823 Forum Posts by "karasz"
At 4/25/03 05:36 PM, jimsween wrote: In USA or Iran? But you have to agree that an Islamic state is dangerous and not a very good idea.
if the USA stays out of Iran, the Iranian students that are more pro-west then the govt in control, the students will be revolting soon...
if the USA starts poking around in Iran the same students that are pro-west may be less likely to be on the US side...
SO the easiest way for a revolution in Iran is to do nothing...
At 4/26/03 04:39 PM, Anarchy_Balsac wrote:At 4/26/03 02:02 PM, jimsween wrote: I'm not an addict but I know that more than 60% percent of people have smoked or drunk beer at least once. Where are these Phantom surveys you keep talking about.you don't know anything, you are making it up. these "phantom" surveys could be found on google no?
umm.... i think he's referring to YOU providing proof to back up your claim...
http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-power3.htm
http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-power.htm
check those out...
At 4/26/03 04:47 PM, Dont_ask wrote: I think you're missing the point. I don't want us to leave either, but what are we supposed to do when the Iraqi's want us out. I can't take it!
tell them to quit bitching and wait for the embassy to be overthrown... ala 1979 iranian hostage situation...
At 4/26/03 03:04 PM, Dont_ask wrote:At 4/26/03 02:26 PM, jimsween wrote: Dont act like you wouldnt love to see the U.S. leave Iraq and then the Iraqi's set up a communist government. You would have to change your bedsheets you'd get so excited.I would love to see us leave Iraq and for the Iraqis to attempt to construct their own government, I'm pretty sure that it would be a catastrophe, and if they were to set up a communist government I would wet my pants....laughing so hard.
they're government would be like that of Iran's... THEN the US would have a much stronger Iran to deal with... since it now owns iraq...
but it wont happen... everyone is forgetting the politics behind the decision to stay... and until the body bags start rising the US will control Iraq...
bush has too much at stake to pull out...
we wont leave... if the US leaves Bush looks real bad... for talking all about installing democracy in the mid-east... then leaving when it gets too hard... not going to happen...
i give the US backed democracy 5 years tops... until the people overthrow it and set up an iranian govt...
At 4/25/03 02:31 PM, ichbincow wrote: 1)If legal what will the penalties for any crimes that involved drugs? ( death,murder,rape,etc) Are you too stupid/young to see that even alcohol ( a legal drink that is taxed and regulated) law enforcement regulations are either not enforced enough or stringent enough as it is?
why not have the same laws as those of things done with alcohol???
2) Do you REALLY want the guy doing surgery/driveing your cab/etc being so high or even haveing imparied judegement to the point where your life is at risk?
who says ur be toking up before work???
3)Crime would not go down it would go up---more people would be doing what it takes to get that next hit--even if it were cheap---crime would rise as more and more junkies rob/steal/etc. to get the money for that next hit.
how do u know more people would do it if it were legal???
Typically I see only young teens and the like argueing that cheaper drugs/legalize drugs etc... is the way to go----I find that they are so stupid--we have enough difficulties involved with alcohol and yet they want to introduce something that is far mor potent?
every anti-drug commercial the exact same could be said about alcohol...
i consider it a terrorist act getting into a car drunk... ur terrorizing the not fucked up people out there...
How about comeing up with WORKABLE checks and balances that help VALIDATE your arguement/statements on legalizeing say for instance weed?
checks would violate the 4th amendment... and they would have to be voluntary if accepted...
At 4/25/03 09:53 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote:At 4/25/03 09:52 PM, DivineSlayer wrote: So stereotypical to assume that a terrorist is from the middle east. Why would you have to put your head in the sand and pray to Allah? Why not just go to a church and pray to God.
most arabs are islamic...
Not all terrorists are middle eastern you know.
true
Who blew up the world trade center, the cast of Friends?
NOW tahts a TV show... also timothy mcveigh, ted kazinsky... i can name more if u'd like...
At 4/25/03 08:28 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: It may seem cruel, but it's clear and true.
You're entitled to your opinion, Stalin. ;)
well i was hopin for my own cool nickname... like hitler stalin... KARASZ
it just doesnt work...
At 4/25/03 05:22 PM, Lord_Miroku_Sama wrote:At 4/25/03 01:17 PM, karasz wrote: in both instances they suck... but just remember ALL drugs are bad... regardless of their legality...
That means that things like Advil or drugs that treat diseases are bad. What the hell are you thinking?
ok lets faceit.. if u didnt understand what i meant then perhaps u need to learn how to interpret things...
fine... this is just for u FUNKbrs and that guy that said he sees few if any people being able to debate both sides rationally and not get all emotional...
drugs are used to keep people alive, since more people are alive, there is less resources to go around for the world... (i actually started a topic like this about a month ago) Thomas Malthus, stated the worlds population would increase to fast that the worlds ability to provide enough food for everyone would fail...
without the use of drugs social security would be a lot better, since less old people would mean less money needed for social security, and a whole bunch of other programs that help the sick wouldnt be needed...
At 4/25/03 04:30 PM, jimsween wrote:At 4/25/03 04:20 PM, karasz wrote: they hate us cuz in the 1950's the iranian shah that was quite oppressive, was kept in power by the CIA paying for a demostration, to show that the shah had a strong backing... where as the prime minister had a demo before the shah and nobody was paid...50 years of hatred all summed up into one thing, surrree. And why exactly were they demonstrating against the shah? Could it be because he was oppressive?
thats what i said... that was my first line: 'iranian shah was quite oppressive'... hence them demonstratiing against the shah... but the PM wasnt pro-west, so the CIA paid for a demonstration
thats what started the hatred which exploded in the 1970's... and IF the admin keeps its mouth shut... within 10 years the pro-west students will be changing the system of govt...
At 4/25/03 04:12 PM, jimsween wrote:At 4/25/03 09:25 AM, FUNKbrs wrote:Beadi IS from Iran. And Iran hates america because of Iran-Contra, not for religious reasons.They hated us before that. And it's not just the not befriending nonbelievers part it is many other radical policies in the Islamic religion. Just as there is in the cristian religon.
they hate us cuz in the 1950's the iranian shah that was quite oppressive, was kept in power by the CIA paying for a demostration, to show that the shah had a strong backing... where as the prime minister had a demo before the shah and nobody was paid...
she will run... and ur a moron if u dont see that...
she wants to be prez... y eles would she stay with the guy that cheated on her???
if not to reap the benefits of having bill clinton help ur campagin...
remember the prez race is never won on the left or right... always the middle that dont give a fuck about anything, just who they think would be a better prez...
if it were more fatal people would be more scared...
but like for most things in america... until the body bags start piling up nobody will give a fuck..
At 4/7/03 01:11 AM, kittie_cross wrote: Just what do the lovely people on Newgrounds have to say about torture methods, death sentences, and cruel-and-unusual-punishment?
personally i think all is fair in love and war... BUT would hold Saddam & Osama in a war crimes tribunal... with a jury that is middle eastern, french, german and russian... and let the good times role...
Personally, I fully support the whole eye-for-an-eye rule...
yeah, its always better to sink to their level...
Besides, the Taliban didn't mind when they murdered all our innocent civilians that were trapped in the Towers,
um... it wasnt the taliban, it was AL-QAEDA... and it really bothers me most people dont make this connection... although it would just be easier to kill all arabs...
so why should they mind when we bomb the hell out of them and their cities?
because THEY could die... or worse yet... lose power
Or am I too sadistic in my thinking?
nomore than i am...
be laying low... chinchillin on the streets... during the long beat to war: i wouldve started doing small things to change my appearacne.... shave the stash, stop dieing my hair, get a cane...
then just enjoy time, perhaps choose the next 'leader' of iraq, while all along im behind the scenes weilding true power...
At 4/25/03 11:07 AM, NEMESiSZ wrote: What if you shoot your friend with his parents' gun by accident because the weed impaired your judgement?
what if u drive ur car into a tree and kill the other 3 people in car with you cuz ur drunk???
in both instances they suck... but just remember ALL drugs are bad... regardless of their legality...
At 4/25/03 12:38 AM, FUNKbrs wrote:At 4/25/03 12:15 AM, karasz wrote: or getting the DAG disliked and hated throughout the forum...That why were called DEVIL's advocates. You dont have to disagree with people who are right, you just have to give them enough oppostion to solidify their beliefs. The same rules of respect and ettiquette that are followed by the PC apply to the DAG.
sounds good...
hey u get into an arguement about abortion and play dag... and the other person will dislike u for about a week... and thats if they liked u to begin with... not that im against taking the opposing view... just saying...
At 4/24/03 11:38 PM, FlattusMaximus wrote:At 4/23/03 10:12 PM, karasz wrote: ok here is the deal... you are elected as top executive of ur country... NOW remember what kind of government you have (no changing the USA into an dictatorship and other stuff like that...)First, I would have a "carry a big stick" forigen policy.
the legislative branch is split evenly 50-50 lib/conserv
how would you go about running the country... NOW keep in mind that politics is politics so if ur idea is too radical (kiling all muslims, circumventing the constitution entirely, replacing legislature with muppets, ), it will get shot down...
im just curious to see how some people calling for the destruction of welfare will go about doing it...
Anyone who fucked with the country would be blown off the face of the earth.
Don't like it? Then I kill you too.
i really enjoy the lack of having free speech in ur world...
I would also return Isreal to the Palestinians, By force if it came to that.
easiest/bloodiest way to solve the problem...
Secondly, I would eliminate affirmitive action, but still keep a government watch out for racisim.
Jobs and places in college should be earned by merit and merit alone.
Nothing else should matter.
it'd be nice... but it wont change... u will still need to know the right person to get a job... and that is something that cant be taken away...
Thirdly, I would crack down on things like gangs and drugs. If push came to shove, I would see how those gangsters liked a couple of armored battalions in "the hood"
good ole martial law never hurt anyone... except those jews in warsaw but who gives a fuck about them...
Also, I would go to war with the major drug producing countries, Completley wipe out their government, and put in someone who wouldn't smuggle shit into america.
good idea... sadly wont happen... y risk american lives to stop drugs... and there will always be a way to smuggle drugs into the country... always...
To help clear up un-employment, I would restart the public works program.
ok... now my mind hurts... everything up until this point was pretty right wing... then this... a socialist program... i need to lie down...
People would get jobs building things and whatnot.
One of the projects would be a line of defenses across the mexican border. I would then gaurd it with 10,000 troops at all times. They would have orders to kill anyone who tries to cross the line without a passport.
ah good back to the right-wing stuff... now it all makes sense...
I would deny all illegals citizenship, and force them to go back to their own countries.
It would be illegal to give a non-citizen a job or admit them into a school.
yeah wouldnt want to help out the less fortunate or anything... and about the jobs... how many wanna be a landscaper? show of hands people?
I would strengthen social security, and enact a law so money could not be taken from it.
Seniors spend their whole lives working for the good of the country. They deserve something in return.
hmm.... again with teh jumping on the side of socialist programs... but hey it will be broke in 20 years so either way
I would push for alternative fuels such as Hydrogen.
have fun...
I would consolidate our allies, keep good relations with them, and listen to NATO.
I would also work to try and pay back our national debt.
well that seems to be the more left-leaning thing to do...
I would raise the fuel tax, while lowering oil prices, thusly bringing lots of new money into the government.
super-duper leftist thing to do... this is weird as hell... u do know that the companies would make less money right... and im sure they would be quite happy with that...
This money would be used to bolster the sagging education system.
I would put a great emphisis on grammar, spelling, history and geography.
the money that u get from putting more taxes on gas, but have cheaper prices...
does anyone understand economics... would that work? other than being politically impossible...
Oh, and I would make the national anthem "Engel" by Rammstein.
yeah nothing like a bunch of very right-wing GERMAN guys writing the AMERICAN national anthem...
At 4/24/03 11:45 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: If someone had spoken up for the rich from the first, none of that would have happened.
or the speaker would be impaled on a spike...
Speaking up for the rich would have made someone very unpopular in that mob, but because noone spoke up, a movement began to take all the money from the rich and kill them if they refused.
robin hood gone mad...
That is the purpose of the DAG (Devil's Advocacy Group). To take up for unpopular causes to help create moderation and debate, thus creating more just and logical conclusions.
or getting the DAG disliked and hated throughout the forum...
sounds good...
this is pretty much aimed at funkbrs... i wanna learn more...
but dont understand what the fuck is going on...
At 4/24/03 10:20 PM, Rydia_Lockheart wrote: Hillary Clinton pretty much did her own thing while she was in office. The constant public appearances and her successful run for the NY Senate make me believe she is out for her own gain. Perhaps, then, her marriage to Clinton is one of convenience? Being married to the former leader of the free world certainly has its advantages.
that and gore wouldve won arkansas at least... maybe even tennesee... then he would be president... but he wanted to win it on his own... and he lost...
also bill is a very good public speaker and can only help with elections... especially when she runs for president, in 2008....
At 4/24/03 11:29 AM, Nirvana13666 wrote: When President George W. Bush froze assets connected to Osama bin Laden, he didn’t tell the American people that the terrorist mastermind’s late brother was an investor in the president’s former oil business in Texas. He also hasn’t leveled with the American public about his financial connections to a host of shady Saudi characters involved in drug cartels, gun smuggling, and terrorist networks.
first i gotta say how much of a horrible idea this was by u stating it...
but anyway u better put up some proof or god help ur soul...
also i have to say how i agree with ya... that somebody fucking knew that 9-11 was going to happen...
there is just too many shady links for there not to be a connection somewhere
well i like all the people for responding to the question...
unfortunately none of it would actually happen...
oh well... politics isnt for everyone
b/c how can a country be sovereign if they have to follow someone else's rules??
and lets not forget some people dont follow the UN human rights law (that was passed before libya was put on it...)
At 4/23/03 10:39 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Should I:
apply for the PC, because you guys are great debators,
yeah the PC is...
boycott the PC, cause you have been known to be elitist (not too often, but there are cases),
well i know i am... dont know bout the rest of the group... although im the elitist that cares... thats right hypocrite right to the bone... after all i wanna work in politics, may as well start boggling peoples minds now...
apply for the PC but be a DAG (Devil's Advocacy Group) member and use my reverse swastika vs inverted cross sig pic (or beg shrike to make one that looks cooler but on the same premise), or,
i say join the PC and start a DAG... i would like to sign up for that...
finally try and form the DAG as a seperate group (which will probably never fly because of the PC monopoly)?
monopolies are made to be broken.... says the member of the PC... weird to the max...
At 4/23/03 10:56 PM, FUNKbrs wrote:At 4/23/03 10:14 PM, karasz wrote:That's what Washington said! YAY!!
the answer: ALL political parties are bad
and thats y he was the best president... well that and cuz he was a federalist... but too cool to say it outloud... although jefferson turned into a federalists once he became president...
just like any congressman/senator says the congress can declare war... then once they are president says the president is within his rights to control the army...
press room= free speech
advertisement= dont lie about what the product does...
ive said it a million times, nobody will realize their civil liberties are gone until its too late...
what would it take any of you for the government to do for you to say 'holy shit, america is turning dictatorial...'
then the US wouldve left with its tail inbetween its leg giving more fuel to al-qaeda that the US can be beaten and would start the big war osama has been waiting for...
