At 10/31/09 02:19 PM, OfficeMan wrote:

At 10/31/09 08:58 AM, idiot-monarch wrote:

At 10/30/09 11:26 PM, OfficeMan wrote: Thanks, I think i might of created a meme!

ED link

Invalid sense i never said i was important. Also look at the word think.

YOU FAIL

BAHAHAHA stop being so cocky you damn 12 year old. When you say "I think" you're trying to appear to be modest and polite, but you're just being arrogant. "I never said I was important"? Well the poster never said that he thought you thought you were important, now did he?

At 10/30/09 02:01 PM, Sds71295 wrote: This thread reeks of win, success, and all around awesomeness. Thank you.

BAHAHA

At 10/30/09 11:26 PM, OfficeMan wrote: Thanks, I think i might of created a meme!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This thread sucks. You all suck at being funny. It's not the fact that half of you can't photoshop that bothers me, it's the fact that you all think that you're being clever when you really aren't.

Anyways, here's mine:

http://iosysos.newgrounds.com/

Wow, how did this go unnoticed for so long? In one of the flashes, the author states that they're simply a fan, not the actual iosys group.

At 9/13/09 10:47 PM, Chdonga wrote: Right after having a dream I usually think that I had had dream before.

that doesn't count.

Anyone remember this song/compilation thing?

http://www.zshare.net/audio/6553290664 49edbf/

It was fairly popular in 2006 as a youtube video. It's since been removed but i still had the original mp3 buried in my terabyte drive. So far, I've had deja vu with about 10 songs since hearing this.

So, the question is, what causes you to feel deja vu? Personally, I absolutely LOVE it when I hear a reference/ hear a song sample/ etc that I have no clue about, then a few days later I see where it was from and shit bricks. Like after I saw Marisa Stole the Precious thing, I saw Castle of Cagliostro, where Zenigata was all "Lupin stole your precious thing, your heart!" at which point I immediately creamed myself.

another day of weak submissions getting daily.

fffffuck!!!

why am I so bad at timing?!

At 7/19/09 01:52 PM, MherMeiser wrote: if ur movie got flagged that means there was something wrong with it

oh god. this injustice is sickening.

That's odd. a lot of my shitty movies get at least 800 views.

At 7/19/09 07:07 AM, AllReligiousDrunk wrote: You don't get it, when a flagged Flash submission gets removed from the portal it is put in a state of administrative review. In this state, it is up for an administrator

EXACTLY. There is no flash-review admin, or even flash-review mods. There are only busy, busy admins and in their spare time they're supposed to look over flagged flash? Screw that. If there were flash mods, then when something was massflagged, it could either be taken down or immediately put back up.

See, the problem with our current flagging system is that once something is flagged, it's completely ruined. There's no chance of getting a daily any more, and the author usually just resubmits.

Flash mods. Seriously, we have review, audio, and bbs mods. Why not flash, considering that NG is almost based entirely on flash?

Sudo is your friend.

you guys obviously aren't doing your job right. the DD submitted like 10 stolen movies yesterday that were filled with porn and had a [dd] tag, but no one noticed.

At 7/18/09 12:10 AM, WackyAnimation wrote: the DD have hit an all time low. they decompiled the flash, and resubmitted a modified version in their name. Luckily we were able to flag it very quickly, but as you can guess we are pissed.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/50 3889

Oh god.

At 7/17/09 05:03 PM, LikkleFazzyPlexoid wrote: the return collab wouldnt of gotten flagged unless there was something wrong with it so it obviously deserved to be flagged!

You're a horrible troll. Just stop.

At 7/17/09 04:51 PM, LikkleFazzyPlexoid wrote: the whistling system is fine maybe the KK shouldnt submit stolen shit

lmfao, ok there sonny.

At 7/17/09 04:42 PM, XIII13 wrote: I was thinking this. They should also add a "This is a spam flash" option, so that there is a lesser chance that spam flashes will make it through.

That's a ridiculous idea. It'll only make the problem with the blurred line between genuine spam with malicious intent and pseudo-spam that's funny worse.

At 7/17/09 04:01 PM, Piemix wrote: Well it provides help to catch abusers of the portal, that's all.

I'm sure it does help, but it's still easily abused.

At 7/17/09 03:48 PM, saqwert wrote: I don't even use my whistle anymore since rage's thread was locked. My whistle will probably be gold forever.

That's nice and all, but I was talking about the whistling system. Like, how users control everything.

At 7/17/09 05:46 AM, Qwazal wrote: This message brought to you by the Church of jesus Christ and Latterday Saints.

Everyone's a comedian.

At 7/17/09 03:30 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote: The solution: Portal mods. To see if the works are legit, the reason of the flags etc... This Portal moderators idea has been around for a while, I think I'd prevent most of those issues.

I agree. Wade needs to set his shit straight and get with the times. He knows that half of the flashes that he deletes aren't malicious anyways, he's just too lazy to check through all of them.

At 7/17/09 12:28 PM, Joshy94 wrote: Quick lock the thread! It can travel over the internets too!

Everyone's a comedian.

And swine flu doesn't look that bad. Even if it was particularly lethal, they've developed a universal method of killing viruses (although it's still being approved by the slow-ass FDA)

if we're going to have a nerd-fest, why hasn't anyone mentioned .svg yet?

At 7/17/09 03:23 PM, Attacknun wrote: It's a work/fail kind of system. It has flaws but it also works. But, I see what you mean. I rewvied a game and I got flagged as it inappropriate. All I had said was "damn this is good" and it was removed.

Not only was that a review deserving of being flagged, I'm talking about flagging Flashes, not reviews.

What do you think of this old feature of Newgrounds? Personally, I hate it. For example, the Kitty Krew's return collab, made with 100% effort and heart, was massflagged. Will Wade do anything about it? No he won't. And that's the big flaw of this system:

NOBODY CARES FOR FLAGGED FLASHES

Hell, some spam crews have even flagged popular artist's works, and only with special contact with Tom or Wade were they able to get them unflagged.

And think of it this way: If something stolen, someone can report it to an admin for deletion. Sure, the flash will be hosted for a few more days, but which is of higher priority, the length of a stolen flash's visit when it will inevitably be deleted, or the life of a legitimate but incorrectly flagged flash, which loses all chance of front page and winning an award even IF it is unflagged?

This is a terrible method of picking out bad flash. Users can simply massflag a flash to send it into oblivion. Yes, I'm sure flagging works on malicious flash, but so? It's not like Tom or Wade actually check if a flash is malicious or not.

In conclusion: discuss the whistling system. What do you think of it?

there may be a few logic gaps in my argument here and there because i'm incredibly pissed off at the laziness involved in handling flagged flash

I too browse the internet a lot. The browser games and flashes are what usually get me hooked.

FUCK NO.

At 7/15/09 05:23 PM, portalwarpedJP wrote: the only problem there'll be is PETA annoying you.

Everyone's a comedian.

Here's an idea. Squash them.

Why would you do that? Just put on some heavy metal.