers!

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/view.php?id=1 580280

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOOlrctrgig
Here you can see a video made by a realy talented young director - and he used my music as well in his short film. I think it turned out really good but decide it after watching it.

http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/view.php?id=1 580280
And this is my page! I'm a kind of soundtrack-like classical mucis composer guy - well I'm trying to be one. Hope you'll like my audios.

so... usualy zero voters are teenagers between 12 and 16 and they think this is fun(to hurt people feelings...)i think you wil have a lot of bad reviews if you will change voting sistem that way. eniway ,i will check your music and if i like it i will 5 all to get even with zero voters.

Nop I don't think that. You dont have to be a teenager to behave like that. I don't want to sound big-headed or like that but this is question of intelligence. I can imagine that some people are zeroed down just becose someone wants to get into the top ten. Then he will be angry because of this and zeroes down someone elses music... and the circle goes on. So I cant belive that zero voting - if it is wrongfully given without any normally written review - is a good thing. And there are always some good music composers who has the talent but cant reach the top ten, nor a big download number beacuse the wrongfull given points. The current rating system gives an opportuniti for revenge - 0 down the scores just for fun or I don't know. In this way could all submissons judged in a - maybe - equal way. I think...

I should have looked around first before opening this topic... ah well...

Well I've read some posts and I say: the ranking should be made by the reviews. So at least these reatrded jerks who always score 0 to the songs have to write something. But I think there should be a minimun character amount that should be written in the review, so one-word revs and some short but nonsens stuff won't be acceptable with the lov scores.
Another thing that I'm agreed with is that the submitter of tha audios could manage his own stuff. So if you want to change an already existing submisson (because you made some volume level changes but nothing else - so the tracks structure is the same), by re-submitting it, change the title, description etc.

Hi Everyone!
I think this problem involves a lot of people. What is this? There are some... dunno how to call them who vote 0 or 1 to any audio submissions. Why? They want to see their submission in the top 10, they have a bad day or they are simply stupid.
I have a LOT negative experience with this as well and I got an idea how to change the system. Maybe I'm sending this to the wrong place but I want to know what are you thinking about this.

The main problem is that everyone (who has an account) can wote on a 0 to 5 scale, without writing a review. So just one click and the scores are falling to hell. My idea is: The rankig should be made only trough the overall points of the reviews. And there could be maybe a minimal character requirement that should be written in the reviews. So I think in this way most of these cases could be solved. Of course there would be also some stupid people who will write nonsense and give unfair points, but I think most of them are too retarded and to lazy to write a normal word down.

So. What do you think about this idea. Could it work? Write your opinion about it.