Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

A psychologist.

I favorited that game...

Probably because they are amazing songs. I agree that they are overdone, but not many people deny the fact that the artist and composer are brilliant.

Today, I was laying in bed procrastinating all the work I will inevitably have to do. Then suddenly I found this topic, and came up with the best idea for a response I ever had.

Unfortunately I have no time to type it all out, so it has to go unposted until my work is done (and that will never happen).

So now here I lay with my laptop and BBS wondering how to end this buzz-kill response. I realize it's just a lame shell of nonsense.

R.I.P Best response ever, we'll never get to read you :(

And this is why I no longer buy games involved in the FPS rivalry. It's sad to see the Battlefield series sink from stand-alone glory to this.

I'll be on Uncharted 3, Tomb Raider, and Human Revolution if you need me.

So naturally I have to ask, "Why don't you buy something else?".

Guns i'd imagine.

At 10/24/11 10:55 AM, JimCoolCarl wrote: so yeah....i dont plan on going to another movie theater ever again.
their not what they used to be and honestly its becoming cheaper and cooler to make your own entertainment area at home.

This plus bootleg.

At 10/24/11 03:15 AM, Halberd wrote:

At 10/24/11 12:34 AM, Hybridization wrote: Nobody listens to them and they're mostly just annoying background noise at football games.

Inb4fapping

Go be an abomination elsewhere

You mean somewhere like NG? I'd be happy too :3

At 10/24/11 01:48 AM, SKHM wrote: Unless, you can provide me with a SCIENTIFIC (read: something verifiable and testable) reason for why we shouldn't "rob" other countries, then shut the fuck up.

How the hell do you derive a moral decision from scientific observation?

At 10/24/11 01:01 AM, Xarnor wrote: Everyone knows the world is fucked up. It's beyond me why people are becoming more and more concerned with it these days. Do you suggest that we individually hunt for and/or grow all of our own food?

I'm not suggesting anything. Just curious as to who cares in society.

I take it you don't.

At 10/24/11 12:55 AM, Chemich wrote:

At 10/23/11 11:08 PM, LocoJoe wrote:

At 10/23/11 10:04 PM, Hybridization wrote:

Sorry for the rant. I just came back from my World Issues course.

Hey look another college hippie idealist who thinks the world should be perfect.

What's wrong with striving for perfection?

There's nothing wrong with striving for perfection, but don't expect to achieve it.

I never said it's achievable, lol. What's with all this needless confrontation?

At 10/24/11 12:52 AM, CorpseGrinderClock wrote: Stuff

THANK YOU

At 10/24/11 12:49 AM, Gagsy wrote: Me thinks you're not understanding the point of cheerleaders.

I'm voluntarily dismissing it and substituting a stereotype.

I'm having coffee with breakfast :3

Oh snap!

inb4satanic

At 10/24/11 12:44 AM, TrueLAD wrote:

At 10/24/11 12:42 AM, Chemich wrote: They're meant to fuck the football team and relieve stress and doubt.

So that's in their official job description is it?

I think it's implied.

Fuck-head.

You used "fuck" and "head" in the same word! How cute :3

What is this I don't even...

Ever play Halo?

Everything in that.

At 10/24/11 12:35 AM, TrueLAD wrote:

At 10/24/11 12:34 AM, Hybridization wrote: Nobody listens to them and they're mostly just annoying background noise at football games.

Closet homosexual.

Attic heterosexual actually.

Nobody listens to them and they're mostly just annoying background noise at football games.

Inb4fapping

When you see it, you will shit bricks...

In other news: opinions.

At 10/23/11 11:08 PM, LocoJoe wrote:

At 10/23/11 10:04 PM, Hybridization wrote:

Sorry for the rant. I just came back from my World Issues course.

Hey look another college hippie idealist who thinks the world should be perfect.

Sorry for having a noble aspiration.

At 10/23/11 11:08 PM, Jedi-Master wrote:

At 10/23/11 11:02 PM, Jedi-Master wrote:
And to think that an American such as myself helped conclude an argument criticizing Americans.

Umm....I think this is the first time I have EVER misused an emote....

What emote?

At 10/23/11 11:01 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote: Have you actually lived in the US?

I have family there.

Having two sides fighting over an issue is a lot more productive than everyone having their own side.

This is very decent logic. However, I'm mostly addressing the childish behavior of the parties and their unwillingness to compromise.

At 10/23/11 10:53 PM, Jedi-Master wrote: You have every right to examine Americans and their politics and to judge them based on what you see or interpret as the truth. Even if your conclusion is objectionable, you have every right to stand by it.

Thanks. This acceptance of difference is rare.

By the way, hell has just frozen over. A BBS argument has ended in compromise.

At 10/23/11 10:43 PM, Jedi-Master wrote:

At 10/23/11 10:35 PM, Hybridization wrote:

Globalization has driven many 3rd-Worlds into extreme poverty

Wouldn't 3rd world countries be in a state of extreme poverty by definition?

I'm using the term to define the regions that I am focusing on. Basically, I'm saying, "Here's why we call them Third-World."

But they were nations in poverty long before globalization became a reality.

Well I am including colonization in much of this. The native cultures were decimated, and now we are abusing their "lag" in civilization evolution.

I won't lie to you; I am a huge supporter of globalization and free trade. But I will say that your example is saddening and a reminder of the evils that the largest corporations(Not all corporations, or even most, though) can and do inflict.

Right. I'm still selfish in that I will still be taking more than I can eat at dinner, but I still acknowledge the fact that many of the world's evils are ignored.

and steals every bit of fruit and vegetables from the mouths of millions of children.

Stolen? How?

I consider buying through unfair/rigged/manipulated markets theft.

This is why we should make markets more free and enforce the principles of capitalism(With small restraints to keep the markets free of monopolies and perhaps oligopolies) through lifting many of the restraints on selling and buying.

I completely agree.

At 10/23/11 10:37 PM, Jedi-Master wrote:

At 10/23/11 10:20 PM, Hybridization wrote: How is that not stupid?

It's just my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

Okay, fair enough.

Also, not taking a side is idiotic and displays your ignorance of government."

How many people actually think this?

Roughly the number of politicians.

You've overstated your point.

Okay...why did you ask, then?

I wanted to see your response.

Lol, okay.

But I will say that it's not difficult to know what unity in the U.S.A. isn't or what it doesn'tentail. And I will say this: unity in America does NOT entail that of political unity. If this were true, no Americans throughout history would be able to attest to the sense of unity that the U.S.A. has felt for most of its history.

I disagree. Political disunion is the reason for the Occupy Wall Street movements.

I said that unity doesn't entail "political unity."

That's what I disagree with. The "political unity" issue caused the OWS movements and Civil War. I suppose the war is a stronger argument, though.

But even in times of "political disunion"(Which has existed for most of our nation's history), people....Americans...have mostly felt united.

Hmm, it just doesn't seem so from an outsider perspective. But, who am I to say what Americans feel :3?

At 10/23/11 10:27 PM, thegarbear14 wrote: where are you even talking about anyway? how are plants which are farmed by people on the land stolen exactly. you could mean the land is stolen from the people, but the food isn't. they are unable to grow their own food due to the land being stolen but crops grown aren't stolen unless already grown before it claimed.

I consider purchasing [anything] from a naive or manipulated market without fair treatment theft. You are stealing their right to fair earnings - much like having a servant work for you and refusing to disclose a part of the contract.