Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I have to ask, is there anyone else who wants these right wingers to try, just so they can be squashed & our collective intelligence quotient can go up a half point or so? Or am I just one mentally fuct son of a bitch?

At 10/11/09 06:27 PM, dySWN wrote:

At 10/11/09 05:23 PM, MaidenHeaven wrote: There really isn't a point to some drugs being illegal. From person experience, mushrooms and weed aren't even bad.

Had to stop you there. Weed is one thing, but the fact that hallucinogens like shrooms have the chance to cause flashbacks at random intervals down the road does not speak well for their legalization. I would hate to see what would happen if we had guys in the armed forces or law enforcement suddenly seeing pink elephants and zombies all over the place..

Do you have a source for psilocybin causing flash back or HPPD, I ask because I have never seen any research on the subject nor have I ever heard of someone getting psilocybin flash backs. That & in my youth used excessive amounts, & my mother has acid flash back so I kind of want to know if I'm at risk.
Also I ask because you referred to hallucinogens which is a very general term.

At 10/12/09 03:30 AM, dySWN wrote:

At 10/11/09 10:30 PM, pr0ded wrote: sure, like calling artists and scientists 'druggies'

...except that the co-workers I was referring to would call themselves druggies, and were mostly more or less average guys. Most of them were your average college students - not particularly cerebral or artistic, but otherwise solid guys save for their addictions. Maybe it doesn't fit the paradigm that you're looking for, but I think it represents a more realistic take on the demographics involved in the issue; I sincerely doubt you could name one case of a scientist actually being better for his substance abuse.

What region are you from? I ask because where I'm from "druggie" is a derogatory term, the use of which is liable to get one popped in the mouth. Most people prefer to be called stoner or psychonaut.

Most of them were your average college students - not particularly cerebral or artistic, but otherwise solid guys save for their addictions. Maybe it doesn't fit the paradigm that you're looking for, but I think it represents a more realistic take on the demographics involved in the issue;

In my experience illegal drug use doesn't have a particular demographic except for age, people from all walks of life use drugs, but younger people are far more likely to use drugs. It's widely believed that more intelligent people are more likely to use drugs, as it is also widely believed that intelligence has a positive correlation to depression, but that neither here nor there.

:...I sincerely doubt you could name one case of a scientist actually being better for his substance abuse.

One thing to remember
Use %u2260 Abuse
Though it could not be proven one must ask; would Freud have been as successful if it weren't for his use of cocaine? Does the altering of thought processes not occasionally lead to a new (and correct) concept? Those are just musing questions though. One quote though

"There is a myth about such highs: the user has an illusion of great insight, but it does not survive scrutiny in the morning. I am convinced that this is an error, and that the devastating insights achieved when high are real insights"
Mr. X AKA Carl Sagan from Marihuana Reconsidered

I hope to gods you're not serious but just incase

Studmuffin47, it's not an issue of them being uneducated, it's an issue of you being fuctarded, If you want to say you don't care what happens because they're prostitutes then say that. But considering people are discussing policy, stating they broke the law they deserve it is bumfuck retarded .

Also not everyone who uses the services of prostitutes does so because they can't get laid otherwise.

On the subject at hand I see no reason these women & men who preform these services should be punished in anyway, There is no victim & the only possible reason to outlaw it other than morality is disease control , & there exists no evidence outlawing it helps prevent disease, it may even make matters worse.

At 8/11/09 04:01 AM, TightRope wrote: Driving drunk? You don't have to submit to a sobriety/alco-brether test, take the 24 hours in jail and pay to get your car out of the impound lot or pay $30,000 for a DUI

That's true but the cops can also claim you slurred your speech & what not, the solution to this is don't talk, hand them your ID get out of your car & lock the door if the cops ask you to take the breathalyzer just shake your head, Also your license can be suspended for doing this. (you sign a contract when you get it stating you'll comply with either a breathalyzer or blood analysis in some states you get to pick, pick the Blood you can sober up on the way to the hospital to take it)

threaten to call your attorney, cops are intimidated by this and take it that you're well off and are going to lose them their job.

Cops are not intimidated by someone saying they'll call there lawyer.

No, you may not search me! Cops have no rights to search your person, just say no, keep all contraband hidden in your car, if a cop asks to search it say no, same with your house.

They do have the right to do a weapons pat down, but yes if you state you do not consent anything that could not be construed as a weapon is inadmissible as evidence

Arrests?! If you are arrested and the cop doesn't read you your Miranda rights, you're off the hook completely!

That's only true for a felony arrest.

Plead Nolo! It cuts whatever crime you committed in half, killed someone and facing death? Plead Nolo! You only get one every five years.

Pleading no contest does not in anyway guarantee a shorter sentence

Never be silent! Always argue back, cops are dumb, the law is dumb, judges are dumb, always argue back and threaten with convincing legal action and you will always be let off the hook.

Unless the cops/judges know you're full of shit & can't afford a lawer.

I don't know, if I remember correctly the US had stealth bombers & smart bombs at that point & that's forgoing the nuclear scenario were we launch then they launch (though Russia's ballistic technology wasn't all to great) overall I'd say that NATO would win due to air superiority.

At 7/26/09 09:37 AM, GLaDOSKitten wrote: The main reason marijuana has not been legalized like everywhere is because it is one of the main triggers for schizophrenia, depression and bi-polar.

To my understanding a schizophrenia has been correlated with frequent use at a young age & a genetic predisposition that 80% of people don't have, so this is a reason for legalization & regulation.
When it comes to depression to my understanding there is only a correlation to cannabis use & depression though I don't rule out that frequent cannabis use may cause depression for some individuals it's more likely that the converse is true IE depression leads to cannabis use.
The same is true of bipolar disorder an additional fact that people often don't realize is that bipolar disorder is often times a misdiagnoses for a disease with the exact same symptoms but to a lesser extent, called Human Existence Syndrome or HES for short.

At 7/27/09 05:39 AM, GLaDOSKitten wrote:
""New research being conducted here and abroad illustrates that marijuana use, particularly during the teen years, can lead to depression, thoughts of suicide, and schizophrenia," said White House Drug Czar John P. Walters. "This press conference is a public health warning."

Are you actually quoting John Walters, listening to John Walters talk about drugs is like listening to a creationist talk about the big bang theory, he's an idiot who's never won a debate on the subject ,lies out his ass, & quit frankly it's common knowledge you just can't trust someone with a perma-scowl

Another study highlighted by officials, published in 2001, suggested that people who were not depressed but used marijuana were four times more likely to develop depression years later than those who never used the drug." - http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/news/
20050503/federal-report-marijuana-causes -mental-illness?src=rss_foxnews

I distrust any source that even mentions faux news, but that aside this article states a correlation with teen use & thus is a reason to legalize & regulate.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn30 98-cannabis-link-to-mental-illness-stren gthened.html

Once again use at age 15 correlated with depression & schizophrenia is a reason to REGULATE

http://www.theantidrug.com/pdfs/MARIJUAN A_AND_MENTAL.pdf

SO I'm supposed to trust a paper provided by an oblivious propaganda site & commissioned under the authority of John Walters? No good sir I think not.

Its taught in psychology classes as a fact. Its accepted by the academic community.
And even if there were doubt, considering the serious nature of these illnesses it is in the public interest to keep marijuana ileagal.

Incorrect sir for the reasons I have already pointed out as well as many others.

Though, I am not against marijuana, Im a casual smoker myself, I just like to know facts about what I do and what the risks are.

I commend you for this sir.

I live in a city where every one & their uncle owns or wants to own a pitbull even if they know jack about training a dog, don't have the time to train a dog, don't have living condition fit for pitbull (I live in a small apartment building w/ tiny 2 bedroom apartments only & still people here think it's a good idea to own a pit). As for there nature pitbulls tend to be more aggressive , are powerful fkn dogs, & have a very strong fight reaction , I heard somewhere that when enraged a pit releases enough adrenalin to kill a man six times over (doubt it's true but wouldn't be surprised if it was), really I think banning pits is a bad idea but idiots keep getting them, & thinking "oh pits are good dogs it's just nature verses nurture" forgetting that nature is a constant & that if you can't nurture it right you shouldn't own it.

At 7/14/09 08:06 AM, AapoJoki wrote:

At 7/14/09 07:54 AM, platypuspwn wrote: I think Homosexuality is an abomination, so I don't like either.

I think that eating shellfish is an abomination.

And that my freinds is why I can never be a christian.

At 6/29/09 11:17 AM, FatJoe214 wrote: wow that's ghetto and i should know im ghetto my self thats pure grade A ghetto my good friend

Ya that's ghetto just 'cause the duct tape

At 6/29/09 11:20 AM, EyelessArchfiend wrote: The only thing that sucks is the gas mask. There are two small vents that blow into your eyes, so you need to keep them shut. We found it easier just to inhale from the hose and leave the mask off.

NO keep them open you need to see how milked it gets plus THC can be absorbed through soft tissues

Wouldn't it be better to rig a percolator instead of just using split chambers?

Heres what I got
Angry Hill Billys 2

It's pretty funny But the voices are annoying I'd give it 3/5

At 6/29/09 07:56 AM, SeaBoundRhino wrote: It's kind of obvious that she is joking.

Still for making that threat she should be arrested & charged or just forced to follow threw on the threat either way.

I'm sorry squirrelly I shouldn't have called you a pussy, I've never been in that situation ,with the few women I have been with it's always been a use/use situation so I have no idea how bad that must have been. Please accept my apology.

That's what happened with me.

At 6/29/09 06:55 AM, squirrelly20 wrote:

At 6/29/09 06:52 AM, biohasard wrote:
Chuck Norris... He is like 69 now (God what a wonderful number) it's going to happen soon...

at least people would shut up about how he is indestructible.

Chuck Norris could only die if he wanted to go to heaven to kick gods ass.

sorry had to do it

Well the worst I've ever seen was my buddies ex who pretty much just used his dumb ass as her personal goon & she didn't give a like about him, fI can remember a time when me & the crew were drinking & he starts grabbing his chest & breathing hard, it looks like he was having a prolonged heart attack to cut the story short I would have shown more compassion to my worst enemy if they were in that state, & he was her BF.One of my home girls threatened to beat her ass if she ever acted like that again & a few weeks later my buddy came back home twacked out (he's a bad addict & had been sober for a while, I think he's probably dead as the last I heard he owed 3.5 grand to people you don't want to owe) she asked him if his GF got him spun then grabbed a bat & headed out the door, her BF had to restrain her it was truly a sight to see.

Now that's the worst I've seen the worst for me personally was my first GF who I was living in the same group home with slit her wrists attention style after her uncle was executed, it sux knocking on someones door see them walk one step out crying with their forearms extended & the seeing & realizing what they just did.

At 6/29/09 06:23 AM, squirrelly20 wrote: okk. I just spent the last cpl months with a girl who didn't love me and she was a bitch and treated me like shit but se was happy i was spending money on her!=] welcome to the world i guess

That's it? quite bitching pussy.

At 6/29/09 06:00 AM, squirrelly20 wrote: They are ridiculous. Yes I posted a thread about this. It is up so shut the fuck up bitching. I know alot of NG users don't have any experience with these aliens called "women". I'm just curious what is your worst story with a girl?

You first!

At 6/28/09 11:35 PM, Texsk8er56 wrote: Ok i have 3 questions about the new Tobacco Regulation ban:

For one, Will this cause a "downfall", per say, in the tobacco industries? Such as the people who make Blacks, Phillies, Other flavored tobaccos. Will this cause a loss of jobs? Or cause these industries to do as bad as the car companies?

Certainly for some the market will be lost maybe some will develop new strategies, but it will hurt companies that make flavored cigars

Also, Menthol's are flavored tobacco, correct? These are not included in the ban. Obama smokes menthol's. I sense hypocrisy In this situation.

I sense idiocy, I don't think this will be all that effective at preventing youth from smoking, after all most minors I know stick to cigarettes while most flavored tobacco comes in the form of cigars.Putting a larger warning label won't do anything as everyone knows how dangerous smoking is . At this time point of sale advertising is pretty much just a sign indicating that they carry the product &the light/mild ban is ridiculous as no one I know actually think light & mild means healthier just not as strong. To be honest I see this as an attack on my freedom of personal choice.

And, any idea when this takes place?

I'd like to know so I can stock up on my beloved cherry Double Diamonds

Out of curiosity does anyone think this was a good use of our governments time? I mean of all the issues America faces the possibility of preventing a few (very few) people from smoking is a priority?

Boil it then toss it in the freezer

At 6/24/09 11:09 AM, Steak89 wrote: Oh quit it, it's not like good ol' NG hasn't come up with a few annoying memes. Dickneck anyone?

I still think Dickneck is hilarious.

At 6/24/09 09:38 AM, Jerich0 wrote: How is sex in anyway free?

It can be, but it's rare.

At 6/23/09 01:56 PM, camobch0 wrote: I would ather just smoke marijuana, atleast it gets you high, and it's cheaper

Where do you live, that cannibis is cheaper?

At 6/24/09 08:48 AM, N00B3N5731N wrote: Nothing good is "free". That is just a fact.

Sex?

Ivanna Morcok

(I used to know a Less Morcoks)

:: tell me that name isn't cruel

At 6/23/09 09:01 AM, Fast-forward wrote: Yomomas ahor

it be better as Yomoma Sa'hor

Like butter mixed with blood & Wild Turkey, I think there's a bit of cilantro in there to.

not bad

It's Pussy Calore not Galore

Adultery is illegal in Colorado, as is having sex with anyone more than ten years younger than you.

Damn Wikis

1.9 million for 24 for songs each worth ¢99, Does any one else think this shows exactly where our "justice" systems interests are?