2,229 Forum Posts by "leanlifter1"
At 10/7/12 06:34 PM, TheMason wrote:
I shall mock him with his own words and my intellectual banter! (Either that or put him to sleep!)
Not only an Ignorant but as well a Fasict statement on your part none the less. Give your head a shake for your indoctrinated EGO has taken over your natural born logic and mind. The "Indoctrinated" or learned ego which is enabled by way of the current "socioeconomic statuesque" is made possible only by way of a weak minds and souls but this weak condition can be rectified if that is what is willed. All the best to you :-)
At 10/7/12 07:05 PM, SenatorJohnDean wrote:At 10/5/12 02:33 AM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: because we both know the pressure of all these thing would have made you fold like a lawn chair. They'd find you under the president's desk crying to yourself.They might have found YOU under the desk crying. You're projecting, because I know that if New Orleans was underwater when I was President, I'd somehow find a way to get those people help.
Also, if he was crying under the chair, MAYBE HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT. NO OTHER PRESIDENT ACTED THIS WAY UNDER CRISIS.
Quote "New Orleans is sinking and I don't want to swim" The Tragically Hip well before New Orleans went under water in real time LOL. Freaky.
At 10/7/12 06:03 PM, TucoM wrote:
You have no pride? Sad!
EGO & Pride are tied to "thy*" hip and I advoccate neither. Self respect and respect in general are completely different ideologie both of which are ideologies I advocate in replacement of "EGO" & "Pride".
At 10/7/12 05:39 PM, MattZone wrote: Let the market decide.
You mean the market or "the "Free-Market", isn't it ? which is contrary to popular belief simply a means anyone can do whatever they want and maximize however they want within the confines of legal legislation, legal legislation which, make no mistake, is also for sale in the Free-Market as well, as are political officials, regulatory institutions and whatever social entity you wish to consider.
At 10/7/12 10:00 AM, morefngdbs wrote:At 10/7/12 08:02 AM, TucoM wrote: MSNBC sux even worse than Fox.......I don't believe either of them would tell you they were on fire.... even if you could see flames in the background of their studio space !
The only time they would realistically tell the truth is if that's what they are being PAID to do. Is telling the truth what they are being PAID to do ?
At 10/7/12 02:29 PM, BloodPact wrote:
Yes you are really getting your point across in throwing insults at people who are trying to engage you in civil conversation.
What I siad goes for everyone incliding myself :-)
At 10/7/12 05:41 PM, TucoM wrote:At 10/7/12 09:53 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:Says the fool who actually supports this bullying teacher. You'd probably let your teachers bully yoAt 10/7/12 07:29 AM, TucoM wrote: I would of called her a communist cunt.Are you really that ignorant ?
Remove Opinion. Pride, & EGO from your thought patterns and you will then realize true logic.
At 10/7/12 05:38 PM, Warforger wrote:
It was around for thousands of years because there was enough to go around, it was around before the population began booming in Stage 2 of the Demographic transition. The only reason it survived into the 1900's was because there was constantly new deposits of gold being found. Right now there isn't any significant number of gold deposits that can yield enough gold to keep up with the population's need for it hence why paper currency is being used.
Funny how what you are saying about Gold is exactly the same thing that is happening to Oil now in days.
At 10/7/12 02:32 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 10/7/12 02:03 PM, HiryuGouki wrote:But why isn't Obama using this to his advantage! In the next debate, he really needs to call out Romney for the sorry idiot he is.Because Obama can't compete because his logic is flawed and most of his "points" are based on lies.
Only a fool can not see that all politicians semantics are based upon lies seems like you so seems like personal opinion to me.
At 10/7/12 11:37 AM, Camarohusky wrote:At 10/7/12 10:05 AM, leanlifter1 wrote: Do you even know what the Meat and Dairy industry is all about ?Getting me tasty cheese and meat for breakfast lunch and dinner.
Thats ignorant.
At 10/7/12 12:06 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 10/6/12 02:40 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
I don't to any of the aforementioned medias either. Nor do I give a damn about any of the topics you listed. So, who's parroting talking points now?
You walk like a duck and talk like a duck you are a duck or sheep. You don't care than fuck off and stop posting you bug.
At 10/7/12 12:10 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 10/7/12 11:03 AM, Warforger wrote:Honestly the gold standard is just stupid, like the video says there's not enough to go around thus it would be an economic drain rather than a benefit unless population growth matches gold production which isn't the case now.
Economic system for thousands of years = stupid
I agree that the "Gold Standard" is not relevant now in day's however what I like to see is people creating change.
At 10/7/12 11:03 AM, Warforger wrote:
You do realize this is a "what-if" scenario
It's not a what if that the economy has collapsed.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/surrender-saif-al-islam-gad dafi-to-the-icc/
At 9/26/12 11:04 AM, Jmayer20 wrote:
They do this because in there cult minds they think it is better for these animals to die then be in "slaved" by humanity.
Come on man you can get much more ignorant than that ^. Do you even know what the Meat and Dairy industry is all about ?
At 10/7/12 07:32 AM, TucoM wrote: Obama has a tendency to choke under pressure.
We all would if you had the weight of a crazy ass country on your back.
At 10/7/12 09:54 AM, morefngdbs wrote:At 10/6/12 03:43 PM, Entice wrote: It makes more sense to reform the current system.;;;
That's not a bad idea ....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19816156
Yup another +1 for a complete overhaul of the current Education system lets brig it up to date :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GuqZf aj34nc
More bad news for the "PetroDollar" and I say good riddance. What do you think of a Gold standard ?
At 10/7/12 07:29 AM, TucoM wrote: I would of called her a communist cunt.
Are you really that ignorant ?
At 10/7/12 02:59 AM, TheMason wrote:
I propose we either:
A) Mock him constantly until the trolling ends or
B) Ignore him until he goes away just as Shaggy did?
Are you 12 or do you just have something to hide if you have to try and mock and ignore people that intelligently think for themselves and don't just regurgitate approved propaganda from the major News cartel. Have you even done any research and thinking outside of pop mainstream culture or are you just a cog of culture. I think you should just go back with the other simpletons and sit in from of the idiot box /TV and debate over Obamas Birth Certificate, Gay marriage, and abortion and leave the real thinking to people who have a brain that works without having to be primed with pre approved News propaganda.
At 10/6/12 07:51 PM, tyler2513 wrote:
No, no, he do fine.
Sounds like a matter of opinion.
I can't recall when privatizing anything manifested into a great ideal unless that great ideal included an astronomical combined national and federal debt of well over 30+ "Trillion" dollars and counting.
At 10/6/12 03:11 PM, Warforger wrote:
You are clearly in no position to call people blind and stupid when you have no idea what you're talking about. Considering how recent these events are, I'm not even sure if you're old enough to legally register on these forums without parental permission.
See the difference here is that I have done the research and became enlightened to the truth and fact of the matter whereas you just ate up what the "Media" sold you onto thinking and regurgitating. The particulars do not matter at all that matters is that the fact is Bush/Cheney are War mongers and profiteers & Obamney is a lying push over that works for Wall Street. Your willingness to be a sycophantic upholder of the proverbial statuesque just solidifies the fact that your ideals are part of the problem in the world not solution. Get of the koolaid and use you own brain for a change. What was Obama's cornerstone of his Campaigning regime again ? I suppose you conveniently forgot about that as well.
At 10/6/12 03:54 PM, RightWingGamer wrote:At 10/6/12 05:19 AM, 24901miles wrote: Teaching is a highly specialized field, good luck convincing any competent Principal that she/he should ruin a teacher's life because that teacher had an emotional response to someone's political T-Shirt during campaign season.So screaming at her, intimidating her, manhandling her, encouraging other students to bully her, and trying to scribble on the shirt are all fine?
This bitch should be imprisoned for assault, firing is only the first logical step.
Lets just say we don't even begin to understand or even really know the actual circumstances and leave it at that.
At 10/6/12 02:09 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 10/6/12 02:01 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:Once again you among some others erroneously and habitually engage in ad hominem attacking instead of developing intelligent and civil argument's to back up your opinions and claims. Am I the only adult here ? If you guy's can develop some quality and logical arguments I will consider changing my stance or at least look into your opinion and peruse it with an open mind. All you have proven is that people with whom you disagree with will be blasted with "personal" attacks but really it's not your fault as that is probable how the political party you support behaves so monkey see monkey do I presume.Say some things that are based in reality, and then we can discuss.
I'm not gonna engage in civil, adult debate if you're just spouting a bunch of nonsense
I don't listen to CNN, MSNBC, FOX, CBC, or the like so I don't think you will be hearing any pre certified by the proverbial statuesque cookie cutter nonsensical rhetoric out of this one. Perhaps you should go back to debating and mulling over arbitrary topics such as "Gay Marriage" "Abortion" and Obama's birth certificate while some of us are thinking about real world issues.
At 9/30/12 11:43 PM, Cootie wrote: I would imagine because some Americans don't realize or care that our "two" parties are too similar and that a third party can indeed win. That, and the fact that the media makes a blockout of most other parties.
The question I would like to entertain is if a so called "third party" actually did get into power how long is it until they get fully corrupted into the same cookie cutter pattern that the two main parties are cut from ?
At 9/28/12 11:22 AM, Baby-Bottle-Bob wrote: "The problem is they cant generate no money in order to establish a good campaigne." Campaigning = support = voters.
Just based on that fact you stated means IMHO we desperately must get money out of politics forever.
At 10/6/12 01:22 PM, LemonCrush wrote:At 10/5/12 10:00 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:but I for one shed a tear for the innocent children and babies and family homes that are still being rendered collateral damage ... GW Bush should be tried for "Crimes Against Humanity" and imprisoned...
But Obama gets a free pass for killing civilians and children?
Hell no but the point is that Bush and Cheney kicked this shit fest off back in 02 or whenever it was exactly I can't remember the exact dates so they are to be held with the utmost accountability and to never be forgotten for the war mongers they are. Obama lied to get into office but then again that's to be expected as all presidents lied to get into power. I really don't know what Obama can tangibly do to stop the wars as this thing is much bigger than one presidency and I knew this when he was Campaigning and stating the first thing he will do if he gets into power is "bring the boys home" and "end" the war on terrorism. I was claiming bull shit then and I am still claiming BS now with Romney just like I was with Obama back when he was campaigning.
At 10/6/12 01:27 PM, LemonCrush wrote:
This. Guys like Leaf Litter are the reason people think libertarians are crazy. People like Leaf Litter take simple ideas, or opinions, and injects so much fallacy (logical, factual and other), and demagoguery into it, that it makes anyone with a similar thought seem as stupid as he.
Once again you among some others erroneously and habitually engage in ad hominem attacking instead of developing intelligent and civil argument's to back up your opinions and claims. Am I the only adult here ? If you guy's can develop some quality and logical arguments I will consider changing my stance or at least look into your opinion and peruse it with an open mind. All you have proven is that people with whom you disagree with will be blasted with "personal" attacks but really it's not your fault as that is probable how the political party you support behaves so monkey see monkey do I presume.
