823 Forum Posts by "karasz"
At 4/15/03 08:48 AM, bumcheekcity wrote:At 4/14/03 03:21 PM, Crack_Smoker wrote: Why can't Syria possess WoMD?they cant possess them because they cant make them. the current laws say that you cant make them, but if you do have some you can keep them. this was made by the US and Russia when they had tens of thousands, so they could keep them and not let others have them.
the more people with a bomb that cann destroy the world the harder it becomes to deter all of them... imagine if osama had a nuke, would he use it? probably, if i were him i definitely would use it...
russia and the USA, britian china and france all have them cuz they need to balance out each other... and we all know that the leaders of those nations wont use them... unless attacked first...
if nations with un-traditionalist foreign policies, and irrational leaders the world gets a lot scarier...
all i said was hey capitalism has a bad side to it too... and illustrated that point using a valid reference...
because with a truly lassiez faire system that kinda thing can happen...
At 4/15/03 12:28 AM, Taxman2A wrote: Never did I say at any time that pure capitalism is a perfect construct. What I DID say, however, was that Capitalism has nothing to do with imposing sanctions on others, which is what Bumcheekcity was accusing "capitalism" of doing. Learn to stay on topic, and quit resorting to the strawman fallacy, dumbass.
and never did i say that capitalism was bad... all i did was state the point that capitalism has its flaws also.
just so we get both sides of the arguement and not a super-duper capitalism has nothing wrong with it stance...
so fuck off
At 4/14/03 10:36 PM, Taxman2A wrote: Capitalism is the opposite of sanctions. The essence of capitalistic spirit is the "Laissez-faire" attitude-"let it be". Capitalism emphasises fewer governmental rules and sanctions under the general belief that governmental sanctions result in an economically weaker and unfair society.
yeah just like in the 1900's when businesses treated their workers worse than the slaves were treated...
allow me please to destroy this article... ive got a hankerin for some spankerin
At 4/14/03 08:37 PM, DavidTheGnome wrote: What is the point of protesting the war against Iraq? Is it just me, or is it more than a little ironic, that while protesting this war, these rebels are causing riots? Riots which invole the very same violence that they are protesting?
protesting a war shows the world that in a democracy people can have different views from the govt and not be arrested...
not all protests start riots...
and the riots are not a war, not to many protestors have guns AND the police use NON-LETHAL weapons, so nobody dies.... where as in a WAR they all have GUNS... so in conclusion its not the same kind of violence
It really doesn't make sense to me. I mean, if the President of the United States publicly declares that we are at war, then we are at war and that statement shoyld be beyond any and all confrontations.
so during a war people shouldnt protest... makes sense, all the Prez has to do is say we are at war and protestors should be silent, all that does is violate the 1 thing everyone knows that people wrote the first amendment for, political protests...
ALSO, the Prez can NOT DECLARE war... only congress... u stupid bitch...
The next thing that we know, these protestors will be dropping bombs to get their point across and gain attention. They are already burning flags and creating violent mobs. What's next?? One thing that I must ask you, if you are among these people: 'Which side are you on?' Obviously, it isn't ours, which makes you a traitor to your own country.
well u got a stupid exaggeration there...
so by exercising our first amendment we must BLINDLY follow the leader...
heres a question for ya, what were ur thoughts when the senate was trying to impeach Clinton... im goin to guess u were calling for his removal...
also when did wanting to bring people OUT of harms way make u a traitor?
By this point, I think that the majority of Americans have realized that war with Iraq is enevitable. Something evidently needs to be done and we are the ones who need to do it, otherwide, it will not ever be finished. Currently, we have enough opposition from France, Germany and Belgium; protestation from our own country does not help this matter.
so we have to do this since no one else will... well then are we going to liberate pakistan, saudi arabia, turkey, israel, cyprus, china and every other oppressive regime in the world...
Out contry has been threatened; attacked without reason. The time for justice has come. Yes, there will be casulties on both sides, but in the end, American will prevail.
um they have reasons... u might not like them but the terrorsits do have reasons...
and nobody doubts teh superiority of the US military over a 3rd world nation...
Saddam Hussein will be repaid for every act of terrorism that he has been a part of, in the form of the destruction of his country and regime. We have given him and his sons the opportunity to leave, but yet, they persist.
destruction of his COUNTRY??? the very thing we are trying to liberate from him we should destroy... makes sense to me...
The United State of America was the first country to develope an atomic bomb. For this, I am grateful. If the ideas of Albert Einstein and Robert J. Oppenheimer hadn't ever been though of, then we would really be up the creek, wouldn't we? We, as Americans, would literally be sitting ducks! At least now, we can fight back!
um... the USA was also the first country to use them, and both einstein and oppenheimer were vehemently against the use of them... einstein has stated that the development of the nukes were his biggest regret... also russia didnt have nukes AFTER WW2 yet were not hit with one at all... also russia, china, britian, france, india, pakistan and israel have nukes and none have been used... also are you calling for the use of nuclear weapons against a much weaker 3rd world nation?
Most likely, we have the technology to simply leave an enormous, Iraq-sized, hole in the ground in the middle east, but never the less, we have not. Why is this?? Because we do not wish to kill millions of innocent people! America does have a heart! Our military is not targeting civilians, but Hussien regime headquarters and Iraq military bases.
but wait a second... first u call for the destruction of the country then the use of nukes NOW ur saying we have a heart? and not targeting civilians doesnt mean none will die...
We are showy mercy. One of our main goals in to liberate the Iraqi people. Yet, we have citizens of this country that ar opposed to this. Opposition to regaining this country's safety and freedom is just about the most Un-American idea that I've ever heard! It is the ultimate betrayl to your fellow Americans.
no people are opposed to killing others... and besides shouldnt the IRAQI people liberate themselves with the HELP of the US... why should 225k US men and women go to a foreign land to liberate them, WHEN the 5 million iraqi people could be armed and take out the iraqi regime...
Do you really want to live in a world where air raid sirens go beserk seven or eight times an hour, or where you do not feel comfortable letting your children out in the yard to play? Iraq is going to continue its terrorist antics until something is done. So unless you desire to live in constant fear, support our president's decision regarding this war.
iraq has not done anything to the US... 15 of the 19 hijakcers were fucking saudis... lets go after them... it makes more fucking sense... and wouldnt the iraqi people have their air raids go on like 8 times a day from US bombs?
i will never support a president that violates teh constitution...
---------------------------------------
So what does everyone think? I mean, she makes a few good points, but I think she goes over the top in calling protestors Un-American. And the way she wants us to support the president sounds more like a dictatorship than support out of opinion.
3 words NA-fucking-ZI
Add some comments, tell me what you think.
she is an idiot that wouldnt last 5 minutes in a conversation against me
At 4/14/03 09:44 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: If I were President, I'd be putting pressure on Cuba, because they're the only enemy with the actual ability to threaten the US.
yeah cuz all of those refugees barely making it on a raft to the US are the real problem...
How is going after Cubans going to make the US safer?
At 4/14/03 03:21 PM, Crack_Smoker wrote: I don't think we'll go to war with Syria, I agree with the above posters that we'll just screw them economically and diplomatically.
sanctions dont work... look at CUBA and at IRAQ...
:Iraq had a lot of strikes against them, while Syria has been pretty quiet until just recently... and they are definitely not doing the North Korea complete defiance thing, most likely due to the fact that the U.S. is on their doorstep.
yeah but we will invade... north korea is a bigger threat but syria is in the mid-east... and bush wants that as his legacy...
Also, why can't Syria possess WoMD?
same reason iraq cant... cuz they may use them against US or give them to terrorists...
also after syria is lebanon... then jordan since it would surrounded by them...
well then u dont have to deal with the patriot act 1 or 2 so then ur one of the lucky ones...
At 4/13/03 08:57 PM, Shangui wrote: To go back on slavery, I think it's a good thing people who are capable of working do it. Why let some persons live on the expenses of others, like in Quebec, hundreds of thousands of people live on a program called BS... all they do is sit in their homes drinking beer and watching T.V. Well I think that kind of things should be corrected by forced employment, like in communism. There is no slavery in doing your share for your country.
howd is FORCING someone to work democratic? sounds more like dictatorial to me...
but now true there are people that abuse the system, there always will be people like that though... also y not just kick them off the program? but im all for having the govt help people when they need it... such as food stamps and welfare... like if u work a job but still cant get ur kid the medicine or food or something that he/she needs THEN have the govt help...
wait a sec... lots of places have squares--- Tianamen, Red... OH i get it... although a town square doesnt make it a communist town... OR DOES IT?
nope it doesny
At 4/14/03 03:03 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: or even better throw USED condoms on them. keep us posted on how the soaking goes.
but it would BE GREAT if u used USED condoms from homosexual lovers...
can anyone say biggest irony ever?
At 4/14/03 03:00 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: This really gets me down. Can't we see happy things? Do you think the news is too depressing, or is it just me?
u have to understand that this is the world we live in... sadly... yeah it sucks, but the news is there to inform us... thankfully though the internet is way better at informing us than anything ever invented... so i suggest u look on the internet for new stories...
and if they show the happy stuff then they will lose money and sadly that is what the news room is all about anymore...
the world is full of sell-outs
At 4/10/03 10:02 PM, WadeFulp wrote: Intelligence reports suggest suicide bombers from Syria and Iran are entering Iraq and going after our troops. So these may not be Iraqi's at all coming after us. If this turns to be true, once Iraq is secure we maybe off to take our Syria and Iran! Maybe we can free all the arab states by Christmas! lol.
this is what mrpink is responding to and let me take him through it... jack ass
wade is merely stating that the US has intel saying guys attacking the US troops maybe from syria and iran... then goes on to say 'we MAYBE off to take syria and iran' (and from recent white house rumblings syria seems to be next...) THEN he jokes about freeing the arabs by xmas, a holiday they dont celebrate... hence the lol after wards u fucking retard... and now onto ur quote:
At 4/10/03 11:42 PM, mister_pink_is_cool wrote: wow, wade is jewish and he wants the US to kill arabs? what a surprise. If you want them killed so bad why don't you sign up and do it yourself you pussy racist wade.
not a fan of israel obviously... but im guesssing its cuz 80% of the country is jewish and not cuz of other reasons...
he doesnt want them killed he wants them freed from their oppresive governments... there is a difference jackass...
how can u call wade racist when u are using a racist slur against him... u deduce he is jewish, then claim since he is jewish he must love israel, then figure since he loves israel and israel has arabian enemies wade must then want all arabians dead... wow ur a fucking moron...
At 4/10/03 10:46 PM, Tool_Of_The_System wrote: Yeah, not many surrounding countries of Iraq are real happy about the change in the regime. So yeah, some of those American hating countries are going to try to invade and terrorize Iraq... and if they piss us off, we're just gonna have to hunt down those frickin terrorist groups and chase them to miles in desert like we did with Osama.
ummm.... Osama could still give the go ahead for suicide bombers in the US... cuz ya know WE AINT GOT HIM YET...
i dont think we are actually going to attack syria... just through some sanctions on them and wait for the young king? i think to give in... just like in CUBA and IRAQ...
bombs drop september 2004... helps with the ya know prez election...
and brings up the anti-war movement the dems are going to need to have a chance at the white house
At 4/14/03 02:09 AM, TheEvilOne wrote: If it is real, then they are the worst hypocrites in history.
come on they're promoting a jesus thong on the bottom...
and there is a god quiz... and the answers are pretty much anti-christian god...
where the hell have u been? this question has been asked for about 6 months now... the war is over... the fighting continues though...
At 4/13/03 04:43 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: Well, Leviticus 18 does say "god hates that" in reference to gay sex, I don't remember the specific line though.
1 samuel 18:1,3-4 --- And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved him as his own soul. And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword and to his bow and to his girdle...
so if the bible has 2 guys marrying each other how can jesus be against homosexuals???
At 4/13/03 04:50 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: what rights have we given up lately? i dont think weve given up any, really. unless some have sneaked off without me knowing.
thats the fun thing about civil liberties... u dont know they are gone until u say the prez is wrong and u get arrested...
im going to guess that noone is going to say take away my civil liberties...
and personally any violation of civil liberties is too much...
but im a fanatic bout civil liberties...
At 4/13/03 03:40 AM, evilkate wrote: Violence solves nothing. It just prolongs the problem and/or leads to more violence.
dammit... im arguing FOR hitting people... damn me and my not thinking things through...
And I think he's more afraid of losing control rather than being in control. Pills do not affect personality. They affect mood. People are stubborn when it comes to their own mental health.
i agree with ya here...
At 4/11/03 06:08 PM, jimsween wrote: Hmm... it's interesting you offer no real rebuttle and only childish insults, it must suck to be dumber than a 13 year old...
wow... so 1 point for jimsween...
also powell is pro-choice... and a pro-choice person will not be nominated for the REP party until the religious right gets much weaker... and thats not going to happen anytime soon...
At 4/13/03 02:23 AM, evilkate wrote: Taking drugs does not change it though. It just makes it more manageable. And I don't understand how living life being miserable is being loyal to oneself.
he's doing it on his terms... not some pills...
although bi-polar tend to annoy me... i dont get it... i mean how can u go from fine and dandy 1 minute... and 10 minutes later be my life sucks???
sometimes i honestly think just slapping people a couple times would get the job done...
At 4/10/03 12:05 PM, Slizor wrote:wait wait wait! i got one....what if there could be a constitutional dictatorship?A dictatorship can have a constitution y'know. And having a Constitution does not mean people will follow it, just look at America. If you want an actual debate about the merits of Communism, bring it on.
now thats a question... a constitutional dictatorship... what the hell kinda country would that be like... the guy in charge is in charge but has to follow certain rules as based in the constitution... wow, that would be weird as fuck...
At 4/13/03 03:05 AM, evilkate wrote:At 4/13/03 03:00 AM, karasz wrote:It isn't. Unless he/or she has a criminal appearance or looks suspicious. It's all about how an officer profiles, not the profiling itself.At 4/13/03 02:58 AM, evilkate wrote: I do agree that it's not the fairest tactic, but I still see it as necessary.why is it necessary to pull over black people for driving a mercedes?
... whoa, we must have different defintions of 'profiling...' cuz ur description of someone looking suspicious is called a cop doing his job... like if a window is busted and a guy is driving a car... then yes pulling him over makes sense...
my definition of profiling is using their skin color/religion against somebody...
At 4/12/03 11:28 PM, AmericanBADASS wrote: Thank God Gore didn't get elected. If Gore was the president, we would probly all be dead. Terrorists would take over the country and Gore would run away like a little girl. The Iraqi people would still be living under Husseins Foot and all Gore would do is try to talk about it while Hussein Builds Chemical weapons to drop on us!
so what is it u dislike about Gore? seems like ur complaining about Gore wanting to use diplomacy instead of force...
based on what would Gore have 'run like a little girl'?
At 4/13/03 02:58 AM, evilkate wrote: I do agree that it's not the fairest tactic, but I still see it as necessary.
why is it necessary to pull over black people for driving a mercedes?
well evilkate ur right about that...
