If I'm ever playing an RPG or anything that gets me interested in what somebody is saying or if I just like the in-game music, then I don't play music.
But if I'm just playing an FPS game & I don't care, then I might put on music from the following bands:

-Fear Before (The March of Flames)
-Dungeon Elite
-Senses Fail
-Daft Punk

At 10/15/09 08:21 PM, ian4678 wrote:

Maybe next time mario when they have a contest for biggest sell out video game character.

Yeah because Mario obiously started making his own decisions & decided to sell out. Exactly when the fuck did Nintendo make Mario a "sell out."

You dumbass....

Fixed..

At 10/15/09 08:21 PM, ian4678 wrote:

Maybe next time mario when they have a contest for biggest sell out video game character.

Yeah because Mario obiously started making his own decisions & decided to sell out. Exactly when the fuck did Nintendo make Mario a "sell out."

You dumbass....

At 10/7/09 07:51 PM, Matt2358 wrote:

At 10/7/09 07:13 PM, LTmatt wrote:

At 10/7/09 06:43 PM, Makeshift wrote:

At 10/7/09 06:34 PM, Slosha69 wrote: L4D is a horrible game. I played it for like an hour and haven't play it since. It is a valid argument. You're a fool.

Shut up.
Left 4 Dead is a game you don't enjoy.
You can't say it's horrible. Other people enjoy it.
I can't believe you only played it for an hour?
I've spent probably almost 50 hours on this game.
I expect your response to be "get a life".

It's called an opinion, fuckface.
He can say it's horrible, because in his mind, it is horrible.
Don't lambaste him with your defensive bullshit and tell him he can't state his fucking opinion because other people liked it.

Actually saying "L4D sucks" is not a statement of opinion, as he never said that it only sucks in his opinion. He was implying that the game sucks to everyone everywhere. It COULD be his opinion, but he never specified if he only though it sucked to him or if he thought it literally DOES suck, no opinion about it, which would obviously be false since that is a normative statement.

... For the love of god, shut up.
He doesn't have to specify every little damn thing he says or thinks. He shouldn't have to say "WARNING: THIS WAS AN OPINION Guiizzz!" for dumbasses who just don't have the sense or reasoning to know it was an opinion..

At 10/9/09 07:26 AM, FurryDemon wrote: I've never even heard of that game, must be that bad then.

I've never even heard of you, you must be a dumbass then.
:...

At 9/20/09 03:12 PM, Grubby wrote: My budget gaming title of honor:

Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne - tons of custom games like DotA, great campaign, amazing multiplayer

I love you Grubby.
:D

Great f*cking game...

At 9/20/09 02:17 PM, Crazetex wrote: Guy who said that you can't customize the Wanderer: you choose his class or create your own by setting his Bravery/Perception/Charisma/Tenacity/Log ic stats. How is that not customization?

Oh I see, I haven't actually played it for awhile, I'll check it out again soon. :D

I downloaded it, it looks pretty good so far. I've actually done a little with RPG Maker, it's pretty hard to make a good game with a small program, but it can be done. I suggest that in your next game, (if you're planning on making one), let the players customize their character a little more besides the name, even though sometimes it depends on what style of RPG you're trying to make.
Otherwise, you've done a nice job from what I've seen.

At 11/9/08 07:48 AM, Supermatx1 wrote: Metroid Prime 3: Corruption : Gamespot: 8.5 IGN: 9.5
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii version): Gamespot: 8.8 IGN: 9.5.
Do they hate Nintendo or something?

Umm, if you haven't noticed, those are all fucking great scores...

At 9/11/09 05:01 PM, zimzap wrote: Very unprofessional. Lots of grammar mistakes and the reviews are worthless.

For example, the Halo 3 review merely calls the graphics "nice." That really helps. No one will ever visit your site over the likes if IGN, Gamespot, Joystiq, etc.

Yeah, I just read over some reviews on the site, & I agree with this, it's really annoying to find grammar & spelling mistakes..

I'm checking it out right now, it looks pretty kewl. I might join it, I really like sites like this one.

At 8/17/09 03:47 PM, explodingbunnies wrote: yes. with my friends i do it over the mic. when i get headshots and kill a lot people, all i say is either "HEADSHOT" or "M-M-MULTI KILL (KILL)"

Haha, whenever one of my friends is gaming with me, they'll do that, too.
My cousin does that alot when we play Super Smash Bros. Melee. :P

At 8/17/09 03:54 PM, Obsessed117 wrote:

At 8/17/09 02:15 PM, little-timmy wrote:

Probably because you play the role of a fictional character in a Fantasy world.

In street fighter you play a role of a fictional character in a fantasy world, so it must be an RPG m i rite gais?

Okay, this is the last thing I'll say:
in Halo, you do not level up your party or characters, same with Super Mario Bros. (Except Super Mario RPG of course),

Really? Oh my bad, leveling up characters is what makes an RPG.

Its official now, Castlevania: Symphony of the Night is an RPG...who would have thought?

Little Timmy, the only thing you have proven so far is that you are ignorant and you cannot come up with a decent argument. The most compelling evidence you have is that "OMG GAMESPOT SAYZ FINUL FANATASY IS AR PEE GEE". You have failed to disprove peoples points and just generally failed at arguing, I hope you respond so I can see another failpost.

Listen, I'm not trying to sound like a fucking dickhead.
I'm just saying what I think is right, I think that JRPGs, are also RPGs. That's all I was trying to say. Btw, I wasn't trying to argue like an asshole.
Good day, I will stop posting in this topic. (Probably).

At 8/17/09 02:08 PM, idiot-monarch wrote:

At 8/17/09 01:56 PM, little-timmy wrote: It still doesn't make or break a JRPG, It just adds alot more fun into the game.

What I'm saying is that most JRPGs lack the complete essentials of an RPG game, and thus, should not be called RPGs.

I'm not saying JRPGs are terrible games, but I can't figure out why they are called RPG games.

Probably because you play the role of a fictional character in a Fantasy world.

Halo is an RPG too, as is Super Mario Bros, as is pretty much every game ever created.

I'm gonna stop arguing now, since your arguments are pretty much nonexistent.

Okay, this is the last thing I'll say:
in Halo, you do not level up your party or characters, same with Super Mario Bros. (Except Super Mario RPG of course),
& look at any JRPG on Gamespot & they are in the category of an RPG.

At 8/17/09 01:43 PM, idiot-monarch wrote:

At 8/17/09 12:58 PM, little-timmy wrote: It doesn't matter if you can customize the main character in a game or not, if you look at any JRPG game on a gaming website like Gamespot.com, it'll be in the category of an RPG game...

It most definitely does matter. The whole idea of RPGs is about customizing your character, playing a role, making choices, and not going through a completely linear path, both in gameplay and in character growth.

It still doesn't make or break a JRPG, It just adds alot more fun into the game.

I'm not saying JRPGs are terrible games, but I can't figure out why they are called RPG games.

Probably because you play the role of a fictional character in a Fantasy world.

At 8/17/09 11:17 AM, idiot-monarch wrote: Man, this is totally geared at JRPGs, which, like someone said, really aren't RPGs at all.

Hero

The Nameless one from Planescape: Torment.

Final Boss

The Master from Fallout (not really the final boss, but the main villain).

Party
the other main characters you meet, have join you, and fight alongside with you.

Kinda liked how it was handled in FO2, in that the other party members could help out in non-combat situations. Haven't played Icewind Dale and Baldur's Gate, though, so I can't say.

Conversation (Dialogue)

Fallout 1. Wonderful writing. I actually cared for some of the NPCs (Harold, The Master, Tandi kinda).

World

Arcanum (for industrial revolution Tolkien world) or Planescape: Torment (very creative and original setting).

Art Direction

Arcanum, Planescape: Torment or Fallout (love the retrofuturism).

Story

Planescape: Torment.

Cutscenes

Meh.

Humor

Fallout? I dunno.

Cooperative Attacks

Timing

Strategy

^ JRPGs are not RPGs

If JRPGs aren't Roleplaying games, then why are they called Japanese ROLEPLAYING GAMES!?
Also, they have the same things in them that should be in a good RPG, you gain skills throughout the game, & it has a great storyline.
It doesn't matter if you can customize the main character in a game or not, if you look at any JRPG game on a gaming website like Gamespot.com, it'll be in the category of an RPG game...

At 8/13/09 09:48 PM, squidly wrote:

At 8/13/09 12:38 PM, little-timmy wrote: I like the ending that they put in because it leaves an opening for a sequel.

There isn't going to be a sequel.

Thanks for pissing on fans' dreams.

I wasn't really expecting one by now anyway, though.

At 8/13/09 01:50 PM, Vladith wrote:

At 8/13/09 01:40 PM, little-timmy wrote: Umm, why do close minded d_ckheads even bother posting here?

You're not calling me close-minded, are you?

No, your not one of the dickheads.

Umm, why do close minded dickheads even bother posting here?

At 8/13/09 12:30 PM, puddinN64 wrote:

At 8/12/09 07:26 PM, little-timmy wrote:

At 8/12/09 07:16 PM, GOTHCLAWZ wrote: When Berry Dies in Conker's Bad Fur Day (N64).

I remember that, yeah, that was a sad ending for Conker...

Apparently, in the original version of the game he was supposed to commit suicide right after he became king.

I like the ending that they put in because it leaves an opening for a sequel.

At 8/12/09 07:48 PM, elementell wrote: When I realised how much of a waste of time they are.

Umm, what the hell are you doing in this Forum then?

... GTFO...

At 8/12/09 07:16 PM, GOTHCLAWZ wrote: When Berry Dies in Conker's Bad Fur Day (N64).

I remember that, yeah, that was a sad ending for Conker...

At 8/12/09 01:44 PM, tobi0 wrote: When I relised I should stop playing games and get a life.

If that happened, then why are you here?

At 8/12/09 08:41 AM, Jerich0 wrote:

At 8/12/09 08:10 AM, IrishGun wrote:

At 8/12/09 07:43 AM, Jerich0 wrote:

At 8/12/09 05:16 AM, OddlyPoetic wrote: When Tidus discovers that he's only a dream of the fayth in Final Fantasy X

Aeris's death in FF7 I cried.

I've taken dumps that were sadder than that.

Grey Fox's death in MGS1 is the winner for me.

This is why I hate the irish.

Hey bitch I'm Irish, btw you misspelled jizzed in your last post here.
The saddest moment I've ever seen in a game was probably the part of FFX when Tidus & Yuna are in the water, (if you haven't seen this part, find out for yourself what happens).
But I haven't beaten FFX yet, but I've been playing it for a while now.

Okay sure, I've been pretty active in the VG Forums lately.

Consoles I currently Own: Xbox 360, Xbox, N64, PS2, & the SNES.
My Online Gamertag: FriskiestStraw (I now have only a Silver Membership.
Games I'm Currently Playing: Final Fantasy X, & Resident Evil: Outbreak.

I think Final Fantasy X may now be my favorite Role-Playing game I've ever played, definitley one of my favorites at the very least.
& I can't wait to get back onto RE: Outbreak, I just got it yesterday, & I beat the first scenerio, too. But I've been playing FFX a little more than RE: Outbreak.

At 8/7/09 07:10 PM, Chiklay4 wrote: you guys actually play this RROD machine? fucking waste of 300 dollars

Since the first day I got & played my Xbox 360 for the first time, it hasn't fucked up since then like the peice of shit that I'm guessing you bought.
Other console fuck up sometimes, too.

I'm fellas! :P

Serious Sam: The Second Encounter Review:

Graphics: Doesn't look near as good as the games being made today, but this is an older game, so it wouldn't be fair to compare it to today's game graphics. But for an older game, it has some pretty good graphics. & besides, in my opinion, graphics don't make or break a game. 8/10

Originality: A tough badass that carries multiple weapons & says some funny one-liners, doesn't sound very original does it? But the game makes up for by throwing in some new creatures that look very awesome! & that's why originality gets a high score. 8/10

Difficulty: Though some monsters or demons are easier to kill than others, some may take a few shots from a rocket launcher. & those who are easier to kill, make up for it in numbers. So if you can take out some enemy with one shot from a certain weapon, don't stop, there's usually a big pack of them & some other creatues running after you as well. 9/10

Sound: Fantastic sound, you can always prepare for a certain enemy chasing after you, suck as a screaming headless maniac bomber, or a huge raging creature charging at you on all fours. 9/10

Weapons: There is a huge variety of weapons in this game & they are all very fun to use & play around with. This includes: A flamethrower, a chainsaw, a rocket launcher, & a couple of shotguns. I don't want to spoil anymore than I already have, but there are so many great things in this game & the fun will probably last for days. 9/10

Story: The story is pretty good, if you take the time to check out the back of the CD case, you should get a pretty good idea about what the story is since it explains pretty much all of it right there. 7.9/10

Replaying: This game is so fun that you'll probably have fun even the second time around, especially if you haven't played it in awhile. Plus, it's got an online mode called: Seriously Warped Deathmatch. Which is definitly worth checking out if you have a good internet connection. 8.8/10

Plus: This game lets you turn the blood off, or turn it green, or put it on Hippie mode. Hippie mode makes people bleed flowers, so if your sensetive to blood, this is still a game you should definitly check out!

Overall: This game is AMAZING... Graphics: 8/10 Originality: 8/10 Difficulty: 9/10 Sound: 9/10 Weapons: 9/10 Story: 7.9/10 Replaying: 8.8/10 Overall: 9.2/10

At 8/3/09 02:29 PM, explodingbunnies wrote: i dont even understand what the fuck your talking about.

explain, plz.

Yeah, me neither, that last post was random...

what the hell?

At 8/1/09 10:26 PM, danwolves wrote: Well, I submitted it to the portal and have no idea where it is now, but it is submitted so it must be floating around somewhere :P

If it's a review that you submitted, then it must be allowed onto the website by the administrator.

At 8/1/09 09:39 PM, danwolves wrote: I recently sent a letter of praise to Popcap about Plants vs Zombies and that was basically a review and I have a copy of it, which I'll put up on the site.

Ooh kewl, I'll definitley read that review, I played a demo of that game & got addicted. :P
Great game, I loved it.
I'll be sure & check out your review.