Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 12/24/14 06:58 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote:

It's not compulsive penis-comparison though, it's hysterical idiots dismissing my views out of hand because their anti-scientific view of race conflicts with mine.

Anti-science? Sorry to tell you but you are wrong. You can ask any anthropologist, biologist and genealogist and they tell you what I've told you. Being an anthropology major I've learned the matters of "race" over the past few years, so I have experience in the field.

It appears that the movie will be shown after all.

At 12/22/14 07:25 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote: Black people literally are less intelligent than other races by all major measures of intelligence (IQ, academic scores etc.) and they commit more violent crime than any other race of people. What planet are you living on where I'm the ignorant one?

I'll let you in on something; race is a biological myth, a cultural construction. Race various from culture to culture. Here in America we base it on skin color. Skin tone is nothing more than a physical adaptation to the angle of the sunlight. The melanocytes in our skin angle themselves to protect the body from ultraviolet radiation. The closer you are to the poles the lighter you skin tone will be. The closer to the equator you are the darker you skin tone will be. If someone from the equator were to move closer to the pulls, after several generations the descendants will start to show signs of adapting to the new angle and vice versa. It’s no different than the strength of the lungs compared to the altitude you live in.

So no, "race" has nothing to do with any of that.

This was bound to happen eventually. With the cases that have been coming up and no clear answers to them someone was going to get this idea in their head.

With Sony's pulling The Interview due to threats could this potentially open the door to limiting freedom of speech when it comes to the film industry? Should Sony have just gone ahead and shown the movie or were they in the right to cancel the film. Just where do we draw the line between standing up to threats and backing down.

It would appear that the US and Cuba will be improving relations with one another. So after decades the embargo on Cuba will be lifted. Really what has it ever done? This could actually help Cuba's conditions improve.

At 12/15/14 11:00 PM, aviewaskewed wrote:

At 12/15/14 09:42 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: According to your ideal the USA does no harm and no president has ever violated anything. Take another sip of the government koolaid and have a seat while the free thinkers move forward.

lol. Took you a whole month to come up with that drivel huh? You also (again) didn't answer a direct question posed to you.

Another funny thing is that none of us ever claimed that government was pure. We just don't jump to conclusions.

At 12/8/14 09:44 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: "innocent people" Women and children for a living.

You really need to get you read back into reality. In war, innocent people get caught in the cross fire, its unavoidable, always has been always will be.

At 11/30/14 10:50 AM, Camarohusky wrote: I hate turkey. The fact the everyone insists on eating pouds of it after thanksgiving to torture. Of all the meats we could eat, we picked the most rancid flavored bird that lasts for-fucking-ever.

Tell me about it. Give me a slice of ham any day.

At 11/26/14 01:08 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Now that the case is over, life should return to normal. Looting and setting fires to the city is only going to cause more problems.

There will always be those handful of hooligans amongst the peaceful protesters that just want to cause trouble.

At 11/23/14 11:15 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: If you would like to sign the petition to have the UN do third party investigations then you are very welcome to.

*facepalm* You just don't get it do. You need evidence for your claims. The UN would not do an investigagtion until you do no matter how many people you got to sign a petition.

Otherwise we should just take it up the ass by the biggest gorilla in the room right.

And here lies the problem. You are so paranoid of government lies that you think they lie all the time. So no matter what anyone says your mind won't change. Even if the UN did an investigation and proved the official report to be correct you would just go straight back to saying it’s a lie.

At 11/23/14 11:03 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Perhaps you could help. I am trying to rally the UN to open up an investigation on the events but they tell me that the US has to much Political, Financial and Military influence to be challenged and it is best to stand down and take it up the ass by Uncle Sam like everyone else.

You missed my point entirely. YOU are the one making an accusation. YOU are the one required to show evidence of why your accusation is correct. If you want some third party investigation you are the one required to give reason, and the only way for you to get that is to provide evidence against the official report. Until then your accusations means nothing.

leanlifter1 or you have to do is provide one piece of credible evidence, just one, then we have something that can be debated, until your do all of you claims mean nothing.

At 11/22/14 07:43 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: No sorry I don't have any fluff to throw at some other fluff. Just logic and common sense not rhetorical propaganda and fluff.

So you have nothing and are going on your government is evil rant.

At 11/22/14 07:32 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: War has always been a scandal.

Sure it has. I mean wars can't start up of over issue between neighbors.

The attacks on the Benghazi strip should have never happened in the first place.

Guess what, shit happens in this world and people die.

This piece of propaganda that you linked to is just some fluff to try and exonerate the Government from foul play.

You got any evidence to back that claim up, until you do your accusation means nothing.

At 11/20/14 11:18 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Private Police could actually arrest Obama and Bush for ... "Crimes Against Humanity". Military has the authority and constitutional obligation to do such but unfortunately ... they are corrupt as well and once again the bureaucracy.

Do you even know what qualifies as a crime against humanity. Last time I checked neither have thrown people in mass graves or done wholesale slaughter.

At 11/20/14 08:09 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: What prevents Government from doing the same ?

A system of checks and balances that make sure no one person has that kind of authority.

At 11/19/14 06:29 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:

I rather choose to pay for a high quality service rather than be forced to pay.

You are "forced" to pay for a reason. You get a ticket means you did something wrong and there are consequences for that.

At 11/19/14 06:06 PM, TNT wrote: Ok. I understand now.

There's a problem though. Where do they get the funding? I don't think they can survive on issuing fines and charging a service fee per visit alone.

There is also the fact that people will have no obligation to pay fees issued by private police and have no obligation to listen to them either.

Something like this should be a chargeable offence. Citizens can't just put a bounty on someone because they think they committed a crime, especially asking for the relatives.

At 11/15/14 05:41 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote: And I can forget about housework, though my husband seems to be handling that OK.

See it as an opportunity to break him and make him do it for you from now on.

At 11/7/14 05:42 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: I am arguing more for ethical excellence. To deny ones own sexual nature by virtue is disgusting and an abomination and disrespect to the natural order of things.

Define natural. Because homosexuality has been observed in the animal kingdom. Homosexuality has been studied and seen as not something someone chooses to be. And from knowing someone who is homosexual they have stated that they have never been interested in women. So I ask again, define natural.

At 11/6/14 05:11 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Now on a religious/spiritual standpoint one could argue that God never intended for same sex relationships.

This is not a good reason to deny marriage to same-sex couples. Not everyone follows the Abrahamic god and unions between two (or more) people have been around long before any of the major religions of today. There are cultures that actually practice unions between people of the same-sex such as some Native American and African tribes. This is in large part as due to some cultures having more then two genders (note that someone's gender is different from someone's sex). So the argument that marriage is traditionally only between men and women is a fallacy as there are different traditions around the world.

At 11/6/14 07:42 PM, TheKlown wrote: Isn't Marriage a state issue? Let the red states decide their shit and let gay states like Jersey, New York, and California support it.

Not when civil rights are being violated. Case and point Loving v. Virginia

Maybe if people weren't such assholes all the time, police would be friendlier.

At 10/27/14 08:28 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote: So now I'm pissing blood. Which coincides with one of the doctors doing my surgery calling me today. Based on previous notes (and this happening), she has reason to believe I may have endometriosis of the bladder, and maybe the bowel. So when I'm knocked out, they'll be sticking a camera up there to see what's going on. If there's anything major, it would mean more hospital time.

Being stuck in the hospital is no fun. Had to go through it twice for internal bleeding.

You can change the wording but you can't change the meaning. People would still be bitching.

At 10/17/14 09:45 PM, frigi wrote: I dont like this idea because I just know they wont be given the right suits, or something will botch it up, or some soldiers will mess up and not wear the suits right or not wear some parts right or at all and somehow get infected, and soon getting others infected.

You're more likely to catch the flu then get infected with Ebola. As far as I know the only way to get it is through the transfer of bodily fluids.

At 10/7/14 09:27 AM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 10/7/14 12:08 AM, LordJaric wrote: Did I miss something or has Youtube been getting dumber.

Were many Youtube joke memes ever very funny?

Not really, just keeps getting dumber and dumber.

Did I miss something or has Youtube been getting dumber. For a while now I've seen people who ask for a song in a vid and idiots keep responding "darude sandstorm" and people keep pointing how can people have x amount of subs when they're are only x amount of people in the world. I don't see the humor in either one.

Went through a six hour first aid/CPR/AED safety course today. Kind of feels good to know that I am now trained to help someone in a medical situation.