Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

is there any games on newgrounds that
are now on sale on the google play store for android?

personally I'd love to see games like
submachine, exmortis, madness and
pandemic make it to my android device.

At 7/10/11 12:41 PM, Bacchanalian wrote:

No, but thanks for shoving a false dilemma in my face. But I suppose it's rule one of any pretentious ass to immediately consider anyone particularly barbed with their criticism to be closed minded to the nth degree.

I didnt shove it in your face. you clicked on the message board of your own free will

If I handed you a shoe box and asked you to give me its dimensions, how would you respond?

I would've probably give you its length width and height

Knowledge and presumption may be finite, but no, the relationship you're establishing is flawed when presumption may be generated to a virtually infinite end.

Yes, why should you bother making coherent arguments? It's a discussion!

most people would just say "please clarify what youre getting at" if it was worded strange

if you dont understand what im getting at just say so. that way i can attempt a clarification. please dont bash an attempt to understand a concept by insulting intelligence.

Alright.

"consciousness as well as the world within computers are the world within electricity are the same type of dimension."

Try this one again.

read the posts between me and the guy talking about euclidean space. i'm not sure but i hope it helps to establish the concept. the concept should sound something like within electricity and some material (in computers it'd probably be silicon and electricity. in humans maybe something more like electricity and brain matter.) an imaginary euclidean space exists. does that make sense to you?

At 7/10/11 05:12 AM, Andre wrote: Not only do I now hate you, but I have cut off my penis in confusion. Fuck you.

you're late to the party man most of us cut off our penises back when it was still punk! you're straight up no penis scene kid now. keep it punk man..... keep it punk.

well. suppose your particle is lagrangian. you can describe its position in seven seperate variables, namely, t, (q_x, q_y, q_z), (v_x, v_y, v_z), where t=time, q_i=position along ith axis, v_i=velocities.

if your particle is moving through a magnetic field, it may produces radiation so that its motion is also dependent on its accelration.

if the particle is lagrangian lets say this particular particle is a classical test particle with newtonian gravity just because i'm not sure if other types of test particles are relevant to modern games. and how about the unstable euclidean space within hallucinations and dreams?

At 7/10/11 04:15 AM, i-am-ghey wrote:

At 7/10/11 03:08 AM, JimChun7689 wrote: but my brain doesn't have bytes

i didn't say they are identical. just analogous, and a failed attempt at causing more confusion by posting something completely random.

and did someone just say the term 'fourth dimension'? in special relativity, the position vector can be written as (ict,x,y,z), but still time is time and space is space. they are not the same. the four dimensional space in special relativity is NOT an ordinary euclidean space, but a minkowski space. general relativity also has four dimensions consist of three spacial components and one time component, except it is meaningless to talk about proper distance between two places as the metric depends on time component as well.

more confusion.

Jesus christ!! someone finally gives me a term i can go look up and explore for myself!! lol i'm trying to go along and confirm all these things as i go along haha anyway can't you apply euclidean and minkowski concepts to video games and to a much lesser extent your own thoughts? for example lets pretend you are building a video game game couldnt you use these 4D coordinates to map a graphical particle (particle was at position (22, 14, 105) at time (5))? and lets say some radical situation came up where your dreams were a hyper reality like when someone is having a vivid dream or hallucinating and you could make accurate measurements in this hyper reality. the fake imaginary environments would provide an unstable euclidean space that exists between 4D events (fall asleep and wake up)

Deatomization!

At 7/10/11 02:47 AM, Bacchanalian wrote:

At 7/9/11 10:57 PM, LeonOfBlain wrote: For as long as I can remember I've almost always heard of time being referred to as the fourth dimension. but i suppose to call it a dimension can open the door to all kinds of phenomena being called a dimension.

From what you've been saying, not just in this latest post, you seem to have the notion of dimensions of space time confused with the notion of dimensions in science fiction movies.

It's mathematics. You don't need to jump through a worm hole to get from the x axis to the y axis, the y axis to the z axis, the z axis to the 't' axis, or any other combination thereof.

And time is an axis due to its nature, not due simply to it existing as a phenomena. You're arguing an abstraction fallacy. For example: If I can say that apples have seeds, then I can say that all foods have seeds.

For the most part, you seem to be mashing words together. Hell, some of your sentences aren't even grammatically cogent, let alone semantically.

Is it really unclear to you whether an electrical charge can be understood mathematically? Because that's actually one of the questions you asked, though in terms you clearly thought sounded deeper.

I hope to god you haven't taken 6th grade science, or that you're trolling.

is it really so hard to believe any of this is up for questioning? I just want a greater understanding of concepts that I dont understand. You seem to have an understanding of dimensions so please if possible provide a basic description of what a dimension is. is it something that fundamentally affects all things? why is the argument that time may not be a dimension a valid argument? I understand why you're saying im jumping to some incorrect conclusions but I believe the best way to determine what something is is to figure out what it's not. when you rule out the wrong you're closer to what is right. this isnt an english class its a discussion. if you dont understand what im getting at just say so. that way i can attempt a clarification. please dont bash an attempt to understand a concept by insulting intelligence.

TL;DR There is no good music or bad music, only opinion.

Not such a stupid, immature 12 year old anymore huh?

take a half hour on youtube looking for some music and im pretty sure you can find music that'll fall on the negative side of your own opinion. with that being said there is some music that tends to get near universal agreement as good music.

look at classical masterpieces as proof because there are reasons why they have stayed popular for so long.

At 7/9/11 11:59 PM, commandab wrote: Creation is the theory that the Christian. God created the universe. ID says it was created by someone else.

They are two different theories.

Yes I wasn't being specific :

3 Big Bang Theory

but isnt creation just the christian form of intelligent design? i mean creationism isnt unique to christianity right?

At 7/10/11 12:23 AM, satanbrain wrote: brains are definably computers, electrons and neurons exist in the present dimensions, therefore they aren't another dimension.

so then would it be more accurate to say that consiousness exists at different energy levels of existing dimensions? this discussion all came about from a theory i heard about in the news of maybe our 3 or 4 dimensional universe was originally a 1 dimensional line.

At 7/9/11 11:12 PM, Yukin wrote:

:time is the 4th dimension because as far as they know the ratio to how length decreases and time increases(which slows it down) is always the same.

so as an object approaches the speed of light does it lose its dimensions of width, height and depth?

At 7/9/11 10:57 PM, commandab wrote: I believe in

1 Creation
2 Intelligent Design
3 Evolution
4 Undecided

I choose Inevitability! it was bound to happen sooner or later as the universe attempts to understand itself.

At 7/9/11 10:51 PM, slayer727 wrote: I mean what do you expect us to say. Since your can't really be answered, I suppose were just supposed to say "wow, that's deep man".

Wow, that's deep man.

not at all, man. what I expect is either a pro/con/maybe as to why it could be or cant be or even just your 2 cents on the matter. its easier to answer a question as a group than it is to come up with answers by yourself all the time.

At 7/9/11 10:49 PM, Gobblemeister wrote:

At 7/9/11 10:42 PM, LeonOfBlain wrote:

I don't really know how thought could be a dimension but whatever....

to me it seems as valid a thought as accepting how time can be a dimension.

I've never heard of time being called a dimension in reference to matter

For as long as I can remember I've almost always heard of time being referred to as the fourth dimension. but i suppose to call it a dimension can open the door to all kinds of phenomena being called a dimension.

::After introducing yourself like this, you then proposed a bullshit theory with no proof, evidence, or resemblance of a thought put into it, and you expect me to take you seriously.

what i expect is that you give it some thought. give me facts why its not possible and then challenge yourself to a scenario in which it is possible.

::I don't really know how thought could be a dimension but whatever....

to me it seems as valid a thought as accepting how time can be a dimension.

::Okay, here's what I interpret that to mean: Are thoughts their own dimension, and are the electrical impulses found in computers also in that dimension?

::My answer: That makes no sense and you're stupid.

its only as stupid as completely disregarding it as a possibility. what makes a signal from my brain to my eyes any different from a signal from a CPU to to a webcam? they both use electrical data dont they? isnt the only thing that defines them is the "electric language" used?

At 7/9/11 07:05 AM, i-am-ghey wrote:

well is there some set limit on how much energy a dimension must have to be considered a dimesion? we in fact uses more brain energy while sleeping, isnt that right?

i don't know what you are talking about. what do you mean by dimension?

yeah i shoulda explained that one a bit better. what i mean is we in our awake state we observe reality. in a sense being able to sense the world outside our bodies is easy and perhaps our natural bodies are proof because our brains work less and use less energy but while we sleep are brains are creating or possible tapping into this dimension where space and things and people and lifeforms exist though for a fleeting moment you experienced and interacted with it so you can say it became data and on what dimesion does data exist? perhaps on the same plane as our thoughts, dreams and computer created environments

At 7/9/11 05:47 AM, Tramps wrote:

At 7/9/11 05:46 AM, Tramps wrote: Nice thought but no.

I think I misunderstood the question but included your answer somewhere in there.

well is there some set limit on how much energy a dimension must have to be considered a dimesion? we in fact uses more brain energy while sleeping, isnt that right?
maybe we use more brain energy to create a small scale dimension.

ps this is an awesome Flash that really helps put things into proportion

The Scale of the universe

sorry bout that i gotta learn to use these posts more wisely

Same thing if I'm understanding correctly, "two distinct dimensions" isn't that different from "two different realities".

well on that topic let me ask about reality would you say that a person who plays a computer mmorpg and interacts within it more often then the outside world lives in a seperate reality?

in my opinion we have created a world that follows a set of rules much like our physics and quantum mechanics and gave birth to a reality within electricty.

i"ll try to be more specific. consciousness as well as the world within computers are the world within electricity are the same type of dimension. (height, width and depth are spacial types of dimensions im not sure what type time is)

and can an electrical impulse be measured for these all three spacial dimensions? thats also a question unclear to me.

finally. that 4 posts per 30 mins limit is a lame rule.

please clarify a bit more op

ok so lets start with electricity. how would you describe a computer?

At 7/9/11 04:10 AM, Blysk wrote: At first i thought you were serious, but upon further analyzation of your thesis, i concluded it makes no sense

its a goddamn pile of horseshit, that's what it is

please specify what part is horseshit. a closed mind can learn no more.

At 7/9/11 04:07 AM, psychicpebble wrote: penis.

thats what she said

I love physics and quantum mechanics I'll be the first to admit I dont even have my first step to a generally acceptable "you know about physics". but what i love about it is that human language formulas attempt to explain with great accuracy the answer to the "neverending why". so my current thought is this: is it possible that the phenomena of thought is itself a dimension and also is it not a similar if not the same dimension as the environment of electrical impulses we designed as computers?

At 7/10/08 08:20 PM, I-smel wrote: Get the guys what made Alien Hominid to do something.

Tom made that game, man. you know. the guy who started this post.

oh and from reboot I'd choose "Render" as the character
either him or Smite Agent

How about the reboot series by Jay Martin

Here's Episode 9 in the ongoing series
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 0958
it's one of the most unique and intriguing thing I've ever watched on newgrounds. definately worth consideration!