Be a Supporter!
Response to: 2012 Election Results Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 07:56 PM, Feoric wrote:

What does any of that have to do with keeping the Koolaid flowing ?

Response to: A good non voter Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 07:28 PM, Tankdown wrote:
At 11/6/12 07:25 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Most people do not know enough about the way the world works to cast a well informed valid vote. You did well grass hopper.
I hate how that's worded....Don't you think any level of being practical could have fit in this picture? For instance one argument thrown is trusting the opinions of those close to me.

Well that is up to your discretion but if you truly do not really know than how are you to make an informed decision. If the school system did not teach you how the world actually works then how is anyone that comes from the school system going to show you the truth ?

Response to: 2012 Election Results Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 07:10 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
I've told you numerous times why I am A-OK with the system and you refuse to even acknowledge.

Some people like self mutilation and I. V. drugs. To each there own. You have not said anything but tried to dam anyone that brings to light to gaping logical fallacies of the US. There's a reason why generally speaking Americans are the most hated people and Country in the world and no it not because it the best ROFLMAO.

Response to: A good non voter Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 07:20 PM, Tankdown wrote: I had an argument with my mother recently. I told her I didn't vote because I knew nothing about the people in National or local levels. If I walked in and selected random candidates based on ...what names, heard about, or ethical background?

Yes, I am a bad civilian by not knowing anything up to this point. Let the remarks be of good reasons when a person decides not to vote.

Most people do not know enough about the way the world works to cast a well informed valid vote. You did well grass hopper.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 07:04 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
You have to be fucking kidding me... Wall Street represents Wall Street and that's it. If you think Wall Street represents America you're fucking deluded. Wall Street eagerly jumps on any chance to fuck the country for its own gain.

Ah so it was Wall Street included in the guise that was 9/11 for the purpose of maximizing profit for Wall Street and world domination for America. Wall Street is a text book Fascist entity.

No. Halliburton is interested in US politics, because it deals HEAVILY in international ground level business, with a specialty in war zone operations. They directly benefit on the ground from US action abroad. US action aborad scares investors which hurts Wall Street's bottom line.

Yet you do not see how blatantly Fascist America is right after you explained what Fascism is in practice with a perfect example being Halliburton. The definition of Fascism there could be Halliburtons logo next to the word and it would be perfectly fitting and text book correct.

Response to: 2012 Election Results Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 07:02 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 11/6/12 06:46 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Why vote when it's a 4 year dictatorship you are voting for.
Because the leaders will work hard to ensure Canada stays our bitch. Now bend over.

Representative of the collective mentality ^ here for the most anyway.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 06:48 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 11/6/12 06:35 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Do you ever think for a min that "Forbes" is probably 100% American biased ?
Nope. Forbes is money biased. Forbes is willing to jump on the US's neck if it means more money for their readers.

WTF is 4chan ? and why all the ad hominum attacks. Clearly I hit a sore spot.
You must have hit a sore spot, and you're totally not fat at all.

Forbes has money interests tied to "Wall Street" and what does Wall Street represent well it represents American interest above all else. To say that Forbes is money biased which they are but it's a fallacy like stating Halliburton only has interest in foreign construction and not American economy/politics.

Response to: 2012 Election Results Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

Why vote when it's a 4 year dictatorship you are voting for.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 04:46 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/6/12 04:30 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Cute article you linked
Forbes is "cute" to you?

Do you ever think for a min that "Forbes" is probably 100% American biased ?

I think the whole pseudo-intellectual hardass front you're putting on is rather pathetic, why don't you just go back to 4chan?

WTF is 4chan ? and why all the ad hominum attacks. Clearly I hit a sore spot.

Response to: What's fundamentaly wrong with US ? Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 05:43 PM, HomicidialFrog wrote:
At 11/6/12 04:13 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
At 11/3/12 05:55 AM, TheKlown wrote:
At 11/2/12 05:26 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
I don't know man I think the working class poor need more breaks like the rich and powerful IMO. Why Should I work hard for the rich man and do my share plus his share of the work and still get compensated far less than him ?
...This is actually so stupid I don't even know how to give a logical response to it.

Take your hippie bullshit elsewhere.

Also "Communist" was a term coined by Hitler to be use by his Nazi's and branded against anybody that opposed his Regime.

Response to: What's fundamentaly wrong with US ? Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 05:43 PM, HomicidialFrog wrote:
At 11/6/12 04:13 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
At 11/3/12 05:55 AM, TheKlown wrote:
At 11/2/12 05:26 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
I don't know man I think the working class poor need more breaks like the rich and powerful IMO. Why Should I work hard for the rich man and do my share plus his share of the work and still get compensated far less than him ?
...This is actually so stupid I don't even know how to give a logical response to it.

Take your hippie bullshit elsewhere.

Pejorative distinctions to futilely and desperately try to dissuade people that actually think for themselves. Do you think you can intelligently refute why you think Corporatocracy is a good thing ? Rather than focus on the 400 people who have more wealth than 150 million in America or the fact that globally 1% of the world's population has more wealth than 40%, let's instead ask ourselves how such a manifestation is even possible and, more critically, why we would expect anything less?

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 04:19 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/6/12 03:54 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Actually the Province I live in Alberta has all the Oil so we would be just fine as we would just cut you guy's off our Oil supply and sell the US share of Canadian Oil to China. The Alberta Oil Sands project supply's the US with 10% of it's annual Oil needs but it represents 50% percent of Alberta's max oil production per year.
China is dependent on the United States for exports, and they own the largest percentage of American debt. If we go, China's ability to trade will come to a grinding halt. The United States going belly up does not end in a situation where Canada will be fine financially. If we go down, you go down with us.

And again, I ask you, if you aren't going to address the points I made previosuly, is it reasonable to assume that you concede those arguments?

Cute article you linked but it is funny you think that China cannot stand on it's own feet. I also am glad you see that it's a "GLOBAL" economy not just the USA and we need to learn to work together with all countries to make this planet prosper. The US need to learn that it is not all about them. The rest of the world will not stand by any longer while the US tries to rape and pillage by way of Politics/Money "Petrodollar" and guns. The point has come where the USA has to make a choice to work together with other countries or fail.

Response to: What's fundamentaly wrong with US ? Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/3/12 05:55 AM, TheKlown wrote:
At 11/2/12 05:26 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEo-NoEquas&feature=g-u-u
She acts like she is from Jersey and New York, people who feel their entitled to free shit even tho they're capable of working and most of them admit they aren't even looking for jobs.

I don't know man I think the working class poor need more breaks like the rich and powerful IMO. Why Should I work hard for the rich man and do my share plus his share of the work and still get compensated far less than him ?

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 03:39 PM, Proteas wrote:
You do realize that Newgrounds is a website based out of the United States, right?

I like American Cheese Burgers 5 Guy's Burgers & Fries is delicious but also bad for my health at the same time so "Moderation" is necessary just like here on newgrounds :-)

I hope you also realize that if the United States collapses, Canada -- being our biggest trade partner and closely tied to us economically -- will be dragged down as well. We go, you get dragged down into the shitter with us.

Actually the Province I live in Alberta has all the Oil so we would be just fine as we would just cut you guy's off our Oil supply and sell the US share of Canadian Oil to China. The Alberta Oil Sands project supply's the US with 10% of it's annual Oil needs but it represents 50% percent of Alberta's max oil production per year.

There's been a lockout, the season's going to start 2 months late if it starts at all. But that's okay, you've still got soft lumber and maple syrup to keep your economy afloat. For now.

Goes to show how much I care about Hockey. Greedy fucks probably want more money. I have not paid attention to Hockey since my family forced me to play when I was a kid. I fuckin hate hockey It can go die off along with the American dream as far as I care.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 03:20 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 11/6/12 03:17 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: I forgot I am talking to the wrong crowd here as you must all be US&A Citizens which is a Country based upon Killing for profit and violence. Can't wait for the US&A to fully collapse.
You better pray for the NHL to start up. Without it your economy will collapse before summer.

NHL to start up ? Did they quit ? I am not Fascist for I do not identify my being with Flags and colorful sports team jerseys to justify a means to usher in "The Fascist Euphoria". Americanism sucks for the most part and this is something I agree on with the proclaimed "Terrorists" but I just call them people of the Middle east.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

I forgot I am talking to the wrong crowd here as you must all be US&A Citizens which is a Country based upon Killing for profit and violence. Can't wait for the US&A to fully collapse.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 03:09 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/6/12 03:08 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: I hope you have the best lawyer in the Country then as the judge will fucking lock you up for murder as you are a danger to the public with a gun in hand.
Come down to Tennesse some time, our lawyers advertise on tv NIGHTLY.

Wow a TV advert I have not seen one of them in years. You guy's still watch the idiot box AKA Propaganda grand central down there ?

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 03:05 PM, Proteas wrote:
And there is nobody here who will disagree with you on that statement, however, if you are actively attacking me in such a way that I am in fear for my very life, there is a provision in the law (even in Canadian law) that will protect me from prosecution if I kill you.

I hope you have the best lawyer in the Country then as the judge will fucking lock you up for murder as you are a danger to the public with a gun in hand.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 02:59 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/3/12 03:55 PM, Cootie wrote: You know that the Amendments are not permanent though. They can be changed and taken away.
The 2nd Amendment is permanent, though, both in how it's been worded and in how the Supreme Court ruled in Heller vs District of Columbia, which reaffirmed the right of the American Citizen to keep and bare arms. From a legal point of view, it will never happen. Our right to keep and bare arms is ironclad.

LOL it's cute how you guy's still think a few pop gun's will keep the Government/Military/Police in Line. You "Patriots" waving your flag and spewing the amendments LOL are doing nothing but painting a sinking ship. You guy's did not do anything years ago when you had the chance and now the ship is sinking with no life boats available. Good Luck.

Response to: Bad Voting Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 08:40 AM, BumFodder wrote: People like her shouldnt be allowed to vote

That lady represent most Americans level of understanding of how the world works which is fuck all.

Response to: Bad Voting Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 10:41 AM, Camarohusky wrote:
At 11/6/12 03:55 AM, Earfetish wrote: I think it is bad voting for people to vote for either Obama or Romney and strengthen the two party system.
That's nice. Now please step aside and let the adults talk.

He's right we should not enable a corrupt two party system of dictatorship.

Response to: What if we Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 01:05 PM, Verspar wrote:
All organization brings people together, but there's yet to be an organization to bring in everyone.
Is there any organization that will be accepted by all?

Internet.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 02:29 PM, Profanity wrote:
At 11/6/12 02:25 PM, leanlifter1 wrote:
At 11/6/12 02:21 PM, Profanity wrote:
You try to hard at trying to bother people AKA Trolling.
No. Just stop being a complete retard in the Politics Forum and you will start earning the respect so many of the other posters have around here.

Murder is morally wrong and I don't care that you guy's think it is just because the corrupt Law says it is. Oh and that is the same Corrupt Law that has destroyed your country and buried it in a debt it will never recover from.

"To be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society is no measure of good health" Jacques Fresco.

Response to: Gold Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 12:56 PM, morefngdbs wrote:
2- If you have been following the news lately , you may have noticed China is buying & importing gold from anywhere inthe world it can get it. & has been keeping every bit of it produced in their country under government control & building up

Also China is DEMANDING that the USA repay it's astronomical debt back in Gold. There was massive Gold stores under the Trade Towers that was never recovered um Strange.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 02:21 PM, Profanity wrote:

You try to hard at trying to bother people AKA Trolling.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 10:56 AM, Camarohusky wrote: Sorry lean, but almost every (possibly every, I don't feel like looking up 50 different state's laws, especially now I no longer have free access to Westlaw) state has the castle addition to self defense meaning that in order to protect one's personal home (not second home, or ancillary property) they can use dedly fore to repel an intruder. The castle exception makes the intrusion per se (not 100% on this, but pretty confident) a danger of serious physical injury. Otherwise deadly force would only be allowed in protection from harm to people, not property, and that expected harm must be seriously injurious or deadly itself.

You're fighting a losing battle here.

Also killing someone is not self defense it is Murder. I find it funny how you guy's hate the law but like it when it is all fucked up and morally backwards which is indicative of a truly sick society. Shakes head and FACE PALM !

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 10:56 AM, Camarohusky wrote: Sorry lean, but almost every (possibly every, I don't feel like looking up 50 different state's laws, especially now I no longer have free access to Westlaw) state has the castle addition to self defense meaning that in order to protect one's personal home (not second home, or ancillary property) they can use dedly fore to repel an intruder. The castle exception makes the intrusion per se (not 100% on this, but pretty confident) a danger of serious physical injury. Otherwise deadly force would only be allowed in protection from harm to people, not property, and that expected harm must be seriously injurious or deadly itself.

You're fighting a losing battle here.

The problem is most people talk big and puff out there chest but when the bullet hit the bones and the blood splatters and they realize they have killed someone it's a different story and they also think they will have time against some that potentially stronger and faster than them what if the victim gets shot first dummies LOL. What do you guy's think this is the wild west LOL.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 04:47 AM, Earfetish wrote:
However, you never cited your source for your claim that people go to jail for killing intruders in self defense.

Murders do go to jail for murdering and just cause there's a law that says killing is allowed in the home does not make it just and morally right. If your a murder you need to be locked up and studied.

Response to: We Need Gun Control Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/5/12 10:23 PM, 919CDS wrote:
"A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence is justified in using any degree of force that the occupant bla bla bla .....

How convenient you like post without citing your sources.

Response to: What if we Posted November 6th, 2012 in Politics

At 11/6/12 01:53 AM, Iron-Hampster wrote: well it doesn't effect me so i still don't mind voting for you!

that's what democracy is all about. Majority vote justifies EVERYTHING!

Actually "Secular Ethics" justifies things the majority just make you feel better about doing wrong "Cause every bodies doin it". "To be well adjusted to a profoundly sick sociaty is no measure of good health" Jacques Fresco.