823 Forum Posts by "karasz"
At 3/22/03 01:01 PM, flamewolf wrote:At 3/22/03 12:51 PM, shamROCK678 wrote: this war is justified.No it isn't, George bush is doing it for the oil!
no ur a fucking moron... we have already discussed this issue to no avail... and truth be told NOBODY'S OPINION HAS CHANGED... for about a good month or 2 the only topic on the forum was 'bush is gay' 'bush is doing it for oil' 'this war is gay' and basically im sick and tired of it...
so in conclusion i hate u and u smell...
At 3/21/03 12:22 AM, House_Of_Leaves wrote: So...I'm gonna see if I can make this simple. Bush's problem with Iraq and Saddam Hussein (supposedly) is that he didn't cooperate with the UN. Bush is now waging a rather unofficial and illegal war on Iraq...and in turn, isn't cooperating with the UN. That's hypocracy.
thank god im not the only one who thinks this...
So, why am I scared to be an American? I have a sickening feeling that eventually, the USA is going to be standing alone, and all the nations that the USA has pissed off is suddenly going to look at the US and say, "YOU dropped bombs. YOU started this. YOU did this against your own Constitution, AND without approval of the United Nations. YOU are now considered a terrorist. YOU disarm."
Boom.
now now, this probably wont happen... the nations that dislike us also want us to do stuff for them, so dont expect any nation to be getting the US to disarm anytime soon... besides any resolution involving the US to disarm would be vetoed by the US... and worst case scenario the US says 'fuck the UN' and leaves it...
also there wont be another attack, farthest it would go is CIA/FBI stops it in time...
also make sure u tell ur congressman to veto the new patriot act 2 bill... section 501 states that secret arrests are legal...
there is a nuke power plant close to here too...
the way i look at it is if i die i die... but i wont die cuz im still a virgin and i wont die a virgin, so its all good...
potassuim iodide pills here i come... MMMMMM... KI pills...
lets not go crazy here kids...
im sure the council is not really weilding any power... just some people playing with their egos...
*politics council tosses puppet karasz to teh side*
*karasz regains consciousness*
FIGHT THE POWER... the forum is to be used by all, no secret societies... fight now and safe the forum OR doom the forum into allowing the 'skull and bones' to control it...
At 3/19/03 01:24 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: I think another, or else I said we might allow, and might is slang for not going to.
thanks for clearing that up
*looks for helmet, finds bike helmet from 9 years ago, runs into hastily built wooden shack with no doors/windows and prepares for armageddon...*
At 3/19/03 01:18 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: The Politics Council is unharmed by your statements, and will continue operations just as it always has.
is anyone else frightened by the 3rd person speak???
that is a sign things are getting out of control... when bush starts doing it better bust out the y2k shelters...
As for the Regulars thread, we try and keep n00bs out of it, but some get through. Yeah.
well the first post said all are welcomed, as long as they are rational and use logic and such... or am i thinking of another thread???
At 3/19/03 11:28 AM, Dig_the_Man wrote: Okay, just for my own knowledge, what are people's top three political leaders they would like to see spanked or given an enema?
1. Dick Cheney (he may be the boogie man, im looking into it)
2. 'Reverends' Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson (like they actually work)
3. Yassir Arafat (he scares me, what with his intifada[sp] and all)
At 3/19/03 08:57 AM, Freakapotimus wrote: If anything got too out of hand (flames, spam, STFU pics) I'd step in and use my MIGHTY POWER... er, my delete button.
best thing ive heard all day...
yeah it sucks and i entirely agree with you...
although ur still in the early stages of posting i will give u some much earned kudos...
hahaha... experts, like THEY know anything
At 3/19/03 01:22 AM, mysecondstar wrote: well, it seems that iraq does have WMD. now we have to deal with "chemical ali", the general in charge of deploying all chemical or biological weapons. the US is in big trouble if they use it.
which is what IVE been saying all along... once we invade some marines are goin to be hit with chemical/biological weapons...
on the good side: I WAS RIGHT....
on the BAD side: i was right about this... damn me and my knowing everything...
At 3/19/03 12:32 AM, NoNameProphet wrote: Hey, even if most people are stupid, no need to antagonize them and point it out =P. Just try and help people out.
Anyone saying everyone sucks and you rock helps no one.
oh i say that but i dont mean it... like if someone truly doesnt understand something then yes i will help them out anyway i can...
its teh people that dont know and dont care, they have their opinions in their head and wont listen to debate/discussion that i cant stand...
What would they do without power you ask? Flame the people with "STFU"? Lol
well thats nothing big... im talkin like banning someone from the forum entirely, cuz that sucks and should not be allowed by anyone other than a mod...
yeah but the democrats runnin for president will ask y are we giving SO MUCH money to iraq, when the US economy is horrible?
and so on and so forth so perhaps they may get the edge...
also the war will take no more than 3 days... but one set of troops will be hit with chemical/biological weapons and that will get teh international community behind the US more-so than it is now...
At 3/18/03 10:54 PM, NJDeadzone wrote: we have alot of optimists on this forum if 5-6 years is the average. If we didn't get permission from the UN to invade a nation, what makes you all think we'll be able to change the government of one without UN support?
because changing the government involves the old government getting out of power... once saddam is out france and russia will be ready to help rebuild iraq and be ready to take its oil, and the countries that were against war will be financing the rebuilding while the US and its puppy-dog attention span move onto another country...
ok... i think it may have been me that said i consider myself elite... and i do feel that way, based on the fact that the majority of the 18-25 year old population is stupid... i also consider most people on this forum in that age group part of the elite because they also know what is going on...
second, the council would have no power unless one of them were a mod... right, i mean what else could someone that is only allowed to post do?
At 3/18/03 07:14 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: The coalition used no atmoic weapons, so any radioactive elements were in-house in Iraq.
the shells that were fired from the US tanks were made of depleted uranium...
At 3/18/03 07:28 PM, NJDeadzone wrote: 1. Bush's 48 hour ultimatum as a successful tactic in bolstering American confidence in war
buy, sets a deadline, something that bush couldnt do before...
2. Saddam's son's refusal to leave as a sign of a potentially long, sandy, Vietnam
sell, the war wont take long BUT the US troops will get hit with some chemical weapons and it will accelerate the war plans and get more people behind the battle...
3. The UN having a chance to interfere with the US's invasion of Iraq within the next few months.
sell, the UN wont be talked to by the US until after teh war and rebuilding starts... then france and russia will be the great allies that helped rebuild iraq..
i must say this was a great idea on ur part... i want more of these type threads...
At 3/19/03 12:07 AM, Damnatory wrote: I'm just another American that doesn't think to much of Bush, but I just had a question. || Given the ultimadum that he and his family had to leave the U.S. and resign from office, Do you really think Bush would do this to avoid a war, and ensure the saftey of our people?
good question, i would have to say no... the theory behind it is he still has a high approval rating, and would consider himself the champion of freedom or something and fight to the death for democracy..
charlie daniels is the musician that wrote 'devil went to georgia'... and other things but he's best known for that song...
At 3/18/03 04:38 PM, Slizor wrote:You should actually read the whole thread before commenting on anything.I was pointing out that arrogant cliquey shit has taken over this forum, not that we should ban it.based on what? cuz i havent seen anything cliquey OTHER than the regulars lounge
oooooooooooooooh but i dont wanna, im at home for the week and have a 56k modem so reading the whole thread is impossible...
but anyone that uses logic is allowed to say stuff in there, i have no tolerance for stupid people that spend more time bitching and moaning than uses RATIONALE thought...I'll stick with my rational thought thank you very much.
the key word is rational, if u have rational and logical posts then feel free to join in the discussion, if all ur going to do is scream and rant with no proof or valid points then dont bother me... although thats my rational anyway...
At 3/18/03 12:35 PM, Slizor wrote:Hmmm... Arrogant cliquey shit....You confuse the issue, anyhow I don't think that the US constitution applies on the internet, especially on a private website.
Right to assembly, anyone?
Even if those in the cliques are stupid, that's also a right of theirs, if I'm not mistaken
the BILL OF RIGHTS, mostly the first amendment, should APPLY to everything... say anything you want EXCEPT threatening other people, thats assault and i wont tolerate it... anything else should be fair game...
also, forming clubs and excluding people should be allowed, then you make a club and form one urself... its no different than the PGA havin that chick play and the LPGA HAVING to let that guy play on it... which is kinda funny cuz i think he is going to destroy the rest of the LPGA, and that chick will do quite nicely, top 25...
I was pointing out that arrogant cliquey shit has taken over this forum, not that we should ban it.
based on what? cuz i havent seen anything cliquey OTHER than the regulars lounge but anyone that uses logic is allowed to say stuff in there, i have no tolerance for stupid people that spend more time bitching and moaning than uses RATIONALE thought...
At 3/18/03 01:47 PM, HighWing wrote: What bothers me more about having this kind of technology is what happens when a disgruntled cop sells it to the wrong person and suddenly this technology is put in the wrong hands. Just the fact that it's out there now means crackers are probably already trying to get their hands on it.
EXACTLY... although hell it doesnt even have to be a disgruntled cop... all we need is john ashcroft to be the AG for another few years and another attack and we will be known as the United States of 1984... we are so fucked... Canada HERE I COME...
At 3/18/03 11:55 AM, D2KVirus wrote:At 3/18/03 11:37 AM, panik wrote: uhh ok. Arguing just for the sake of arguing does not make you right either.Sorry, did I just read you shooting yourself in the foot?
Congratulations, you have just gained a PHd in Dumbassity.
yeah, thats right panik has the phd... kudos for dumbassity though, that one required some thought...
At 3/17/03 11:39 PM, RaspberryLock wrote:At 3/17/03 11:07 PM, karasz wrote:Do they even have one yet? I thought all they had was a anti-submerine missile the fired. I thought they just created the crisis by turning on their nuclear facilitiesAt 3/17/03 10:43 PM, RaspberryLock wrote:um... NORTH korea can HIT the US with a nuclear weapon...
yeah the tae-dong II or III im not entirely sure... can hit like the west coast...
and venuzula and the OPEC nations and some from ourselves... the point being???That this is not a war for oil as it is sterotyped.
i understand...
thats the spirit...I was being sarcastic.
as was i
um, the terrorist alert warning system was invented for firefighters, police officers and security personnel and was never intended to let teh people know about it... but someone slipped up... and there are terrorists cells in the US
Whats new?
uh, you really didnt disagree with me on this so i have nothing to say
or set a briefcase with a nuke in it and set it off... that would be fun...
eh.heh. Russia still hasn't accounted for those two nuclear suit case bombs.heh.heh.
see, and your spending all ur time saying that attackin iraq and north korea would be a waste... SOMEONE has them, and since osama isnt talked about anymore, i can only assume kim jong il and saddam do, cuz thats what teh news is talking about...
At 3/17/03 11:16 PM, HighWing wrote: Nope. Maybe you should take a look at some world news. People in some of those other countries are protesting the war just as the US public is. Britin's parliment in perticular is under heavy fire from the public protesting the war just as the US public is. This war has no point, it's a Bush revenge and he just happens to have a few governments to back him up reguardless of the people's voice. I mean come on look at the Korean war, and Kent state?
yeah but the public opinion in other countries are more against teh war then the US... the protesters are doing shit, 15 million people protested last month and nothing changed... if you want to change something then get a bunch of people and vote for someone else in the upcoming elections... thats the only way to change things...
i dont understand teh korean war and kent state reference... kent state happened during teh vietnam war, and it was an accident that those 4 people got shot, at least thats how i learned it anyway...
d2kvirus what the fuck are talking about... ur last post made no sense at all... i cant even refute it...
At 3/17/03 10:43 PM, RaspberryLock wrote: I honestly don't see the point of attacking Iraq,
or the threat of North Korea.
ok i agree with ya on iraq... but north korea can hit the US... thats why its a threat, the CIA director said it can hit the US...
:After reading the mystical north korean threat, we should just pack up and leave and let Sorth Korea take care of them.
the US is the reason there is a south korea... along with the 20 or so UN nations that put up 10% of the troops for the korean war...
:Instead of the US soaking up mortuary numbers, we can let the south koreans. Also south koreas technology is so minimal that *maybe* they can hit us if pangea happens to form within the next 22 years.
um... NORTH korea can HIT the US with a nuclear weapon...
:Also Iraq... the war isn't for oil, or money. Its just a poor lad trying to continue what his father didn't.
well the reason is dad didnt get saddam is cuz the UN resolution was only to get iraq out of kuwait...
:We get most of oil from France (40% I believe) and some from Russia.
and venuzula and the OPEC nations and some from ourselves... the point being???
:Also there are no Terrorist links with Iraq, just a bad anti-american dictator.
this has already been debated and discussed where are you going with this???
:If anything we should continue our "quest to kill bin laden", maybe we'll find him in 30-40 years or so *rolls eyes*.
thats the spirit...
:As for these terrorist cells, with the whole dandy TERRORIST ALERT WARNING Level I'm pretty sure they won't attack us.
um, the terrorist alert warning system was invented for firefighters, police officers and security personnel and was never intended to let teh people know about it... but someone slipped up... and there are terrorists cells in the US
:Besides what are they going to do, fly planes into the new built world trade center to piss us off?
or set a briefcase with a nuke in it and set it off... that would be fun...
basically you make no real point... what was the purpose of u writing this????
At 3/17/03 10:47 PM, Judge_DREDD wrote:
..that's like asking if aliens would ever crashland on the earth (Just Aint Gonna Happen) ..and bUSh know it!
what about roswell and area 51??? COINCIDENCE OR CONSPIRACY??? you decide
in 47 hours and 57 minutes they will launch chemical weapons at the invading troops... should make for good television...
oh and NO
At 3/17/03 11:42 AM, Freakapotimus wrote: Helping cops keep tabs on wireless data
By Ben Charny
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
March 17, 2003, 7:11 AM PT
NEW ORLEANS - Cops are finally getting to see firsthand whether pager-favoring, tech-savvy criminals have upgraded to America's newest wireless networks.
Until recently, police conducting wiretaps on services such as mMode from AT&T Wireless and PCS Vision from Sprint PCS could intercept only phone conversations. Millions of instant messages or photos were off limits to crime fighters' wiretaps because the necessary eavesdropping technology didn't exist.
Now, VeriSign, Cisco Systems and other members of 2-month-old Global LI Industry Forum (LI stands for "lawful interception") say they have finally developed the answer, beginning with VeriSign's NetDiscovery service, which was introduced at the CTIA Wireless 2003 show here Monday.
Full story at http://msn-cnet.com.com/2100-1039-992832.html
another great idea brought to u by the PATRIOT ACT: destroying your bill of rights since 2001...
yeah before u know it, THEY will know EVERYTHING you do... but it will be ok, cuz if u speak out then u will be 'taken care of'...
