Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/20/04 04:56 PM, diazepim wrote: Blow all that shit up... why wonder about who built it... Just blow the shit out of the pyramids, stonehenge, easter island, great wall of china... it's a waste of time studying aliens and the past.

So, what you're basically saying is: "it's stupid to think"? Evidently, one could see how you live by this motto; but if the rest of mankind stopped thinking, the human race would have been wiped off the face of the earth a long time ago (which brings a new question to mind: how are you still alive?)

Too bad, the rest of the world isn’t as ignorant as you. We’ve already figured out the Pyramids and the Great Wall of China were constructed by humans. In fact, no one ever thought the Great Wall of China was ever created by aliens (well except uninitiated morons such as yourself.)

we should concentrate here and now. All those ancient stuctures are NOT marvel... they are poor design and POORER engineering.

For its time, these structures are considered human marvel. The pyramids are so perfectly even, and are also coordinated with the stars. Most of our engineering techniques are based on structures like these. If you so desperately need a reason why we should study structures such as this here it is: we learn from the past. “Here and now” is uneducated, redneck, backwards thinking that is a menace to society.

I mean, if you had all those slaves to build the great wall, why didn't you just build a huge slave army and wipe out all of north of china?!?!?

Because China is more populated then any other country in the world; thus, they would naturally have more slaves then anyone else.

What's the point of making a pyramid to hide your goods, when it got robbed right after they built it...

I wouldn’t expect an ethnocentric hick like you to know anything about culture. However, it was more religious and cultural beliefs that led the Egyptians to build the pyramids.

Then we don't have to wonder about "who" or "when" or "why"... it's a waste of human life to ponder about needless things.
That way, we don't have to wonder about "who" or

It’s thinking that makes men smarter. It’s thinking that makes humans learn and evolve. All these “needless things” are what got our society to where it is today. So Hitler, go take your idiotic destruction rants to people who might actually be your intellectual equals (a mental institution for example.) Couldn’t help but notice you cut off in mid-sentence. What’s wrong, was it time for you to take your medicine?

Since you're going to "teach me a lesson" I guess I could strenghten my argument by saying this: making machines that hydrolize water and convert carbon dioxide and whatever the hell else you want them to do: believe or not; that takes electricity! I'm sure even you're propagandist CNN brought to your attention the massive power outage that occured a while ago. Electricity is not abundant; nuclear and hydro-electricity can only produce so much energy. There is no way (nowadays) that we could have enough electricity to power the homes of every human on earth and have the capacity to produce all those things nature produces mechanically. I suppose the next thing you're going to tell me is that the power outage was all a conspiracy to discourage ppl from distroying the environment! I can't wait!

Let's not forget glucose. A complicated formula (C 6 H 12 O 6) that is necessitated by every living creature on the planet and is only produced by plants during photosynthesis. How easy do you think it will be to create enough glucose for the entire planet and be able to concentrate it into some pill that you expect people to take three times a day?

Please don't say I'm from PETA, because I hate PETA (they try and convince us that milk causes cancer.) I'm more for science, and logical thinking. No one agrees with you and no one will ever agree with you. You're thinking is neither forwards or backwards... it's... downwards! It's going to ram mankind into the ground and form a crater larger then the one in your insignificant brain!

At 1/19/04 10:23 PM, diazepim wrote: Okay you treehugger from the buttcrack of EPA and Green Party and PeTA... I will comeback and beat you senselessly with uncontested experience.

Lol! I'm not a treehugger. I'm just reasonable enough to see that a world without vegetation and animals isn't beneficial to humans in any way. Unlike you, I have reliable sources to tell me this. I don't know which crackpot that escaped from the insane asylum you've been listening to but I think it's time you wake up and face reality.

Get your steamroll'n 'cus what you have said ain't shit... and I might decide to start with the fact that 78% of earth is covered by H 2 O... for a W. Virginian Deliverance Inbred like you, that's the chemical forumlary for water....

Once again, there are billions of humans on this Earth that inhale oxygen every second, 24/7. You can hydrodize all the water on this Earth, and create enough oxygen for them to breathe for maybe a day if you're lucky. Let's not forget that doesn't count the water they have to drink as well. I'm not saying it's impossible to make enough water for every human to be able to drink and breathe; I'm just saying it's pointless (apparently like arguing with you.)

I'm too tired to type a "can of whoop ass" right now, to "en garde" mon frier... I am the idiot-terminator... I have been sent from the future to anihilate fart-tards... Kuta-klux-cluefone,

You desperately need a life outside of Newgrounds... But just for the hell of it, bring it on! I'm actually curious on what idiotic nonsence you are going to spit out next considering I've pretty much contradicted every illogical thing you've said so far.

YOU have been targeted for forum-intelligence termination.

Yes, and you've already been hit several times...

Nope, you can get it all in pill form. Nope, you can get it all in pill form. You can get all that shit in a Slimfast.

Ok there, Senator Jesse! While you’re at it, why don’t we switch to communism, be identified by numbers instead of names, and have the government put microchips into our brains! What you are proposing is that we live in some dark world with no vegetation, where machines rule and we eat all are meals in pill form… No one wants a world like that! And I just thought I’d point out that humans would be unable to live from pills since they would lack energy which plants absorb from the sun and which is absorbed by humans when we ingest plants. Humans need energy to function and thus, pills would not cut it!

You seem to be worried about America being overweight. Trust me, pill-form meals are not an answer many people would like or consider. Just do it the old fashioned way: eat healthy and in reasonable portions and exercise regularly. It’s a lot more satisfying and fulfilling. And also, you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with the word “nope.” Can you at least try and span your vocabulary past the fourth-grade level?

One volcanoe erupting puts out more sulfuric acid than all of man from 1900 to 1990... so shut the fuck up.

Does your stupidity know no bounds? Thanks for the volcano thing; I’m pretty sure even a preschooler would know that! Although even a preschooler would probably be able to spell volcano correctly. Sulfuric acid isn’t what destroys the ozone; I merely brought it to talk about the acid rain problems. What really does make it dissipate are Freon and CFC particles (although methane also plays a factor.) Just one Freon particle can eliminate millions of 03 particles from the ozone. This is simple chemistry you learn in ninth grade (which you must have failed several times.) So please, don’t talk about things you don’t understand.

the hole in the ozone been there... since... DINOSAURS!?!?! So sit down and shut up.

You keep saying things like the food chain and global warming are topics initiated by propaganda. However, it is idiotic statements like these that tell me you are being brainwashed by propaganda. Things like durable development, biostability, the food web, and global warming are all topics that have been researched and are backed up by concrete facts. When you say things like this… it’s not only ignorant, but also pathetic that you strongly believe this. It has been shown and proven that the ozone layer is thinning and has been at an alarming rate for several years.

I’m not saying it’s impossible to live without animals or vegetation; I’m saying it’s idiotic and pointless. Why spend so much money on researching and creating ways to live without the environment when we can spend a small amount to preserve it. We invest money into the environment, and it repays us with resources (wood, combustibles) not to mention keeps the planet’s chemical balance in check. Even the most right wing of people know this! I hate to break it to you, but what your proposing will never be accepted by the educated so I believe it is you who should “sit down and shut up.” And the next time you try and argue with me, bring a few more facts. Otherwise, your argument is completely pointless.

Nope, we can hydrolyze water to make all the oxygen we want... and hydrogen to fuel the cars.

HAHAHAHA! Now who's wasting money?! Not just money but energy and time to make a device that could do this... Hydrolyze water? First off, you would need enough water to produce oxygen for the ENTIRE PLANET to consume every second of every day! But wait, that causes another problem: what the hell is going to happen to all the water if we use it to make oxygen. Even a sheer idiot like you must know that humans need water to drink. That’s billions of humans who need to drink gallons of water every week? Oh sure, we could find some idiotic way to merge hydrogen and oxygen particles together and make more water. But that just causes a costly, time-consuming cycle that we can all avoid by simply preserving the environment.

Your plan has yet another flaw. We would also need a method to convert the carbon dioxide we exhale back into oxygen. That means we need to make a device massive enough to convert the entire planet’s carbon dioxide’s exhalant into something else (such as oxygen.) Your reasoning is completely illogical. Why waste so much money on trying to create an artificial photosynthesis when trees do it for us for free!

However, I do agree with the hydrogen-fueled cars. This planet only has a good twenty years left of combustibles such as oil, fuel, and natural gas. Hydrogen is not only efficient, but also much more environmentally friendly then petroleum. Thank you for bringing that up to further strengthen my argument.

Hey you don't know that, and I don't know that... I just heard the Raelians on CNN... but human cloning is soon on the way.

If you actually watched a non-biased news source that doesn’t spread psychopathic, hysterical propaganda, you would know that it has been proven as a hoax. Human genes (well, not yours) are far too complicated to clone at this stage of the genome project we’re in. And you say I’ve been brainwashed by the media? Does the word hypocrite mean anything to you?

Yeah, it's called R/D... How long did the Wright Brother's flyer at Kitty Hawk fly? 12 seconds.. 3 years is a lot longer time for the first large mammal clone than the most significant invention of 20th century... now we have Boeing 747 and Space ship Challenger... yeah, in a few years... we can extend Dolly number 34, to about 500 years... think about that.

Let’s go into recap mode…

Kutatoxi

The genome project isn't that advanced yet!

Diazepim

Has your mentally challenged ass heard of Dolly? It's a cloned sheep.

Seems as though you’ve just proved my point! The genome project has barely begun and it will be decades before we will be able to clone more complicated specimens such as humans or chimps properly and have them keep the same lifespan as the original specimen. Also, as you indirectly pointed out, I believe the genome project’s goal was to increase human and animal longetivity and give them immunities to certain diseases; not so that we could wipe all the animals out.

At 1/19/04 03:13 AM, diazepim wrote: So that explains how you keep it in your family, and your sister and your niece are pregnant.

Hmm, unfortunately it seems as though animal-Hitler's voice cannot be silenced. First off, congratulations on being able to turn my own insult right back at me so wittily. Honestly, I've never heard anything more childish! You might as well have used the "I am rubber you are glue" comeback, you pathetic five-year-old.

Nope YOU are WRONG and a fucking moron. First of all, we can develop killer insecticides if we spent all the wasted money trying to save a freak'n humpback whale or saving a bengal tiger... hell selling the meat off a whale could fund research to destroy any insects. So no you don't need other animals to kill off the insects. We can use the marvel of human technology.

Most of the insecticides we use are harmful to all living things, including humans. What you are suggesting is spraying our ENTIRE planet with an insecticide powerful enough to kill every species of insect on the planet?! One, there is no such insecticide, and two, if there was, it would have to be powerful enough to be harmful to humans as well. Also, little money is invested in animal protection; a lot of it is volunteer work. Trust me, the government wastes far more money, making weapons they don’t even use then they invest in environmental protection. Furthermore, few people eat whale meat and few American markets sell it; so it’s a terrible idea.

NOPE, food chain, food web is just a theory and proposition by EPA and naturalist freaks... fuck the whales and the endangered specie list... we can save their DNA and clone them later... they're taking up natural resources and taking up political time and money.

So, you're saying that if a certain species is wiped from the planet, any species that eats the extinct one won't be affected? And any species that have the extinct one as a predator won't be affected? It's hard to believe anyone is that fucking stupid. The food web is not some complicated bullshit invented by the media (and why the fuck would they make up something like that?) It's simple logic that can be comprehended by even the most idiotic of humans.

And money?! What resources do animals prevent humans to have?! You should really try to back your arguments with CONCRETE evidence. The environment gives us much more then it takes from us. If we have a lack of resources, it’s because humans extract them and don’t economize them. If anything, animal activity is financially beneficial to humans. If you took a fucking economics class, you would know that.

we really don't need photosynthesis to make oxygen.. and most of the Earth oxygen is made by ocean algae.

This is horribly untrue. Algae don’t make even a quarter of the planet’s oxygen. And since the oxygen particles are in the water; humans cannot inhale them.

At 1/18/04 08:32 PM, JudgeFUNK wrote: I'm not fat. I'm chubby. CHUBBY WITH EVIL!

Seriously, it's probably a cultural thing. Americans eat things that taste good, like icecream, and spicy sugar covered fried lardlets. We can AFFORD to waste food by being obese. Besides, very few jobs in the US are very labor intensive these days.

I'd say more of a lack of culture. You can ask about any country's official dish and it's always some fancy recipe made with fresh ingredients and prepared slowly (especially in Europe and North-Western Africa.) However, you ask for America's (or Canada's; I'm not being hypocritical here) official dish and what do you get? Big Mac and Fries? Isn't that just a little sad?

The problem is that in North America, people are in far too much of a rush to care about what they eat. Buisinessmen are in so much of a rush to get back to the office and make more money that they don't have time to prepare an adequate meal. So what do they eat instead? Deep fried Mc Donnald's shit! Most of Europe have over 2 hour lunchbreaks! They use this time to buy fresh ingredients and to make a fine meal that isn't infused with loads of trans fats. They also eat very slowly which gives them time to digest more properly (unlike Americans who eat their double cheeseburger in two bites.)

At 1/18/04 07:03 PM, MsBobble wrote:

At 1/17/04 05:03 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: Most of the attacks i've heard from Americans against france seem to involve either the words "cheese eating surrender monkeys" or "When did the french last win any wars?"

When did the french win any Wars??? good point I dont remember any heroic WW2 efforts out've them if they were in south america they wouldnt have done shit... and the japanese wouldnt have done shit too them because there such f8in pansy's there worthless

LMAO! My God, you're an idiot! Let me point out that the quote you used is theoretically making fun of you. It states that the only thing Americans have on the French is irrelivant, steriotypical nonsense that proves just how ignorant they are! If you had any intelligence whatsoever, you would know that the French fought Germany years before the US ever even thought of jumping in the war. France actually had a descent army at the time but the Germans used a snide tactic against them which led to their downfall.

France is not panzy. It's ironic since you're the one who's going on some psychopathic rant about them, you fucking racist! If you've ever actually been to France, you would know that they are worth far more then your sorry ass! Go take your mindless dribble somewhere else, you gun-fucking hick. You have no reason to hate France other then the fact they didn't help you in the war on Iraq; and look who's laughing now! Your country wasted millions of dollars on an unjustified war and now you're stuck with rebuilding the goddamn place, and no country will help you!

So, in conclusion, please learn a bit about your history before you ever consider posting on Newgrounds again. Also, I cannot emphasize just how hipocritical that moronic picture of yours is! Bush, calling other people morons?! The man who thinks there is no French word for "entrepreneur" is calling someone else a fucking moron! That's really pathetic...

At 1/18/04 06:34 PM, MsBobble wrote: No really what a true american is, is someone who can realize what the fuck america needs.

That is a subject that is probably debated on every day and in which each American has a different opinion on. No one can really know what America needs since different people will believe it needs different things. If you're illogical reasoning was true, then there would be no "true American."

And this crap where hispanics come into our country fuck have a child and he's an american... its horrible.

Alright, first off, what exactly do you have against hispanic people? Do they march up to you and beat you senseless every day? I'm pretty sure you don't even know why you hate hispanics and if you do, it's probably based on some false information you heard on television or from your redneck parents.

We need to tighten borders for them... An illegel immagrant tried to rape me because the american borders let him past.

That's the worst lie I've ever heard. For every hispanic person that's raped someone, I'm certain there's at least 500 "real Americans" who have done the same. You say you're not racist, yet you have a negative opinion about a certain ethnic group that is based on one or two individual cases you may have seen on the news. If that's not racist, I don't know what is.

At 1/18/04 03:54 PM, Jimsween wrote: The way communism works you have to control things, or else it would be easily abused.

Yes, and that is precisely what is wrong with communism. It is a system where pretty much everything is done for you; and it doesn't matter whether you work your ass off at your job or if you laze around, you still get the same amount of money and the same social status. So, alot of people would naturally abuse this system which is why you must place a party in charge to maintain communism and make sure no one abuses the system. But then, it's no longer communism since you have a small group of people that are "in charge" and of a higher social status then everyone else. Like so many have already said, communism itself can only work in a perfect society. And I wouldn't even consider it "perfect" since a society with no variety, no reward and where everything is done for you isn't much fun.

Also, it is a fact that some jobs require more work, effort, experience, and knowledge in order to accomplish them then others. In capitalism you have hockey players and presidents of corporations who contribute more or less nothing to society yet they make more then doctors, professors, and scientists, and sure that's wrong. However, in communism you would have bus drivers, toll booth workers, store clurks, and even bag boys at the Safeway all make as much as surgeons or reserchers. If a toll booth worker made as much as a surgeon, there would be very few people who would decide to be surgeons and a shit load of tool booth workers... That's why in a communist society you have to force people to take certain jobs. There is very little choice in a communist society and also little individualism. Which, unfortunately, makes it much worse then capitalism.

At 1/18/04 09:31 AM, Unpossibility wrote: Well, the last time I checked, the earth´s future isn´t looking nice and happy. There´s very little that can be done about that, so it´s time to find new solutions. Putting people on the moon and mars, soon becomes civilization on both, and then to pluto, other galaxies, light speed, ect ect.

I don't think Bush had "humanity" in mind when he decided to put men on the moon and on Mars. He's evidently going to use them for military and reserch purposes. It will be an extremely long time before a civilian will get the opportunity to set one foot on the moon...

At 1/17/04 04:35 PM, Unpossibility wrote: Yes, but you´re talking about what comes after. People could argue that the change in the first place and the whole redefining of marriage could be very much accomidating to gay people. Not to mention that they could also call it ´´repression´´ of religion, since marriage in their books is very much defined as ´´man and woman´´

Perhaps it would be better to create some new, non-religion oriented bond similar to marriage that could be accorded to same-sex couples. That way, gays would be able to have some kind of bond that proves their love for each other and they would be able to have many of the perks of marriage without pissing off the Uber-Christians.

At 1/16/04 11:18 PM, DarkAchron wrote: Extreme Heat, long days, constantly under attack and fear of Death by Suicide Bombers are but just a few of the things the the US Troops in IRAQ deal with on a daily basis.

What would emplore them to commit suicide? Is the extreme heat hazing them and making them lose sight of the family that they have back home. All their loved one's that are waiting for there hopeful Safe Return.

Why kill themselves? It's easy enough for me to say "Hey, Why Do it?" basically because Im not there. Its very easy to say That you wouldnt do something, unless you've been through it yourself.

The Suicide Rate in IRAQ is sky rocketing.

Any Feelings on this?

Hmm, and Americans wonder why there weren't that many countries that helped them in the war in Iraq... Maybe if Bush didn't send half his soldiers to go fight such a pointless, unjustified war, your soldiers wouldn't be suffering in the first place.

I guess that's another group we have to add to the long list of "people who suffered because of the war on Iraq."

At 1/15/04 09:46 PM, Dagodevas wrote:

At 1/15/04 09:34 PM, swallowing_shit wrote: You mean that law which made it illegal for any Black person to own a fire arm?

I've never heard of no such thing. Are you being sarcastic?

Since I'm not too up to speed with the American constitution, I'm not 100% sure if it still is. However, it was true that Black people were prohibited to own guns; probably out of some fear of an uprising after slavery was abolished...

At 1/16/04 08:39 PM, Eskimo_Joe wrote: Wow everyone is against me now. . . LOL!

I believe it is because you are an incoherent moron. You know, you could shorten your signature by simply writing Pro-Stupidity.

At 1/16/04 05:41 PM, K-Rizl wrote:

At 1/16/04 10:13 AM, Kutatoxi wrote: Mind if I take a shot? Because this guy seems to be a terrible debater. First off, your retorical questions and unwitty sarcasm is really starting to get old. Yes, you are immature, so grow up.

Who me?

The terrible debater was directed at you. Your e-mail stated that you would make an ass out of Eskimo-Joe (which I am all for) but so far you've been doing a poor job of it. However, the rest of that paragraph was directed to Joe, not you.

At 1/15/04 11:12 PM, JesusCyborg wrote:

At 1/15/04 10:49 PM, Dagodevas wrote: And JesusCyborg, I’m not a Democrat (in case you were directing that at me).

If you're in to buddha you are an ultra-liberal.

Buddha encouraged peace, peace of mind, and respect for all living things; what exactly do you have against this? Considering you have "Jesus" in your name I'll assume you're a Christian. Jesus and Buddha shared many of the same views so it's pretty hypocritical of you to badmouth Buddha.

At 1/14/04 12:09 AM, kada722 wrote: China is getting kinda scary. hopefully if they officially switch to free market they wont collapse into poverty like russia. imagine 1 billion starving people

China is leaning towards capitalism more and more. However, they are still communist in the sense that there is a ruling communist party in which the citizens are unable to vote on. Furthermore, as a communist country, China can move masses very quickly as well as draft as many soldiers as they want. Their only major problem is it's economy but it's slowly starting to increase since industry is also increasing in China. It is without a doubt the most likely candidate for the next superpower.

At 1/15/04 05:35 PM, Eskimo_Joe wrote: I got this email a few minutes ago:
You are the epidemy of fucking stupid, France didn't help, THATS ALL!!!, also they didn't for a good reason, if you look at the big things(or the small things for that matter) you'd see past the rediculous propaganda, and see that you are at an error. THE WHOLE THING IS ABOUT THE OIL!!!! Even people that believe in professional wrestling know that. I dare you to defend your arguement and I'll make such an ass out of you.

Uh huh. . . . I need to grow up? Your msn name thing is Megaman and Zero, yeah, I am the one that needs to grow up.
"take MORE drugs" wow, that is such a good insult! "I dare you to defend your arguement and I'll make such an ass out of you" fine, I am defending myself, take your best shot asshole.

Mind if I take a shot? Because this guy seems to be a terrible debater. First off, your retorical questions and unwitty sarcasm is really starting to get old. Yes, you are immature, so grow up.

I really don't know why you hate the french. I don't even think you do; you just hate them because the media hates them, or you're desperate for attention. Either way, if you could name me one non-steriotypical reason why you detest them so much, it would really clear up some issues for a lot of us. And don't say "they didn't help us in Iraq" because countless other countries and the UN itself never supported that war (with good reason considering it was essentially about securing Iraq's oil supplies.) Bush is a terrorist, and is just as bad as Bin Laden himself!

At 1/15/04 01:03 PM, Dagodevas wrote: I'm not on a crusade to destroy Moore or any of that nonsense. I just don't see it as being an upfront and honest documentary.

Welcome to the world of political documentaries. There is no such thing as an "honest" documentary that has to do with a political subject. They are all biased and will all try to lead the audience into believing what they want them to believe, even if that means exaggerating and lying about certain facts.

You say Moore shouldn't have won the oscar for best document but have you actually seen the other documentaries nominated? The truth is I haven't even seen them (or at least I don't think I have, I didn't watch the Academy Awards.) However, you can't say Moore didn't deserve the award if you can't name a documentary that deserved it more. Until you can name an upfront, honest documentary that was also nominated and was more deserving of the oscar then Bowling, your argument is rather pointless.

At 1/14/04 09:47 PM, Kutatoxi wrote: That was... beatiful! Couldn't have put it better myself!

I withdraw my previous statement. It seems I misunderstood your post. You basically said that you get "honor" out of fighting for your country with all of your heart. Well, let's say your country declared a war on some defenseless for no reason other then they have a large amount of ressources. Then, they have their soldiers mercilessly slaugter thousands of innocent people for the soul perpose of self-gain. Is this considered honorable? You do not get honor by fighting for your country, you get it by fighting for what is right; even if that means disobeying your country.

Honorable people shouldn't ask for recognition or reward, they should simply be happy knowing what they did was right. Pledging blind allegiance for your country isn't honorable, you might as well be a robot, programmed by the army to do their bidding. And also, not only soldiers are honorable, but anyone who fights for something that is right can be considered honorable.

At 1/15/04 05:52 PM, K-Rizl wrote: thats not what i said, i was agreeing with you, read it again

Damn! Sorry, my mind seems to be playing tricks on me again.

At 1/15/04 05:38 PM, K-Rizl wrote: Osama is probably from there, but thats one out of a shit load

If only you were intelligent, you would know that he was. And you can't go judging a country just because a few madmen were born there. Most of the terrorists from Saudi Arabia probably haven't even grown up there. Furthermore, if you bombed every country in which a psychopath was born, all there'd be left would be no-name countries like such as Sweeden, Belarus, and Iceland.

At 1/14/04 10:06 PM, diazepim wrote: I'm telling you all, Saudi Arabia!!! Most of the terrorist, along with Osama are from Saudi Arabia. Blow the shit out of Saudi with tactical nuclear intercontinental warheads... and make it another US territory or state... suck the old dry... and build missile silos pointing at every muslim nations in the middle east...

Now here boys and girls, is a classic example of Catch 22: "crazy people don't know they're crazy." Although in your sorry ass case, it would be more along the lines of "stupid people don't know they're stupid..."

Have you ever thought of supporting Hitler? You seem to have alot of the same views as him you fascist twit. First off, name me one terrorist other than Osama that was born in Saudi Arabia. Also, if we worked according to your drugged out reasoning, we would thus have to destroy Austria since it was the birthplace of Hitler. Then, England for Henri VIII. France for Napoleon. Russia for Stalin. Japan for Mao. Mongolia for Ghengis Khan. Italy for Mussolini. And finally the US for Bush, Johnson, Ford, Harrison, Harding, Madisson, Manson, The Son of Sam...

So try thinking a bit before you type anything next time. Or better yet, just don't type at all.

At 1/14/04 10:43 PM, diazepim wrote: Sorry to say....let me reverse your chromosomal deficient or extra-gened (that means you're retarded) ass ignorance...

Why yes, I do know what a chromosomal defect is! It's precisely what happened to you when your father fucked his sister.

What you said above hold NO GROUND what so ever... You do NOT need mountain lions to survive... matter of fact you can live with 90% of the species of animals GONE... they aren't really that important.... it's called EQUILIBRIUM.... which Animals make a small small small part of.....

Unfortunately, I see that you will not be reading any articles that hold concrete facts. You see, and I'm going to be vague on the details of precise durable developpement, humans need food to live; that's obvious! We also need trees to absorb carbon dioxyde and create oxygen and glucose (which humans need to live) following me so far? So these trees need nitrogen to survive, all living creatures do. However, very few plants can absorb nitrogen directly so they need bacteria to do it for them. Trees also need to reproduce and to defend themselves against harmful enviromental factors. Animals and insects are the ones who help them with this. Now you must be farmiliar with the food chain. Well when you apply this to every single animal on the planet you get a very entertwined food chain (in lamens terms.) Make a small dent in the chain and it can fall appart. Now of course, animals don't only depend on each other for food. Anyway you can follow where I'm going with this all the way to humans.

Has your mentally challenged ass heard of Dolly? It's a cloned sheep. Have you heard of the 12 mice that were cloned? Dude, although they haven't figure your genetic mentally retarded gene out, people are doing it.... One group already claimed to have cloned a human being in the Caribbean...

Why yes, I have heard of Dolly. How long did that sheep survive? 3 years? You see, the problem with cloning is that the cloned cells are the same age as the original being. So even if you get a baby the cells can be as old as an adult's. Plus, sheep chromosomes are extreamly easy to clone. I've never heard of this Caribbean thing, give me a source. Anyway, this whole cloning thing is beside the point...

What does Oxygen have to do with wiping out species!?!??

If I'm not mistaken you said to whipe out the tropical forests. Well believe it or not, tropical forests have trees and trees make oxygen! And I'm not going to go into details again on how animals and insects contribute to a tree's survival.

Most Americans are happy with chicken and beef.. .sometimes fish and crabs and lobsters... do we really need more?

Well, luckily, I'm not an American. My taste surpasses the traditional Big Mac and KFC. I'm sure an uneducated redneck like yourself wouldn't know this but humans actually need fruits and vegetables to live to. Not to mention cerial products which inderectly depend on animal, insect, and bacterial activity.

Finally, concerning the ozone. You evidently have no idea just how much sulfuric and nitric ions are being sent into the athmosphere each day. They produce sulfuric and nitric acids which cause acid rains and wrecks our ozone. Our ozone is dissipating at an alrming rate and it's only been a couple hundred years since the industrial age. Imagine what another 20 years could do...

Not quite sure why that got posted twice... My internet's been fucking up latetly.

At 1/12/04 03:02 AM, diazepim wrote: There is NOT ONE PROOF OR REASON that HUMAN cannot survive without other animals... HELL, we have the technology to biogenetically engineer the crap out of just about any DNA lifeform...

OK, I REALLY hope this post is a joke. Because if it isn't I can honestly say that you are the most stupid person I've ever met on Newgrounds (and that's saying alot.) If you had ANY brains whatsoever you would know that human survival depends on other animals. Ever heard of durable developpement? It proves that every species on this planet (no matter how small) contributes to the survival of another. I could go into detail with this but maybe it would be better if you figured it out for yourself...

The genome project isn't that advanced yet! We can barely clone anything yet; all we can do is genetically enhance things (which is kind of freeky if you ask me; I'd rather not have my food try and bite me back.) And even if we mastered cloning, if we destroyed every species on this planet, it would be impossible to recreate every ecosystem on Earth...

I say fuck the endangered species and rain forests, that's too much time and money on some species of animal and plant that aren't very adaptable... and are going to be extinct anyway...

Yeah! Sources of food, 1/3 of the planet's oxygen, who the fuck needs that!? You're shear idiocy evidently knows no bounds! Take a fucking ecology course for God's sake! Or at least read some article that may enhance your intelligence in the slightest. I agree with you partially on one point, however. Every species will be extinct sooner or later to be replaced by another. However, humans (with our CO2 and N2 and all our sulfuric and nitric acid we're sending into the athmosphere) are speeding this process to an unatural extent!

All we really need are badass engineered corn that can withstand winter... some not-so-angry fat ass cows on heavy ass steroids...... and some chicken with like 12 genetically engineered legs... we can make corn-cow-human-chicken ecosystem.

Go and make one, eat it, come back, and tell me you again that's the way you want things to be!

The global warming? We'll build a giant ass Frigdair air conditioner soon as we think it's getting hot enough, until then... BUSH, start your HUMMERS and SUV... Bigger, a lot freak'n better...

You don't understand you moron! Without our ozone, the sun's UV rays would be powerful enough to burst humans into flames in an instant. It would litteraly melt steel, iron, titanium, and any alloy in seconds!

So don't bring up that environ-animal shit.

Once again, if this is a childish joke, I'm not laughing. And if you are serious, may God have mercy on your miserable soul... Get a proper education and take a nice, good look at the theory of evolution.

At 1/12/04 03:02 AM, diazepim wrote: There is NOT ONE PROOF OR REASON that HUMAN cannot survive without other animals... HELL, we have the technology to biogenetically engineer the crap out of just about any DNA lifeform...

OK, I REALLY hope this post is a joke. Because if it isn't I can honestly say that you are the most stupid person I've ever met on Newgrounds (and that's saying alot.) If you had ANY brains whatsoever you would know that human survival depends on other animals. Ever heard of durable developpement? It proves that every species on this planet (no matter how small) contributes to the survival of another. I could go into detail with this but maybe it would be better if you figured it out for yourself...

The genome project isn't that advanced yet! We can barely clone anything yet; all we can do is genetically enhance things (which is kind of freeky if you ask me; I'd rather not have my food try and bite me back.) And even if we mastered cloning, if we destroyed every species on this planet, it would be impossible to recreate every ecosystem on Earth...

I say fuck the endangered species and rain forests, that's too much time and money on some species of animal and plant that aren't very adaptable... and are going to be extinct anyway...

Yeah! Sources of food, 1/3 of the planet's oxygen, who the fuck needs that!? You're shear idiocy evidently knows no bounds! Take a fucking ecology course for God's sake! Or at least read some article that may enhance your intelligence in the slightest. I agree with you partially on one point, however. Every species will be extinct sooner or later to be replaced by another. However, humans (with our CO2 and N2 and all our sulfuric and nitric acid we're sending into the athmosphere) are speeding this process to an unatural extent!

All we really need are badass engineered corn that can withstand winter... some not-so-angry fat ass cows on heavy ass steroids...... and some chicken with like 12 genetically engineered legs... we can make corn-cow-human-chicken ecosystem.

Go and make one, eat it, come back, and tell me you again that's the way you want things to be!

The global warming? We'll build a giant ass Frigdair air conditioner soon as we think it's getting hot enough, until then... BUSH, start your HUMMERS and SUV... Bigger, a lot freak'n better...

You don't understand you moron! Without our ozone, the sun's UV rays would be powerful enough to burst humans into flames in an instant. It would litteraly melt steel, iron, titanium, and any alloy in seconds!

So don't bring up that environ-animal shit.

Once again, if this is a childish joke, I'm not laughing. And if you are serious, may God have mercy on your miserable soul...

At 1/14/04 09:43 PM, diazepim wrote: stuff

That was... beatiful! Couldn't have put it better myself!

At 1/14/04 12:03 AM, Empanado wrote: I don't quite get what you're saying here.

You're from Chili... and you don't know who he's talking about? He's referring to Agusto Pinochet, a terrible dictator (much like Saddam) who is responsible for countless cases (several thousands) of murder, torture and dissapearences! I can't believe you didn't learn this in school... He was appointed by the American gouverment in order to stop the so-called "evil" communist-socialist party which was currently rising in Chili. It was the exact same case for Saddam except instead it was Iran they were trying to stop; and look how that ended up!? In fact, if I can name ONE good thing Bush had done: he hasn't put anything psycho dictators in power (although that could quickly change.)

Anyway, First: I care because, as i said previously, i care about the future of my country. The US is a VERY important factor to the economical and political stabilities of many countries, specially little ones like mine.

Are you on drugs!? You're country is by far the most wealthy in South America. Hell, you're country is less dependant of the US economy then mine! Chili is 2nd supplier of ocean ressources worldwide, the #1 supplier of copper in the world, the 4th (I think)supplier of wine, and a hell of a lot more! You don't owe anything to the US. If anything, they owe you.

I may add that it looks like you people think that by saying that a country is "important" it means that i like it. Well it doesn't, y'know.

So, are you saying you hate or don't hate the US?