Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

His... Friendship. I'd be all: "Give me all your... Friendship."

Or ask in the Sigmakers thread. I believe they also do profile pics.

I would open the screen keyboard thingy and go from there, either painting the letters back on (if they were scratched off) or scratch them in the paint (if my keyboard was painted). So, five minutes of annoyance, followed by my normal way of business.

Hooray, pragmatism!

Am I the only one to think 'Bridget' the moment I saw the thread title...

PENIS!

Haha, penis.

Come on, you know it was going to happen.

Ooh, about seven or so.

1. Hitch-hike for a period of time.
2. Get in a fight. A real fight. Broken jaws and that sort of things.
3. Live in London for a while.

Those three I really want to do. Why? Why not?

Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture - Douglas Coupland I recommend anything by Douglas Coupland, but highly recommend Generation X.
Nausea - Jean-Paul Sartre
Dune series - Frank Herbert I haven't read it, but apparently, it's quite good.

At 5/20/09 08:43 AM, Lost-Chances wrote: Day Of The Triffids by John Wyndham is an enjoyable book. Pretty long but not too long but has a pretty disappointing ending. However, the plot is unique.

Fixed. Triffids, not tiffids.

Hedgeclipper.

Seriously, how many times?

Did she dump you in mortar? No? Then quit your whining.

Horribly, horribly English, I know. But it should get the basic idea around: a teacher dumps a kid in mortar.

At 5/18/09 10:41 PM, AndrewGlisson13 wrote: I would do several things. First, I would go back 6000 years in order to disprove creationism. Second, I would go to the future, buy some high-tech thing, go back to the present, and then sell it, claiming that I was the one who invented it.
At 5/18/09 11:43 PM, xenonmonkey wrote: Go to the future, Find an immortality medication, bring it back to the present and become a billionaire

Ooh, I like these ones. And the consequences it harbours. You go to the future, and learn of some magnificent invention. You buy one, figure out how it works and then go back in time, draw the plans or whatever, and BAM you're the guy who invented it.

BUT -and what a but, almost as big as yo momma's- where did it come from? To the people in the future, someone in the past, you, built it. And invented it from scratch. As is normal for inventions. T you, it already existed and you just made a new one. How did it form? It's like some guy going back in time to give himself the plans for his time machine. He then builds it and goes back in time to give his past self the plans. They exist in that time-loop, but have never been made.

At 5/18/09 11:53 PM, uzi47 wrote:

At 5/18/09 11:51 PM, uzi47 wrote: I don't actually you can travel further in time

If you couldn't understand this I meant: I don't actually believe...

Yes, you can. Time travel into the future is easier than going back in time. See, the faster you go, the slower time seems to be going for you. If you go at 99% the speed of light, and go to Alpha Centauri and back, you will have travelled (for us people here on Earth) about nine years. However, you will have aged less. Namely about 0.6 years, if I did everything correctly.

Time travel to the past is a lot harder: you need to go faster than light. There are ways to do this, but there are some catches to it.

At 5/19/09 02:56 AM, Gorgorothx wrote: Until you got trampled to death by a triceratops... or until you broke a bone and had no doctors or medicine to ease your suffering ;) I love pessimism

Or you exploded because of your own internal pressure and you being in a vacuum? Or if you're really talking about Earth, get killed by toxic radiation, burned by erupting volcanoes or suffocate.

At 5/11/09 03:36 PM, Dcombat wrote: Bastard. I was about too post that.
So being scene is like fight club.

I'm afraid it's more like /b/. I doubt a lot of scene people have heard of Fight Club.

At 5/11/09 12:11 PM, kalhua wrote: QUESTION #1:

Who am I to decide over the life of the unborn child of a woman I do not know? I would say it would be hard for her and that there are chances she will loose her child soon. However, she is the only person able to decide whether or not the child lives.

QUESTION #2:

If I do not know their standpoints, I can hardly make a decent judgement.

Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?
A: Kidiri.

Promote surreal humour.

Oh lord. This is going to far. From the wikihow on being scene:

Warnings
* The first rule of being scene is not to talk about being scene.

This is unsolvable using the base pic. You are at the place with the tag 'you here' and need to get to the place with the tag 'get here'. Since both sentences are correct, I cannot go to the place marked 'get here' without having the other tag be incorrect. Ergo, no solution. BUT since this is the solution, there is one. Creating a paradox. So I'm not going to give it.

At 5/5/09 04:50 PM, Pepperfrog wrote: Go as Snake.

Go as Snake.

Perhaps these people will know.

At 5/2/09 11:20 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote: the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog

Fuck you, BBM. I was going to do that...

Oh well. Fox?

The error is in the step where you divide by (a-b). Since a=b, a-b=a-a=0. Thus, you divide by zero and the universe implodes and is replaced with an even stranger version of itself.

Is the video not playing, or are you unable to get to the site? Because the first would be -as some said- a missing plug-in. Go here to download Flash player 10.0.22.87 (the newest version).
If it's the latter, I suggest using a proxy. Here's a quick Google for proxy.

Hope I helped.

Babe. As in Babe.

If they allow them in, they wouldn't be able to vote for the country that allowed them.

I don't believe you can vote for your own country, I could be wrong, however.

I'd grab the bottle of water next to me.

But that's no fun. So I'd go on my swivel chair to the stairs, climb on the handrail, slide down, climb back up because I've discovered I can't get to the water, grab my chair in one hand, slide back down, put it on the ground, sit on it and ride to the water. Going back is a bit more of a pain.

At 4/12/09 02:12 AM, Thesuit11 wrote: Rock Lobster-B52's

Love shack, so no.

Also: Dragostea din tei by O-zone/Haiducii.

Yeah, basically, this.

At 4/9/09 06:24 AM, Shreddy wrote: you need to learn to google as well by the looks of it, none of those are INSIDE a cliffside fortification like the ones found at omaha beach

He asked for the interior of a German bunker. The first two are such interiors. The third one's a plan so he can have a look of what it kind of looks like and the the last two are other bunkers for reference. Since the fortifications of Omaha beach were part of the Atlantic Wall, they were a very important line of defence from attacks from Britain and the US. I don't think they would leave such an important structure abandoned. There would've been a certain degree of habitation in it, such as shown in the first picture.
The second picture (the first of the series, that is) is one of a gunning room. By the looks of the size of the gun, most likely artillery. This might be the only error, seeing artillery most likely would've been placed further to the back. The second pic in the series clearly shows people going down into the bunker, which is clearly dug in. The third pic is one of the com-room and the fourth another one of the sleeping quarters.
I don't think the difference between bunkers somewhere in Poland on the plains or bunkers in the South of France would've differed much. My guess is that all of them are built according to a basic plan and adjusted where needed (e.g.: artillery, built into rock, dug in...) so that the only minor differences would be with a couple of adjustments where needed. He also didn't specify WHICH part of the bunker he wanted an inside of, so I gave what I could find. Which is more than what you gave him.

Plus, the emphasis in your accusation lies wrongly: the way you said it, it looks like I didn't give him inside views (what I obviously did). While you meant -or so I believe- is that I didn't provide views of cliff side bunkers, so that it should to be: "none of those are inside a CLIFFSIDE fortification like the ones found at omaha beach".

Two minutes of googling. This is what I found. Seriously, learn to google.

#1
#2 Change the 1 in the URL into 2,3,4 or 5 for other views.
#3
#4
#5
Now shut up and make a flash wherein you credit me as a source for images.

I mean, seriously, learn to google.

At 4/8/09 03:36 AM, Lagerkapo wrote: Whence defending one's own well-being:

Half-knuckle to the trachea. Trust me, I'm a martial artist.

That, or the solar plexus.

College-level sociology, philosophy, anthropology and environmental psychology. High school world (mostly European, though) history, biology, physics (college-level statics), maths (with college-level calculus), Latin, Ancient Greek, French, Dutch, English And that's about it I guess.

Do note, however, that I try to research my claims before making them. For the basics, I'll rely on my memory, but should it fail me, I'm off to Wikipedia or Google.