Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/2/03 09:52 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
V. Can you explain what happened to the wings of the aircraft and why they caused no damage, as the impact hole is perfectly square?

VII. Can you find the aircraft's point of impact anywhere on the Pentagon?

the impact didn't knock down that square section. The approach was 45 degree anle to the wall. The force shot thru three sections of the building as marked by the "punch out" hole. The entry point couldn't have been more than 10 or 20 feet wide because the reinforced pillars were spaced every 10 feet. The square section of building shown in photos fell as a result of and after fire was put out.

I don't live in the States. We didn't hear anything about the Pentagon aftermath overseas. Did all the families get empty coffins or what?

At 11/4/03 04:47 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: I'm glad to see that people are beginning to take this theory seriously -- I had an incredibly hard time pushing this idea before I brought it on to here.

that site's front page also lists lots other sites who offer opinions For or Against a Boeing causing the Pentagon crash. The opinions are split about 50-50, but that's still pretty low for such a major event.. guessing there would be irrefutable evidence either way - like burnt bodies and such?

i'm starting to think that the "cam" photos from the sentry box across from the Pentagon lawn (the small top-left inset "fuel explosion" image i posted above) is faked. Another shot shows what looks vaguely like the tail of the plane going in.. but hell, you don't have to be CSI to see that the timing of shrapnel and explosion are totally out of proportion to views from other angles.

The real question is "why fake or lie about it" ..so far, we know that of the four planes, flight77 was the only one that had it's tracking disabled midflight (somehow) and this was the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon.

Good one JMHX for raising this. I think the subject was taboo until now. I remember seeing a computer graphic of the Pentagon crash not many hours after it happened, and i remember thinking, "geez that was fast work!!"

At 11/1/03 01:30 AM, zombe_man wrote: were not as powerful as we think we are and we as a counrty need to put down our american flags for a second and learn that.

America, despite it's global conflicts, and business expansionism, has been quite isolationist.. sport is one example (baseball - except for exporting it to Japan - isn't a global sport, or is American football) ..there isn't anything wrong with that, except when it comes to international affairs, then America doesn't really know how to play the game.

The British were very imperialistic in years gone by, but they also were pragmatic, concilatory and diplomatic when they needed to be. America makes a sport of war, flag waving, and global business dominance, but when things go wrong, it's like "whoa, play fair or we nuke u, and noboddy wins!?"

Take China, they start to out produce goods at lower costs than American companies, and America suddenly starts talking of "a fair playing field" in trade exchange, but ingores it's own trumping on every other countries economic and political woes.

"What's bad for the dog, is unpalatable for the master!" ..maybe countries like China will pump out a billion new toy puppies that can bring American airports to a standstill - now that they've learnt the American art of sporting for business. Gotta luv a fast learner!!

pro's
- kool fresh look
- matches the rest of the site
- input box (post and search) are awesome.

con's
-topic icons, altho kute, are too "flashy" ...animated shelling wud look better.
-all sig text is now too large (bold) taken down 1 size wud help with reading posts.
- same for sig pics (but not sure what to suggest?)

suggestion
- find a way to make each topics title font kolor orange (same as the titles on this post screen)
- where it sez "Press Post it Once only.." needs to change from red to another kolor (more compatible with light grey)

BTW, excellent work!!!

At 11/4/03 04:24 AM, Fr33k wrote: Here in Holland we have experience with pot or weed whatever you call it. Several goverment institutes in my country have studied that and they all agree -It is better for a human body the have a joint than to drink alcohol. Weed does less damage to the brain than alcohol does. I've also had lessons here at my school that soft-drugs is better than alcohol.

So I say, legalize it today.

One sane government in a world of anti-reefer madness!

well, many governments know of these studies, but the lobbists from the brewries are VERY influential. The polititians can afford expensive alcohol and cigars and a taxi or limo when intoxicated. Meanwhile, the rest of us are given criminal records for a quiet relaxing smoke in our own home.

There needs to be some new way to fund further research in more countries, and that would only hapen if they could sell and tax legally distibuted product (..purely optional to growing your own of course!)
_

At 11/4/03 09:28 AM, D2KVirus wrote: Remember kids: When YOU talk to God, it's called "prayer". When GOD talks to you, it's called schizophrenia.

LOL.. precisely!!

someone should tell the new gay bishop that's he's sleeping with TWO perverts :)

~oh yes kiddies, he's the only "openly" gay bishop *winks*

do you have a server large enough to host all those *ahem* "whitehause secrets"?

At 11/4/03 09:31 AM, D2KVirus wrote:

At 11/3/03 11:21 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: Marijuana = Must Stay Illegal

That is all.

Would you mind wearing this Jimsween mask? It makes things a lot easier...

hehe.

here, now hold this toothpick weaner and poke out yer tounge, now say E=MCª ..i'll just take a foto for the PC archives

(<>.<>)

before the pentagon wall collapsed;
YOU BE THE JUDGE

At 11/3/03 11:20 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: A truck bomb doesn't rouse the same sense of patriotism that a jet liner does.

"Some witnesses saw a C-130 flying very close to the pentagon at the same moment there was the explosion." "

9-11 Conspiracy

this site speculates that it was a US air-force (Pentagon) missile based on it's trajectory, and exit point, and the fact that it had a white hot intensive heat (supposedly aviation fuel only causes red or orange intensity explosion as seen in WTC footage)

At 10/30/03 04:41 PM, blueloa13 wrote: Yea, it just depends on what the stance of the rebels is

by rebels, you mean; "teh enemy combatants, the terrorists, the filth and scum villans and criminals, the foreign resistence forces, the side of evil, the fascists, defenders of dictatorships, potential thought criminals, the aliens, them asians, those frogs, the towel-heads, commies, hippies, tabliban, al qaeda, ismlamic fundamentalists, anti-religous order,anti-jewish neo-nazis, the insurgency, drug dealers, drug peddelers, drug takers, gun enthusiasts, the 1337 tech haxxors, the freedom fighters, the anti-American front, the NG users army, my dog, and all counter revolutionaries..." o_O

like, did i forget anyone? ..definately WW-III

(yep, maybe enough "tigger words" for teh FBI computers to check NG out! ;)

*inhales deeply of the Force*

"hmm, Judgement is strong in this thread!" </jedi voice>

..to make a better society we have to have small pockets of localized justice. Kinda how Guantanamo Bay is a land and law unto itself. Kinda how America has constitutional law for every state, but on a much wider scale; commune states, cult states, lawless states, anarchy states, christian states, the whole works.. (then just have very lax migration law and see what happens!)

For every new "unconditional ban" (on smoking for example) ..then you should have to set up a new state, merge the states that share common laws, and divide the states where laws differ, and let suvival of the fittest be the litmus test for each and every combination of political belief system.

That's how i would do it (..yeah, it's the opposite of forcing "free democracy" on every nation ;)

At 10/29/03 08:55 PM, izuamoto wrote:

yes it should be legal. It would cut down on the power of drug dealers.

yes it should be legal. It would also cut down on the law enforcement budgets.

CDs and DVDs are more waterproof than spare HDD.

my *ahem* storage is hard too, never floppy ;)

anyone using peni.. i mean pen drives?

At 10/26/03 10:57 PM, Lord_Aba wrote: COBOL aka the worlds most boring language.

COBOL beats out the others in boredom kos it's primarily used for accounting purposes (taxation, wages, 2K bugs) ..that's a double whammy compared with lower level languages which are handy for robots and other kool haxxor stuffs.

Nitro's sig: "Join the DAG today, and hang out with all your favorite people from the PC" - FUNKbrs

..ahh *nostalgia* ~hey Nitro!
things haven't changed soo much (umm, yet! ;)

ok, I'll be President of Secretaries (and other babes B-)

"Yes. We've just legalized polycatalytic currency conversion. The exact definition is still quite vague, but lawyers have told us it'll enable our party to buy out the next election"

At 10/24/03 06:31 PM, bumcheekcity wrote: I stand by everything TheTio just said. You go in and you only go out when the Iraquis have a democratic election.

Even if it's a farce, a corrupt election, or someone favorable to the US by hokie.

this thread wouldn't last two weeks in the club section.

actually!! there is one way to find out..

meh, you can beat me up now [b]_| |V| |-| ><[/b]

At 10/23/03 11:15 PM, OpIvy420 wrote: Hundreds are dying, and all Bush can say is "Bring 'em on."

yes, that policy really puzzles me (inciting violence on both sides)

and I've got 1 to 10,000,000 odds that we're not going to find any WMDs in the country.

shame more ppl didn't place bets on it before the war, then the "known odds" would have told the public a lot more than was filtered thru the White House by "military intelligence"

So why not bring our soldiers back home?

fastest way out of a war zone is in a body bag (they'll bring them home 1 way or the other) America wants more "Heros"

At 10/22/03 06:50 PM, TheShrike wrote:

At 10/22/03 06:19 PM, JudgeFUNK wrote: At least teh shrikey under5tands m3......

j4, 3y3 d0

Owerr gawd, |>ats 500 |<u73!!1

my duaghter will luv that site :)

At 10/21/03 02:26 PM, TheShrike wrote:

At 10/21/03 12:25 PM, Kirk_Cocaine wrote: god told moses "thou shall not kill" then surely god would lead by example.

That's the single worst argument against religion I've ever heard. How do you know god would lead by example?

yes, the 11th (lost) commandment was "Don't do as i do, Do as i say"

is it revenge or pride? Iraqis don't have much, so pride is worth so much more to them. In fact Iraqi pride is almost as strong as American pride. Bush is as stubborn as Saddam. Which side will back down first??

At 10/22/03 06:48 PM, General_Patton wrote:

How about THAT shit?

how about u get bannorred

At 10/22/03 09:31 AM, UNpossible wrote:

I agree that we forget the idea. Not only is there no white color, but I don't want to have to change my aura. I like my green aura.

it's because of ppl like u and bcc that our aura's no longer have any meaning. why don't u both just get a big colorful sig pic and be satified with not disclosing your political views in a political forum.

anyway, last i counted, about 6 ppl said it's a good idea :)

At 10/20/03 09:02 AM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote: I later found out you can get a fifty pound fine if you are caught dropping a butt or smoking in a no smoking zone, starnge stories i tell you.

why do they always think that the only way to control ppl is to fine the fuck out of us??! ..makes you wish you were rich so you could run around flaunting all the laws doesn't it!

It's like one millionaire crossing Sydney harbour bridge, half way across his luxury car ran outta fuel so he just left it there in middle of traffic and caught a taxi. It's basically saying the rich can do what they want, so long as omly the poor are affected by an infinate number of minor infringments.

yeah i join.

let's see; "Slightly_Crazy_Dude :: Krinkles Krew Member #6"

..i guess that makes me #7 :)_*

p.s. why is madness interactive rated so low??

At 9/22/03 05:38 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: What a joke. I just can't believe how someone could make such a statement as the one that man did in your local newspaper.. "They should pay us"

i heard yesterday (ABC News) that Bush's request for $20 Billion reconstruvtion funding is now going to be revised as a $10 Billion loan to be repaid in oil exports. This goes totally against Bushs sworn pledge that the war was not to take Iraqi oil out of Iraqi hands.

It's not like they are giving the Iraqis $10 Billion to spend as they want.. NO, it's all pre-spent thru American companies that have close ties to the White House.

As was stated on BBC News, that makes America like an amred robber, invading a sovereign state with absolute superior weaponry just to claim the spoils. It also puts America entirely at odds with Russia and China whom already have large contracts with Iraqi mechants for a post-sanction marketplace in oil production.

How totally disgusting!!!!!!

if it's such a good idea, what colors (other than R-G-B) would you all like to see to represent your political views? (ie. when new aura colors are added in teh future)

Shih (on DAG forum) joked about wanting mauve! hehe.. that's like saying "i'm half way between political opposites" - lol