Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Ivy and Harley please

At 11/4/10 05:55 AM, Dean wrote:

At 11/4/10 05:50 AM, Ledgey wrote: inb4 walmart

Asda = Walmart

I know, but not as huge here as Walmart is in America. Just you wait, soon they'll shed this disguise and sell things at cheap(er) prices, thus one step further to a world wide monopoly!

inb4 walmart

I don't think it's right to call Ahmadinejad an anti-semitic. He is certainly anti-Israel, but not from the perspective that he dislikes the Jews; there are thousands of Jews living peacefully in Iran at the moment. Furthermore, his 'denial' of the holocaust ties in more with his anti-zionism rather than ant-semitism.

Akira Yamaoka, Silent Hill series. Clearly the superior vidya game composer.

plus I hate Pro-life Catholics that tell people what they do with their lives, hell they did that for half a Millennium and science was taboo and advancement was stagnant unless you wanted to be considered a heretic.

Did you just relate anti-abortion to the dark ages?

I agree with him

All the time.

If abortion is taking a human life. Why is it morally acceptable to murder a child because of its mother's misfortune?

This is a good point. The way I see it the mother's survival should come first. Abortion should only be used as a last resort in such cases but I feel that the preservation of her life is key.

My main quarrel with abortion is how freely available it is and that it is primarily used after carelessness, which is not a sufficient reason in my eyes.

Pro-life except in certain circumstances, ie chance of death to the mother, rape etc.

I'm not particularly relgious but I've just always thought it was wrong to use abortion as a contraceptive. The way I see it, it's a life being aborted, a potential human being. It's chance at life is being severed because it was conceived during some drunken encounter? Because they're 'unaffordable'? I just think that's morally wrong.

1 + 1 = 2

prove me wrong

I'm sorry but what's the point in her offering him a job? I thought she was the one going for the job?

This just makes no sense.

I bet he didn't see that coming.

teehee

It's not that I hate Macs, even though they're incredibly overpriced and a bit shit. It's just Apple are one of the more ridiculous companies in ol' Silicon Valley. Steve Jobs is a prime example. During the whole iphone-losing-connectivity thing he worded it so the consumer was to blame. When the iphone couldn't connect to wifi during a conference, he blamed the audience. He's so perfect!

Also Apple fanboys are like the plague. It's a computer, not a fucking social revolution.

I know Microsoft and the whoever aren't exactly less evil, but Apple and Steve Jobs has that smarminess about it that makes you cringe.

they also totally stole Apple Corps name, those bastards.

There's already a Newgrounds community group.

http://steamcommunity.com/groups/Newgrou nds

text

tl;dr? Read the fucking post properly, retard.

aheehee, this is going to be fun

First off, I didn't say that The Taliban WILL attack, I said that they are "Threatening" to attack, and I did say that I can't find a solid link, besides that Sun Article, which I soon found out was a different story, since I found it on google when searching the topic and figured "Hey, this must be it." without reading.

Haha, all I did was ask for a bloody source. For one, it's Five News, not the most reputable news channel in history considering it's pratically the leftovers from Sky News. Secondly, you failed to provide a companion article of any kind, despite the fact that it's pretty big news. Also, I never claimed you said that lol.

Also, there were Russian spies that wasn't caught until recently. And I'm not mistaking Taliban and Al-Qaeda, at all. Both of them are on the same side, with the same goals. The Taliban are more powerful and smarter than Al-Qaeda however.

Russian spies work on a vast budget, whereas the Taliban, or more relevantly Al-Qaeda have no state nor budget. Furthermore, both seek different goals, Al-Qaeda aim for destruction and fear-mongering which is obviously going to prioritised over Russians wanting to steal information on the Quango budget.

And what, they're completely different. They don't have the same goals nor the same methods. The Taliban seek political power, Al-Qaeda do not. Al-Qaeda are the primary terrorist group, the Taliban only support them.

And the Government IP address detector is VERY easy to screw over, all you need is a decent IP address hider and your surfing with stealth.

..wat. You're implying that the government and the secret service can be duped by proxies?

On top of that, Criminal Gangs get access to guns (And a few big ones.), if street thugs can get access to one or two AK-47's you can bet your ass a group like the Taliban or Al-Qaeda who have alot of hidden funders and spies can get access to guns, missiles, rocket launchers and hide them in our country. They also probally will have the sense not to use the Internet to plan operations.

Whilst I didn't rule out the possibility of an attack, I will maintain something along these lines is very... well 'Sun' like. For one, street thugs don't use AK47s and missiles, more like adapted replicas. And perhaps not (unless they're using proxies lolol), but that's not the only way they go about it silly. Like I said, you underestimate the secret service.

Hilarious, you try and insult me in a hope to make me feel bad.

Your going to have to try ALOT harder.

More along the lines of playful digging, you tool. I imagine you'd have a heart attack if you watched Harry Enfield.

They just did a report on it on Five News, some reporter did an interview with some Taliban.

Haha, Five News. Also source?

Oh and I'm not implying that Saudi Arabia is a Taliban place. However, Taliban has alot of members in Saudi Arabia. And if the Taliban are telling the truth they have alot of them over here.

Well, the Taliban aren't your standard boys club and membership isn't exactly recorded. There's no substantial proof that the Taliban are operating in Saudi Arabia, nor has it ever been brought to international attention. Furthermore, it sounds very much like you're mixing the Taliban up with Al-Qaeda.

Considering America's paranoia over the Muslim Communities and how our Government bends over backwards like idiots so they don't end up offending Foreigners, it makes sense that there are a decent amount here to probally make a very small army who will try to cause as much damage as possible before they're eventual death.

"a decent amount here"? Are you refering specifically to foreigners? If not, I don't see how the two sentences fit. And like I said, it's difficult for any terrorist group to organise in this country, considering our phones and emails are being tapped and ol' mother government can see what websites you go on. So next time you plan to search for instructions to build an IED, think twice my friend. I'm not saying it's right, quite the opposite.

oh hey another fellow scouser!

>Puts phone in pocket

Well for one, of course they're going to threaten the West using scare tactics. They're an enemy with no state and no conventional forces which naturally would have to rely on threats to stir public opinion against NATO forces.

Secondly, there's a reason why there have been no terrorist attacks against us since 7/7. Hundreds of terrorist cells have been found and no effective attack has resulted. I obviously can't predict that there won't be an attack, but security here is better than you or the Sun think.

Also,

(You should note that the Muslims in Saudi Arabia are trying to replace Big Ben with a even larger Clock Tower so they can have the new GMT in they're Country.)

Probably the most hilarious thing I've read all day. Not only do you imply that Saudi Muslims = Taliban, but you also think that GMT relies on the size of a clock tower?

Bloody hell, maybe you should work for the Sun hahaha.

Half-Full article here: (Not many Newspapers have written an article on it yet.)

And they haven't since 2006, you know why? Because all it is is jingoistic hype aimed at pushing up military support from the likes of you, sir.

What's the point in playing a hat simulator if you can't buy hats?

I watched it, I went insane, I cried.

but upon reflection, it was a great OVA

You were scared by the first one? lol you should play Amnesia

but yeah I've been wondering the same, loved the first one, considering this one. Reviews seem positive, so might well get it.

I had it earlier on, wasn't happy about the rain as I had to go out at the time.

At 9/19/10 11:49 AM, phrozonfire wrote: I find your exceeding politeness refreshing.
Do you regard the British as the same as Americans?

No, most Japanese regard British differently from Americans. However the image of the British might be seen as a bit dated.

You mean like this?

Because that's entirely up to date.

Also are there huge spiders in Japan? I'd like to go but I hate spiders.

Film is a bit shit, I fell asleep during the first time I watched it (was a bit drunk though). The whole baby rape scene was a bit shocking but I watched the whole thing.

Now Human Centipede, there's a film.

At 9/16/10 02:13 PM, stick101 wrote:

At 9/16/10 01:22 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: that is ironic since the current pope was a NAZI YOUTH.

Really?

Yes, when it was mandatory to join. It would have been hard to find a 14 year old German boy who wasn't in the Nazi youth at that time.

Haha, it seems the papacy keeps having these slip ups as of late, after one of his entourage said Heathrow was like a third world country because of aggressive Athiesm or something. I mean, I'm not a big fan of positive Atheists, but nor am I sympathetic towards religious people who make silly statements like this.

That said, I'm not a millionaire and he is, what do I know?

I thought you were.

you're all ever so kind <3

+1

I hear from people who've been that it's shit if you're new and you spend most of the time either in a rubber ring or learning how to do it.

But I've never been there so I'd be up for it.

sounds exactly like last.fm

but then I haven't seen it yet

Even if talks did happen, a settlement would be nigh on impossible from both perspectives. The Palestinians are still bitter about the Nakba and ofcourse the ongoing illegal settlements. Flipping that, the Israeli people don't want to look like they're giving in to the Palestinians and Hamas, who have targeted innocents.

Both have done wrong and both are not willing to accept their mistakes, yet that is the only way for peaceful and constructive talks.