458 Forum Posts by "karlu20"
uncensored versions of this girl (nsfw) and every pic of her ever that isnt there as well as anything about her you can find kthx
if youre good with photoshop/ flash diy stuff counts
At 12/20/08 08:25 PM, Twilight95 wrote: Lasso tool to cut out what you want (Change to magnetic if you don't have a steady hand).
Press Edit and copy the selected piece
this, but right click -> feather by a few pixels 1 - 3 depending on the thing, first to make it a little smoother
-Funniest User
LOLZILLA
-Attention Whore
GOTHCLAWZ <3
-Drama Queen
cellardoor6
-Never Logs Off
Gagsy
-I Miss Yew
LastSpartan </3
-Best Artist
THEJamoke <3
-Master Creator
Black-Ops <3
-Rookie of the Year
LampFace
-Most Improved
HotActionYiffFur
-Biggest Spammer
EpicFail
-Most Overrated
WadeFulp
-Most Underrated
THEJamoke <3 x2
-Worst Moderator
Ultrabear
-Best Moderator
JadeTheAssassin
-Worst Poster
Kagoe
-Best Poster
Earfetish <3
At 12/17/08 08:17 PM, THEJamoke wrote: And who's fault is that, huh?
PHappy b-day little sis o' mine.
speak of the devil, ty bunni
also, requested lock cause im sick of what this descended into
At 12/17/08 08:07 PM, 1337leader wrote: It is very well possible, considering the state of newgrounds and it's user quality. It's really hard to find nice users on here anymore.
i wouldnt say that, and people are entitled to their own opinions on things... i find it funny he only seemed to join in it because it was a bandwagon if you will... i wonder if more people had been defending you than attacking you he wouldve sided with you?
if thats what he wants to believe, so be it, but he should at least learn about the facts behind things like that before making a judgment one way or another
anyways, random nice users i thought of:
you
zack
jacob
ifun (even if im not her friend)
earfetish (even if im not his friend)
bunni (even if we never talk)
tyler
etc.
At 12/17/08 08:04 PM, 1337leader wrote: Yeah, I agree with Jaclyn, at least those two dolts can come up with good insults and can troll better, you don't know a god damn thing about me, and you don't have any sufficient argument against me to prove I'm mentally ill. Sheesh, get a life >w>
they cant come up with good insults. they can just troll better. tbh idk if this guys trolling... i think he might be serious :s
At 12/17/08 07:54 PM, Ghyfty wrote: What the hell are you trying to do? Make me feel bad with your wise words of wisdom, lol?
a better question is what the hell are you doing in my birthday thread, on my birthday, bitching at and insulting my gf
fuck off.
at least matt and paytah know a few things about her, you dont know shit. have a little decency, i mean i know this is newgrounds but is that so much to ask?
At 12/17/08 07:36 PM, Wyvvern-Guy wrote: Yay. Happy birthdayz.
thanks ^.^
you totally just +1ed, but idc, yay for on topic +1ing
At 12/17/08 07:17 PM, Infinite-one wrote: I should take the opportunity to post something here.
lolol horo.
temptation girl is better.
proof (nsfw)
At 12/17/08 07:00 PM, COKEHEAD75 wrote: Happy birthday Karlu20!
The best of birthday wishes to you.
thanks ^.^
*ignoring idiotic spammyness*
anyways, back on topic for my birthday i gotted:
photoshop and office home + student 07!
also, i blew all the candles out at once but i cant decide what to wish for... :o
---
anyways, to those besides mappy (matt) and paytah (doom) since obv i know they wont stop
youre all idiots, this is my birthday thread now leave me and my gf alone
At 12/17/08 06:25 PM, Matt475 wrote: Everyone point and laugh, karlu dates a little boy over the computer, who thinks he is a female cat.
Better?
*hating post limit thing*
noes.
problems with trollish logic:
-kitten is an mtf transsexual, not a boy.
-kittens name was given to her by me
-kitten identifies as a kitsune (fox girl) not a neko (cat girl)
oh wait, trolls nawt use logic, kk than mappy carry on
i go open presents nao. baiiii
At 12/17/08 05:58 PM, Ghyfty wrote: Nice.
Here's a tip: don't use **. Seriously.
kk i wont use astrixes
*opens presents*
At 12/17/08 05:52 PM, Ghyfty wrote: Aww, man. I misread it. I mean 17.
Dammit, I look like an idiot.
*feels badful* there there... *hands piece of cake*
At 12/17/08 05:46 PM, Ghyfty wrote: Happy Birthday, you loving hentai 19 year old.
im 19? holy shit thats news to me
At 12/17/08 05:46 PM, 1337leader wrote: Happy birthday love!!! Hope you have many more great birthdays!
ty kitti *frenches* <3
wuv oo
^.^
---
igott maded thread without me asking... yay... *feels specialful*
At 12/14/08 04:29 PM, Zerok wrote: OF COURSE, we'd need restrictions, otherwise everyone would flood everywhere with their own overdone, unoriginal polls.
Restrictions, managed automatically by the site:
- need at least 500 posts.
- account needs to be at least 6 months old.
- restricted to creating one every... say... two (to four weeks).
- ANY BBS ban results in an automatic 30-day ban for creating poll threads, effective AFTER your BBS ban clears.
lolwut why make such insane rules?
more realistically speaking:
-rules mimicking the bbs rules; of course since this would be a bbs feature it would already follow those rules, minor changes would be needed however to make them applicable to the polls
-a separate option for moderators to ban one from using polls for x amount of time, especially, for instance, what if its a user requested ban? a system mandated ban for 30 days for every single ban you get, that just seems overkill, once a ban is up it should be up and the slate wiped clean. if you fuck up again you get banned again and so on
At 8/20/08 01:41 PM, cyberpotato wrote: Have you ever collected some strange stuff at some point in you're life. Like spoons, stuffed animals ect.
rocks - my mom threw them out :(
sticks - my mom threw them out :(
leaves - my mom threw them out :(
and so on and so forth
current collections:
hentai/ ecchi ranging from vanilla stuff to stuff found on gurochan - 628 pics and im in the process of completely revamping how i organize it... lucky me :(
i have other things big enough to consider a collection, but not used for 'collecting' purposes; some day i intend to start a collection of sex toys. at least 1 possibly 2 of every sex toy ever made - 1 to sit on a display case, 1 for fun
At 12/14/08 12:09 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: Alright, so I plan to cook dinner for my girlfriend tomorrow. At the moment, I've got a cold, it's not that bad, but it's very irritaitng and the pressure headaches I am getting from my nose that will not unblock is not sometihng I want to give her.
What are the risks that she will get ill from my food? Naturally, I will wash my hands thoroughly and I do think that any germs may be killed during the cooking progress, but I don't want to play fast and loose with Ms ZAAL's health.
pretty bad, you should wash your hands and then use a sanitizer thats fda approved afterwords, at least to help reduce chances even more than washing hands (and the hotter water used to wash hands, the better, it should be as hot as you can stand)
like... im in culinary arts, learning to be a chef, and you arent supposed to cook foods while youre sick
but since you arent selling it what you can and cant do is up to you more or less; to improve your chances you could try wearing latex/ latex alternative gloves that are fda approved (but obviously still wash your hands)
itt: virgin who watches porn ranting about virgins who watch hentai.
*sighs* virgins and non-virgins alike watch porn and hentai alike. some also dont watch it. it boils down to personal preference.
side note:
"battering the beef bayonet" the fuck?
"becoming a hapless socially awkward fuckwit" if your euphamism doesnt scream that than i dont know what does.
also, you claim those who watch hentai are insecure, how about you be secure enough to call it masturbation kthx
also, why cant girls be kinky? im a girl. im kinky. i like hentai. :(
<gurochan /g/ and /f/, and 4chan /d/ and /e/3
At 12/13/08 10:44 PM, IblameLeoforthis wrote: Also, as a side, poll for which chick is the hottest. There was a thing online about this back in April, surveying which men chose the below three women as the most appealing. After a few votes I'll tell you who got the most votes in the survey, and what size jeans they wear.
the poll is flawed:
- since it is a study based on weight more or less all other traits should ideally be as close as possible, that is clearly not the case
- plus size models do not accurately represent fat people
sooo, put people who more accurately represent fat people and have similar traits overall. guarantee the results will be VERY different; now by that i dont mean people that are extremely fat, just not a skinny person claiming to be fat, plus size is still thin. not anorexic. but thin.
---
in any case, i would choose none of the above. the middle and right are the most appealing, but not because of size. and the first has unhealthy, brittle looking hair, bad skin tone, and is kinda flat looking, their knees also kinda bother me + their skin seems dried out. although her face isnt that harsh it is much harsher than the middle and right two.
At 11/23/08 06:01 PM, NeonFlame126 wrote:At 11/23/08 02:47 PM, AKACCMIOF wrote: 60% of Americans would vote for an atheist even if they were completely qualified.60% + 31% + 26% = 117%
31% of Americans think there's not enough religion in politics.
26% of Americans think an Atheist cannot be morale.
Did no one else really pick up on this?
60% of americans according to his statistics would(nt) - im assuming thats a typo - vote for an atheist even if they were qualified. 40% would
31% think theres not enough religion in politics 69% think there is enough/ too much
26% think atheists cant be morale 74% think they can
---
all different questions on a similar topic; so the same people can be polled more than once
At 11/8/08 04:55 AM, Monocrom wrote: Not quite the same..... I take 20 people, dress them up in business suits or dresses, take you into the room, and ask you to pick out the 5 gay people in the room without speaking to anyone.
Same situation, but I ask you to pick out the 5 Black people in the room.
Fairly obvious which task will take about 3 seconds.
doesnt really matter which is more obvious*, they were discriminated against legally, and currently homosexual couples are as well; specific example:
-interracial marriage was not always legal in the us, obv it is now.
-gay marriage is not currently legal in the us; overall
*if a homosexual couple is looking for marriage than its going to be obvious, and theyll be discriminated against; it will also be obvious to anyone whom they are out of the closet to as well as if they dont try to hide pda towards any loved ones
At 11/7/08 05:35 PM, andythehedgehog wrote: I personally think this is a bit lower than slavery on the bad scale, but it's still terrible.
the analogy is more post slavery, the jim crow laws and what not
At 11/7/08 05:07 PM, ZeroAsALimit wrote: Wow! Wait guys....wait......people actually have reverance for the constitution? :o
maybe, just maybe somewhere in america?
naa thats hoping for too much :s
At 11/7/08 04:18 AM, Monocrom wrote: Incramentalism works far better than telling the citizens of an entire state that their popular vote doesn't mean shit.
because we live in a direct democracy where the majority votes on issues directly?
oh wait... the founding fathers didnt want a direct democracy, for this exact reason, the majority would discriminate upon the minority overwhelmingly; the majority is not always right nor is the minority. but the best plausible option is to have representitives
@ fuzzy; uh no jews havent, in some places marriage wasnt allowed period + was illegal far far back into the past, as well as there havent always been jews. also history wasnt invented. nor was it discovered per se. but this is me being nit picky, i get what you meant to say
it is a right. because otherwise you would not necessarily be able to marry them, even if both you and them wished. it is a right that you have the ability to get married, though not necessarily a guarantee
how do you harm an inanimate object? it merely alters the definition in some cases, and maintains and reinforces it in others; also, id rather a definition 'harmed' than gay couples harmed emotionally because their love isnt quite as valid as a straight couples in the eyes of the law, which is supposed to be just
um... procreating isnt contributing, the world is overpopulated already, vastly overpopulated, and it would only speed up the decline, in a few generations the world will run out of *a lot* of things, we as a whole either need or have become accustomed to; also they contribute. they work. they have jobs. they pay taxes. they do their part contributing, and what about families whom are sterile? should they not be allowed to marry?
i believe you dont understand, no one is asking the people as a whole to tolerate it. merely give equal rights. hate gays all you want, i really dont care, but that stops when it infringes on anothers rights, hate all you want. but legislature should be passed so that it is unbiased. no one forces you to accept gay marriage by making it legal. you arent being asked to get married to a homosexual.
and lastly, once upon a time in america it was illegal in places for a black person to marry a white person. gee, sound familiar no? but wait *gasps* how can that be, the gay marriage ban isnt ANYTHING like other infringements on basic rights
@ zephy; civil union does not always grant the same rights. some states have civil unions involving equal rights and some do not. just like some have civil unions. and some do not. i also wouldnt say this has turned into a flame war... but a heated debate filled with far too many personal attacks. though it isnt the politics forum, so obv expecting us to be mature isnt going to happen
with some food there is an actual discernable difference that will affect the final outcome of the food
be it quality, or ingredients, or whatever else - take kosher salt, for instance
im in culinary school and one of the first things we learned: always use iodized (table) salt for baking unless the recipie says otherwise, always use kosher salt for cooking unless the recipie says otherwise
why?
kosher salt is more coarse, and therefore better for seasoning during most cooking processes, but table salt is more preferable for baking, because unlike during cooking (the two are distinctly different, though both can be classified as 'cooking') the salt doesnt dissolve in most cases, and you dont want it to more thourougly mix in, for seasoning meals after having been cooked table salt should be used, because its a finer salt, and since it wouldnt be dissolving during the cooking process (the foods already been cooked) table salt allows you to use less, give more flavor to the food, and not end up literally having to chew the salt along with your meal
that being said, if someone wants to buy it for other reasons thats fine too, to each their own
At 10/13/08 10:21 PM, Earfetish wrote: why thank you
youre welcome ^.^
You're exactly write, and I am a pervert too. I was kinda using 'pervert' as the perjorative, but I heard a very good point recently, 'perve' doesn't at all give credence to the term 'paedophile'.
*cough* write? i thought i was right...?
"My mate Ben's coming over, he's a nice guy but he's a bit of a perve."
"Oh really?"
"Yeah, he rapes children."
lol
That's what I said, or at least what I intended to say. People who say they're into rape reject anything that depicts real rape, because it's fantasy.
not necessarily, they could reject it for other reasons ie: legally not wanting to get in deep shit for it
I said that, too. If they didn't have empathy they'd get off on real rape, but since they do have empathy, they're relieved by the 'this is rape FANTASY only' disclaimers. I know, man. I hope I didn't come across as saying anything else, because I am totally fine with fetishism and perversion, in fact I love that humans can be fetishists and I think it's one of the most interesting parts of life's rich tapestry.
well, you came across as saying it, but having read a lot of your posts i was fairly sure thats not how you meant it
So hopefully no offence, none was certainly intended and I agree so far.
none taken
I think if you view images of children being abused (lolicon isn't a picture of a child being abused) and masturbate to it then you have a lack of empathy which is kind of worrying. Just like if one of your friends who has a rape fantasy tracked down real-life rape and got off on that kind of real-life misery. I've no problem with that fantasy but I would have to question the fetishist if they got off on non-consensual and depressing stuff.
technically anyone whos into rape is into non-consensual stuff - whether they leave it purely as fantasy + consensual role play or actually go out and rape people
Well I agree that the fact that the children in the images aren't consenting is important when considering its morality, but my point was, if we say 'non consensual acts should be banned from public viewing', where does the line stop? Terrorist execution videos? Covert upskirt videos? Fight videos? Prank videos?
the best argument i could come up with (and i stayed up later than i shouldve, thinking) that doesnt go against my morals (ie, they people watching it are potentially dangerous, lets take the precaution and arrest them before they go out and do something) is that if they paid for the images, theyre funding the source, which gives the source greater incentive to go make more + they just bought something thats illegal, if they got it free i have no idea - and quite frankly, id rather say 'i dont know' than go off saying well they might go and commit a crime hence they should be punished
Y'know I don't. And adults who have been in relationships with people who were far older than them, even when they were past the age of consent say that there was a massive power difference in the relationship and they would've preferred not to have been in it.
the potential for abuse is there... either way, but i do believe they could give their consent if they were informed, and that if no one tried to intimidate/ black mail/ etc the other, their consent should be valid, but this is an entirely different argument
That's entirely it - I know it's shaky ground, despite that the majority agrees with me, but I think if you view images of real-life children being abused and degraded, and get sexually excited, and you either don't mind the transparent harm in the images you're watching or you're in denial about exactly how dangerous it is, then you're a dangerous individual and you should be confronted about it. Like, you're doing something absolutely disgusting and atrocious and I think it's right for society to be concerned.
if you (in general) view it by accident, lets say for arguments sake on 4chan, and someone posts cp, and you happen to get aroused by it, i dont feel that makes you dangerous, and while they might have gotten aroused, there wasnt an intent to break the law, so theyve no reason to be punished or ostracized
'absolutely disgusting and atrocious' is subjective; 'weed is absolutely disgusting and atrocious and i think its right for society to be concerned' see?
I have NO PROBLEM with fantasy material, in the slightest, and have nought but respect, admiration, and a closet belonging to, the fetish community. And I don't think there's conflict in my beliefs, either. But wanking to real-life images of horror and ejaculating is a lot worse than watching execution videos and feeling sorry.
i think there is a conflict, not in your beliefs, though, in your reasoning, i mean, i dont exactly have a very good reason either, and thats the best i could come up with, but id be more likely to say i dont know why i believe it, than say something like 'theyre potentially dangerous' which is basically the reason you gave
on a completely unrelated note, care to comment on my blog? i thought about it a few months before i became certain of my opinion, and happen to be very curious as to what you consider dominance to be
At 10/13/08 08:55 PM, Earfetish wrote: And if you get off on it, then maybe you need your balls chopped off, because you appear to me to be just as dangerous as a rapist and either lacking empathy or in denial about how cruel your perversion actually is.
but even I recognise these arguments as lacking somewhat. I don't think I could ever say 'viewing CP should be legal' because in my heart I really think it shouldn't be.
you know, earfetish, i really do look up to you in a lot of ways - and respect your opinions usually but your view on this bothers me a bit
first of all, you mentioned they were perverted, perversion is so subjective, anyone can call any deviant perverted, you and i are perverts in at least someones eyes out there, just because someone finds someone else a pervert doesnt give one reason to be jailed
second, im into s&m personally, and ive several friends who are into rape specifically - im for consensual stuff though, if they watch pornography depicting actors being 'raped' - they arent dangerous for that reason, if they show intent to harm another person or harm another person then theyre dangerous. besides, just because someones into rape doesnt mean they dont have empathy, they happen to be some of my closest and sweetest friends - this also applies to my friends whom are pedophiles (though the most any of them watch is lolicon) a few of them are into purely vanilla sex acts, some are into rape, some s&m, and some into other fetishes that have nothing to do with bdsm at all
i dont believe cp should be legal, but only because more often than not it would be non consensual for any children involved (i do, however, believe that children can consent and their consent means something)
and isnt this kinda advocating, at least this particular point that youre basing your argument on, that people can be guilty without committing a crime/ for their thoughts, something - that from what ive seen - you detest?
At 9/27/08 04:00 PM, 1337leader wrote: Also karlu, thank you for adding the good points, they were much needed ^w^
youre welcome love <3
im not entering this debate, its beneath me, im saving my debating for when i post my extremely long essay i write on/ off on why being gay and having equal rights (including adoption marriage etc) is perfectly fine
if anyone here wants to use something to prove a point to gagsy or whoever else, here are some sources id like to donate:
proof in nature:
http://www.subversions.com/french/pages/
science/animals.html
http://www.bidstrup.com/sodomy.htm
http://www.nhm.uio.no/againstnature/anim al_human.html
morality:
http://www.bidstrup.com/marriage.htm
and gagsy? natural is a bad word to argue a point on, if something occurs in nature it is natural - whether it is believed to be unusual morally wrong, or whatever else, even if it is man made it can be argued to be natural for humans are indeed natural in themselves
