Be a Supporter!
Response to: Pistons vs. The Spurs Posted June 22nd, 2005 in General

Game seven is gonna be one-sided coming up Thursday. San Antonio can not and will not lose this game. I'm a Heat fan, and for Detroit to get so lucky in the Eastern Conference Finals pisses me off.

Response to: Pistons vs. The Spurs Posted June 22nd, 2005 in General

There is no way San Antonio is gonna let Detroit win game 7. They have the better offence and the two are the best defensive teams in the league. Spurs will take it in 7, no matter how much I hate them. Parker and Ginobili are going to lead them in the first half and Duncan is gonna take over the 3rd and 4th quarters.

Response to: Family Guy Crew Posted May 30th, 2005 in Clubs & Crews

I hate to say it, but Stewie is getting old and fast. All these attempts on Louise's life is starting to get annoying. However, his long lasting rivalry with Brian makes him a great character to watch.

Also, who else HATES that ripoff of Family Guy, American Dad? I say we boycott that show and give Family Guy an extra 30 minutes!

Response to: Child porn? Posted May 30th, 2005 in Politics

Also, I know a kid who, when he was 16, got a 19-year-old pregnant. They're still together and claim they "love" each other. He's on his 3rd kid and he's only 19.

That's a bit off topic from the child porn thing, but if he can go on doing something like that, then how can the LAW limit the viewing of 17 and maybe 16-year-olds. As long as you're not obsessing over them and stalking them, it can't be that bad.

Response to: Child porn? Posted May 30th, 2005 in Politics

At 5/24/05 03:59 PM, Druid5 wrote: yeah it's still child porn and yes you can be arrested. Ignorance of the law does not grant you immunity from the law.

It's not ignorance of the LAW. It's not knowing what you're getting.

If somebody send you a picture of a 17-year-old chick that looks like her 22-year-old sister...how are you to blame for not knowing?

Response to: R I P, Eu Constitution Posted May 30th, 2005 in Politics

At 5/30/05 12:07 PM, jonthomson wrote: While this is probably the best thing the French have done in their history since giving us Kronenbourg, they'll find a way to push it through anyway. They're sneaky like that.

It's funny, the UK will vote no as well, but for almost the opposite reasons.

The French have done plenty, nobody recognizes them because we would rather go on about how bad they are. Also, the UK would most likely vote for it in spite of the French and their efforts. Then again the Brits are a tough people to predict.

Response to: Hiring a Stripper for a 16 year old Posted May 30th, 2005 in Politics

I think they should work on legalizing having stippers at a party for people 16 and over. It's not like the average 16-year-old child in America doesn't have any contact with pornography or sex acts otherwise. Let's not beat around the bush, I want my sons to have only the best strippers and prostitutes at their Sweet 16s!