860 Forum Posts by "Love"
I just want to know the Truth. After ACII, all I care about are glyphs.
Racism only applies to whites.
It's almost time! Are you going to any halloween parties (or hosting)? You know, "blood punch" and "eyeball ice-cream" costume parties where they play the same song over and over again (probably "Party Rock Anthem")? If so, are you dressing up? I'm definitely going to a few of them - haven't decided what to dress up as since I probably won't be going trick or treating (I think sneaking around after dark in your early twenties would be too creepy even for Halloween). If I could host a party, I'd probably pull some sort of ImprovEverywhere-esque prank on the guests.
No matter what happens, I'm sure this is going to be a wild weekend.
Also, admire this work of art:
At 10/27/11 10:16 PM, Chumbawamba wrote: One does not simply walk into Mordor.
This is the best post ever.
Bill Gates is not allowed to have anything celebratory until iPhone 5.
At 10/27/11 11:42 PM, HollowedPumkinz wrote:At 10/27/11 11:35 PM, Hybridization wrote: This is completely dangerous and you could end up in jail (for the gun thing). Unless the gun is multicolored like a water pistol, or has a very clear orange muzzle, what you would be doing is illegal.General: "Making me lose faith in humanity everyday."
You know, if so many people think the same way, there's a good reason for it.
I did read the OP in its entirety.
This is completely dangerous and you could end up in jail (for the gun thing). Unless the gun is multicolored like a water pistol, or has a very clear orange muzzle, what you would be doing is illegal.
You mean Congress has something else to work on?
No worries, guys.
At 10/27/11 10:55 PM, Cordyceps wrote: There was an old animated series that superimposed real mouths to save money, decades before Daneboe came into the scene.
This.
AO is just the most well known and best quality (for the most part).
At 10/27/11 08:28 PM, Synnxile wrote: lol..i don't associate my pets with such imaginable and barbaric things. HAHAHAHHAHAH ;D ;D
You have no childhood!
At 10/27/11 06:47 PM, Syztm wrote: Hey, did you guys hear? When you hover your cursor over the Angry Face icon, something scary will happen!
Why did you have to say that :(
Now I'm terrified.
At 10/27/11 07:10 PM, RobJohnson wrote: If I were a child, (and I had no prior knowledge of the rules) I would be very confused and either eat the thing in secret, or be completely turned off by the test and not eat any amount of marshmallows awarded just because I did not understand.
Well the children are given all the rules (except for the pre-designated time limit). The researcher must confirm that the subject understand the rules, otherwise the results are distorted and unreliable.
But, yes, if we substituted "dollar" for "marshmallow", it would be more appropriate for your age. So, let's say you are given the same scenario with $500,000 - the timeframe is in decades. Would you still wait?
I usually go here for advice.
At 10/27/11 07:01 PM, roderickii wrote:At 10/27/11 05:56 PM, Hybridization wrote: Piplup :D!Thats an awesome parrot.
I think I deserve to be awarded the most points in this thread.
Unfortunately I don't have any pokeballs.
At 10/27/11 07:01 PM, RobJohnson wrote: stop giving marshmallows to our children.... you are only contributing to childhood obesity.
Childhood obesity is the leading cause of childhood obesity.
At 10/27/11 06:45 PM, sparrow wrote: Surely the greatest horror film ever?
I need to see this movie! I need something to cheer me up after Paranormal...
At 10/27/11 06:46 PM, adamflecko wrote: This thread.
Surely the greatest pile of shit ever?
Bashing the OP must make your post automatically funny, huh?
I sure as hell wouldn't give them to Japan.
At 10/27/11 05:02 PM, DarkMatter wrote: What if kids just don't like masrhmellows on their own?
Pre-testing the researcher would need to ask if the child liked/disliked marshmallows.
At 10/27/11 04:37 PM, g0t wrote: From: DonCarrera
Sent: 3 minutes ago
Subject: Well fuck this.
Can we make up or something? That was actually a shitty trolling attempt in that thread but I feel sort of stupid for taking it too far...
Win.
Re-installing should keep your library anyway.
I don't have the fact to back this up, but...
Piranhas are fish.
At 10/27/11 04:23 PM, g0t wrote:At 10/27/11 04:18 PM, Hybridization wrote: WTF why did this turn into a flame war?Now go on, ask me something else.
Well wouldn't you think that a female perspective is ultimately the best one? I'm not saying EVERY female has the exact same mindset as me, but I can give pretty decent rule-of-thumbs.
For instance, if you are after:
A) Sex exclusively: Using most of the advice in this thread will probably work on sluts/whores - whatever nasty word you want to use to describe them.
B) A trivial relationship: Using most of the advice in this thread will probably work 50% of the time, but the relationship will probably not last (which is what you are after anyway).
C) A serious relationship: None of the advice in this thread will work on rational/mature females.
IMHO
Now all I need is a microscope, and I will be good to go!
At 10/27/11 03:54 PM, fuzzum111 wrote: If I have the choice of going to taco bell now and paying for my food.
Or waiting an hour for my dad to get home and having -him- buy lunch? I'd rather wait.
Well this scenario incorporates some sort of loss through instant satisfaction, but I see where you're going with it.
At 10/27/11 04:02 PM, Bobbybroccoli wrote: Now I would wait for the second marshmallow, but this test is biased to be given to 13 year-olds an older, snce this test is to test brain patterns in early stages of life.
Right; so, maybe you would like to take the question metaphorically and translate it into something more valuable such as money or a car and bump up the timeframe to years or even decades.
WTF why did this turn into a flame war?
I disapprove of this discussion.
I hold it in, because over-exaggerating is childish and stupid - never results in something good.
